際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Recruiting via Facebook: The
WORK4 Business Case
Pierre-Antoine Antonini 25/03/14
Strategic Analysis and
Recommandations
VARIOUS WAYS TO RECRUIT: The more you climb the job
ladder, the less available positions there are, the more
riskier recruitment is and the more expensive it is
C-足level	
 
Middle	
 
Management	
 
White	
 collar/Blue	
 
Collar	
 
Head-足hunter	
 
Internal	
 &	
 Networking	
 
	
 
Recrui>ng	
 agencies	
 
Social	
 Networks	
 
Job	
 boards	
 
Internal	
 &	
 Networking	
 
Small	
 ads	
 (press	
 and	
 
social	
 networks)	
 
Job	
 fairs
FACEBOOK AS A RECRUITING CHANNEL: "

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MIXED SIGNALS
ADVANTAGES
 DISADVANTAGES
RECRUITER
 ≒ Easy targeting
≒ Education
≒ Experience
≒ Pro鍖l
≒ Cultural 鍖t
≒ Widespread candidate basis
≒ Desktop
≒ Mobile
≒ Pro鍖les not always accurate
≒ FB not the place where you
talk about job activity
≒ Fake pro鍖les
≒ People browsing FB not always in
job mode state-of-mind
≒ Maybe not appropriate for high-end
pro鍖les
≒ Friends are peer and rarely
hierarchical竪 value of referrals?
CANDIDATE
 ≒ Access to company pro鍖les
≒ Closer and connect
through personal
network
≒ Know more about
company culture
≒ Pre-鍖lled pro鍖le
≒ Some users may not want to mix
private and professional life
≒ Mixed signal sent to candidates:
OK they are interested in my pro鍖le
but does that mean they will look at
all the LOLCats videos I posted?
WORK4 Labs product overview
≒ Capability	
 for	
 companies	
 to	
 build	
 their	
 recrui>ng	
 
site	
 and	
 promote	
 their	
 brand	
 Career	
 Page	
 
≒ Use	
 FB	
 ad	
 system	
 to	
 promote	
 your	
 brand	
 and	
 
available	
 posi>ons	
 to	
 matching	
 candidates	
 Ads	
 Solu>on	
 
≒ Browse	
 FB	
 users	
 鍖Nng	
 with	
 your	
 needs	
 
Recruiter	
 
Solu>on	
 
≒ Help	
 candidates	
 geNng	
 referred	
 by	
 their	
 friends	
 
on	
 FB,	
 Linkedin	
 and	
 TwiTer	
 Referral	
 Solu>on	
 
≒ Adapts	
 the	
 career	
 page	
 to	
 mobile	
 to	
 enable	
 mobile	
 
users	
 to	
 check	
 available	
 posi>ons	
 and	
 apply	
 
Mobile	
 Recrui>ng	
 
solu>on
Positioning: level of job/cost for recruiting
High-足end	
 job	
 posi>on	
 
Low-足end	
 job	
 posi>on	
 
Expensive	
 Cheap	
 
WORK4	
 
LINKEDIN	
 
MONSTER	
 
Headhunters	
 
Recrui>ng	
 Agencies	
 
Small	
 adds	
 
JOB	
 FAIRS	
 
Internal	
 
Networking
Business model
≒ Recrui>ng	
 
agencies	
 
≒ Schools	
 
	
 
	
 
≒ Career	
 site	
 
builder	
 on	
 
FB	
 
≒ Target	
 
candidates	
 
	
 
	
 
≒ Access	
 to	
 FB	
 
users	
 as	
 
poten>al	
 
candidates	
 
≒ Provide	
 a	
 
beTer	
 鍖t	
 of	
 
candidates	
 
	
 
	
 
≒ increase	
 ROI	
 
of	
 
recruitments	
 
≒ Companies	
 
with	
 low	
 
mainstream	
 
visibility	
 
≒ Small	
 
companies	
 
≒ FB	
 site	
 
≒ FB	
 ads	
 
≒ FB	
 
Framework	
 
≒ FB	
 ads	
 
≒ Hos>ng	
 costs	
 
≒ Campaign	
 fee	
 
≒ License	
 fee
LINKEDIN IS THE TOP PLAYER IN SOCIAL
NETWORKS RECRUITING
≒ Advantages
 Own their social network
 Pro鍖le are far more detailed and done on purpose
 Candidates can go through referred jobs/similar searches/similar
applications
 Trusted network for companies and applicants
 Can be used both for networking and job applications
 Cheaper than Monster ( 139.95 for a 30-day posting compared
to 630)
≒ Disadvantages
 Not targeting low-end jobs
≒ Recruiting agencies testimonial showing a growing trend:
Forget about Monster and other job boards, you should
de鍖nitely buy the Premium LinkedIn account
3 RECOMMANDATIONS
≒ Following the positioning grid, the cheap service (in cash or
time) for high-end jobs is not really addressed
 I am not sure FB is the right place, would need more time to
study FB users pro鍖le
≒ For immediate action, I would recommend:
 Have a W4US FB app for candidates to browse jobs 
≒ to incite them to 鍖ll their pro鍖le properly
 Have the ability for candidates to look for speci鍖c locations and
salary range
≒ I understand companies dont want to reveal all these data in the 鍖rst
place to get more applications but it is so annoying from an
applicants perspective)
 Facebook was built by replicating real-life social networks (most
of them were school networks)
≒ W4US should take advantage of all alumni groups on Facebook to
look for candidates and advertise
2 New Features proposal
≒ Ability to search for/target candidates who have
applied to similar positions at competition
 Companies are always interested by people working at
the competition
 If they can access people who have applied to
competition (anonymously), they know these pro鍖les
are currently looking for a job and might be interesting
candidates
≒ Ability to advertise in Alumni groups in FB:
 W4US contacts groups admins and can propose rev-
share, perks or just primary info on new jobs
 Audience in alumni is targeted, more prone to read and
trusting the content
THANK YOU!
If you want to discuss the topic, please contact
me at pierreantoine.antonini@gmail.com or
@pierreantoine

More Related Content

Recruiting via Facebook: The Work4 Business case

  • 1. Recruiting via Facebook: The WORK4 Business Case Pierre-Antoine Antonini 25/03/14 Strategic Analysis and Recommandations
  • 2. VARIOUS WAYS TO RECRUIT: The more you climb the job ladder, the less available positions there are, the more riskier recruitment is and the more expensive it is C-足level Middle Management White collar/Blue Collar Head-足hunter Internal & Networking Recrui>ng agencies Social Networks Job boards Internal & Networking Small ads (press and social networks) Job fairs
  • 3. FACEBOOK AS A RECRUITING CHANNEL: " MIXED SIGNALS ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES RECRUITER ≒ Easy targeting ≒ Education ≒ Experience ≒ Pro鍖l ≒ Cultural 鍖t ≒ Widespread candidate basis ≒ Desktop ≒ Mobile ≒ Pro鍖les not always accurate ≒ FB not the place where you talk about job activity ≒ Fake pro鍖les ≒ People browsing FB not always in job mode state-of-mind ≒ Maybe not appropriate for high-end pro鍖les ≒ Friends are peer and rarely hierarchical竪 value of referrals? CANDIDATE ≒ Access to company pro鍖les ≒ Closer and connect through personal network ≒ Know more about company culture ≒ Pre-鍖lled pro鍖le ≒ Some users may not want to mix private and professional life ≒ Mixed signal sent to candidates: OK they are interested in my pro鍖le but does that mean they will look at all the LOLCats videos I posted?
  • 4. WORK4 Labs product overview ≒ Capability for companies to build their recrui>ng site and promote their brand Career Page ≒ Use FB ad system to promote your brand and available posi>ons to matching candidates Ads Solu>on ≒ Browse FB users 鍖Nng with your needs Recruiter Solu>on ≒ Help candidates geNng referred by their friends on FB, Linkedin and TwiTer Referral Solu>on ≒ Adapts the career page to mobile to enable mobile users to check available posi>ons and apply Mobile Recrui>ng solu>on
  • 5. Positioning: level of job/cost for recruiting High-足end job posi>on Low-足end job posi>on Expensive Cheap WORK4 LINKEDIN MONSTER Headhunters Recrui>ng Agencies Small adds JOB FAIRS Internal Networking
  • 6. Business model ≒ Recrui>ng agencies ≒ Schools ≒ Career site builder on FB ≒ Target candidates ≒ Access to FB users as poten>al candidates ≒ Provide a beTer 鍖t of candidates ≒ increase ROI of recruitments ≒ Companies with low mainstream visibility ≒ Small companies ≒ FB site ≒ FB ads ≒ FB Framework ≒ FB ads ≒ Hos>ng costs ≒ Campaign fee ≒ License fee
  • 7. LINKEDIN IS THE TOP PLAYER IN SOCIAL NETWORKS RECRUITING ≒ Advantages Own their social network Pro鍖le are far more detailed and done on purpose Candidates can go through referred jobs/similar searches/similar applications Trusted network for companies and applicants Can be used both for networking and job applications Cheaper than Monster ( 139.95 for a 30-day posting compared to 630) ≒ Disadvantages Not targeting low-end jobs ≒ Recruiting agencies testimonial showing a growing trend: Forget about Monster and other job boards, you should de鍖nitely buy the Premium LinkedIn account
  • 8. 3 RECOMMANDATIONS ≒ Following the positioning grid, the cheap service (in cash or time) for high-end jobs is not really addressed I am not sure FB is the right place, would need more time to study FB users pro鍖le ≒ For immediate action, I would recommend: Have a W4US FB app for candidates to browse jobs ≒ to incite them to 鍖ll their pro鍖le properly Have the ability for candidates to look for speci鍖c locations and salary range ≒ I understand companies dont want to reveal all these data in the 鍖rst place to get more applications but it is so annoying from an applicants perspective) Facebook was built by replicating real-life social networks (most of them were school networks) ≒ W4US should take advantage of all alumni groups on Facebook to look for candidates and advertise
  • 9. 2 New Features proposal ≒ Ability to search for/target candidates who have applied to similar positions at competition Companies are always interested by people working at the competition If they can access people who have applied to competition (anonymously), they know these pro鍖les are currently looking for a job and might be interesting candidates ≒ Ability to advertise in Alumni groups in FB: W4US contacts groups admins and can propose rev- share, perks or just primary info on new jobs Audience in alumni is targeted, more prone to read and trusting the content
  • 10. THANK YOU! If you want to discuss the topic, please contact me at pierreantoine.antonini@gmail.com or @pierreantoine