The document outlines the benefits and risks of setting up an effective Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) service. It discusses components of an OPAT service including different delivery models like self-administered, infusion centers, and home-based care. Risks of OPAT include misdiagnosis, inappropriate treatment duration or location, and increased antimicrobial resistance. The document emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary teams, appropriate patient selection, education and support to maximize benefits and safety of OPAT programs.
1 of 44
Downloaded 38 times
More Related Content
OPAT April 2016
1. Setting up and running an
effective OPAT service
Linda Nazarko
Nurse Consultant
West London Mental HealthNHS Trust
Hallam Conference Centre, London 14th
April 2016
2. Aims and objectives
To enable you to:
Be aware of the benefits and risks of OPAT
Be aware of how to tailor services to meet needs
Be aware of the range of services provided
Types of therapy S-OPAT, H-OPAT, C-OPAT
Selecting patients and monitoring outcomes
Understand the needs of those requiring short and long
term therapy
Providing patient support and education
Demonstrate benefits to commissioners
And most importantly how to work together to care for
patients
3. OPAT, past present and future
Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT )
now used to describe IV therapy outside inpatient
settings
Developed 1974, for children with cystic fibrosis
First described UK early 1990s
6. The OPAT team
Physician- IDT consultant
Microbiologist
Pharmacist with expertise in antibiotic
therapy
Nurse specialist
Community nurses
Administration support
8. Self administered outpatient
antibiotics therapy (S-OPAT)
Self-administration of intravenous
antimicrobial therapy, in selected
patients under the supervision of a
specialist team, is a safe and feasible
strategy (Barr et al, 2012a)
Between 38-53 percent of patients can
self administer
9. Infusion centres H-OPAT
Cost effective
Can be based in community hospitals, clinics
or acute hospitals
Can be used to teach patients and staff,
deliver therapy, check bloods, monitor
patients
Patient has to travel but less delay in waiting
for staff
Drop in for problems
10. Home (community) C-OPAT
Around 70 percent of those treated in
hospitals suitable for OPAT in some form
OPAT was generally safe and effective, but
specific patient groups were identified with
more complex management pathways and
poorer outcomes (Seaton et al, 2011)
Specialist IV teams
Community nurses
Private companies
11. Types of therapy
Antimicrobials.
Chemotherapy.
Bisphosphonates.
Iron sucrose but fall off in use some areas
Immunoglobulins.
Parenteral nutrition (PN);
Blood products
Intravenous fluid
15. Suitable for OPAT?
70 percent suitable 30 percent not
Generally safe but specific groups more
complex and have poorer outcomes
26 percent re-admitted in 30 days
Some patients three times more likely to
be re-admitted
16. Higher risk patients
Complex pathways
Older
Co-morbidities
Resistant organisms
Number of non infective admissions last
year
Endocarditis with cardiac or renal failure
17. Selecting patients
Clinical judgment
Do they meet local
criteria
How often will
review be required
Treatment regimes
Suitable vascular
access
18. Emmas story
Delivered by emergency caesarean
section and returned home with baby.
Developed post operative infection,
admitted and potentially separated from
her baby whilst having IV antibiotics.
Distraught and desperate to go home
19. Margarets story
Margaret is an 86 year old widow. She has a
confirmed diagnosis of vascular dementia
and has moderately severe problems with
cognition. Margaret lives alone and has a four
times daily package of care and support. She
was treated for pyelonephritis secondary to
renal calculi and discharged home with a PIC
line. Margaret was unable to consent to,
understand or adhere to treatment and
removed the PIC line. It was not possible to
deliver OPAT and she was re-admitted.
20. Mareks story
Came to UK from Poland and is
supporting a wife and two children. Has
multidrug resistant TB. Needs oral
antibiotics plus daily IV antibiotic
therapy for at least six months. Keen to
S-OPAT but worried he will not
manage. Fearful that he will lose his
job if he is late or has a lot of time off
22. Supporting patients
Patients may be anxious, having IV antibiotics at
home can be scary
Patients need:
A leaflet giving information, advice and support
Details of what to do if there are problems, who to
contact and where to go if problems occur.
Patients are people and level of support needed
varies
Weekly reviews and ongoing help and support
23. Community Initiated OPAT
Partnership microbiology, IDT, pharmacy and
community to initiate and treat certain
conditions at home, e.g ESBL E.Coli
infections of urinary tract and cellulitis
24. Hospital Initiated OPAT
Plan discharge early
Consider likely duration therapy,
vascular access, discharge medication
Consider midline access if staff are not
competent with central lines
Be aware of constraints in community in
terms of capacity
Give plenty of notice
25. Roles of rapid response
Short sharp courses of treatment e.g
treatment ESBL UTIs requiring IV
therapy and cellulitis
Bridging treatment to facilitate
discharge and handover to long term IV
services
26. Risks of OPAT
The administration of intravenous antimicrobial
therapy is potentially hazardous. These are:
1. Misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment
2. Inappropriate OPAT therapy when oral
would be effective
3. Inappropriate duration of therapy
4. Inappropriate place of care
5. Increased anti-microbial resistance
27. Lower leg cellulitis- are we winning?
In 2012 over 93,000 admissions, over 407,000 bed days.
Cost 贈259-175 million
Admissions increased 88 percent in nine years now falling.
Why?
Diverting a quarter would save 100,000 bed days and
around 贈64 million
28. Misdiagnosis & inappropriate treatment
1/3 of those with
cellulitis misdiagnosed
Misdiagnosis of UTI
common
Oral might work just as
well
IDT approval of
OPAT requests
29. Inappropriate duration
Cellulitis 3-4 days parenteral therapy
nurse review and switch
Osteomyelitis may be exposed to
prolonged therapy with little evidence
benefit past 6 weeks
Review by specialist team to mitigate
risks
30. Inappropriate place of care
Tighter control over who can request
OPAT
OPAT approval by IDT
Education and review to reduce risk of
inappropriate discharge
31. Antimicrobial therapy
Third generation cephalosporins
High risk C. Difficile in hospital but not in community
however 60 percent C. diff now developing in non
hospitalised.
Daily or occasionally twice daily therapy
32. Antimicrobial stewardship
We could be close to reaching a point where
we may not be able to prevent or treat
everyday infections or diseases (DH &
DEFRA, 2013).
Every antibiotic expected by a patient, every
unnecessary prescription written by a doctor, every
uncompleted course of antibiotics, and every
inappropriate or unnecessary use in animals or
agriculture is potentially signing a death warrant for a
future patient. (Donaldson, 2008)
33. Antimicrobial stewardship (2)
25,000 deaths in Europe in 2007 because of
antibiotic resistance.
Fifty percent of antibiotics prescribed
unnecessarily
Take time and diagnose properly
Prescribe prudently, narrow spectrum safer
Say no when not clinically indicated
Use right dose, right time, right route and
right duration
35. Developing and supporting staff
Staff training in IV
therapy
Learn how to use
VADs used in OPAT
RCN Standards
guidance
Nurse specialist and
OPAT team support
36. Delivering a comprehensive service
Use existing services
But dont overwhelm them
Build on services
Tailor services to meet needs
Community for housebound,
rapid response for short
interventions and infusion
centre to enable and empower
those needing long term
OPAT
37. Business case and KPIs
British Society for Antimicrobial Therapy (2011).
Outpatient and Parenteral Antimicrobial
Therapy
(OPAT) Toolkit for Developing a Business Case
for OPAT Services in the UK. BSAC,
Birmingham.
http://e-opat.com/wp-
content/themes/pmix/Business_case_toolkit_
PDF.pdf
38. Evaluate outcomes
Use existing
information routinely
gathered
Quality tools
Additional
questionnaires,
interviews, audits
39. What to evaluate
Clinical and patient outcomes
Service specific e.g. number of
admissions prevented, bed days saved
Improvements in functional status
Patient satisfaction
Productivity and efficiency
Staffing indicators
40. Why evaluate
Services change over time and we may be too busy
to notice
We need to learn what we can improve
We may identify gaps and opportunities to develop
41. Cost effective services
Get accurate costs of services
Not just cost but also:
Accessibility, care closer to home
Timely no long waiting lists
Relieving pressure on traditional
services
Meeting or exceeding quality indicators
42. Being excellent is not enough
You need to be seen to excellent
Be visible
Evaluate and innovate
Disseminate
Move forward
You are stars let your light
shine brightly
43. Final tips
Up to 70 percent of inpatients could benefit from OPAT
Around half of those having OPAT could self administer OPAT
can be community or hospital initiated and can be used to avoid
admissions or reduce length of stay.
OPAT can enable people requiring parenteral therapy to remain
at home or to go home sooner. This enhances quality of life.
OPAT once a highly specialist service is entering the
mainstream
It is vitally important that staff from acute and community and
across disciplines form a team to minimise risk and maximise
benefit
44. Thank you for listening
Any questions?
Check out profile for useful downloads
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/linda-nazarko-
1952a746