Seismic Retrofit for Reinforced-concrete
& Steel structural buildings
Seismic strengthening of building
Equipped with base isolation and
or energy dissipation devices
Steel braces as part of the seismic retrofit of the Building
Design buildings to withstand explosions
-If the seismic design is based on the work of structural elements
Sulfides in the region and achieve plasticity and slow collapse
Cracks and not fragile and sudden as we have seen in earthquakes
-The design elements of the resistance of origin in the bombings -
In addition, based on the theory of relay payloads
The transition to the next element and stop the progress cracking
The collapse of neighboring elements
In any case cracked component or suddenly collapse on neighboring elements
To bear the full loads and resist the influence of the stress resulting from the exit
One of the elements of service
- Can be found in detail step by step -
On the theory and how to design a sentence construction to resist
Bombings and compared with the seismic design and similarities between them
Greetings
Wind engineering testing
In Wind Engineering, wind tunnel tests are used to measure the velocity around, and forces or pressures upon structures. Very tall buildings, buildings with unusual or complicated shapes (such as a tall building with a parabolic or a hyperbolic shape), cable suspension bridges or cable stayed bridges are analyzed in specialized atmospheric boundary layer wind tunnels. These feature a long upwind section to accurately represent the wind speed and turbulence profile acting on the structure. Wind tunnel tests provide the necessary design pressure measurements in use of the dynamic analysis and control of tall buildings
Thank U
push-over analysis technique
for performance-based design of building frameworks subject to earthquake loading.
The technique is based on the conventional displacement method of elastic analysis.
Through the use of a plasticity-factor that measures the degree of plasticization
the standard elastic and geometric stiffness matrices for frame elements (beams, columns, etc.)
are progressively modified to account for nonlinear elasticplastic behavior
under constant gravity loads and incrementally increasing lateral loads.
The behavior model accounts for material inelasticity due to both single and combined stress states, and provides the ability to monitor the progressive plasticization of frame elements and structural systems under increasing intensity of earthquake ground motion
for performance-based design of building frameworks subject to earthquake loading.
The technique is based on the conventional displacement method of elastic analysis.
Through the use of a plasticity-factor that measures the degree of plasticization
the standard elastic and geometric stiffness matrices for frame elements (beams,
columns, etc.)
are progressively modified to account for nonlinear elasticplastic behavior
under constant gravity loads and incrementally increasing lateral loads.
The behavior model accounts for material inelasticity due to both single and combined
stress states, and provides the ability to monitor the progressive plasticization of frame
elements and structural systems under increasing intensity of earthquake ground motion
- -惆惘悋愕悸 惠忰悸 悋悽愀悸 惠惴惘 惠愀惘 惆悽 悋愀悋惘悋惠 悋愆悖
悋惘忰悸 悋惘悸 悋 悋惆悸
- 惺 惓惡悋惠 悋慍 悋惠- 悋惠愃惘 悋惠惆惘悴 忰悋惠 悋慍慍悋悸 - 悋惡 悋惠愃惘悋惠 悋悋惠悋悋惠
惠愆 惠惷惺 悋悋惶 悋惆悸 悵 惡惺惆 悋悋惠悋悄 悋惠忰
惠惶 悋愀惺 惠愕忰 悋惺悋惶惘
push over愃惘 惺惠惆悸 悋惆悋惠 悋惠 悋忰悋惷惘
悋惺 悋 悴悋悄 悋惆 惠忰惆惆 惺 悋惶
惺惷 悋惆悋惠 忰惆惆惠 悋惺 悋惶 悋惆 惺 悋悋惺 愆悖
忰惓 惠愀惡 悋愆惠惘悋愀悋惠 悋愀惺 悋惠愆 惠愀惡悋惠 惠愆
悋惶 悋惆 悵 悋悖悋
-1悴惺 惘悋惠 悋悋愀悋惘悋惠 惺 悋 悋惘惠悋惺 悋惡悋悄 惺 悋愀惘悋 惺惆悸 悋惶
惡 悋惺悋惆 悋惘悸 忰悋 悋悒愀悋惘 悋悽悋惶 悋 惺慍
push-over analysis technique
for performance-based design of building frameworks subject to earthquake loading.
The technique is based on the conventional displacement method of elastic analysis.
Through the use of a plasticity-factor that measures the degree of plasticization
the standard elastic and geometric stiffness matrices for frame elements (beams, columns, etc.)
are progressively modified to account for nonlinear elasticplastic behavior
under constant gravity loads and incrementally increasing lateral loads.
The behavior model accounts for material inelasticity due to both single and combined stress states, and provides the ability to monitor the progressive plasticization of frame elements and structural systems under increasing intensity of earthquake ground motion
for performance-based design of building frameworks subject to earthquake loading.
The technique is based on the conventional displacement method of elastic analysis.
Through the use of a plasticity-factor that measures the degree of plasticization
the standard elastic and geometric stiffness matrices for frame elements (beams,
columns, etc.)
are progressively modified to account for nonlinear elasticplastic behavior
under constant gravity loads and incrementally increasing lateral loads.
The behavior model accounts for material inelasticity due to both single and combined
stress states, and provides the ability to monitor the progressive plasticization of frame
elements and structural systems under increasing intensity of earthquake ground motion
- -惆惘悋愕悸 惠忰悸 悋悽愀悸 惠惴惘 惠愀惘 惆悽 悋愀悋惘悋惠 悋愆悖
悋惘忰悸 悋惘悸 悋 悋惆悸
- 惺 惓惡悋惠 悋慍 悋惠- 悋惠愃惘 悋惠惆惘悴 忰悋惠 悋慍慍悋悸 - 悋惡 悋惠愃惘悋惠 悋悋惠悋悋惠
惠愆 惠惷惺 悋悋惶 悋惆悸 悵 惡惺惆 悋悋惠悋悄 悋惠忰
惠惶 悋愀惺 惠愕忰 悋惺悋惶惘
push over愃惘 惺惠惆悸 悋惆悋惠 悋惠 悋忰悋惷惘
悋惺 悋 悴悋悄 悋惆 惠忰惆惆 惺 悋惶
惺惷 悋惆悋惠 忰惆惆惠 悋惺 悋惶 悋惆 惺 悋悋惺 愆悖
忰惓 惠愀惡 悋愆惠惘悋愀悋惠 悋愀惺 悋惠愆 惠愀惡悋惠 惠愆
悋惶 悋惆 悵 悋悖悋
-1悴惺 惘悋惠 悋悋愀悋惘悋惠 惺 悋 悋惘惠悋惺 悋惡悋悄 惺 悋愀惘悋 惺惆悸 悋惶
惡 悋惺悋惆 悋惘悸 忰悋 悋悒愀悋惘 悋悽悋惶 悋 惺慍
Repairing and Strengthening of Concrete structures
1. REPAIR AND
STRENGTHENING OF
CONCRETE STRUCTURES
CES423 : Construction Engineering (2)
Submitted by:
Abdallah Shahen Mohamed ID:15P1003
Ahmed Bahaa El Din Aly ID:15P1012
Ahmed Essam Ali ID:15P1051
Islam Mohamed El Sayed ID:15P1023
Mohamed Karam Sayed ID:15P5002
Nael Hesham Ahmed ID:15P6015
Seif Ahmed Mohamed ID:15P1022
Youssed Ehab Salah ID:15P1041
Submitted to:
Dr. Amgad Talaat
Ain Shams University
Faculty of Engineering
Credit Hours Engineering Program
NOVEMBER 5, 2019
2. 1| P a g e
Table of Contents
Case Study (1).......................................................................................................................... 2
1.1.Introduction:.................................................................................................................. 2
1.2.Description of structure:............................................................................................... 2
1.3.Preview on Nature:........................................................................................................ 2
1.4.Conclusion and Recommendations:............................................................................. 4
1.5.Introduction:.................................................................................................................. 6
1.6.Description of structure:............................................................................................... 6
1.7.Preview on Nature:........................................................................................................ 6
1.8.Conclusion and Recommendations:............................................................................. 6
1.9.General Conclusion:...................................................................................................... 6
1.10. General Recommendations: ...................................................................................... 7
Case Study (2).......................................................................................................................... 9
2.1.Introduction:.................................................................................................................. 9
2.2.Virtual Previews:......................................................................................................... 10
2.3.Survey Results: ............................................................................................................ 11
2.4.Conclusion and Recommendations:........................................................................... 13
2.4.1. Conclusion:........................................................................................................... 13
2.4.2. Recommendations: .............................................................................................. 13
Case Study (3)........................................................................................................................ 15
3.1.Introduction:................................................................................................................ 15
3.2.Distress Observed:....................................................................................................... 15
3.3.Repair of Cracks in Masonary walls: ........................................................................ 16
3.4.Repair and Strengthening of RCC Columns ,Beams and Slabs: ............................ 17
3.5.Strengthen of Masonary Columns:............................................................................ 18
3.6. External Wall Plastering and Protective Coating: .................................................. 18
15. 14| P a g e
10.悋悽惘愕悋 悋 悋惡悋 惡 悋悋惶 悋忰惆 惡 惆惆 愆惡 惷惺 惠
.悋愕惡 惡惺惘惷
11.忰 悋愀惡 忰悋悧愀 悋愕忰悸 悋悽惘愕悋悸 悖惺惠悋惡 惺 悴惡悋3惠惘
惡愕20惡惠愕忰 悋忰悋悧愀 惺惘惷 愕124悋悋惠 85./
12.忰悋 惡愕 悋忰悋惘悸 愀惡悸 惺 惠2.愕
16. 15| P a g e
Case Study (3)
IndiaNehru Memorial College
:Introduction.3.1
A survey was conducted by Canada Mortgage and Housing
Corporation in the city of Toronto to develop a better
understanding of the condition of existing high-rise buildings in
order to determine the more cost-effective repair methods. The
survey indicated that the average cost/unit for repairs over 10
years was approximately four lakh rupees for all work, excluding
regular maintenance items such as interior finishes. This amount is
equal approximately to one month's rent per year. It was found out
that water penetration and air leakage through the building
envelope was the main cause which resulted in structural and
other damage. The condition in other metro cities will be more or
less similar and cost will be even higher in costal cities associated
with severe environmental distresses. Repair materials and
methodology will be similar for any type of concrete structures
either a low or a high-rise building. To study the distress and its
repair methodology, an Institution building in a costal
environment which was repaired and rehabilitated was selected as
a case study.
3.2.Distress Observed:
Since the building was very old and located in a marine climate,
the water leakages and reinforcement corrosion were major issues.
There were leakages in the roof and water seepage through the
external walls. The walls were made of laterite stone block
masonry. The pointings of the stone masonry were disintegrated
and water was leaking through these joints. There were spalling of
plaster, cracks in the masonry walls and also cracks in the ceilings
of the RCC roof. The water seepages and leakages led to growth
of fungus and mosses on the walls and the ceilings.
17. 16| P a g e
The corrosion of reinforcement led to spalling of concrete. There
were cracks in the RCC ceilings and columns.
Spalled plaster, fungus growth in walls Cracks in the ceiling and masonry wall
Fungal growth in ceilings Corrosion and spalling of concrete in
columns
3.3.Repair of Cracks in Masonary walls:
There were some cracks in the masonry walls. At those locations
the plastering was chipped of and cutting of V-grooves were made
along the length of the crack by chiseling. The cleaning was made
by a high pressure water jet. A wire mesh was fixed along the
cracks after which the cracks were repaired with medium
structural grade repair mortar.
18. 17| P a g e
Repair and Strengthening of RCC Columns.3.4
:Beams and Slabs,
The reinforcements in the most of the columns were corroded.
There was complete loss of cover concrete in some columns. The
following steps were taken:
Distress and spalled concrete portions were identified and
marked for repair and restoration.
Reinforcements were exposed by chiseling properly with light
weight hammer and chisel.
The exposed reinforcements were properly cleaned by wire
brushed and entire concrete and steel surface were washed with
potable water.
Thereafter the reinforcements were applied with a rust remover
and rubbed with gunny sacks, wiped properly and washed with
high pressure water jet to wash out the traces of any residues.
Then the same reinforcements were applied with anti-corrosive
epoxy zinc primer to prevent further corrosion.
After that the distressed concrete portions were properly
applied with epoxy bonding agent for acting as an impervious
layer to restoration patch.
Finally a cementitious high structural grade repair material was
applied in mortar consistency to build the thickness of the cover
concrete as needed at site condition.
The ceiling surface of roof slab and beam were also repaired in
the similar manner.
19. 18| P a g e
3.5.Strengthen of Masonary Columns:
The masonry columns of the corridor needed to be repaired and
strengthened for carrying out additional loads. This was achieved
by providing steel jacketing to those masonry columns. The steel
jackets were made of 4-ISA 75x75x6 and braced with tie rod in a
zigzag way. The concreting was done with cementious high grade
structural repair mortar.
Strengthening of masonry columns by steel jacketing
3.6. External Wall Plastering and Protective Coating:
All the external wall plasters were loosened and debonded from
the masonry surface for which plastering was chipped out and
replastering was done. It was finished with cement mortar
admixed with polymer modified mortar and finally protected with
an elastomeric acrylic coating.
Before repair After repair