Persuasion attempts are common in modern societies that rely on persuasion over force. Persuasion aims to influence beliefs, attitudes, and behavior through communication. The study of persuasion examines who delivers the message, the content of the message, the audience, and the effects. Early research by Hovland and colleagues tested how source credibility, message structure, and audience characteristics impact persuasion. Their experiments showed credibility, expertise, trustworthiness and likability increase persuasiveness. Later research analyzed real-world campaigns to understand persuasion across diverse topics and audiences.
2. Persuasion
Attempts to persuade you are everywhere all the
time
That is, wherever you go now, someone is trying to
influence you
The attempts dont stopthey go on day and night
Advanced industrial countries rely heavily on
persuasion for social influence
Less emphasis on brute force
Mass communication available
Persuasion is more efficient and may be more effective
3. Persuasion
Persuasion is the use of communication to
influence beliefs, attitudes and/or behavior
If the persuasive communication is meant first and
foremost to advance the interests of the
speaker/author ahead of other considerations, it
is propaganda
The study of persuasion has been one of the
main foci of media studies
4. Applied research
Most persuasion research is meant to test
specific persuasive communications strategies
or tactics rather than to build theory
Advertising research
Copytesting
Campaigns studies
Propaganda studies
Educational/persuasive campaigns
Public health interventions
5. Theory development
Theory may be developed and tested using
scientific research methods
Experimental studies, usually
More often, the results of advertising,
educational campaigns reviewed and theory is
induced from real-world experience
Advertising effectiveness monitoring
6. Hovland and colleagues
First recruited to study the effectiveness of
the U.S. governments attempts to educate
soldiers and boost morale during World War II
The Why We Fight series
Followed up the American Soldiers studies
with a program of research on persuasion
Yale School of persuasion research
7. Hovland et al.
Applied Lasswells paradigm for study:
Who?
Says What?
To Whom?
In Which Channel?
With what effect?
8. Who?
Hovland et al. looked at the effects of
credibility of source on the effectiveness of
attitude change messages.
Controlled experimental designs
Presented identical messages but varied the
source of the message
News stories and editorials supposedly written by
sources of greater or lesser credibility, or from more or
less credible news organizations
9. Hovland et al.
The researchers found that credibility of the
source was an important determinant of the
persuasiveness of the message
However, the impact of message source seemed to
decay over time
Sleeper effect
Credibility of the source was tied to a number of
characteristics
Expertise
Trustworthiness
Likeability
10. Expertise
Does the source appear to be knowledgeable
on the topic?
A source may be perceived to have expertise even
if he doesnt
Im not a doctor, but I play one on TV
All sorts of actors dressed up as doctors in early
commercials
FCC restricted representations of sourcescannot be
misleading or false
11. Trustworthiness
If the source seems honest and
straightforward we are more likely to be
convinced by what she says
The audience has some reason to believe the
source is honest
Newspersons commitment to objectivity
Walter Cronkite
A history of openness and honesty (self-disclosure)
Oprah
12. Trustworthiness
Another source of trustworthiness is situational.
If the speaker or author is perceived to be
arguing in favor of a position that is in her
self-interest she will be less persuasive
If you overhear someone talking you are
more likely to be influenced than if they
know you are listening
An experiment with a supposedly overheard
discussion led to greater attitude change
13. When the speaker argues against his own
self-interest, he is more persuasive
Joe The Shoulder Napolitano arguing for
more stringent sentencing
A group of wealthy people opposed to the
repeal of the inheritance tax
14. Charisma
Personal charm or likeability
Ronald Reagan
Teflon president
Celebrity endorsements
Not really clear why some people are appealing
Physical attractiveness
Physically attractive people are liked, trusted
15. Homophily
If the speaker is a lot like the audience member,
he is more likely to be persuasive
Probably a combination of expertise (she understands
me and my situation) likeability (people like those
who share their view of the world) and
trustworthiness (I can trust someone like me)
In propaganda studies, this is called Just Plain Folks
Candidates try to portray themselves as resembling the
group they are targeting
Eating ethnic foods
Wearing work clothes
16. Sources
Heavy use of celebrities
Positive affect prior to advertising, etc.
Natural on-air presentation
Physical attractiveness
Association with certain image, roles
17. Says what? (content)
Structure of arguments
One-sided v. two-sided
Primacy v. recency
Conclusive v. non-conclusive
Rational v. emotional appeals
Fear
Humor
Visual v. semantic appeals
18. Fear appeals
Fear appeals have been heavily studied
Hovland et al. concluded that moderate fear was
the most effective
Too little fear does not motivate
Too much fear causes target to avoid message or
implications
More recent findings have led to conclusion that
high levels of fear work well if a sense of efficacy
is generated and clear means of dealing with the
fear provided
20. Framing
Loss v. gain
Episode v general trend
Examples v. statistics
False comparisons
21. To whom?
Personality factors
Self-esteem
Curvilinear effect
Education
Two-sided messages are more effective with more
formally educated while one-sided are more effective with
less formally educated
Rational appeals relatively more effective with more
formally educated
Interest
Topical interest predicts topical knowledge and pre-
existing attitudes (varies with demographics)
22. Gender
Women are more persuadable
May no longer be true
Social norms/beliefs
Active participation
23. Audience
Targeting
Choice of media based on the ability to reach a
target audience
Target is usually low hanging fruit
Fish where the fish are
Fish when the fish are biting
Messages written for particular audience rather
than for everyone
Tailored messages are now possibleevidence
indicates they are more effective
25. With what effect?
Learning
Most common/easiest change
Attitude change
Especially when existing attitudes are not strongly
held
Behavior intention
Most predictive of actual behavior
Behavior
Changing behavior is very difficult because of the
multiple influences that determine behavior
Biological, psychological, situational, cultural influences
26. With what effect?
Sleeper effect
Selectivity
Interaction with education/demographics
One-sided v. two-sided
Boomerang effects
27. Effect
Varies across topics/products, audiences,
campaigns
Information
Attitude change
Positioning/branding
28. What problems with the experimental
method are there?
One-time exposure
Compared with campaigns people experience on a
regular basis
Forced exposure
Negates selectivity
Demand characteristics of experimental method
Especially when carried out with students
Overuse of available samples
Students may not be people
29. What problems with the experimental
method are there?
Lack of competing messages
Usually choose topics the audience knows
little about
30. Campaigns
Studies of the effectiveness of campaigns
Advertising
Political campaigns
Propaganda campaigns
Public health campaigns
31. Campaigns analysis
The massive use of advertising allows for the
testing of real-world media persuasion across
a wide range of topics
Meta-analyses of marketing/advertising
campaigns
Meta-analyses of copy tests
Reviews of public health campaigns
Comparison of political or propaganda campaigns
and public opinion
32. General findings
Memory for campaigns is low
Recognition scores are better
Attitude change is not often very great
However, change does occur and can be
significant under certain circumstances
Topic is relatively unknown
Media are consonant
Topic is emotionally charged
33. Meta-analysis
Lodish et al. Advertising works: A meta-
analysis of 389 real world split cable T.V.
advertising experiments
TV advertising weight alone is not enough
The status quo is not enough
It is unlikely that there is a strong relationship
between standard measures of TV commercial
recall and persuasion for established brands and
the sales impact of the copy
34. New brands or line extensions tend to be more
responsive to alternative TV advertising plans than
established products
These data support the importance of
introductory weight and prime time for new
products
Concentration of higher TV advertising weight is
related to increases in brand sales
38. Dual-processing theory
Dual-processing theories argue that we
process persuasive messages differently if we
are motivated to attend to them and are
capable of processing them than if we just
monitor them at a very low level or are unable
to process them
Central v. peripheral processing
39. Central processing
If we are motivated and capable of processing
we will carefully review the arguments made
to see if they are convincing according to
rational argument
Appropriate evidence
Strength of argument, logic
40. Peripheral processing
If we just give slight attention to a persuasive
message, are not motivated enough to dedicate
the effort to evaluate the logic and strength of
argument, then we will tend to process according
to peripheral cues
Attractiveness of the source
May be sexual
Visual cues/attractiveness of the setting
Music
Emotion