際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
DEVELOPMENT FROM PRELIM
TO FULL PRODUCT (THRILLER)

        By: Eugenie MacDonald
PLANNING AND RESEARCH

 We researched are target audience for our thriller, because in the prelim we didnt have a specific
audience, therefore we needed to do some more research into what audiences normally watch thrillers.

 We found out that 18-35 year olds should be are target audience.

 For our thriller storyboard we did some research on it, because in our prelim we didnt think about
the structure properly and we made quick decisions. In the final film we knew it had to be a good story
otherwise there would be no improvement.

 We created a digital storyboard which presents what the film will be like. The storyboard was
detailed included shots types and camera angles that were going to use. Whereas as in the prelim we
didnt go into detail.
THE CAMERA WORK
     In our final film we included a lot more close ups because in the prelim we received feedback that
there was not enough close ups and it wasn't detailed enough therefore we decided to include close ups
in are final film.

     In the final film we also used tracking whilst the actress was on the way to her office however in the
prelim we didnt use any tracking this was because we didnt really know how to track safely.

 In the final film we also used panning from a distance to get shots of the scenery, however in the
prelim we tried to do panning, but we didnt do it with a tripod so it was very unsteady and shaky and it
didnt look very good. In the final film when we was panning, we used a tripod so it was much easier.
LIGHT COMPARISON
 As we filmed our final film outside and inside we used natural light at the start, where as in our
prelim we was in a classroom so we had to use the room light.

    The location where we filmed our thriller was in an office and there was around 5 light switches, so
we could have used some on and off to have some variation in the lighting, whereas in are prelim we
only had 2 lights so it would be either dark or very bright.
SOUND COMPARISON
 In our prelim we used music from YouTube and didnt create it ourselves
because we were not that confident with soundtrack pro and we ran out of time. We
decided to get a James Bond soundtrack from YouTube.
 We improved this in are final film by creating are own sounds with non diegetic
sounds and Foley sounds. We used soundtrack pro because we had learned to use it
properly. In conjunction with our footage we matched the scene or action with a
specific sound for e.g. the knock on doors, and the door opening and closing.
 Compared to are prelim we just used diegetic sound even though it was quiet,
this didnt really make are prelim very appealing.
EDITING SKILLS
 In our prelim it was pretty basic when it came down to editing, we just selected clips,
put them together edited the cuts, however we didnt use any cross cuts or match cuts
even though we tried to it was just a case of that we didnt have the right camera shots to
do it.
 In our final film we had loads of footage but as editing took place we it got cut down.
We used transitions from each scene and we also used cross cuts and match cuts. In this
editing process of our final film we used final cut pro which is the same software we
used in the prelim
 In the final film we went in to much more detail and included a range of transitions,
titles and also the sound.
M I S E E N S C E N E C O M PA R I S O N

   In the prelim our mise en scene wasnt really good as we were not organized and didnt have a proper location, we
    wanted a casino setting but instead we used a classroom. Also the costumes of the prelim were not good as we
    were just wearing normal casual clothes and not a suit or tux which you would expect normal poker players to be
    wearing.

   Compared to are final film we took a lot of consideration into our Mise en scene because we knew where we went
    wrong and this made it easier. In the final film we needed a good office so we managed to contact an owner of an
    office and use that for the day as we didnt want to use a college office as it was too small. The office we used was
    perfect.

   Also for costumes we improved a lot, we got the main character who was a detective to wear a suit which made
    her look like a detective instead of wearing normal clothe; we needed her too look well dressed.

   Final film props were also perfect as they were already in the office so we made it look as real as possible. The one
    problem we came across was in the the prelim and that is that the sunglasses we were using broke so we had to
    improvise and still use them but it didnt really look right. We didnt have any problems with props in the final
    film.
THE TITLES
 We researched the conventional orders of a typical thriller opening as we did not
include titles in are prelim. We done this by the use of You tube and teaching materials on
the Candi blog. We found the order and then included titles onto our final film.
 In the final film we used a narrative opening where the titles of the film come up
whilst the film is still being played, we decided to do this because it creates a flow to the
film as we didnt think stand alone titles would have this effect.
 When doing the titles for the final film we had to change the font size and colour, we
changed the font size because it didnt really stand out and we also had to change the
colour because at first it was blurred into the background and it was hard to see when
receiving are feedback.

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Question 7 evaluation
Question 7 evaluationQuestion 7 evaluation
Question 7 evaluation
hannahgrinham
Post production Diary-One/Two
Post production Diary-One/TwoPost production Diary-One/Two
Post production Diary-One/Two
Grace Crawford
Question 7
Question 7Question 7
Question 7
Amber2805
Evaluation question 1
Evaluation question 1 Evaluation question 1
Evaluation question 1
edengrace99
Question 2 evaluation
Question 2 evaluation Question 2 evaluation
Question 2 evaluation
Amber2805
Question 7 evaluation
Question 7 evaluationQuestion 7 evaluation
Question 7 evaluation
abbie605
Question 1 evaluation
Question 1 evaluationQuestion 1 evaluation
Question 1 evaluation
Amber2805
Nabila question 6 and 7
Nabila question 6 and 7Nabila question 6 and 7
Nabila question 6 and 7
AshraProduction
Evaluation Question One
Evaluation Question OneEvaluation Question One
Evaluation Question One
Frankie Knee
Evaluation question 7
Evaluation question 7Evaluation question 7
Evaluation question 7
jameshmedia
evaluation q7. genice john-lewis media
evaluation q7. genice john-lewis media evaluation q7. genice john-lewis media
evaluation q7. genice john-lewis media
genicejohnlewis
What have i learnt about technologies from the
What have i learnt about technologies from theWhat have i learnt about technologies from the
What have i learnt about technologies from the
Rebecca Durrington
Question 7
Question 7Question 7
Question 7
lorettapaterson1
Evaluation activity 7
Evaluation activity 7Evaluation activity 7
Evaluation activity 7
Priyash Ariyaratnam
Evaluation Activity 7
Evaluation Activity 7 Evaluation Activity 7
Evaluation Activity 7
Priyash Ariyaratnam
Evaluation of dave wallaces tutorial
Evaluation of dave wallaces tutorialEvaluation of dave wallaces tutorial
Evaluation of dave wallaces tutorial
Kayyah_Robun
Diary entry
Diary entryDiary entry
Diary entry
jessicaroseramplin
Sound journal
Sound journalSound journal
Sound journal
anandjiwade
Technologies Nabila
Technologies NabilaTechnologies Nabila
Technologies Nabila
AshraProduction
Improvements
ImprovementsImprovements
Improvements
sevcan1997
Question 7 evaluation
Question 7 evaluationQuestion 7 evaluation
Question 7 evaluation
hannahgrinham
Post production Diary-One/Two
Post production Diary-One/TwoPost production Diary-One/Two
Post production Diary-One/Two
Grace Crawford
Question 7
Question 7Question 7
Question 7
Amber2805
Evaluation question 1
Evaluation question 1 Evaluation question 1
Evaluation question 1
edengrace99
Question 2 evaluation
Question 2 evaluation Question 2 evaluation
Question 2 evaluation
Amber2805
Question 7 evaluation
Question 7 evaluationQuestion 7 evaluation
Question 7 evaluation
abbie605
Question 1 evaluation
Question 1 evaluationQuestion 1 evaluation
Question 1 evaluation
Amber2805
Nabila question 6 and 7
Nabila question 6 and 7Nabila question 6 and 7
Nabila question 6 and 7
AshraProduction
Evaluation Question One
Evaluation Question OneEvaluation Question One
Evaluation Question One
Frankie Knee
Evaluation question 7
Evaluation question 7Evaluation question 7
Evaluation question 7
jameshmedia
evaluation q7. genice john-lewis media
evaluation q7. genice john-lewis media evaluation q7. genice john-lewis media
evaluation q7. genice john-lewis media
genicejohnlewis
What have i learnt about technologies from the
What have i learnt about technologies from theWhat have i learnt about technologies from the
What have i learnt about technologies from the
Rebecca Durrington
Evaluation of dave wallaces tutorial
Evaluation of dave wallaces tutorialEvaluation of dave wallaces tutorial
Evaluation of dave wallaces tutorial
Kayyah_Robun
Sound journal
Sound journalSound journal
Sound journal
anandjiwade
Improvements
ImprovementsImprovements
Improvements
sevcan1997

Similar to Question 7 part 2 (20)

Prelim compare
Prelim comparePrelim compare
Prelim compare
Jordane Davis
Evaluation question 7
Evaluation question 7Evaluation question 7
Evaluation question 7
maxdellimayo
Jasmine Monk - Evaluation
Jasmine Monk - EvaluationJasmine Monk - Evaluation
Jasmine Monk - Evaluation
Sian Mapp
Jasmine Monk's Evaluation
Jasmine Monk's EvaluationJasmine Monk's Evaluation
Jasmine Monk's Evaluation
Sian Mapp
Evaluation: Question 7
Evaluation: Question 7Evaluation: Question 7
Evaluation: Question 7
katiekatiekatie
Question 7
Question 7Question 7
Question 7
mcgeoghann
Question 7
Question 7Question 7
Question 7
mcgeoghann
Question 7
Question 7Question 7
Question 7
mcgeoghann
Eq 7
Eq 7Eq 7
Eq 7
sole_kata
Question 7 evaluation
Question 7 evaluationQuestion 7 evaluation
Question 7 evaluation
hannahgrinham
Evaluation 7
Evaluation 7Evaluation 7
Evaluation 7
CCProductions
Progression Since Preliminary Task
Progression Since Preliminary TaskProgression Since Preliminary Task
Progression Since Preliminary Task
marrd005
Evaluationtask7
Evaluationtask7Evaluationtask7
Evaluationtask7
alex00112233
Quality summary
Quality summaryQuality summary
Quality summary
naylovesu
Question 7
Question 7Question 7
Question 7
AA60871
Media Evaluation
Media EvaluationMedia Evaluation
Media Evaluation
sazmobile
Preliminary task evaluation
Preliminary task evaluationPreliminary task evaluation
Preliminary task evaluation
CVSmediastudies
Presentation1
Presentation1Presentation1
Presentation1
ebunawo
Evaluation Q7
Evaluation Q7Evaluation Q7
Evaluation Q7
Cissnei
Evaluation of finished product
Evaluation of finished productEvaluation of finished product
Evaluation of finished product
Cissnei
Evaluation question 7
Evaluation question 7Evaluation question 7
Evaluation question 7
maxdellimayo
Jasmine Monk - Evaluation
Jasmine Monk - EvaluationJasmine Monk - Evaluation
Jasmine Monk - Evaluation
Sian Mapp
Jasmine Monk's Evaluation
Jasmine Monk's EvaluationJasmine Monk's Evaluation
Jasmine Monk's Evaluation
Sian Mapp
Evaluation: Question 7
Evaluation: Question 7Evaluation: Question 7
Evaluation: Question 7
katiekatiekatie
Question 7 evaluation
Question 7 evaluationQuestion 7 evaluation
Question 7 evaluation
hannahgrinham
Progression Since Preliminary Task
Progression Since Preliminary TaskProgression Since Preliminary Task
Progression Since Preliminary Task
marrd005
Evaluationtask7
Evaluationtask7Evaluationtask7
Evaluationtask7
alex00112233
Quality summary
Quality summaryQuality summary
Quality summary
naylovesu
Question 7
Question 7Question 7
Question 7
AA60871
Media Evaluation
Media EvaluationMedia Evaluation
Media Evaluation
sazmobile
Preliminary task evaluation
Preliminary task evaluationPreliminary task evaluation
Preliminary task evaluation
CVSmediastudies
Presentation1
Presentation1Presentation1
Presentation1
ebunawo
Evaluation Q7
Evaluation Q7Evaluation Q7
Evaluation Q7
Cissnei
Evaluation of finished product
Evaluation of finished productEvaluation of finished product
Evaluation of finished product
Cissnei

Question 7 part 2

  • 1. DEVELOPMENT FROM PRELIM TO FULL PRODUCT (THRILLER) By: Eugenie MacDonald
  • 2. PLANNING AND RESEARCH We researched are target audience for our thriller, because in the prelim we didnt have a specific audience, therefore we needed to do some more research into what audiences normally watch thrillers. We found out that 18-35 year olds should be are target audience. For our thriller storyboard we did some research on it, because in our prelim we didnt think about the structure properly and we made quick decisions. In the final film we knew it had to be a good story otherwise there would be no improvement. We created a digital storyboard which presents what the film will be like. The storyboard was detailed included shots types and camera angles that were going to use. Whereas as in the prelim we didnt go into detail.
  • 3. THE CAMERA WORK In our final film we included a lot more close ups because in the prelim we received feedback that there was not enough close ups and it wasn't detailed enough therefore we decided to include close ups in are final film. In the final film we also used tracking whilst the actress was on the way to her office however in the prelim we didnt use any tracking this was because we didnt really know how to track safely. In the final film we also used panning from a distance to get shots of the scenery, however in the prelim we tried to do panning, but we didnt do it with a tripod so it was very unsteady and shaky and it didnt look very good. In the final film when we was panning, we used a tripod so it was much easier.
  • 4. LIGHT COMPARISON As we filmed our final film outside and inside we used natural light at the start, where as in our prelim we was in a classroom so we had to use the room light. The location where we filmed our thriller was in an office and there was around 5 light switches, so we could have used some on and off to have some variation in the lighting, whereas in are prelim we only had 2 lights so it would be either dark or very bright.
  • 5. SOUND COMPARISON In our prelim we used music from YouTube and didnt create it ourselves because we were not that confident with soundtrack pro and we ran out of time. We decided to get a James Bond soundtrack from YouTube. We improved this in are final film by creating are own sounds with non diegetic sounds and Foley sounds. We used soundtrack pro because we had learned to use it properly. In conjunction with our footage we matched the scene or action with a specific sound for e.g. the knock on doors, and the door opening and closing. Compared to are prelim we just used diegetic sound even though it was quiet, this didnt really make are prelim very appealing.
  • 6. EDITING SKILLS In our prelim it was pretty basic when it came down to editing, we just selected clips, put them together edited the cuts, however we didnt use any cross cuts or match cuts even though we tried to it was just a case of that we didnt have the right camera shots to do it. In our final film we had loads of footage but as editing took place we it got cut down. We used transitions from each scene and we also used cross cuts and match cuts. In this editing process of our final film we used final cut pro which is the same software we used in the prelim In the final film we went in to much more detail and included a range of transitions, titles and also the sound.
  • 7. M I S E E N S C E N E C O M PA R I S O N In the prelim our mise en scene wasnt really good as we were not organized and didnt have a proper location, we wanted a casino setting but instead we used a classroom. Also the costumes of the prelim were not good as we were just wearing normal casual clothes and not a suit or tux which you would expect normal poker players to be wearing. Compared to are final film we took a lot of consideration into our Mise en scene because we knew where we went wrong and this made it easier. In the final film we needed a good office so we managed to contact an owner of an office and use that for the day as we didnt want to use a college office as it was too small. The office we used was perfect. Also for costumes we improved a lot, we got the main character who was a detective to wear a suit which made her look like a detective instead of wearing normal clothe; we needed her too look well dressed. Final film props were also perfect as they were already in the office so we made it look as real as possible. The one problem we came across was in the the prelim and that is that the sunglasses we were using broke so we had to improvise and still use them but it didnt really look right. We didnt have any problems with props in the final film.
  • 8. THE TITLES We researched the conventional orders of a typical thriller opening as we did not include titles in are prelim. We done this by the use of You tube and teaching materials on the Candi blog. We found the order and then included titles onto our final film. In the final film we used a narrative opening where the titles of the film come up whilst the film is still being played, we decided to do this because it creates a flow to the film as we didnt think stand alone titles would have this effect. When doing the titles for the final film we had to change the font size and colour, we changed the font size because it didnt really stand out and we also had to change the colour because at first it was blurred into the background and it was hard to see when receiving are feedback.