This document analyzes the business cycle relationship between the US and Puerto Rico using quarterly and annual GDP and economic index data from 1947-2009. It finds that while Puerto Rico and the US do not have a synchronized common business cycle, they do share a non-synchronized "codependent" cycle with a one quarter lag, indicating Puerto Rico's economy is impacted by but does not move in tandem with the US economy. The study has implications for countercyclical monetary policies between Puerto Rico and the US Federal Reserve.
1 of 15
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Presentation coidine 2012 cesar sobrino
1. The Codependent Cycle
between the US and Puerto Rico
By
César R. Sobrino - Universidad del
Turabo
& Ellis Heath – Valdosta University
2. Motivation
? According to Mundell (1961), for optimum
currency areas, economies should have
synchronized common cycles.
? According to Frankel and Rose (1997;1998),
trade intensity and synchronicity of business
cycles are endogenous.
? This statement raises the issue whether
currency areas lead to synchronized business
cycles.
– Data of Puerto Rico is relevant.
– Puerto Rico belongs the US currency area.
3. Objectives
? Find a common cycle between US output
and PR output.
– A sychronized common business cycle.
– A non-synchronized common business cycle.
– Using Vahid and Engle’s (1997) test
? Policy implications about findings.
4. Previous literature
? Frankel and Rose (1997, 1998), Calderon,
Chong and Stein (2007); Artis, Chouliarakis,
Harischandr (2011); Bordo and Hiebling
(2011); Artis and Okubo (2011); Inklaar, Jo-A-
ping and de Haan (2008); Shin and Wang
(2003); Rose (2008) for EMU; and, De Pace
(2011).
? Herrera (2003)
Mexico and US share a common trend and common
cycles since NAFTA adoption
Vahid and Engle (1993)
5. Common feature literature
? For stationary series
– Engle & Kozicki (1993)
? For non-stationary series
Conditional to cointegration
– Vahid & Engle (1993)-Common cycle
– Vahid & Engle (1997)- Codependent cycle
6. Methodology & Data
? VECM
? Vahid and Engle’s (1997) statistic
? Data:
– Fed St. Louis, US RGDP (annual)
– Conference Board: US CEI (quarterly)
– Junta de Planificacion: RGDP (annual), CEI
(quarterly).
– Bureau of Labor Service (BLS): both
unemployment rates- quarterly series
7. Real GDPs
1947-2009
30.5
24
30.0
23
29.5
22
29.0
21 28.5
28.0
20
50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05
Shortcoming: Annual and fiscal year side)
US RGDP in logs (right-hand
PR RGDP in logs (left-hand side)
14. Conclusions
? US and Puerto Rico outputs share a non
synchronized common cycle.
Codependency at one quarter.
? Compared to Mexico, PR is less integrated
to the US in the short run.
– Merchant Act (Jones Act)
? Look for some monetary mechanism with
NY Fed for smoothing GDP falls
(countercyclical monetary policies).
15. References
? Frankel, J.A., Rose, A.K., 1997. Is EMU more justifiable ex post than
ex ante? European Economic Review, 41, 753-760
? Frankel, J.A., Rose, A.K., 1998. The Endogeneity of the Optimum
Currency Area Criteria, The Economic Journal, 108, 1009-1025.
? Engle, R. and S. Kozicki (1993) “Testing for Common Features”,
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 11: pp. 369-396.
? Herrera, Jorge (2004) Business Cycles in Mexico and The United
States: Do They share common movements? Journal of Applied
Economics, Vol. VII, No. 2, 303-323
? Mundell, R. (1961) Optimun currency areas, American Economic
Review, 51, 667-655.
? Vahid, F & Engle, R. (1993). "Common Trends and Common
Cycles," Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 8(4), pages 341-60,
? Vahid, F. and R. Engle (1997), “Codependent Cycles”, Journal of
Econometrics 80: 199-221.