�ݺ�ߣ

1 Amanda Knox Innocent of Murder And Rape

This and the Government document what I sent is what happened. (She’s totally
innocent of murder and rape)

You have to understand that a girl on a 13 week student visa does not need to a kill a girl
when she goes home 13 weeks later.
Also when she went not guilty in court and Meredith Brother went on T.V and said they
were not into sex games .im sorry I didn’t believe this at all.

If she was there at the scene of the crime she wouldn’t admit it!!!! Of course not!!!! She
would say anything not to tell the truth!!!!

If she was at the scene of the crime, why would she (she gave the wrong guy ... and
didn’t admit being at the scene of the crime.)

Admit it, but not give the right guy, thereby protecting the real killer but (i.e. Rudy
Threatened Amanda)

Sacrificing her. This guy was there!!!! See other document Who posted this in December
2009 I’ve looked on face book but took the posts down after.But a person on face book
remembers him Sarah Snyder. Does.

You need to remember that he has threatened Amanda of course because he has pleaded
not guilty and kept saying it’s not me and Amanda has said nothing about him. Rudy is
trying to keep Amanda in jail and he wants to get out.

See he thought if she goes to jail for it. Then he can get out!!!! So he implicated her and
had a held over her!!!! That’s why she’s in jail and not once in the police statements has
she mentioned his name even though he killed Meredith.

This is what happened

Rudy went to the house at least once and met Miss Kercher and liked her.
. So he went around to the house and she let him in. for sex. She refused the sex he
threatened her with the knife Meredith struggled and fought with Rudy. Meredith was
screaming for Amanda and shouting to Amanda in her room. Rudy put the knife up to
Meredith and stabbed her in the neck and she ended up murdered while he was trying to
rape her.

He cut Amanda’s bra off Meredith because her clothes were being washed in the washing
machine. He then ransacked the room stole her money and broke the window.

He then closed the door and locked it and had her phones took the knife with him washed
his hands (He knew he couldn’t walk outside with blood on his hands everywhere) stood
on the bathroom mat obviously there must have been blood on his hands. He had to wash
his hands in the sink no matter what.

Andrew Greenwood F.D.S.c Computer Science University Of Science And technology


By this time Amanda was scared in her room with Raffaele She didn’t want to go out of
the room incase she thought she was next. She must have been living a nightmare herself.
I can imagine knowing that a person in the next room to you was being killed and there
was screams and what would a female do. It wouldn’t surprise me if she locked the door
and didn’t want to come out because she heard the screams.

Rudy entered Amanda’s room where the door could have been locked and she has opened
it again and left his footprint and possibly blood on the floor and threatened Amanda to
take the knife away and hide it in a safe place.

And probably threatened Amanda again told her that he wasn’t at the house or I will tell
the police that you were here at house if you blow the whistle on me!! He threatened
Amanda with the knife as well and told her not to say anything. Rudy left the house and
threw the phones away.

Which one of them was recovered later? The reason being Meredith’s phone went
missing means she must have had Rudy’s phone number in her phone and he was texting
her for sex so he threw it away.

When Amanda walked outside a neighbor said they hears two people going past there
window and heard the screams as well inside the house. This time she is now trapped and
has been seen because she was carrying the knife and couldn’t say anything.

She walked back to Raffaeles house with the knife where she stayed there the night. I
could imagine she didn’t want to come back to the house I don’t think I would either.

See you have to remember that this is a very scared girl with hearing screams in her room
And then he walks in and tells her to do something knowing that your friend has been
seriously hurt or murdered she would be scared. When she was interviewed by the police
she said this didn’t seem real to me and seemed like a dream.

She gave Patrick’s name out instead of Rudy’s because of what Rudy told her. She
couldn’t give Rudy’s name to the police. Even though she should have told them the truth
about what happened.

Rudy claimed that she wasn’t at the house because he knew that in court she would have
to contest the D.N.A and witness statements so it keeps her in prison and he gets out.

So she sacrificed herself and goes to jail for Rudy!!! He hoped he would get out
And she would still be in jail and used Amanda as an escape goat! So Rudy pleaded not
guilty and says it wasn’t me.

She wasn’t involved in the murder or rape!!! But she took the knife out of the house
(because she was threatened) so he’s had her over a barrel!!!! This makes her go to jail!!!
For something she didn’t do.



Rudy’s intentions were to just have sex with Meredith that’s all I don’t think he intended
to kill her probably just wanted the sex more than anything else he was sending text to
Kerckers phone for sex. They found the knife at Raffaeles house and was concluded with
Amanda’s Sweat on it and blood of Meredith’s D.N.A.

The D.N.A

http://www.dna.gov/basics/evidence_collection/identifying/

This is the link for the testing on a lab and the backlog of work they need to get through
which means cases must be rushed to get rid of the data and the cases that have built up
in the labs across the countries.

Ok the knife, the D.N.A on the knife lasts for four weeks to swab.
If somebody has cut there finger on the knife and rinses the knife the D.N.A is there and
will stay there no matter what. D.N.A testing can go back as far as 10,000 years in some
cases so how long could it go back with blood and a weapon.

If a killer has comes in and picked up that knife. And murdered with it then the two
people will find themselves in court probably, because it has two Profiles of D.N.A on
it .which would be swabbed and one is strong positive and the other week negative or
positive and positive depending on the testing.

The Sink

Amanda’s blood could of come from anything brushing her teeth nose bleed menstrual
problems cut finger in the bathroom even clipping toe nails and slipped or dug too deep
and blood came out and cleaned it in the sink used a cloth in the bathroom anything even
a cut lip or using a razor to shave her legs. But the knife was rinsed in the bathroom in
any case and Rudy had washed his hands in the bathroom which was Kerchers blood in
the sink. When they have tested for it has become positive for Meredith blood and
negative for Amanda’s blood means Amanda’s blood was more negative compared to
Meredith’s blood which means previously Amanda had blood in the sink from a previous
time.

He then went to use the other toilet in the shared house and walked through the hallway if
any blood has come from the bathroom and gone to the other bathroom what ever was
left over would have been from Rudy when he used the second bathroom he didn’t flush
the toilet properly and left his facieses in the toilet.

So Rudy has walked through from one bathroom to the other bathroom. The trial in the
lounge has come from Rudy when walking through, and to clean up blood from a tiled



floor it can still be swabbed and tested where ever the blood is. Also they can take it back
months probably and possibly years when testing for D.N.A.

The bathroom Mat

It is Rudy’s footprint it’s the same characteristics and profile of his foot print which I
compared together from the images and websites.
http://www.friendsofamanda.org/footprint.html under a microscope will probably say
this. I have looked at the images and compaired them all and it is Rudy’s footprint in the
bathroom where he has stood on the bathroom mat and rinsed the knife and the blood has
swilled around the sink. Saturday, August 14, 2010

The Bra

Meredith was wearing Amanda’s bra her clothes were being washed in the washing
machine and this is four girls sharing a house and clothes get mixed up in the laundry and
get left around and forgot and pick up clothes from each other and miss place them.
Leave them lying around. Meredith was wearing Amanda’s bra and Rudy cut it off.

See they found Raffaeles D.N.A on the bra which doesn’t suggest it was sex games
Meredith was wearing Amanda’s bra because Meredith’s clothes could have been washed
and for here to wear Amanda’s bra is very probably which would result in Raffaeles
D.N.A on the bra itself. Raffaeles and Amanda could have been playing and blood and
sweat on it with each others D.N.A on the bra. Then Amanda had washed it and Meredith
picked it up by accident.

Meredith probably picked up Amanda’s bra and wore it .Girls are terrible for sharing
clothes a lot of them do in the U.K its even worse when they are out in clubs and
partying. Swap clothes sometimes. I have seen students in England swapping shirts they
do at football matches at a lot of it with men as well. This is the 2010 not 1960s

The knife

When they have taken swabs from the knife it has come back with two profiles from the
knife. When the knife has been swabbed it’s come back positive and that means that the
knife has been tested and found two peoples blood on the knife. Yet again blood will stay
approximately on the weapon for about 4 weeks it could be longer or shorter I don’t have
the proper figures on this but my conclusion is its four weeks or around that figure.

That a mean if a person has cut there finger with the knife and rinses it the blood will still
be there and when swabbed again will say that it’s two or three peoples profiles. If a
killer has come in and picked up the knife and murdered with it then it will have the
victims profile on the knife along with the killers profile as well depending if there was
any argument with the knife i.e. a struggle and the victim defended themselves.



The blood was found on the knife which means Amanda could of slipped with it had a
distraction had an accident with the knife when preparing food slipped with the knife cut
her finger blood was dripping from the knife ran down the blade didn’t notice it had
happened rinses the knife under the tap and the D.N.A is still there she might of picked
up a broken glass off the floor when holding the knife cut her finger on the glass then
held the knife.

This is just common accidents in the home where her blood was taken from a knife. Put
the knife down left it for a few days Rudy picked up the knife and killed Meredith with it
and cleaned the knife and left two profiles of D.N.A on it and it happens. All it’s said
from forensics was there was blood on the knife which was tested at the handle and no
testing was done on the blade I think. Rudy would have used a decent sized knife for
cutting his cannabis up drug dealers tend to use a decent knife for this. Rudy has been
seeing with carrying knives in any case and his criminal convictions as well say all this.

I couldn’t understand why they don’t test on the blade. This again could be a conclusion
to mixed D.N.A where a second or third persons profile could be involved in this. And
yet again could possibly result in 1, 2, and 3, people being arrested or more even though
only one person did the murder.

Still doesn’t say that Amanda picked up the knife and killed Kercher with it. All it says
is that Amanda’s blood was found on the knife. Also the police found the knife at
Raffaeles house and what has happened between the times she has left with Raff from her
house and gone to Raffaeles house. Has she had the knife? In her pocket when carrying it
as well and slipped over and fell and cut her hand tripped up over the pavement when
going to raffs house cleaned the blade when she got to his house and didn’t wash it
properly.

Or has the police taken samples of blood from her when she was arrested and saliva and
hair as well searched the house and found the knife and implicated her to the knife and
lied as well about the blood on the knife its all possible.

DNA conclusion

The problem with D.N.A is the mixed contamination when it’s got two other peoples
profiles in it of maybe more. D.N.A is accurate to 98.9% on average. But when police do
a crime scene they tend to miss things and also they tend to misplace the contents and it
becomes very sloppy it’s not D.N.A itself it’s the people that use it.

The reason for this is there time and what they do is time consuming and with inside labs
when testing if they have 50 cases in it around a country they can miss parts and skim
areas where it needs more analysis. When profiling and doing things takes a lot of the
time up. When studying at university for degrees in there first year they have to sit on
average about 12 modules in there first year of study and maybe 10 in the second year
and the third year can be about 9 modules as well.



This is a picture of D.N.A testing comparing profiles.

So they have a lot of work to get through in the time they have. When doing there work
in the job is about the same. It takes up a lot of time and it can end up being sloppy work
and not accurate like D.N.A is supposed to be. So what happens is people get wrongful
convictions because parts of it get skimmed.

What’s happened with this case is it has been taken from profiles from one person and
matched the blood and tested it around areas and found the same profile of a person and
the killer has used the same sink area.

So when they have swabbed it and tested it they found 2 profiles and matched it up at the
lab. Where they said that a second person has used the sink and there is there blood inside
the sink. Bear in mind the testing for D.N.A blood could have been from a profile that
was 4 weeks previously.

Rudy has used the sink to rinse the knife and Amanda had blood on the sink which was
negative so that means previously she has used the sink but maybe cut herself or
something like that nose bleed or anything cut toe cut lip shaving legs with a razor
brushing her teeth and left traces of blood in the sink from a previous time.

All D.N.A said there was blood in the sink nothing else at all. So it’s had two profiles of
D.N.A of blood. It’s the same as a weapon or anything like that. D.N.A can be accurate
or it can be sloppy.

The text Messages

The text messages were sent on the 30th October 2007 to a phone where it was went to the
wrong cell phone address basically it’s just a Halloween prank mainly they went to
parties in any case. It doesn’t prove anything at all.



The prosecution

This was done terribly and Giuliano Mignini and Manuela Comodi fitted them up as a
crime of ritual sadistical cult. But as this prosecutor made it out to be a slaying which
didn’t happen in sex because they were students and thought that all students are all into
sex and mass orgies and things like that .I mean if Mignini is into that things then he
should practice it away from the courts and don’t involve people into things that didn’t
happen.

Amanda treated the Perugia as a holiday and wanted to go there have some fun and play
around a bit which there is nothing wrong with that.

But I have noticed that in this there is a problem of intercepted phone calls which is
illegal and shouldn’t be done unless consulted with a Judge first and had permission to do
this and a court order as well. Having evidence in court for this and allowing the details
to come out shouldn’t be allowed and it’s breaking privacy laws and peoples right.

If this is the case and they have used this and did not go for a court order for the taped
phone conversations that proves that the prosecution is corrupt and illegal and they
should be excluded from there job and also

See article

AMANDA KNOX TRIAL TESTIMONY, FRIDAY, JUNE 12, 2009.
AUDIO #10

LG: At this point I would like to ask the Court to listen to a telephone
call between Knox and Filomena Romanelli from the 5th. There's an audio.
Precisely giving some confirmation on this point. So if you authorize me, it
lasts about three minutes.

GCM: Please do. It's the one for which a transcription was requested?

LG: Exactly.

GCM: Please do. Is the telephone call in Italian? [Background noise] Go ahead.

LG: So, this is the telephone call that was intercepted on Nov 5th 2007,
starting at 22:29, and the first question that I will ask Amanda is: where
were you? Maybe it's better if -- do you remember where you were at 22:29?

AK: Twenty-two...wait...

LG: Ten twenty-nine, ten thirty.



AK: Which day?

LG: The 5th.

AK: On the 5th...umm...ten thirty...that would be around class time, so...

LG: No, in the evening.

AK: Oh, in the evening, oh, the evening! I was still at the house of these
neighbors.

[Telephone call audio: loud ringing or beeping]

FR: Hello?

AK: Ciao bella.

FR: Ciao bella, how are you? [very sweet, friendly voice]

AK: [Italian noticeably less good than now, slow, yet really not so bad, not
absolutely a beginner] Oh, fine. I had a good day, without police.

FR: Aah...

AK: But Raffaele received a "call" [in English]--

FR: From whom?

AK: From the police. So we umm just got here, to the Questura, for questioning.
But I have to wait outside. And...umm...umm...when he...

[LG cuts off the audio]

LG: I'm stopping it. Amanda, who were you talking to in this phone call?

AK: With Filomena.

LG: And where were you?

AK: At the Questura. I was near the elevator. Waiting for Raffaele.

LG: And the call came on the cell phone? [Strange question, it was Amanda
calling]

AK: Yes.



[LG restarts the audio]

FR: Finishes?

AK: That's right.

FR: So you're there again today.

AK: Yes.

FR: Madonna!

AK: I know. And I thought I wouldn't have to go [inaudible squeak but I'm
guessing she said "there today"]. And what did you do today?

FR: Me, today, I went to my office to get some information about our contract.

AK: Yes? And how is it?

FR: It's good, it's good. And then I called the agency.

AK: Mmm. And?

FR: And I have an appointment for tomorrow morning.

AK: Tomorrow morning?

FR: At 9:30. Yes. I'm going. Do you want to come?

AK: Um, I have to meet my mom at the station.

FR: Fine, fine.

[LG interrupts the audio]

LG: I'm stopping it for a moment to ask this question. How is it that you
were worried about the rental contract of the house? What was your worry
on November 5th?

AK: We had to clarify with the agency about the house, because when we paid
the rent, we were paying either the agency or the landlady, and what we
wanted to do is, we wanted to get out of this contract at the agency, to
find another house together.

LG: And who was taking care of these questions?



AK: It was mainly Filomena.

LG: I see.

[Restores telephone audio]

FR: Then let's -- [at this point she switches to English. Cute accent -- but
her English isn't really any better than Amanda's Italian! Literal
transcription.] We can do in this way, if you want. After that I get
in the agency office to talk about what we have to do...

AK: Yes?

FR: ...after I have to go to office to talk with my lawyer...

[A voice intervenes, perhaps the interpreter? LG stops the audio] Afterwards
she had to go to her office to see her lawyer. [Background murmuring.
Audio rewinds a bit and starts again, this time translated orally bit by
bit by the interpreter]

FR: ...about the problem of the home because he says that we have a problem.

AK: Yes?

FR: And if...if the agency says there are some problems with the rest of the...
rest of the...in legal ways [I think this is what she just tried to say but
it's hard to understand. The interpreter simply says "One can't understand
Romanelli's English very well" (!) At this point Filomena switches back to
Italian.] We're okay because it's all in our favor.

AK: Good.

FR: Then I'll go to work but if you want, we can see each other after and
you can tell me how it went.

AK: Yes, and you can meet my mom.

FR: Great!

AK: Good.

FR: Great! Then if she needs anything, we can see about it, okay?

AK: Yes, sure. Call me, okay?

FR: Okay, fine. Say hi to Raffaele.



AK: Okay.

FR: Take it easy, Amanda. Bye.

AK: Sure, of course. Oh, right now somebody wants to talk to me. Ciao bella.

FR: Ciao, ciao.

[End telephone audio]

The Psychology Report

They claimed that Amanda was living a double life where she is psychotic and narcastic.
I find this to be very untrue she doesn’t seem to be a person like that at all and I can’t see
this. She’s more wrapped up in security and doesn’t seem to trust people but tries to
avoid people in difficult situations. She seems to be more frightened more than anything
else and likes her friends because she feels safe around them.

The report based on the previous analysis was totally incorrect. They gave her a profile
of an assassin where I can’t see her hurting a fly at all. She seems very funny and likes to
have a laugh around people which is totally normal.

I can’t see where they got this from. You have to remember that she was there in Perugia
in Italy to have a holiday she’s a U.S citizen not from Italy so the reports would be false
in any case it wouldn’t be of a true person she is not a home in her own country and with
friends she knows or her family as well she is in Italy alone so it will be different it wont
be correct.

Final Conclusion

I find that Amanda Knox is totally innocent of Murder and Rape.

The only part she has done is where she has took the knife out of the house because of
what Rudy has done and has been threatened not to say anything about it.
I can’t see her doing this at all not to another girl who was her friend and got on pretty
well. They probably had a good relationship together and were close friends. I know that
Rudy had threatened Amanda 100% in total there is no doubt about that.

With Amanda hearing screams in her room and then he comes in she will do what ever
he says especially if there is dripping blood everywhere she would be scared no doubt at
it. Rudy was more concerned about Meredith but trapped Amanda.



When she does get out prison I can’t see her trusting anybody again and personally what
she has been through I can understand that totally. It’s a shame that a girl has been
wrongfully convicted in this matter and needs to be sorted out and released under time
served what ever she says in appeal court. The only conviction for her is perverting the
course of justice and she should be released due to the sentence she has served.

The police forensics did the investigation in 48 hours which was terrible the size of this
and the time scale is very sloppy and they must of rushed it and made a mess I don’t
know what country in the world does an investigation in 48 hours I cant find one at all
and this is a full murder investigation. That proves they must have skimmed areas and
missed parts and maybe they couldn’t be bothered to do it and just flawed it in total.
It’s a disgrace and a shambles to the Italian people and there Italian government.

References

http://www.dna.gov/basics/evidence_collection/identifying/

http://www.friendsofamanda.org/footprint.html luminol

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Meredith_Kercher Rudy’s convictions

http://web.me.com/j_phipps/Methods/Sep22009/Luminol%20Lab.pdf

Luminol testing is like blue light when it picks up traces of blood and shows the blood
where it’s not visible to human light. Typically, luminol only shows investigators that
there might be blood in an area, since other
Substances, including household bleach, can also cause the luminol to glow.

Andrew Greenwood F.D.S.c (Computer Science)


�ݺ�ߣ

Readthisone

More Related Content

Readthisone