際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
ROME
significance
of Pompey
and
Crassus in
70BC
Political
Developments in
the Late Republic
The Story of
the
consulship of
Pompey and
Crassus in
70BC
Background: Significance of the
consulship of Pompey and Crassus in
70BC
After the war against Sertorius and
the Spartican rebellion, Pompey and
Crassus both believed they deserved a
reward. The war against Sertorius had
been declared a bellum externum so
Pompey could legitimately be
awarded a triumph (except of course
that he did not meet the age and rank
conditions) but the slave revolt only
qualified for an ovation. Crassus
would have been most unhappy.
Pompey and Crassus had likely been
rivals since they both supported Sulla
 Pompey had been the favourite
while Crassus had been virtually
ignored.
The Death of Spartacus by
Hermann Vogel (1882)
Even though the did not
get along, Crassus
sought Pompeys
support when both men
decided to stand for the
consulship of 70BC.
Despite Pompeys
popularity with the
people, he was still far
too young and had held
no public office.
Nevertheless the Senate
passed a decree
exempting him from the
provisions of Sullas les
annalis. Crassus met all
the conditions to run for
Consul.
Pompey
Pompey was worried about his
own inexperience and so he
asked his friend Varro to help
him. Varro wrote him some
notes on senatorial
procedures.
The tribunate was dealt with
first  they re-introduced the
powers of the tribune. This was
very clever. Whether they were
fully aware of the significance
or not, this became the main
way that Pompey and others
were able to advance their
career and get around the rules
and objections of the Senate.
She-wolf suckling
Romulus and Remus
Next Pompey and Crassus
revived the roles of the Censor.
The censor was responsible for
maintaining lists of Senators 
they immediately re-drafted the
Senatorial lists and expelled 64
members of the senate. Those
who filled their places were
loyal to Pompey.
During this time a big scandal
was brewing. Verres had been
governing a province of Sicily.
Unfortunately he was corrupt 
stealing wealth and money, and
misgoverning for his own gain.
He charged business owners
incredibly high taxes, he would
cancel business contracts and
give them instead to those that
had given him a donation.
Cicero
Temples and private houses were robbed of
their works of art. He used the emergency of
Spartacus to make some quick money  he
would pick key slaves of important and wealthy
land owners and accuse them of organising to
join Spartacuss revolt, and of causing trouble in
the provinces.
He would then sentence the slave to death by
crucifixion  unless of course the slave owner
paid a rather large bribe to have the charge
dismissed. Sometimes it went even further  he
would occasionally make up a slave! He would
accuse a slave that didnt exist of plotting to
join Spartacus  he would then demand that
the wealthy land owner hand over the slave to
the authorities  clearly they couldnt do so
when the slave didnt exist  he would then
charge the land owner with hiding the slave and
sentence them to imprisonment  unless of
course they could pay the fine (bribe) to have
the charges dismissed.
Crassus crucified
6,000 of Spartacus's
followers on the road
between Rome and
Capua.
His victims included some of Pompeys
Sicilian clients. That said, Verres had
some very powerful friends and
supporters in Rome. His corruption
could not continue, but it would cause
a scandal as many would support him.
The victims of his crimes turned to
Marcus Tullius Cicero to represent
them.
The court was made up exclusively of
Senators, some of which may have
been Verres friends. The judge,
however, was the honest and
trustworthy Manius Acilius Glabrio  he
would not allow bribery to sway his
decisions. Verres was not happy  he
tried to have court proceedings
postponed for a year knowing that his
friend Marcus Caecilius Metellus would
be the presiding judge the following
year.
Cicero accuses Verres
Cicero would allow for none of
these delay tactics and managed
to have the case heard in a
timely fashion. The effect of
Ciceros first brief speech was so
overwhelming that Hortensius
(Verress lawyer) refused to
reply, and recommended his
client leave the country.
Before the expiration of the 9
days allowed for the prosecution
Verres was on his way to
Massilia. There he lived in exile
until 43 BC, when he was
proscribed by Mark Antony,
apparently for refusing to
surrender some art treasures
that Antony coveted.
"Verres had been only a type. He had
stood for the whole corrupt system.
It was for more than the
condemnation of one man that the
orator had striven, and the outcome
of the great trial was the death-knell
of the power of the Optimates.
Cicero's singleness of purpose, his
devotion to duty, his skill in foiling
the most cunning moves of a
determined opposition had borne
fruit, and he was well content.
Frank H. Cowles
This court case and the
published writing of Cicero,
led to final piece of important
legislation in the consulship
of Pompey and Crassus. L.
Aurelius Cato introduced
reform that took sole control
of the jury courts away from
the senate and shared this
power between the senate,
the equites and the tribuni
aeraii  a group just below
the equites in wealth. Since
the tribuni aeraii had similar
interests to the equites,
together they would be able
to keep senatorial jurors in
check.
Crassus
Significance: (Scullard) Thus
within ten years of his
retirement the essential parts
of Sullas reforms had been
swept away: little remained
but his reorganization of the
courts themselves. His
attempts to check tribunes
and army commanders alike
had failed, but although the
restored tribunate might
chastise the Optimates with
whips, the military dictators
chastised them with
Scorpions. The Senate had
failed to rise to the
opportunity that Sulla had
given it and the ultimate
result was further civil wars in
which the Republic perished
The most
important
thing to
remember:
Significance: By the first century
BC, the senate was the virtual
government of Rome. The Senate
gave special commands to
generals, giving them legitimacy,
which meant that it could not stop
a popular general using the army
to further his ambitions. Once a
military situation was settled, the
senate was powerless to stop the
generals demanding more power
and using their armies as a threat.
It was this inability to control
generals and armies that allowed
circumstances to develop which
helped bring about the fall of the
republic.

More Related Content

Option M (Rome) 1.3a

  • 2. The Story of the consulship of Pompey and Crassus in 70BC
  • 3. Background: Significance of the consulship of Pompey and Crassus in 70BC After the war against Sertorius and the Spartican rebellion, Pompey and Crassus both believed they deserved a reward. The war against Sertorius had been declared a bellum externum so Pompey could legitimately be awarded a triumph (except of course that he did not meet the age and rank conditions) but the slave revolt only qualified for an ovation. Crassus would have been most unhappy. Pompey and Crassus had likely been rivals since they both supported Sulla Pompey had been the favourite while Crassus had been virtually ignored. The Death of Spartacus by Hermann Vogel (1882)
  • 4. Even though the did not get along, Crassus sought Pompeys support when both men decided to stand for the consulship of 70BC. Despite Pompeys popularity with the people, he was still far too young and had held no public office. Nevertheless the Senate passed a decree exempting him from the provisions of Sullas les annalis. Crassus met all the conditions to run for Consul. Pompey
  • 5. Pompey was worried about his own inexperience and so he asked his friend Varro to help him. Varro wrote him some notes on senatorial procedures. The tribunate was dealt with first they re-introduced the powers of the tribune. This was very clever. Whether they were fully aware of the significance or not, this became the main way that Pompey and others were able to advance their career and get around the rules and objections of the Senate. She-wolf suckling Romulus and Remus
  • 6. Next Pompey and Crassus revived the roles of the Censor. The censor was responsible for maintaining lists of Senators they immediately re-drafted the Senatorial lists and expelled 64 members of the senate. Those who filled their places were loyal to Pompey. During this time a big scandal was brewing. Verres had been governing a province of Sicily. Unfortunately he was corrupt stealing wealth and money, and misgoverning for his own gain. He charged business owners incredibly high taxes, he would cancel business contracts and give them instead to those that had given him a donation. Cicero
  • 7. Temples and private houses were robbed of their works of art. He used the emergency of Spartacus to make some quick money he would pick key slaves of important and wealthy land owners and accuse them of organising to join Spartacuss revolt, and of causing trouble in the provinces. He would then sentence the slave to death by crucifixion unless of course the slave owner paid a rather large bribe to have the charge dismissed. Sometimes it went even further he would occasionally make up a slave! He would accuse a slave that didnt exist of plotting to join Spartacus he would then demand that the wealthy land owner hand over the slave to the authorities clearly they couldnt do so when the slave didnt exist he would then charge the land owner with hiding the slave and sentence them to imprisonment unless of course they could pay the fine (bribe) to have the charges dismissed. Crassus crucified 6,000 of Spartacus's followers on the road between Rome and Capua.
  • 8. His victims included some of Pompeys Sicilian clients. That said, Verres had some very powerful friends and supporters in Rome. His corruption could not continue, but it would cause a scandal as many would support him. The victims of his crimes turned to Marcus Tullius Cicero to represent them. The court was made up exclusively of Senators, some of which may have been Verres friends. The judge, however, was the honest and trustworthy Manius Acilius Glabrio he would not allow bribery to sway his decisions. Verres was not happy he tried to have court proceedings postponed for a year knowing that his friend Marcus Caecilius Metellus would be the presiding judge the following year. Cicero accuses Verres
  • 9. Cicero would allow for none of these delay tactics and managed to have the case heard in a timely fashion. The effect of Ciceros first brief speech was so overwhelming that Hortensius (Verress lawyer) refused to reply, and recommended his client leave the country. Before the expiration of the 9 days allowed for the prosecution Verres was on his way to Massilia. There he lived in exile until 43 BC, when he was proscribed by Mark Antony, apparently for refusing to surrender some art treasures that Antony coveted. "Verres had been only a type. He had stood for the whole corrupt system. It was for more than the condemnation of one man that the orator had striven, and the outcome of the great trial was the death-knell of the power of the Optimates. Cicero's singleness of purpose, his devotion to duty, his skill in foiling the most cunning moves of a determined opposition had borne fruit, and he was well content. Frank H. Cowles
  • 10. This court case and the published writing of Cicero, led to final piece of important legislation in the consulship of Pompey and Crassus. L. Aurelius Cato introduced reform that took sole control of the jury courts away from the senate and shared this power between the senate, the equites and the tribuni aeraii a group just below the equites in wealth. Since the tribuni aeraii had similar interests to the equites, together they would be able to keep senatorial jurors in check. Crassus
  • 11. Significance: (Scullard) Thus within ten years of his retirement the essential parts of Sullas reforms had been swept away: little remained but his reorganization of the courts themselves. His attempts to check tribunes and army commanders alike had failed, but although the restored tribunate might chastise the Optimates with whips, the military dictators chastised them with Scorpions. The Senate had failed to rise to the opportunity that Sulla had given it and the ultimate result was further civil wars in which the Republic perished
  • 13. Significance: By the first century BC, the senate was the virtual government of Rome. The Senate gave special commands to generals, giving them legitimacy, which meant that it could not stop a popular general using the army to further his ambitions. Once a military situation was settled, the senate was powerless to stop the generals demanding more power and using their armies as a threat. It was this inability to control generals and armies that allowed circumstances to develop which helped bring about the fall of the republic.