ºÝºÝߣ

ºÝºÝߣShare a Scribd company logo
PP
specifciations
As a table write down 3 specifications of a
good snowman
Frankie¡¯s snowman specification:
¡ñ It must be white
¡ñ It must be made of snow
¡ñ It must have a round shape
¡ñ It must have a carrot for its nose
Use Frankie¡¯s specification to
evaluate this snowman:
¡ñ Is it white?
¡ñ Is it made of snow?
¡ñ Does it have a
round shape?
¡ñ Does it have a
carrot for it¡¯s nose?
Use Frankie¡¯s specification to
evaluate this snowman:
¡ñ Is it white?
¡ñ Is it made of snow?
¡ñ Does it have a
round shape?
¡ñ Does it have a
carrot for its nose?
Use Frankie¡¯s specification to
evaluate this snowman:
¡ñ Is it white?
¡ñ Is it made of snow?
¡ñ Does it have a
round shape?
¡ñ Does it have a
carrot for its nose?
Use Frankie¡¯s specification to
evaluate this snowman:
¡ñ Is it white?
¡ñ Is it made of snow?
¡ñ Does it have a
round shape?
¡ñ Does it have a
carrot for its nose?
What are the problems with Frankie¡¯s
specifications?
How could these specifications be
improved?
Albert¡¯s specification
Specification
topic Materials Aesthetics Function Size
Specification
detail What materials will be used?
How will it
appear?
To be a
representation of a
man
What size should it
be?
Limited Snow with stick arms Pile of snow
Does not look like a
man Under 0.5m high
Adequate
Snow with stick arms and
stone facial features One snow ball
Looks somewhat like
a man
Over 0.5m and Under
1m high
Substantial
Snow with stick arms, stone
facial features (eyes and
mouth) and a distinct nose
(example a carrot)
Two snow balls
(head and body)
Looks a lot like a
man
Over 1m and under
1.5m high
Rigorous
Snow with stick arms, stone
facial features (eyes and
mouth), a distinct nose
(example a carrot) and a
fabric hat or a scarf
Three snow balls
(Legs, body and
head) Looks like a man Over 1.5m high
Take a look at Albert¡¯s snowman
specifications:
¡ñ Why are these specifications
better?
¡ñ Why would they be easier to
evaluate?
Personal project specification
You will be required to reflect on and allow
other people to reflect upon your personal
project at the showcase.
For this reason you must develop a suitable
specification
Specifications - Example
Specification stages
1. Identify the details of a rigorous example of
your final outcome using the rigorous goal
outcomes worksheet.
2. For each specification develop a scale from
a limited to adequate to substantial to
rigorous, using the specification worksheet
PP specification
Specifications - Template
Level Descriptor Task specific clarification
1-2 Develop a limited criteria for the
product or outcome
? Some specification stated
? Stated list format
3-4 Develop adequate criteria for
the product or outcome
? Most specification described
? Described list format
5-6 Develop substantial and
appropriate criteria for the
product or outcome
? All specification described
? Specification table attempted
? Suitable range shown for some
specification
7-8 Develop rigorous criteria for the
product or outcome
? All specification described and are suitably
challenging specification identified
? Specification table completed
? Suitable range for all specification
Specification rubric

More Related Content

PP specification

  • 1. PP specifciations As a table write down 3 specifications of a good snowman
  • 2. Frankie¡¯s snowman specification: ¡ñ It must be white ¡ñ It must be made of snow ¡ñ It must have a round shape ¡ñ It must have a carrot for its nose
  • 3. Use Frankie¡¯s specification to evaluate this snowman: ¡ñ Is it white? ¡ñ Is it made of snow? ¡ñ Does it have a round shape? ¡ñ Does it have a carrot for it¡¯s nose?
  • 4. Use Frankie¡¯s specification to evaluate this snowman: ¡ñ Is it white? ¡ñ Is it made of snow? ¡ñ Does it have a round shape? ¡ñ Does it have a carrot for its nose?
  • 5. Use Frankie¡¯s specification to evaluate this snowman: ¡ñ Is it white? ¡ñ Is it made of snow? ¡ñ Does it have a round shape? ¡ñ Does it have a carrot for its nose?
  • 6. Use Frankie¡¯s specification to evaluate this snowman: ¡ñ Is it white? ¡ñ Is it made of snow? ¡ñ Does it have a round shape? ¡ñ Does it have a carrot for its nose?
  • 7. What are the problems with Frankie¡¯s specifications? How could these specifications be improved?
  • 8. Albert¡¯s specification Specification topic Materials Aesthetics Function Size Specification detail What materials will be used? How will it appear? To be a representation of a man What size should it be? Limited Snow with stick arms Pile of snow Does not look like a man Under 0.5m high Adequate Snow with stick arms and stone facial features One snow ball Looks somewhat like a man Over 0.5m and Under 1m high Substantial Snow with stick arms, stone facial features (eyes and mouth) and a distinct nose (example a carrot) Two snow balls (head and body) Looks a lot like a man Over 1m and under 1.5m high Rigorous Snow with stick arms, stone facial features (eyes and mouth), a distinct nose (example a carrot) and a fabric hat or a scarf Three snow balls (Legs, body and head) Looks like a man Over 1.5m high
  • 9. Take a look at Albert¡¯s snowman specifications: ¡ñ Why are these specifications better? ¡ñ Why would they be easier to evaluate?
  • 10. Personal project specification You will be required to reflect on and allow other people to reflect upon your personal project at the showcase. For this reason you must develop a suitable specification
  • 12. Specification stages 1. Identify the details of a rigorous example of your final outcome using the rigorous goal outcomes worksheet. 2. For each specification develop a scale from a limited to adequate to substantial to rigorous, using the specification worksheet
  • 15. Level Descriptor Task specific clarification 1-2 Develop a limited criteria for the product or outcome ? Some specification stated ? Stated list format 3-4 Develop adequate criteria for the product or outcome ? Most specification described ? Described list format 5-6 Develop substantial and appropriate criteria for the product or outcome ? All specification described ? Specification table attempted ? Suitable range shown for some specification 7-8 Develop rigorous criteria for the product or outcome ? All specification described and are suitably challenging specification identified ? Specification table completed ? Suitable range for all specification Specification rubric

Editor's Notes

  • #8: Highlight that specifications which require a yes or no do not make for a very descriptive evaluation
  • #10: These evaluation provide a range and also incorporate personal opnion