際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
3.3 scoring
rubrics
Scoring rubrics
 - are descriptive scoring schemes that are
developed by the teachers or other
evaluators to guide the analysis of the
products or process of students efforts.
 - are typically employed when a
judgement of quality is required and
maybe used to evaluate a broad range of
projects activities.
3.3 scoring
rubrics
Criteria Setting
 The criteria for a scoring rubrics are
statements which identify what really
counts in the final output.
3.3 scoring
rubrics
Major criteria for product
assessment
 Quality
 Creativity
 Comprehensiveness
 Accuracy
 Aesthetics 3.3 scoring
rubrics
Substatements
Topic: Three hundred years of Spanish rule in the
Philippines
 Interrelates the chronological events in an
interesting manner.
 Identifies the key players in each period of the
Spanish rule and the roles that they played.
 Succeeds in relating the history of Philippine
Spanish rule. 3.3 scoring
rubrics
When are the scoring rubrics an
appropriate evaluation technique?
 - Grading essays is just one example
of performances that may be
evaluated using scoring rubrics.
3.3 scoring
rubrics
Scoring rubrics may be used:
 Evaluate group activities
 Extend projects and oral
presentations
3.3 scoring
rubrics
Authentic assessment
 Checklist may be used rather than
scoring rubrics in the evaluation of
essays.
3.3 scoring
rubrics
Checklist
 Enumerate a set of desirable
characteristics which are actually
observed.
3.3 scoring
rubrics
Scoring rubrics
 Based on descriptive scales and
support the evaluation of the extent to
which criteria have met.
 purpose of assessment
3.3 scoring
rubrics
Benefits of scoring rubrics in
the evaluation process
 1. support the examination of the
extent to which the specified criteria
have been reached.
 2. provide feedback to students
concerning how to improve their
performances. 3.3 scoring
rubrics
General vs. Task Specific.
3.3 scoring
rubrics
1
 The identification of the qualities and
attributes that the teacher wishes to observe
in the students outputs that would
demonstrate their level of proficiency.
2
 determined whether holistic or an
analytical rubric would be more
appropriate
3
 The identification and definition of
the criteria for lowest level of
performance.
Process of development scoring rubrics
3.3 scoring
rubrics
A note of caution:
 It is suggested that each score
category should be defined using
descriptors of the work rather than
value-judgement about the work
(Brookhart, 1999)
 For example, students sentences
contain no errors in subject-verb
agreements, is preferable over,
students sentences are good.

3.3 scoring
rubrics
Kingsoft Office
published by www.Kingsoftstore.com
@Kingsoft_Office
kingsoftstore

More Related Content

scoring rubrics

  • 2. Scoring rubrics - are descriptive scoring schemes that are developed by the teachers or other evaluators to guide the analysis of the products or process of students efforts. - are typically employed when a judgement of quality is required and maybe used to evaluate a broad range of projects activities. 3.3 scoring rubrics
  • 3. Criteria Setting The criteria for a scoring rubrics are statements which identify what really counts in the final output. 3.3 scoring rubrics
  • 4. Major criteria for product assessment Quality Creativity Comprehensiveness Accuracy Aesthetics 3.3 scoring rubrics
  • 5. Substatements Topic: Three hundred years of Spanish rule in the Philippines Interrelates the chronological events in an interesting manner. Identifies the key players in each period of the Spanish rule and the roles that they played. Succeeds in relating the history of Philippine Spanish rule. 3.3 scoring rubrics
  • 6. When are the scoring rubrics an appropriate evaluation technique? - Grading essays is just one example of performances that may be evaluated using scoring rubrics. 3.3 scoring rubrics
  • 7. Scoring rubrics may be used: Evaluate group activities Extend projects and oral presentations 3.3 scoring rubrics
  • 8. Authentic assessment Checklist may be used rather than scoring rubrics in the evaluation of essays. 3.3 scoring rubrics
  • 9. Checklist Enumerate a set of desirable characteristics which are actually observed. 3.3 scoring rubrics
  • 10. Scoring rubrics Based on descriptive scales and support the evaluation of the extent to which criteria have met. purpose of assessment 3.3 scoring rubrics
  • 11. Benefits of scoring rubrics in the evaluation process 1. support the examination of the extent to which the specified criteria have been reached. 2. provide feedback to students concerning how to improve their performances. 3.3 scoring rubrics
  • 12. General vs. Task Specific. 3.3 scoring rubrics
  • 13. 1 The identification of the qualities and attributes that the teacher wishes to observe in the students outputs that would demonstrate their level of proficiency. 2 determined whether holistic or an analytical rubric would be more appropriate 3 The identification and definition of the criteria for lowest level of performance. Process of development scoring rubrics 3.3 scoring rubrics
  • 14. A note of caution: It is suggested that each score category should be defined using descriptors of the work rather than value-judgement about the work (Brookhart, 1999) For example, students sentences contain no errors in subject-verb agreements, is preferable over, students sentences are good. 3.3 scoring rubrics
  • 15. Kingsoft Office published by www.Kingsoftstore.com @Kingsoft_Office kingsoftstore