This document provides information about urban poverty in Mumbai and Chicago by comparing their development histories, demographics, issues faced by migrants and low-income communities, and the relationship between poverty and criminalization. In Mumbai, a large percentage of the population lives in slums that lack basic services. Slum redevelopment has displaced many and led to homelessness. Migrants face housing shortages, poor living conditions, and barriers to social services. In both cities, low-income neighborhoods experience overpolicing and criminalization of their communities. Poverty is multidimensional and criminalization contributes to its perpetuation. Effective policies are needed for more inclusive urban development that addresses inequality in access to resources.
1 of 31
Download to read offline
More Related Content
ppt uchicago
1. Urban Poverty and
Development
Gayathri Krishna
Vineetha Venugopal
Pooja Chavan
Shibili Shahadathi
M.A. in social Work in Community Organisation & Development
Practice (2nd Year)
Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai
1
3. Introduction To Mumbai
Entertainment, Fashion and Commercial Center of India
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) is the richest
municipal corporation in the country- GDP- $ 278 billion as of 2015
Population Density- Mumbai- 53,000/sq mi (21,000/km2)
Chicago- 1,318/sq mi (509/km2)
Religion demographics:
Hindus: 67.39%
Muslims: 18.56%
Buddhists: 5.22%, Jains: 3.99%, Christians: 4.2%. Sikhs: 0.58%
Parsis and Jews account for the rest of the population
3
4. 42%- Maharashtrians;19%- Gujaratis, while people from other areas of the
country account for the rest (39%) of the population (Mumbai
Population(2016, October 26)).
Crucial events that shaped the city:
1992 riots- After the Babri Masjid incident- political gains
1993- Underworld involvement- Mumbai blast- Muslims started feeling
insecure and moved to the peripheries from the centre of the city-
Ghettoisation
Great Bombay Textile strike
4
5. Indias development- characterised by geographical inequality (Jagdale
2014)
Inclusive development?
Overall Income growth and income gap growth
5
Development in Urban Centres
6. Low Income Settlement- Slums
Low economic settlements- thrown out of the formal housing sector because it is
expensive and much beyond their income levels (not only BPL).
percentage of people living in slums is estimated to be as high as 41.3% in
Greater Mumbai (Mumbai Population(2016, October 26))- occupying about
2500 hectares of area, which constitutes a mere 6% of the total land area (Jagdale
2014).
.
6
7. Conditions of these slum occupations are
dangerously unhygienic
defined unfit for human- overcrowding, lack of ventilation, electricity or
sanitary facilities
by the Census of India.
Slum population- Highly vulnerable and displaced to outskirts during urban
development
Area made liveable by slum dwellers are taken up for redevelopment
Political and economic factors play an important role in the sustaining the
slums- privatisation of slum rehabilitation after 1991(Jagdale 2014).
slum policies have become increasingly reliant on the market and on local
self-help agencies, a trend in step with the neoliberal turn across the
developing world (Nijman 2008)
Slum rehabilitation and issues related to it
creation of vertical slums
7
9. Homelessness
Slum redevelopment in India often results in livelihood loss - vertical slums-
loss of old way of life - desertion - homelessness -
Homelessness in Chicago - bus stop, train, pavement, bridge.
Gentrification - Chicago - rent rise - eviction - loss of affordable housing -
Uptown - Homelessness - pavements, under the bridge - Uptown-Pilsen
Beggary Act - no warrant; no trial; 3-10 years prison term; arrest of
dependents; inadequate shelters - criminalization of landless labourers , old
and people with disabilities and homeless people. (Bombay prevention of
beggary act, 1959)
Persons in Destitution (Protection Care and Intervention) Model Bill
9
10. Water and Sanitation- Slums
Notified: 40 lpcd officially - the irregular, erratic timings lead to feminisation
of poverty. E.g. Cheeta Camp . Services inferior quality compared to non
slum areas
Non-notified slums - established after 2000; eligible for water under 2014
ruling; yet to be fully implemented - changing cut off dates and inequality
Nearly half of Mumbais slum non notified (Subbaraman and Murti,2015)
Slums on central government land - Illegal slums - not eligible for any
services; no security of tenure
Water Mafia -illegally tap into city water pipes - cross contamination highly
priced service by private vendors - criminalisation
Or buy water from far away legal pipe owners or tanker water (Subbaraman
et.al, 2015). 10
11. Sanitation
Lack of access to clean water -> diarrhoeal illness in children > recurrent
diarrhoeal illness -> increased child mortality and malnutrition
(Subbaraman and Murty,2015)
Households spend an average of 52 to 206 times more than standard
municipal charge of INR 2.25 (USD 0.04) per 1000 litres of water.
95% use less than the WHO minimum of 50 litres per capita per day (
Subbaraman et.al, 2013)
Notified slums -> shared or community toilets
Non notified -> less number of toilets - lack of reliable water supply-
excessive use (high population density) - lack of maintenance ; more open
defecation - dysfunctional toilets
11
12. Lack of sewer infrastructure - health concerns - criminalisation of open
defecation ( Subbaraman et al, 2012) .
High cost and long wait at pay and use toilets
Inadequate solid waste disposal
Barriers in accessing Municipal electricity supply- electricity stealing
Barriers to access municipal schools - time consuming , expensive
transportation ; social stigma
Difficulty in accessing official documents - no official residence proof -
difficult to access services
Discrimination in compensation provided after disasters and calamities
Forced eviction and loss of home - reinforcing poverty
Different neighbourhood - different facilities - community healthcare -
community college
Inequality in Access to Services
12
13. notified slum- parallel informal economy ;
$600 million to 1 billion turnover (Yardley, 2011).
Textiles, carpentry; leather;
recycling; rag picking ;
domestic help, drivers etc
Unsafe , congested working conditions; home as workplace; exploitation
Congested shared housing - Tuberculosis & other diseases
People unable to move out due to high land price/rent in Mumbai
Dharavi - city within a city
13
14. MIGRATION
Comparative perspective: Mumbai and Chicago
1.Who are migrants?
2.Why do people migrate?
3.Push and pull factors of migration
4.What are the effects of migration?
14
15. Nature of Migration
MUMBAI
15
Interstate Migration
Village to city
Migration
City to city Migration
CHICAGO
Voluntary Migration
Forced Migration
International
Migration
17. Effects of Migration
MUMBAI
Housing
Mushrooming of slums
Water Supply
Sanitation
Lack of fundamental needs:
Education, Healthcare, Shelter
Lack of government scheme benefits
Poor work conditions
Inadequate wages
Issues of secondary citizenship
Increasing Inequalities
Social Exclusion
CHICAGO
Increasing numbers of
Undocumented immigrants
Difficulty to access basic services for
undocumented immigrants
Issues of Housing
Cheap labour force
Issues of secondary citizenship
Insecurity and hatred among
residents of the city towards various
racial groups
Increasing Inequalities
Social Exclusion
17
25. Two aspects of poverty and its relation with
criminalisation
Economic poverty and criminalisation
The lower standard of living and often high degree of economic compulsion
forces the lower section to indulge in crimes. The deepened social and
economic divide is the primary reasons for the exacerbation of crime and
social conflict in cities such as Mumbai(Shaban, 2008)
Critique : States double stand on crime in poor areas and to the big fishes;
Poverty as multidimensional concept
Abraham Maslow ( Hierarchy of needs) considers food, shelter, cloth,
safety and security as humans primary needs. The lack of these primary
needs can be called as poverty.
25
26. Mumbra: The story of a Muslim ghetto
A ghetto in the outskirts of Mumbai that thousands of Muslim families
settled in as a result of 1992-93 riots. The population has increased from
45,000(1992) to 9,000,00(2011).
The government hasnt set up a single public school or hospital and people
suffer with a 6 hour daily power cut.
In 2014, 150 policemen searched all the houses in Mumbra during
midnight by shouting raid all the safe hubs of terrorists to find out a
chain snatchers group.
In 2015, private school in Panvel( 34 km away from Mumbra) decided to
ban admission for children from this ghetto by saying bad behaviour as a
reason. 26
27. Many people from Mumbra have been denied job due to the label of
criminal/ terrorists (including women).
Extra-judicial killings and fake encounters.
The poor economic condition and backwardness coupled with unique
social circumstances, Muslims forced to live in urban slums. The fear of
other makes them to live in the ghettoes. Further the overwhelmed
policing makes their lives double insecure (poonawalla, 2014) .
27
28. Do Black lives really matter to the state?
One in four black children in born in 1990 had a father imprisoned. The
expansion of incarceration increased by increase in policing.
The forms of supervision and policing found in the black neighbourhood
foster a climate of fear and suspicion in which people are pressured to
inform on one another(goffman,2009)
Imprisoned or formerly imprisoned men have difficulties participating in
sustained ways in the lives of their families, there families become socially
and economically disadvantaged in this process( Mclanahan 2004)
Thus, criminalisation also contributes to sustenance of poverty.
28
29. Conclusion
Poverty and development juncture- crucial factors that needs to be taken
care are
Development of low income settlements
the inequality in access to resources,
homelessness,
migration and
criminalisation of vulnerable communities and its aftermath.
Role of social workers in advocacy , engagement with community,
community organising, empowerment of communities- both social and
economic of vulnerable communities.
Push for urban development more inclusive and equal.
29
30. References
Mumbai Population. (2016, October 26). Retrieved November 15th, 2016, from
http://worldpopulationreview.com/world-cities/mumbai-population/
Jagdale, R. H. (2014). An overview of slum rehabilitation schemes in Mumbai,
India (Doctoral dissertation).
Nijman, J. (2008). Against the odds: Slum rehabilitation in neoliberal
Mumbai.Cities, 25(2), 73-85.
Shaban, A. (2008). Ghettoisation, crime and punishment in Mumbai. Economic and
Political Weekly, 68-73.
Goffman, A. (2009). On the run: Wanted men in a Philadelphia ghetto. American
Sociological Review, 74(3), 339-357.
Subbaraman, R., & Murthy, S. L. (2015). The right to water in the slums of
Mumbai, India. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 93(11), 815-816.
Subbaraman, R., Obrien, J., Shitole, T., Shitole, S., Sawant, K., Bloom, D. E., &
Patil-Deshmukh, A. (2012). Off the map: the health and social implications of being
a non-notified slum in India. Environment and urbanization, 24(2), 643-663.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/29/world/asia/in-indian-slum-misery-work-
politics-and-hope.html
30