Are you ready to improve your processes? Mike shares his recruiting departments process improvement results as well as some of the tools and techniques that led to the positive outcomes.
2. Todays Agenda
Introduction to Sharp
Are you ready for a process improvement
initiative?
Introduction to Six Sigma
What is LEAN vs. Six Sigma
Results
Questions
3. Sharp HealthCare
San Diegos Health Care Leader
Not-for-profit
Largest health care system in San Diego
4 Acute Care Hospitals
3 Specialty Hospitals
2 Affiliated Medical Groups
Full range of programs and services
Largest private employer in San Diego
15,000 Employees
2,600 Affiliated Physicians
2,000 Volunteers
5. Are you ready?
Foundational elements of process
improvement
Often overlooked
Leads to the failure of many, if not most, process
improvement initiatives
6. Are you ready?
Define
What is the true problem? Baseline measures
What does success look like?
How will it be measured?
Assess
What is the driver for improvement?
Internal to the department
External, but within the company
External from the company
A mix?
7. Are you ready?
Assess
How will you sustain the gains/improvements?
Policy and procedural changes
Audits
How
What resources
Who
Incentives
What kind?
Unintended consequences
8. Are you ready?
Assess
Are your processes stable?
It is impossible to improve any process that is not
consistent The Toyota Way
Is anything hiding problems
The Toyota Way
Batch manufacturing
9. Are you ready?
Assess
Is anything hiding problems (continued)
What may be hiding problems in Recruiting?
Success
Brand
Lack of competition
Lack of need
Candidate database
Apathy
Unrealized problem(s)
Lack of knowledge of a better state
10. Are you ready?
Assess
Do you have the resources?
People- everyone is accountable
Money
Time
What are the obstacles?
Can we mitigate them?
12. What is Six Sigma?
A methodology that focuses on data-driven
decisions
Reduction in variation
A statistical term that represents near-perfection
A philosophy of driving results to levels never
before expected
13. Define DMAIC Methodology
The context of the process
The customer
The right metrics and targets
Measure
Input requirements
D
Output requirements
In-process requirements C Lean M
Analyze
Cause and effects
Six Sigma
Determine the gap
Improve I A
Ideal state
Apply innovation
Future state
Control
Sustain the gains!
14. What is Six Sigma?
Defects Per
Defects Per
Sigma level (1-6) refers to
the number of defects per Million
Million
Opportunities
Opportunities %
%
million opportunities. The
1
1 697,672
697,672 30
30
higher the number, the
fewer the defects. 2
2 308,770
308,770 69
69
3
3 66,810
66,810 93.3
93.3
Most organizations
operate around 3 to 4 4
4 6,209
6,209 99.37
99.37
Sigma. 5
5 232
232 99.97
99.97
From 3 to 6 represents a 20,000 6
6 3.7
3.7 99.9997
99.9997
times improvement in quality.
Is 99% Good Enough?
Is 99% Good Enough?
15. The Classical View of The Six Sigma View of
Quality Quality
99% Good (3.8 ) 99.99966% Good
(6 )
20,000 lost articles of mail per Seven lost articles of mail per
hour hour
5,000 incorrect surgical 1.7 incorrect surgical
operations per week operations per week
2 short or long landings at One short or long landing at
most major airports daily most major airports every five
years
200,000 wrong drug 68 wrong drug prescriptions
prescriptions each year each year
16. WHAT IS LEAN?
A Methodology That Focuses On
Improving Workflow
Eliminating Waste
Delivering Value
On-Demand, Defect-Free,
One-By-One at the Lowest Cost
17. Lean Thinking Complements Six Sigma
Lean Six Sigma
Waste is the enemy Variation is the enemy
Focus on process Focus on process
velocity quality and eliminating
Tools provide defects
analysis of process
Tools provide analysis
flow and value-
added vs. non- of contributing causes
value added to identify the vital
few
Synergy: Variation is much easier to see with a lean process
18. Lean Six Sigma Compared to
Traditional Problem Solving
Strong focus on the customer
Eliminating defects
Focus on process (velocity)
Intolerance to process waste
20. Recruitments Six Sigma Project
Baseline data for
3/2005:
Openings: 765
New candidates: 1883
Applicants per
position: 2.5
Time to fill: 53 days*
*all of CY 2005
21. Results
Measurable
improvements
Number of open
positions
March 2005: 765
March 2010: 343
Reduction: 55%
22. Results
Measurable
improvements
Time to fill
CY 2005: 53 days
CY 2009*: 36 days
Reduction: 32%
*Through June 2009
23. Results
Measurable
improvements
New applicants
March 2005: 1883
March 2010: 2578
Increase: 36.9%
Peaked September
2010: 3925 or a
108.4% increase
24. Results
Measurable
improvements
Applicants per posting
March 2005: 2.5
April 2010: 5.2
Increase: 108%
Peaked January
2010: 9.6 or a 284%
increase
28. Results
Measurable
improvements
New hire performance
improvements*
FY 2004 vs. FY 2005:
15.3% increase
FY 2004 vs. FY 2006:
23.1% increase
FY 2004 vs. FY 2007:
20.5% increase
FY 2004 vs. FY 2008:
23.1% increase
29. Results
Non-measurable
improvements
Improved approach to
managing expenses
Media
Events
Other
Improved approach to
investigating new
media, technologies
and practices
30. Results
Non-measurable
improvements
More confidence
working with the hiring
managers
Improved
relationships
More comfortable
providing input
More comfortable
innovating
31. Results
Non-measurable
improvements
Expedited a culture of
more accountability
Within Recruitment
Outside of
Recruitment
MP TO PUT OUR STORY INTO PERSPECTIVE, LET ME TAKE A MOMENT TO PROVIDE YOU A VERY BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE SHARP HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATION. SHARP IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT, FULLY INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM SERVING THE ENTIRE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO FOR OVER FIFTY YEARS.. And for our last polling question, please let us know what industry you work in
MP TO PUT OUR STORY INTO PERSPECTIVE, LET ME TAKE A MOMENT TO PROVIDE YOU A VERY BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE SHARP HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATION. SHARP IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT, FULLY INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM SERVING THE ENTIRE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO FOR OVER FIFTY YEARS.. And for our last polling question, please let us know what industry you work in
MP Start of many process improvement initiatives: Things need to be better, or improve But this critical step is often overlooked and leads to failure How many times have you been part of a process improvement initiative only to see all those efforts either: Result in improvement that is short lived Or drift to a state of marginal improvement This is because of our eagerness to get the work done without thinking of where we are and where we are going Would you start a long journey with no idea where you are and where you are headed?
MP How to determine where you are and where you are headed: Define where you are by: Looking at what the problems are, accept that you may not know the causes yet Determine how things will be measured, again accept that you may add to these measures Conduct baseline measures, this will later help you measure effectiveness Determine what success looks like by: Listening to the voice of the customer, what you want usually doesnt matter, what they want does Job seeker example GM example Defining what successful measures will be: Better time measures (be careful) Better cost measures (be careful) Better quality measures Better outcomes Anecdotal measures The definition of success may be partially defined by the driver for improvement For example, if your customers are saying quality is too low, you wouldnt necessarily focus on cost savings
MP Sustaining the gains/improvements are one of the areas that many projects fail: We all have examples from our experience of those projects that improve performance for a short time, but them everyone slowly returns to their old ways Early on or in some cases before starting the project, look at the tools that you have to make the improvement sustainable and review any infrastructure like policies and procedures that may need to be changed. If policies and procedures need to be changed, you will need to build into your plan the necessary steps based on your organization. Approvals from sr. leadership, committees, etc. Impact on other departments that utilize/are governed by the same policy/procedure Input and buy in from customers For example: if you are changing the service delivery model, you want input from those that receive the service Do you use audits? (how, what resources do you have, who would do it, what is the enforcement mechanism) Incentives? (what kind, how do you fund?) Watch for unintended consequences
MP It is impossible to improve any process that is not consistent from the Toyota Way Process improvement is difficult enough with one process, let alone 5 processes that are inconsistent and vary from person to person So ask your self, are your processes stable? If they are, then you can proceed with the initiative If they are not, this makes things very difficult How do you do a baseline measure? Are the variable processes the cause of the issue? Work to create one process and see what the impact is You may still be able to measure a baseline, but it would probably need to be something like customer satisfaction Also be prepared to accept that part of your processes/infrastructure may be hiding problems In Toyota Way one manufacturing process that hides problems is traditional batch manufacturing where a large supply of parts is made, but that has an unintended consequence of hiding inefficiencies in planning and production
MP Here are some examples of things within Recruiting that would potentially hide problems
MP Finally before starting: Assess if you have the resources necessary, this is another point of failure or at least delay for projects Identify other obstacles and proactively try to find a way to mitigate them Buy in from someone that is hard to convince Cooperation from another department Systems and processes that would not support change or need to be worked around
Many of the elements of Six Sigma and touched upon in The Toyota Way To be honest, I didnt read Toyota Way until after the Six Sigma Project was complete and realized that some of the concepts in the book were ones that we utilized and explored as part of our project
I have taken you through some of these earlier, specifically Defining and Control To Measuring on this slide I would add a baseline measure to establish a means by which to measure progress
Who functions at a Six Sigma level? Airplane industrythinking about landings. Six sigma focuses on reducing variability, it does not much matter where could be very useful in these businesses as well. 3 capabilityhistorical standard 4 capabilitycurrent standard 6 鰹 capabilitynew standard We must deliver every project, product, or service with the highest quality. In todays marketplace, good is no longer good enough. The experience of several world class companies which have dramatically improved quality levels using the Six Sigma method has demonstrated that: We can be much better if we take a rigorous approach to quality improvement. Six Sigma means: A 99.99966% probability that we will not pass on a defect to the customer.
March 2005 was as far back as I could go Were a big organization with a lot of moving parts, so obviously these improvements are the result of many initiatives, some of which were part of or resulted from six sigma, but some were independent or even beyond our control
MP
MP Applicant volume increases started small in July 2005 and kept growing stronger and stronger with some fluctuation
MP We started tracking applicants per posting because we recognized the number of postings declining and felt that this decline would eventually impact the volume of applicants, which is something that we may be seeing today.
MP For those of you outside of healthcare, Registry is something like a last minute temporary employee they come in to cover for a shorter period of time, usually for unplanned absences Having additional available staff and a strong internal temp pool can mitigate the need for external registry We also implemented an internal system that allows employees to bid on available shifts for coverage
MP Dramatic reduction in Registry Hours
MP The reason I did not share cost with you is the number was deceptive. The underlying structure of how we worked with Travelers changed completely since FY 2004 and the per hour rate increased dramatically as a result.
MP So getting to the focus of this presentations title, these are the results we have for quality of hire We measured quality of hire for the purpose of this presentation by comparing average merit increases for individuals hired on or after FY 2004 FY 2004- before the Six Sigma Project This slide reflects the percent increase in average merit increase since the FY 2004, not the actual increase to salary Quality of hire is the result of a process As you can see, Six Sigma is a great tool/methodology for reviewing and improving processes So look at where you are, and where you want to be: The D in DMAIC stands for Define, so define what a high quality hire is. Is it mgr satisfaction, performance, cultural integration, team integration, new hire satisfaction, is it multi-dimensional? What time frames are critical? Then decide if a Six Sigma process is what you need to make the improvements necessary. Look at the variability, determine what is driving it and fix it. Keep asking why throughout the process? The C in DMAIC stands for control and that is the true key- building a sustainable fix.
MP I feel that the non-measurable improvements are the true benefits and the measurements are the outcome of those improvements Being data driven, being more confident in moving forward with new technologies You have a comfort with data going in You have a comfort with data to evaluate efficacy
MP Communication improves relationships Armed with data and experience, we are more comfortable providing input to managers More comfortable innovating
MP Throughout the talent supply chain, more accountability Perfect- no Better- yes
MP My contact information is: [email_address] Also on LinkedIn and Twitter I also have a blog: socalrecruiting.wordpress.com