際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Chapter 6: Performance Appraisal
Method of Performance Appraisal

                 Comparative Approach

                                  Forced Distribution

                  Name:                  Matrix Number:

         FRAN SISKAH YOHANES             07DPM10F1065

              OW CHEE WEI                07DPM10F1052

        ABDUL MUNIR BIN JAPRIN           07DPM10F1057
Definition:
Forced distribution is a form of
comparative evaluation in which an
evaluator rates subordinates
according to a specified
distribution.
Example:
 Manager who is told that he/she must rate
  subordinates according to the following
  distribution:
Example  (continued)
 In a group of 20 employees, manager will
  distribute their employees as the following:
Advantages:
 This method tends to eliminate
  raters bias.

 By forcing the distribution according
  to pre-determined percentages, the
  problem of making use of different
  raters with different scales is
  avoided.
Limitations:
 Is difficult to using this method in salary
  administration, however, is that it may
  lead low morale, low productivity and high
  absenteeism.

 Employees who feel that they are
  productive, but find themselves in lower
  grade feel frustrated and exhibit over a
  period of time reluctance to work.
THANK YOU

More Related Content

PB 501 Human Resources Management

  • 1. Chapter 6: Performance Appraisal Method of Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Forced Distribution Name: Matrix Number: FRAN SISKAH YOHANES 07DPM10F1065 OW CHEE WEI 07DPM10F1052 ABDUL MUNIR BIN JAPRIN 07DPM10F1057
  • 2. Definition: Forced distribution is a form of comparative evaluation in which an evaluator rates subordinates according to a specified distribution.
  • 3. Example: Manager who is told that he/she must rate subordinates according to the following distribution:
  • 4. Example (continued) In a group of 20 employees, manager will distribute their employees as the following:
  • 5. Advantages: This method tends to eliminate raters bias. By forcing the distribution according to pre-determined percentages, the problem of making use of different raters with different scales is avoided.
  • 6. Limitations: Is difficult to using this method in salary administration, however, is that it may lead low morale, low productivity and high absenteeism. Employees who feel that they are productive, but find themselves in lower grade feel frustrated and exhibit over a period of time reluctance to work.