際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
S05411 Text:
                           S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
       ________________________________________________________________________

                                         5411--A
           Cal. No. 966

                              2011-2012 Regular Sessions

                                   I N   S E N A T E

                                     May 18, 2011
                                      ___________

       Introduced by Sens. FUSCHILLO, DILAN, AVELLA, BRESLIN, DIAZ, DUANE,
         FLANAGAN, GRISANTI, HASSELL-THOMPSON, KENNEDY, KLEIN, KRUEGER, LARKIN,
         LITTLE, MONTGOMERY, OPPENHEIMER, PARKER, PERKINS, SAMPSON, STAVISKY,
         VALESKY -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be
         committed to the Committee on Transportation -- reported favorably
         from said committee and committed to the Committee on Finance --
         reported favorably from said committee, ordered to first and second
         report, ordered to a third reading, amended and ordered reprinted,
         retaining its place in the order of third reading

       AN ACT to amend the highway law, in relation to enabling safe access to
         public roads for all users by utilizing complete street design princi-
         ples

         THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
       BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

   1     Section 1. Legislative findings. It is hereby found and declared that
   2   to achieve a cleaner, greener transportation system the transportation
   3   plans of New York state should consider the needs of all users of our
   4   roadways   including   pedestrians, bicyclists, public transportation
   5   riders, motorists and citizens of all ages and abilities, including
   6   children, the elderly and the disabled. By encouraging good planning,
   7   more citizens will achieve the health benefits associated with active
   8   forms of transportation while traffic congestion and auto related air
   9   pollution will be reduced. Therefore, it shall be the policy of the
  10   state to consider people of all ages and abilities and all appropriate
  11   forms of transportation when planning roadway projects.
  12     S 2. The highway law is amended by adding a new section 331 to read as
  13   follows:
  14     S 331. CONSIDERATION OF COMPLETE STREET DESIGN. (A) FOR ALL STATE,
  15   COUNTY AND LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS THAT ARE UNDERTAKEN BY THE
  16   DEPARTMENT OR RECEIVE BOTH FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING AND ARE SUBJECT TO
  17   DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OVERSIGHT, THE DEPARTMENT OR AGENCY WITH

        EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                             [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                  LBD11543-02-1
S. 5411--A                          2

 1   JURISDICTION OVER SUCH PROJECTS SHALL CONSIDER THE CONVENIENT ACCESS AND
 2   MOBILITY ON THE ROAD NETWORK BY ALL USERS OF ALL AGES, INCLUDING MOTOR-
 3   ISTS, PEDESTRIANS, BICYCLISTS, AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION USERS THROUGH
 4   THE USE OF COMPLETE STREET DESIGN FEATURES IN THE PLANNING, DESIGN,
 5   CONSTRUCTION, RECONSTRUCTION AND REHABILITATION, BUT NOT INCLUDING
 6   RESURFACING, MAINTENANCE, OR PAVEMENT RECYCLING OF SUCH PROJECTS.
 7      (B) COMPLETE STREET DESIGN FEATURES ARE ROADWAY DESIGN FEATURES THAT
 8   ACCOMMODATE AND FACILITATE CONVENIENT ACCESS AND MOBILITY BY ALL USERS,
 9   INCLUDING CURRENT AND PROJECTED USERS, PARTICULARLY PEDESTRIANS, BICY-
10   CLISTS AND INDIVIDUALS OF ALL AGES AND ABILITIES. THESE FEATURES MAY
11   INCLUDE, BUT NEED NOT BE LIMITED TO: SIDEWALKS, PAVED SHOULDERS SUITABLE
12   FOR USE BY BICYCLISTS, LANE STRIPING, BICYCLE LANES, SHARE THE ROAD
13   SIGNAGE, CROSSWALKS, ROAD DIETS, PEDESTRIAN CONTROL SIGNALIZATION, BUS
14   PULL OUTS, CURB CUTS, RAISED CROSSWALKS AND RAMPS AND TRAFFIC CALMING
15   MEASURES; AND RECOGNIZE THAT THE NEEDS OF USERS OF THE ROAD NETWORK VARY
16   ACCORDING TO A RURAL, URBAN AND SUBURBAN CONTEXT.
17      (C) THIS SECTION SHALL NOT APPLY IF IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED AND SET
18   FORTH IN PUBLICLY AVAILABLE DOCUMENTS THAT ONE OF THE FOLLOWING EXISTS:
19      (I) USE BY BICYCLISTS AND PEDESTRIANS IS PROHIBITED BY LAW, SUCH AS
20   WITHIN INTERSTATE HIGHWAY CORRIDORS; OR
21      (II) THE COST WOULD BE DISPROPORTIONATE TO THE NEED AS DETERMINED BY
22   FACTORS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: LAND USE CONTEXT;
23   CURRENT AND PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES; AND POPULATION DENSITY; OR
24      (III) DEMONSTRATED LACK OF NEED AS DETERMINED BY FACTORS, INCLUDING,
25   BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LAND USE, CURRENT AND PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES,
26   INCLUDING POPULATION DENSITY, OR DEMONSTRATES LACK OF COMMUNITY SUPPORT;
27   OR
28      (IV) USE OF THE DESIGN FEATURES WOULD HAVE AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON, OR BE
29   CONTRARY TO, PUBLIC SAFETY.
30      (D) NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO REQUIRE THE DEPART-
31   MENT OR AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION OVER A PROJECT TO EXPEND MONIES IN
32   ACCORDANCE WITH SUBDIVISION (A) OF THIS SECTION THAT EXCEED THE AMOUNT
33   OF STATE AND FEDERAL FUNDING FOR COMPLETE STREET DESIGN FEATURES.
34      S 3. (a) No later than two years after the effective date of this act,
35   the department of transportation shall publish a report showing how it
36   has complied with section 331 of the highway law and changed its proce-
37   dures to institutionalize complete street design features into planning,
38   project scoping, design and implementation of the required highway and
39   road projects. The report shall include, but not be limited to, a
40   discussion of the review of and revisions to various guidance documents
41   regarding lane width, design speed, average daily traffic thresholds,
42   level of service and roadway classification. The report shall also show
43   any best practices that the department of transportation utilized in
44   complying with section 331 of the highway law.
45      (b) In identifying such best practices, consideration shall be given
46   to the procedures for identifying the needs of the mix of users, includ-
47   ing primary and secondary users and the identification of barriers. The
48   department of transportation shall consult with transportation, land-use
49   and environmental officials, including representatives from:
50      (i) Counties, cities and towns;
51      (ii) Metropolitan planning organizations;
52      (iii) Public transit operators;
53      (iv) Relevant state agencies; and
54      (v) Other relevant stakeholders, including, but not limited to, repre-
55   sentatives from disability rights groups, aging groups, bicycle and
56   pedestrian advocates, and developers.
S. 5411--A                          3

1     S 4. This act and/or any failure to comply with the provisions of this
2   act shall not be admissible as evidence against the state, any munici-
3   pality or public authority in any claim for monetary damages against the
4   state, a municipality or a public authority.
5     S 5. This act shall take effect on the one hundred eightieth day after
6   it shall have become a law; provided, however, that this act shall not
7   apply to transportation projects undertaken or approved prior to the
8   date on which this act shall have become a law.

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

CAPS Somerville AAB #C10 264 Mtn4Reconsider
CAPS Somerville AAB #C10 264 Mtn4ReconsiderCAPS Somerville AAB #C10 264 Mtn4Reconsider
CAPS Somerville AAB #C10 264 Mtn4Reconsider
eilily Community Access Project, Somerville
State Bridge Profile New York 2014
State Bridge Profile New York 2014State Bridge Profile New York 2014
State Bridge Profile New York 2014
artba
Vermont State Bridge Profile
Vermont State Bridge ProfileVermont State Bridge Profile
Vermont State Bridge Profile
artba
pt 4: The Quickway Proposal: South County
pt 4: The Quickway Proposal: South Countypt 4: The Quickway Proposal: South County
pt 4: The Quickway Proposal: South County
Alan Hoffman
State Bridge Profile Oregon 2014
State Bridge Profile Oregon 2014State Bridge Profile Oregon 2014
State Bridge Profile Oregon 2014
artba
ERRP=Addendum to resettlement action plan - package - 2 & 3
ERRP=Addendum to resettlement action plan - package - 2 & 3ERRP=Addendum to resettlement action plan - package - 2 & 3
ERRP=Addendum to resettlement action plan - package - 2 & 3
zubeditufail
Rails to Trails - Past, Present, and Future
Rails to Trails - Past, Present, and FutureRails to Trails - Past, Present, and Future
Rails to Trails - Past, Present, and Future
Bryan Townley
Transportation myths and sacred cows restoring our cities
Transportation myths and sacred cows restoring our citiesTransportation myths and sacred cows restoring our cities
Transportation myths and sacred cows restoring our cities
TheLastMile
Utah State Bridge Profile
Utah State Bridge ProfileUtah State Bridge Profile
Utah State Bridge Profile
artba
Maine State Bridge Profile
Maine State Bridge ProfileMaine State Bridge Profile
Maine State Bridge Profile
artba
State Bridge Profile North Dakota 2014
State Bridge Profile North Dakota 2014State Bridge Profile North Dakota 2014
State Bridge Profile North Dakota 2014
artba
DC State Bridge Profile
DC State Bridge ProfileDC State Bridge Profile
DC State Bridge Profile
artba
Georgia State Bridge Profile
Georgia State Bridge ProfileGeorgia State Bridge Profile
Georgia State Bridge Profile
artba
Kentucky State Bridge Profile
Kentucky State Bridge ProfileKentucky State Bridge Profile
Kentucky State Bridge Profile
artba
pt 8: The Quickway Proposal: North County
pt 8: The Quickway Proposal: North Countypt 8: The Quickway Proposal: North County
pt 8: The Quickway Proposal: North County
Alan Hoffman
Ongoing broad ave initial improvement plan
Ongoing broad ave initial improvement planOngoing broad ave initial improvement plan
Ongoing broad ave initial improvement plan
Borough of Leonia
South Dakota State Bridge Profile
South Dakota State Bridge ProfileSouth Dakota State Bridge Profile
South Dakota State Bridge Profile
artba
TransitCapitalVisionReport_20140514
TransitCapitalVisionReport_20140514TransitCapitalVisionReport_20140514
TransitCapitalVisionReport_20140514
Adam Bejan Parast
New Mexico State Bridge Profile
New Mexico State Bridge ProfileNew Mexico State Bridge Profile
New Mexico State Bridge Profile
artba
Finch MSF EA Consultation July 7, 2014 - MSF specific
Finch MSF EA Consultation July 7, 2014 - MSF specificFinch MSF EA Consultation July 7, 2014 - MSF specific
Finch MSF EA Consultation July 7, 2014 - MSF specific
Crosstown TO
State Bridge Profile New York 2014
State Bridge Profile New York 2014State Bridge Profile New York 2014
State Bridge Profile New York 2014
artba
Vermont State Bridge Profile
Vermont State Bridge ProfileVermont State Bridge Profile
Vermont State Bridge Profile
artba
pt 4: The Quickway Proposal: South County
pt 4: The Quickway Proposal: South Countypt 4: The Quickway Proposal: South County
pt 4: The Quickway Proposal: South County
Alan Hoffman
State Bridge Profile Oregon 2014
State Bridge Profile Oregon 2014State Bridge Profile Oregon 2014
State Bridge Profile Oregon 2014
artba
ERRP=Addendum to resettlement action plan - package - 2 & 3
ERRP=Addendum to resettlement action plan - package - 2 & 3ERRP=Addendum to resettlement action plan - package - 2 & 3
ERRP=Addendum to resettlement action plan - package - 2 & 3
zubeditufail
Rails to Trails - Past, Present, and Future
Rails to Trails - Past, Present, and FutureRails to Trails - Past, Present, and Future
Rails to Trails - Past, Present, and Future
Bryan Townley
Transportation myths and sacred cows restoring our cities
Transportation myths and sacred cows restoring our citiesTransportation myths and sacred cows restoring our cities
Transportation myths and sacred cows restoring our cities
TheLastMile
Utah State Bridge Profile
Utah State Bridge ProfileUtah State Bridge Profile
Utah State Bridge Profile
artba
Maine State Bridge Profile
Maine State Bridge ProfileMaine State Bridge Profile
Maine State Bridge Profile
artba
State Bridge Profile North Dakota 2014
State Bridge Profile North Dakota 2014State Bridge Profile North Dakota 2014
State Bridge Profile North Dakota 2014
artba
DC State Bridge Profile
DC State Bridge ProfileDC State Bridge Profile
DC State Bridge Profile
artba
Georgia State Bridge Profile
Georgia State Bridge ProfileGeorgia State Bridge Profile
Georgia State Bridge Profile
artba
Kentucky State Bridge Profile
Kentucky State Bridge ProfileKentucky State Bridge Profile
Kentucky State Bridge Profile
artba
pt 8: The Quickway Proposal: North County
pt 8: The Quickway Proposal: North Countypt 8: The Quickway Proposal: North County
pt 8: The Quickway Proposal: North County
Alan Hoffman
Ongoing broad ave initial improvement plan
Ongoing broad ave initial improvement planOngoing broad ave initial improvement plan
Ongoing broad ave initial improvement plan
Borough of Leonia
South Dakota State Bridge Profile
South Dakota State Bridge ProfileSouth Dakota State Bridge Profile
South Dakota State Bridge Profile
artba
TransitCapitalVisionReport_20140514
TransitCapitalVisionReport_20140514TransitCapitalVisionReport_20140514
TransitCapitalVisionReport_20140514
Adam Bejan Parast
New Mexico State Bridge Profile
New Mexico State Bridge ProfileNew Mexico State Bridge Profile
New Mexico State Bridge Profile
artba
Finch MSF EA Consultation July 7, 2014 - MSF specific
Finch MSF EA Consultation July 7, 2014 - MSF specificFinch MSF EA Consultation July 7, 2014 - MSF specific
Finch MSF EA Consultation July 7, 2014 - MSF specific
Crosstown TO

Viewers also liked (13)

A Progressive Approach to Improving Regulation - PPI
A Progressive Approach to Improving Regulation - PPIA Progressive Approach to Improving Regulation - PPI
A Progressive Approach to Improving Regulation - PPI
Scott Thomasson
廩廡 廚廖廡 廣廖廡 -
 廩廡 廚廖廡 廣廖廡 -  廩廡 廚廖廡 廣廖廡 -
廩廡 廚廖廡 廣廖廡 -
Bsocial! Social Media Marketing agency
Presentacio
PresentacioPresentacio
Presentacio
Juan Esteban Londono Cdoc
Vasundhara Outdoors
Vasundhara OutdoorsVasundhara Outdoors
Vasundhara Outdoors
Vasundhara-Outdoors
Test
TestTest
Test
dannielleor
Test
TestTest
Test
dannielleor
Presentacion
PresentacionPresentacion
Presentacion
Juan Esteban Londono Cdoc
Urban problems
Urban problemsUrban problems
Urban problems
afifibs
OCD:
OCD:OCD:
OCD:
dmody
Urban problems
Urban problemsUrban problems
Urban problems
afifibs
Edicion[1][1]Edicion[1][1]
Edicion[1][1]
Erika Morales
Apresenta巽達o F3B! Produ巽探esApresenta巽達o F3B! Produ巽探es
Apresenta巽達o F3B! Produ巽探es
f3bcomunicacao
Slave Lake fire
Slave Lake fireSlave Lake fire
Slave Lake fire
Jodi Koroluk
A Progressive Approach to Improving Regulation - PPI
A Progressive Approach to Improving Regulation - PPIA Progressive Approach to Improving Regulation - PPI
A Progressive Approach to Improving Regulation - PPI
Scott Thomasson
Urban problems
Urban problemsUrban problems
Urban problems
afifibs
OCD:
OCD:OCD:
OCD:
dmody
Urban problems
Urban problemsUrban problems
Urban problems
afifibs
Edicion[1][1]Edicion[1][1]
Edicion[1][1]
Erika Morales
Apresenta巽達o F3B! Produ巽探esApresenta巽達o F3B! Produ巽探es
Apresenta巽達o F3B! Produ巽探es
f3bcomunicacao
Slave Lake fire
Slave Lake fireSlave Lake fire
Slave Lake fire
Jodi Koroluk

Similar to NYS Complete Streets Legislation (20)

continuation-of-road-clearing-MC-2020-145.pptx
continuation-of-road-clearing-MC-2020-145.pptxcontinuation-of-road-clearing-MC-2020-145.pptx
continuation-of-road-clearing-MC-2020-145.pptx
JosephusDeysolong1
Rural Long Range Transportation Plan 2005 - 2030
Rural Long Range Transportation Plan 2005 - 2030Rural Long Range Transportation Plan 2005 - 2030
Rural Long Range Transportation Plan 2005 - 2030
LSCOG
Senate Bill Text 110411
Senate Bill Text 110411Senate Bill Text 110411
Senate Bill Text 110411
Ports-To-Plains Blog
Space 134 - Caltrans Transportation Concept Report (2012)
Space 134 - Caltrans Transportation Concept Report (2012)Space 134 - Caltrans Transportation Concept Report (2012)
Space 134 - Caltrans Transportation Concept Report (2012)
Community Development Department-Glendale, CA
01.ENTRIPS
01.ENTRIPS01.ENTRIPS
01.ENTRIPS
Eastern Neighborhoods Transportation Implementation Planning Study
Terms of agreement sw final 9 02 16
Terms of agreement   sw final 9 02 16Terms of agreement   sw final 9 02 16
Terms of agreement sw final 9 02 16
E'ville Eye
Defining public transport routes for tod 8 october 2013 daisy dwango
Defining public transport routes for tod 8 october 2013 daisy dwangoDefining public transport routes for tod 8 october 2013 daisy dwango
Defining public transport routes for tod 8 october 2013 daisy dwango
ReaVaya_KM
Plan preparation techniques
Plan preparation techniquesPlan preparation techniques
Plan preparation techniques
CoEP
Honolulu land use ordinance amendment
Honolulu land use ordinance amendmentHonolulu land use ordinance amendment
Honolulu land use ordinance amendment
Honolulu Civil Beat
Transportation planning 1
Transportation planning 1Transportation planning 1
Transportation planning 1
EngrABRahimoon
Item06a part8
Item06a part8Item06a part8
Item06a part8
Naoise
Road network
Road networkRoad network
Road network
Engr Abdurrashid Dada MNSE
DEVELOPMENT OF FORMAL PLANNING PROCESS.pptx
DEVELOPMENT OF FORMAL PLANNING PROCESS.pptxDEVELOPMENT OF FORMAL PLANNING PROCESS.pptx
DEVELOPMENT OF FORMAL PLANNING PROCESS.pptx
MMACvlogs
Converting of Hubli Dharwad BRTS-LRT.pdf
Converting of Hubli Dharwad BRTS-LRT.pdfConverting of Hubli Dharwad BRTS-LRT.pdf
Converting of Hubli Dharwad BRTS-LRT.pdf
KRISHNAKANTH MALLIKARJUN
Urban Planning Related Issues.pdf
Urban Planning Related Issues.pdfUrban Planning Related Issues.pdf
Urban Planning Related Issues.pdf
KRISHNAKANTH MALLIKARJUN
Block 10102 redevelopment plan 11.25.2013 - DRAFT
Block 10102 redevelopment plan 11.25.2013 - DRAFTBlock 10102 redevelopment plan 11.25.2013 - DRAFT
Block 10102 redevelopment plan 11.25.2013 - DRAFT
Candice Osborne
Alternative for BRTS.pdf
Alternative for BRTS.pdfAlternative for BRTS.pdf
Alternative for BRTS.pdf
KRISHNAKANTH MALLIKARJUN
BRTS Impact.pdf
BRTS Impact.pdfBRTS Impact.pdf
BRTS Impact.pdf
krishnakanth648816
BRTS Alternative.pdf
BRTS Alternative.pdfBRTS Alternative.pdf
BRTS Alternative.pdf
krishnakanth648816
et al. Traffic Management and Accident Investigation.pptx
et al. Traffic Management and Accident Investigation.pptxet al. Traffic Management and Accident Investigation.pptx
et al. Traffic Management and Accident Investigation.pptx
adarayanjamesred
continuation-of-road-clearing-MC-2020-145.pptx
continuation-of-road-clearing-MC-2020-145.pptxcontinuation-of-road-clearing-MC-2020-145.pptx
continuation-of-road-clearing-MC-2020-145.pptx
JosephusDeysolong1
Rural Long Range Transportation Plan 2005 - 2030
Rural Long Range Transportation Plan 2005 - 2030Rural Long Range Transportation Plan 2005 - 2030
Rural Long Range Transportation Plan 2005 - 2030
LSCOG
Terms of agreement sw final 9 02 16
Terms of agreement   sw final 9 02 16Terms of agreement   sw final 9 02 16
Terms of agreement sw final 9 02 16
E'ville Eye
Defining public transport routes for tod 8 october 2013 daisy dwango
Defining public transport routes for tod 8 october 2013 daisy dwangoDefining public transport routes for tod 8 october 2013 daisy dwango
Defining public transport routes for tod 8 october 2013 daisy dwango
ReaVaya_KM
Plan preparation techniques
Plan preparation techniquesPlan preparation techniques
Plan preparation techniques
CoEP
Honolulu land use ordinance amendment
Honolulu land use ordinance amendmentHonolulu land use ordinance amendment
Honolulu land use ordinance amendment
Honolulu Civil Beat
Transportation planning 1
Transportation planning 1Transportation planning 1
Transportation planning 1
EngrABRahimoon
Item06a part8
Item06a part8Item06a part8
Item06a part8
Naoise
DEVELOPMENT OF FORMAL PLANNING PROCESS.pptx
DEVELOPMENT OF FORMAL PLANNING PROCESS.pptxDEVELOPMENT OF FORMAL PLANNING PROCESS.pptx
DEVELOPMENT OF FORMAL PLANNING PROCESS.pptx
MMACvlogs
Converting of Hubli Dharwad BRTS-LRT.pdf
Converting of Hubli Dharwad BRTS-LRT.pdfConverting of Hubli Dharwad BRTS-LRT.pdf
Converting of Hubli Dharwad BRTS-LRT.pdf
KRISHNAKANTH MALLIKARJUN
Block 10102 redevelopment plan 11.25.2013 - DRAFT
Block 10102 redevelopment plan 11.25.2013 - DRAFTBlock 10102 redevelopment plan 11.25.2013 - DRAFT
Block 10102 redevelopment plan 11.25.2013 - DRAFT
Candice Osborne
et al. Traffic Management and Accident Investigation.pptx
et al. Traffic Management and Accident Investigation.pptxet al. Traffic Management and Accident Investigation.pptx
et al. Traffic Management and Accident Investigation.pptx
adarayanjamesred

NYS Complete Streets Legislation

  • 1. S05411 Text: S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 5411--A Cal. No. 966 2011-2012 Regular Sessions I N S E N A T E May 18, 2011 ___________ Introduced by Sens. FUSCHILLO, DILAN, AVELLA, BRESLIN, DIAZ, DUANE, FLANAGAN, GRISANTI, HASSELL-THOMPSON, KENNEDY, KLEIN, KRUEGER, LARKIN, LITTLE, MONTGOMERY, OPPENHEIMER, PARKER, PERKINS, SAMPSON, STAVISKY, VALESKY -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Transportation -- reported favorably from said committee and committed to the Committee on Finance -- reported favorably from said committee, ordered to first and second report, ordered to a third reading, amended and ordered reprinted, retaining its place in the order of third reading AN ACT to amend the highway law, in relation to enabling safe access to public roads for all users by utilizing complete street design princi- ples THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: 1 Section 1. Legislative findings. It is hereby found and declared that 2 to achieve a cleaner, greener transportation system the transportation 3 plans of New York state should consider the needs of all users of our 4 roadways including pedestrians, bicyclists, public transportation 5 riders, motorists and citizens of all ages and abilities, including 6 children, the elderly and the disabled. By encouraging good planning, 7 more citizens will achieve the health benefits associated with active 8 forms of transportation while traffic congestion and auto related air 9 pollution will be reduced. Therefore, it shall be the policy of the 10 state to consider people of all ages and abilities and all appropriate 11 forms of transportation when planning roadway projects. 12 S 2. The highway law is amended by adding a new section 331 to read as 13 follows: 14 S 331. CONSIDERATION OF COMPLETE STREET DESIGN. (A) FOR ALL STATE, 15 COUNTY AND LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS THAT ARE UNDERTAKEN BY THE 16 DEPARTMENT OR RECEIVE BOTH FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING AND ARE SUBJECT TO 17 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OVERSIGHT, THE DEPARTMENT OR AGENCY WITH EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD11543-02-1
  • 2. S. 5411--A 2 1 JURISDICTION OVER SUCH PROJECTS SHALL CONSIDER THE CONVENIENT ACCESS AND 2 MOBILITY ON THE ROAD NETWORK BY ALL USERS OF ALL AGES, INCLUDING MOTOR- 3 ISTS, PEDESTRIANS, BICYCLISTS, AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION USERS THROUGH 4 THE USE OF COMPLETE STREET DESIGN FEATURES IN THE PLANNING, DESIGN, 5 CONSTRUCTION, RECONSTRUCTION AND REHABILITATION, BUT NOT INCLUDING 6 RESURFACING, MAINTENANCE, OR PAVEMENT RECYCLING OF SUCH PROJECTS. 7 (B) COMPLETE STREET DESIGN FEATURES ARE ROADWAY DESIGN FEATURES THAT 8 ACCOMMODATE AND FACILITATE CONVENIENT ACCESS AND MOBILITY BY ALL USERS, 9 INCLUDING CURRENT AND PROJECTED USERS, PARTICULARLY PEDESTRIANS, BICY- 10 CLISTS AND INDIVIDUALS OF ALL AGES AND ABILITIES. THESE FEATURES MAY 11 INCLUDE, BUT NEED NOT BE LIMITED TO: SIDEWALKS, PAVED SHOULDERS SUITABLE 12 FOR USE BY BICYCLISTS, LANE STRIPING, BICYCLE LANES, SHARE THE ROAD 13 SIGNAGE, CROSSWALKS, ROAD DIETS, PEDESTRIAN CONTROL SIGNALIZATION, BUS 14 PULL OUTS, CURB CUTS, RAISED CROSSWALKS AND RAMPS AND TRAFFIC CALMING 15 MEASURES; AND RECOGNIZE THAT THE NEEDS OF USERS OF THE ROAD NETWORK VARY 16 ACCORDING TO A RURAL, URBAN AND SUBURBAN CONTEXT. 17 (C) THIS SECTION SHALL NOT APPLY IF IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED AND SET 18 FORTH IN PUBLICLY AVAILABLE DOCUMENTS THAT ONE OF THE FOLLOWING EXISTS: 19 (I) USE BY BICYCLISTS AND PEDESTRIANS IS PROHIBITED BY LAW, SUCH AS 20 WITHIN INTERSTATE HIGHWAY CORRIDORS; OR 21 (II) THE COST WOULD BE DISPROPORTIONATE TO THE NEED AS DETERMINED BY 22 FACTORS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: LAND USE CONTEXT; 23 CURRENT AND PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES; AND POPULATION DENSITY; OR 24 (III) DEMONSTRATED LACK OF NEED AS DETERMINED BY FACTORS, INCLUDING, 25 BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LAND USE, CURRENT AND PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES, 26 INCLUDING POPULATION DENSITY, OR DEMONSTRATES LACK OF COMMUNITY SUPPORT; 27 OR 28 (IV) USE OF THE DESIGN FEATURES WOULD HAVE AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON, OR BE 29 CONTRARY TO, PUBLIC SAFETY. 30 (D) NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO REQUIRE THE DEPART- 31 MENT OR AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION OVER A PROJECT TO EXPEND MONIES IN 32 ACCORDANCE WITH SUBDIVISION (A) OF THIS SECTION THAT EXCEED THE AMOUNT 33 OF STATE AND FEDERAL FUNDING FOR COMPLETE STREET DESIGN FEATURES. 34 S 3. (a) No later than two years after the effective date of this act, 35 the department of transportation shall publish a report showing how it 36 has complied with section 331 of the highway law and changed its proce- 37 dures to institutionalize complete street design features into planning, 38 project scoping, design and implementation of the required highway and 39 road projects. The report shall include, but not be limited to, a 40 discussion of the review of and revisions to various guidance documents 41 regarding lane width, design speed, average daily traffic thresholds, 42 level of service and roadway classification. The report shall also show 43 any best practices that the department of transportation utilized in 44 complying with section 331 of the highway law. 45 (b) In identifying such best practices, consideration shall be given 46 to the procedures for identifying the needs of the mix of users, includ- 47 ing primary and secondary users and the identification of barriers. The 48 department of transportation shall consult with transportation, land-use 49 and environmental officials, including representatives from: 50 (i) Counties, cities and towns; 51 (ii) Metropolitan planning organizations; 52 (iii) Public transit operators; 53 (iv) Relevant state agencies; and 54 (v) Other relevant stakeholders, including, but not limited to, repre- 55 sentatives from disability rights groups, aging groups, bicycle and 56 pedestrian advocates, and developers.
  • 3. S. 5411--A 3 1 S 4. This act and/or any failure to comply with the provisions of this 2 act shall not be admissible as evidence against the state, any munici- 3 pality or public authority in any claim for monetary damages against the 4 state, a municipality or a public authority. 5 S 5. This act shall take effect on the one hundred eightieth day after 6 it shall have become a law; provided, however, that this act shall not 7 apply to transportation projects undertaken or approved prior to the 8 date on which this act shall have become a law.