The document summarizes a study examining undergraduate psychology course offerings at 174 institutions in the Rocky Mountain region. The most commonly offered courses were Introductory/General Psychology, Social Psychology, and Abnormal Psychology. While some core courses remained the same as previous studies, there was also some regional variation in course availability. The findings suggest a need for consensus on core guidelines for undergraduate psychology curricula to help programs with curriculum decisions.
6. Background
?? Due to the growing need to assess
accountability efforts in institutions of
higher education, the American
Psychological Association (APA) has
provided assistance to psychology
programs by publishing a revision of t
Guidelines for the Undergraduate Maj
(APA, 2013).
?? Current best practices in higher educa
rely on setting clear expectations for
student learning, aligning curricula wi
these expectations, assessing student
attainment, and using assessment resu
7. Method
f
the
ajor
ation
ith
ults to
?? Course offerings at 174 institutions of higher educatio
?? Coding methods similar to Stoloff et al. (2005) and Pe
?? Two-year programs were excluded if they offered
?? Four-year programs were excluded if they did not
?? The courses were then collapsed into the 46 most com
Results
?? Surprisingly, there was a wide variety of courses offe
?? Along the different types of granting degree institutio
Introduction/ General Psychology, Developmental Ps
? Even though historically most of the offered courses h
8. n in the Rocky Mountain Region (Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Utah,
erlman and McCann (1998) were used to establish exclusionary criter
d no psychology courses.
t offer a formal psychology or behavioral science (with an emphasis i
mmon psychology courses as established by the APA (APA, 2014).
red in the Rocky Mountain Region at the 2-year college level
on studied, it has shown that most of their courses offered have remain
ychology-Lifespan.
have remained the same there are changes in their total frequency am
9. Colorado, Nevada, Arizona, and New Mexico) were examined.
ria as well as tabulate the courses.
in psychology) degree.
ned the same: Clinical / Counseling Psychology, Social Psychology,
mong all institutional levels
10. Discussion
?? The difficulties in the data mining
remain the same as reported by
Perlman (1999); that could imply
that the difficulties in creating a
broad consensus in course contents
and their place in the psychology
curriculum could be a field in itself
?? Considering that most of the courses
are offered at the 2 year college
level, it is necessary to review their
curricula more deeply.
?? In the field of psychology as a
,
11. effect changes that promote more effic
and effective student learning (APA,
2013).
?? Findings from the 1991 St. Mary¡¯s
conference indicated that undergradua
psychology students should have a str
foundation in psychology as well as a
broad base of knowledge in the natura
social sciences that expose them to the
diversity in the field. They should also
experience conducting research in ord
learn about the different methods used
explore human behavior and cognition
(Stoloff et al., 2005).
?? Current data are needed to allow
department chairs deans and faculty
12. cient
ate
rong
al and
e
o
der to
d to
n
to
Table 1
Amount of Institutions in Region Included by Institutio
Institution Type
Doctorate Granting Universities
Comprehensive Colleges and Universities
Baccalaureate College
Two-Year College
Tribal: Tribal Colleges
?? Even though historically most of the offered courses h
13. Ta
Ov
Ra
on Type
# in Region
# with ¦·
Program/Classes
% with ¦·
Program/Classes
21 20 16.4
20 17 13.9
27 17 13.9
83 65 53.3
12 3 2.5
have remained the same, there are changes in their total frequency am
14. able 3
verall Frequent Courses by Study
ank
Perlman &
McCann (1999)
Stoloff et al.
(2005)
Rocky Mountain
Area (2013)
1
Introductory
Psychology
Research Methods
Area
Introductory/
General
Psychology
2 Abnormal
Developmental
Area
Social Psycholo
3
Social
Psychology
Introductory Abnormal
mong all institutional levels.
15. whole, there is a general lack of
understanding of what is being
taught in each course nationwide, the
content of the curriculum on a
national level, and the courses being
offered nationally.
?? The difficulties experienced and
coding and the dramatic variation of
courses from institution to institution
may indicate that there is a need for
set of guidelines to help departments
and programs as they shape their
curriculum. These guidelines should
likely address consensus in the field
on what courses and skills are
critical for psychology students. In
addition there should be flexibility
n
gy
16. department chairs, deans, and faculty
evaluate the status of national curricul
and to assist them in curricular decisio
for their service areas, justifying and
defining new and existing positions, a
developing outcome and assessment
measures. (Perlman & McCann, 1999
Hypotheses
?? The same general courses or course are
should be represented as in previous
investigations with some allowance for
regional variation in interests.
?? Even though traditional core courses co
remain in the most frequent offered cou
17. to
la
ons
and
9).
Special Focus Institutions (Art/Business/Religion)
eas
ould
urses
Table 2
Most Frequent Offered Course / Area - Rocky Mounta
Doctoral
Granting
(N=20)
Com
RankCourses
Raw
Count
%
Ra
Cou
1
Introductory/General
Psychology
15 75% 15
2 Social Psychology 20 100% 18
3 Abnormal 17 85% 14
4
Personality Psychology/
17 85% 13
18. 11 0 0.0
Total 174 122 100
ain Region (2013)
mprehensive
(N=20)
Baccalaurate
(N=22)
2-Year
(N=82)
All Institutions
(N=144)
aw
unt
%
Raw
Count
%
Raw
Count
%
Raw
Count
%
5 75% 27 100% 70 85% 127 88%
8 90% 27 100% 41 50% 106 74%
4 70% 24 89% 40 49% 95 66%
3 65% 27 100% 21 26% 78 54%
20. Selected References
Future Directions
??Phase II will involve evaluation of
course offerings from Universities
Nationwide
??Phase III requires all data as compared to
the new APA 2013 core guidelines
??Possible evaluation of availability of
Capstone offerings across Universities
addition, there should be flexibility
and room for variation to address the
needs of the region and of faculty.
ory
ods
on/
gy/
21. remain in the most frequent offered cou
psychology, as professional hub betwee
disciplines, could be adapting to new
community and professional demands,
changing the relative weight that some
professional areas have in the education
curriculum.
?? With the recent re-emphasis on psychol
as a science and it¡¯s role as a hub scienc
(Cacioppo & Freberg, 2013), there may
more statistics and research methods co
offered.
View publication statsView publication stats
22. urses,
en
nal
logy
ce
y be
ourses
Personality Theory
5 Research Methods 18 90% 11
6 Statistics 17 85% 11
7
Cognitive Psychology/
Human Cognition/
Cognition
19 95% 15
8
Child Psychology/
Infancy and Childhood
Development
14 70% 8
9 Human Sexuality 12 60% 6
10
Special Topics/Survey of
Current Topics
19 95% 4
25. Selected References
American Psychological Association. (2013). 2014 Undergraduate Study
in Psychology: Curricula and Outcomes. Survey. American
Psychological Association.
American Psychological Association. (2013). APA Guidelines for the
Undergraduate Psychology Major V 2.0. . Retrieved
from http://www.apa.org/ed/precollege/undergrad/index.aspx
Cacioppo, J. T, & Freberg, L. A. (2013). Discovering Psychology: The
Science of Mind, Briefer Version (1st Ed.). Belmont, CA:
Wadsworth.
Perlman, B. & McCann, L. I. (1999). The Most Frequently Listed
Courses in the Undergraduate Psychology Curriculum. Teaching of
Psychology, 26:3, 177-182.
Stoloff, M., McCarthy, M., Keller, L., Varfolomeeva, V., Lynch, J.,
Makara, K., &¡Smiley, W. (2010). The Undergraduate Psychology
Major: An Examination of Structure and Sequence. Teaching of
Psychology, 37(1), 4-15.
ty
ent