The document analyzes the performance of three face detection algorithms: one using local SMQT features and a split up SNoW classifier, one using an efficient and rank deficient approach, and a simple and accurate color face detection algorithm for complex backgrounds. It tests the algorithms on several face databases, recording the success rate and processing time. It finds the local SMQT approach has the highest accuracy at 98% but takes the longest time, while the efficient rank deficient approach has a lower accuracy of 87.5% but processes images much faster at around 26 seconds.
1 of 60
More Related Content
Performance Analysis of Face Detection Systems
1. Performance Analysis of Face Detection Systems
Melike Sennur Kocal (028354)
Onur enol (990406)
2. Face Detection
Biometric id,Surveillance,Security.
Too many variations of human face.
Extracting the face.
4. Project Aim
Analyse Performances of 3 Algorithms
Face Detection Using Local SMQT Features and Split Up
SNoW Classifier
Face Detection Using Efficient & Rank Deficient
Simple & Accurate Color Face Detection Algorithm in
Complex Background
5. Project Aim
For-Loop for many images
Cropping the detected faces
Place the cropped faces into an output folder
Timer Function for total elapsed time.
6. Project Aim
For-Loop for many images
Cropping the detected faces
Place the cropped faces into an output folder
Timer Function for total elapsed time.
COMPARISON
52. Test Results
Database
# of
photos
Success (%) Seconds
ORL 400 400 100 135,9
YALE 165 165 100 39,462
JAFFE 213 211 99.06 1095,77
COHN KANADE 180 164 91.11 3095,838
HUMAN SCAN 1521 1490 97.96 11159,83
FG-NET 126 126 100 452,06
AVERAGE 98.02 % 2663,14
Using Local SMQT Features & Split Up SNoW Classifier
53. Test Results
Database # of photos
# of
cropped
photos
# of
correct
photos
(%) Seconds
FG-NET 126 119 75 59.5 102.83
CVL 797 752 575 72.1 4283.835
A Simple & Accurate
Face Detection Algorithm in Complex Background