The civic core is the part of the population that is responsible for a disproportionately large part
of civic participation. This paper shows how the level of activity and the composition of the civic
core have changed in the Netherlands between 1997 and 2009 using data from the Giving in the
Netherlands Survey. The results show that - despite ongoing secularization - the civic core in the
Netherlands is increasingly religious. At the same time, the prevalence of higher educated
individuals in the civic core has diminished. Engagement in charitable giving is increasingly
related to engagement in volunteering. In sum, the increasing concentration of activity in the
civic core is especially visible among religious persons and volunteers.
2. • Religious people do more of the total
giving and volunteering in the United
States, Canada, the Netherlands and
Flanders.
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 2
Capital
3. Religion in the Netherlands
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 3
Capital
4. Giving in the Netherlands
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 4
Capital
5. • Civic participation tends to be
concentrated among a small group that
does most of the giving and volunteering.
• Reed & Selbee (2001, NVSQ) call this
group the ‘civic core’.
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 5
Capital
6. • You can think of giving and volunteering
as a natural phenomenon with a certain
level of concentration.
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 6
Capital
7. Like firebugs.
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 7
Capital
8. • Firebugs tend to cling together.
• In my own front garden I find them
especially on dry and sunny places.
• Churches are like the sunny rocks in my
garden – a fertile environment for donors
and volunteers.
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 8
Capital
9. This is not what the bugs do.
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 9
Capital
10. They concentrate -
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 10
Capital
11. Into a core.
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 11
Capital
12. So, why?
• Why is religious affiliation and activity
associated with giving and volunteering?
• What is it in religion that makes people
care about society as a whole?
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 12
Capital
13. Popular dichotomies
• Conviction and community (Wuthnow,
1991)
• Intrinsic religious motivation (Cnaan et
al., 1993) vs. associational ties (Jackson et
al, 1995)
• Norms and networks (Ruiter & De Graaf,
2006)
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 13
Capital
14. Volunteering and Giving
• Volunteering and charitable giving are two
types of contributions to society
• They are both indicators of social capital,
governed by similar principles
• With Pamala Wiepking I recently
summarized the literature on charitable
giving in a review article for Voluntary
Sector Review (November 2011 issue).
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 14
Capital
16. • In this formulation, religion is viewed as
an external force that influences people.
• From religious communities, people ‘get’
their networks and convictions.
• Religious beliefs and prosocial values may
vary from person to person.
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 16
Capital
17. So, why?
• Why is religious affiliation and activity
associated with giving and volunteering?
• What is it in religion that makes people
care about society as a whole?
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 17
Capital
18. So, why?
• Why is religious affiliation and activity
associated with giving and volunteering?
• What is it in people that makes them care
about religion and society as a whole?
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 18
Capital
19. A stone in the pond…
• Going back to the firebugs, I wonder why
bugs like sunny rocks.
• Why do donors and volunteers love going
to church?
• Church attendance involves exposure to
requests for contributions.
• For those who dislike contributing and/or
being asked to do so, the church is not a
fun place to be.
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 19
Capital
20. Endogeneity
• Religion is increasingly a matter of choice.
• People with personalities and value
systems that conflict with the church in
which they were ‘born’ will leave.
• Social influence in religious communities
is also to some extent the influence group
members allow.
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 20
Capital
21. -
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 21
Capital
23. Back on track: so what?
• This talk is mainly about how the
concentration of giving and volunteering
among religious groups in the Netherlands
has changed over time.
• This is important because religion
disappears from Dutch society.
• Will giving and volunteering decline along
with secularization?
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 23
Capital
24. Not…
• …if those who are ‘left behind’ in churches
become more active citizens.
ïƒ this would lead to a higher level of
concentration of giving and volunteering
among the religious.
• …if another factor gains importance, such
as education – but I am saving that for
another occasion.
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 24
Capital
25. The data
• All the ‘Giving in the Netherlands’ survey
data that we have gathered biennially
since 1997. Total n=9,696.
• The data are treated as separate cross-
sections and then pooled into one file.
• Amounts are adjusted for inflation.
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 25
Capital
26. Total giving by religion
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 26
Capital
27. Religious giving
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 27
Capital
28. Secular giving by religion
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 28
Capital
29. Top quintile, 2009
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 29
Capital
30. Doing their share?
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 30
Capital
31. Growing inequality in secular
giving over time
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 31
Capital
32. Volunteer hours top quintile
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 32
Capital
33. Increasing concentration
Proportion of volunteers by total giving quintile
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 33
Capital
34. Amounts donated by non-
volunteers
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 34
Capital
35. Amounts donated by volunteers
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 35
Capital
36. Household giving: no-yes
Catholic 1.403*** 1.438***
Protestant 1.757*** 1.751***
Survey wave 1.116***
Catholic * wave 1.038***
Protestant * wave 0.985
Secondary education 1.166*** 1.191***
Tertiary education 1.618*** 1.673***
Secondary * wave 0.915***
Tertiary * wave 0.916***
Church attendance (4 categories) 1.180*** 1.182***
Attendance * wave 0.997
n 9,696 9,696
Odds ratios in logistic egression of household giving, also including age (model 1) and age * wave (model 2),
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 36
Capital
37. Amount donated in €
Catholic -109*** -111***
Protestant 216*** 215***
Survey wave 14***
Catholic * wave 7***
Protestant * wave 3
Secondary education 51*** 71***
Tertiary education 160*** 185***
Secondary * wave -17***
Tertiary * wave -21***
Church attendance (4 categories) 125*** 124***
Attendance * wave 2***
n 7,857 7,857
Odds ratios in logistic egression of household giving, also including age (model 1) and age * wave (model 2),
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 37
Capital
38. Volunteering: no-yes
Catholic 1.142** 1.146**
Protestant 1.723*** 1.709***
Survey wave 1.045***
Catholic * wave 0.999
Protestant * wave 1.025
Secondary education 1.190*** 1.245***
Tertiary education 1.613*** 1.695***
Secondary * wave 0.958***
Tertiary * wave 0.963***
Church attendance (4 categories) 1.333*** 1.326***
Attendance * wave 1.017***
n 9,030 9,030
Odds ratios in logistic egression of household giving, also including age (model 1) and age * wave (model 2),
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 38
Capital
39. Amount donated in € (logs, donors only)
Catholic -.063 -.097 -.098
Protestant .841*** .744*** .688***
Survey wave .111*** .106*** .085***
Secondary education .707*** .585*** .554***
Tertiary education 1.393*** 1.278*** 1.237***
Volunteering .389*** .235*** .159
Volunteering * wave .067*** .059*** .046***
Social responsibility .384*** .357***
Altruistic values .628*** .582***
Asked to volunteer .108* .058
Number of solicitations .214*** .161***
Requests * wave .015*
n 5,983 5,983 5,983
Odds ratios in OLS regressions of log of total amount donated, also including age , age * wave, education * wave, religion * wave
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 39
Capital
40. Secular amount donated in € (logs, donors only)
Catholic -.063 -.259*** -.296***
Protestant .283*** .098 -.064
Survey wave -.026*** .114*** .085***
Secondary education -.025 .585*** .522***
Tertiary education .554*** 1.278*** 1.304***
Volunteering .375*** .132
Volunteering * wave .054** .031
Social responsibility .357***
Altruistic values .643***
Asked to volunteer .057
Number of solicitations .165***
Requests * wave .018**
n 5,983 5,983 5,983
Odds ratios in OLS regressions of log of total amount donated, also including age , age * wave, education * wave, religion * wave
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 40
Capital
41. Additional results
• Concentration of giving among the elderly
is due to their stronger religiosity.
• No significant changes in relationships
with hours volunteered among volunteers.
• No changes in relationships of prosocial
values with giving.
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 41
Capital
42. Additional results
• Similar denominational differences in
helping behavior as in volunteering.
• Helping is positively related to
volunteering, both secular and religious.
• The relationship between secular
volunteering and church attendance has
become stronger over time.
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 42
Capital
43. Conclusions
• The civic core is increasingly religious.
• The civic core is becoming less highly
educated.
• The civic core becomes increasingly
concentrated: volunteering and giving
increasingly go together.
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 43
Capital
44. Concentrating from
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 44
Capital
45. To this core.
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 45
Capital
46. A grim future?
• How can we create new forms of cohesion
in society that bring people together?
• Creating opportunities to contribute time
and money in groups with positive norms:
sunny rocks
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 46
Capital
47. Something else
-
UCSIA Workshop Volunteering, Religion, and Social
December 8, 2011 47
Capital