ºÝºÝߣ

ºÝºÝߣShare a Scribd company logo
Poor Rich divide in Aravind Adiga¡¯s ¡°The
White Tiger¡± And Swarup's ¡° Slumdog
millionaire Q$A
Monali Jethwa
Roll No : 19
Paper 13: The New Literature
Submitted : Department of English
M.K.B.U
l Arvind Adiga is an Indian ¨C
Ausrelian Writer and journalist.
lWon booker prize in 2008
lIn 2009 film adopted for the
future film.
lVikas swarup writer of Slumdog
Millionaier Q&A.
lOscar Wining Film In 2009.
lFilm Directed by Danny Boyel.
Introduction :
¡°The servant ¨C master system implies two things : one is that the
servants are far poorer than the rich ¨C a servant has no possibility
of ever catching up to the master. and secondly , he has access to
the master ¨C the master¡¯s money , the master¡¯s physical person.
yet crime rates in India are very low. even though the middle class
¨C who often have three or four servants ¨C are paranoid about crime
, the reality is master getting killed by his servant is rare¡­¡­ you
need two things a divide and a conscious ideology of resentment .
we don¡¯t have resentment in India. the poor just assume that the
rich are a fact of life ¡­. but I think we¡¯re seeing what I believe is a
class based resentment for the first time¡±(sawhney , 2008)
lBalram Halwai is a protagonist as a modern hero.
lBalram climing the ladder of the success is by the mudering of the
mr.Ashok; like
l - His employer .
l - Stelling his bag full of money 700,000 based on
l philoshopy of the revage , ambition , curruption.
lThis story Portrayal of the Relationship with ¡° Balram Halwai ¨C Master
Mr.Ashok.
Poor- Rich concept in Aravind Adiga¡¯s ¡°The White
Tiger¡± And Swarup's ¡° Slumdog millionaior¡±
l The white Tiger :
l Balram halwai who represented the sublertan section of socity ,
juxtaposed against the rich socity.
l Adiga employes the example of Rooster coop to examine the
never ending the suffer of the sublertn grups of suffer.
lIn this powerfull commentary on the injustice
l
lClass sruggles in India.
lSummdog Millionaier Q&A
l Swarup's portrayeal of his protagonist Jamal from slum back groung
and define the concept of slum subaltern.
lPresent slum sublertan in the midest of muder , extoration , postitution.
l slums are no more threat to growing globel poverty but asset to
echonomy grow if given direction .
lStatastic way How poetry is on the raise In India.
l 4 In ever 10 children are malnourised accoring to UN reports.
lIndian Rank 66 out of 88counties in ¡° Globle Hunger Index¡± 2008
l India has more hungree people more than 200 millioan people ¨C then
any other countries in the wolrd.
lOne thired of world's poor lives in india ¨C according to the letest povertiy
estimate from the
- World Bank
lIndia rank in poverty 128 out of 177 countries in
,UN Development Index .
Conclusion..
l Arvind Adiga's story of rickshow wallah's move from ¡°
darkness¡± of rural India to the ¡° Light¡± of urban Gurago , and
we known haesh face behind that.
lBoth writers are very vibrant in the social criticism .
lSocial Inequality to the poor and rich devied in socity ,
leading escalationof violance , crime and evils of all
magnitudes.

More Related Content

paper 13 Poor And Rich Divide in The white tiger

  • 1. Poor Rich divide in Aravind Adiga¡¯s ¡°The White Tiger¡± And Swarup's ¡° Slumdog millionaire Q$A Monali Jethwa Roll No : 19 Paper 13: The New Literature Submitted : Department of English M.K.B.U
  • 2. l Arvind Adiga is an Indian ¨C Ausrelian Writer and journalist. lWon booker prize in 2008 lIn 2009 film adopted for the future film. lVikas swarup writer of Slumdog Millionaier Q&A. lOscar Wining Film In 2009. lFilm Directed by Danny Boyel. Introduction :
  • 3. ¡°The servant ¨C master system implies two things : one is that the servants are far poorer than the rich ¨C a servant has no possibility of ever catching up to the master. and secondly , he has access to the master ¨C the master¡¯s money , the master¡¯s physical person. yet crime rates in India are very low. even though the middle class ¨C who often have three or four servants ¨C are paranoid about crime , the reality is master getting killed by his servant is rare¡­¡­ you need two things a divide and a conscious ideology of resentment . we don¡¯t have resentment in India. the poor just assume that the rich are a fact of life ¡­. but I think we¡¯re seeing what I believe is a class based resentment for the first time¡±(sawhney , 2008)
  • 4. lBalram Halwai is a protagonist as a modern hero. lBalram climing the ladder of the success is by the mudering of the mr.Ashok; like l - His employer . l - Stelling his bag full of money 700,000 based on l philoshopy of the revage , ambition , curruption. lThis story Portrayal of the Relationship with ¡° Balram Halwai ¨C Master Mr.Ashok.
  • 5. Poor- Rich concept in Aravind Adiga¡¯s ¡°The White Tiger¡± And Swarup's ¡° Slumdog millionaior¡± l The white Tiger : l Balram halwai who represented the sublertan section of socity , juxtaposed against the rich socity. l Adiga employes the example of Rooster coop to examine the never ending the suffer of the sublertn grups of suffer. lIn this powerfull commentary on the injustice l lClass sruggles in India.
  • 6. lSummdog Millionaier Q&A l Swarup's portrayeal of his protagonist Jamal from slum back groung and define the concept of slum subaltern. lPresent slum sublertan in the midest of muder , extoration , postitution. l slums are no more threat to growing globel poverty but asset to echonomy grow if given direction .
  • 7. lStatastic way How poetry is on the raise In India. l 4 In ever 10 children are malnourised accoring to UN reports. lIndian Rank 66 out of 88counties in ¡° Globle Hunger Index¡± 2008
  • 8. l India has more hungree people more than 200 millioan people ¨C then any other countries in the wolrd. lOne thired of world's poor lives in india ¨C according to the letest povertiy estimate from the - World Bank lIndia rank in poverty 128 out of 177 countries in ,UN Development Index .
  • 9. Conclusion.. l Arvind Adiga's story of rickshow wallah's move from ¡° darkness¡± of rural India to the ¡° Light¡± of urban Gurago , and we known haesh face behind that. lBoth writers are very vibrant in the social criticism . lSocial Inequality to the poor and rich devied in socity , leading escalationof violance , crime and evils of all magnitudes.