The document contains results from an analysis of a residential building using ETABS software. It includes 14 tables that compare displacement, moment, shear, and other values with and without bracings for the building under linear static analysis along different soil zones. The tables are accompanied by graphs that show the variation of these values with the number of stories.
MATLAB Modeling of SPT and Grain Size Data in Producing Soil ProfilePsychjit Mmz
油
The study was carried out to find out a suitable numerical procedure for establishing a graphical presentation of the soil profile of a site using SPT values and grain size analysis data. MATLAB numerical tool was used for this purpose and the soil properties was estimated using established empirical correlations. A computer Software was developed where SPT values at borehole locations, percent of grain sizes, water table and GPS coordinates of the site were used as inputs, Rectangular grids in 2-D or 3-D space were created for interpolation or extrapolation of the gridded data in meshgrid format. The output yielded intermittent SPT profile and the contour plot matrix for subsoil soil condition of a site. The output soil-profile is presented by a 3-D shaded surface plot that would be useful for preliminary selection of a project site, land use planning, zoning ordinances, pre-disaster planning, capital investment planning,
Fifteen borehole data of SPT values and grain sizes along a 20 km stretch of ongoing Janjira approach road project of Padma multipurpose bridge in Madaripur district were used to verify the usability of the developed Software. Disturbed soil sample were collected up to depths of 19.5m depth in every 1.5m interval to perform grain size analysis test. Excel spreadsheet was used where more than 500 data including SPT-N values, percent sand and fines at depths, GPS coordinated, reduce level and ground water table. The soils at the site were predominantly alluvial deposits. All these data were used in MATLAB interactive environment for numerical computation, visualization, and programming. The purposes of the study were to find SPT contour profile and soil-profile of a particular alignment of the site and to extract borehole Log form SPT profile and soil-profile of a specific location of the alignment.
Outcome of this study can be used in microzonation studies, site response analysis, calculation of bearing capacity of subsoils in the region and producing a number of parameters which are empirically related to SPT values.
In this presentation, the nonlinear seismic behavior of three ordinary moment-resisting concrete space frames with unsymmetrical plan in three, four and five stories are evaluated. The three buildings were originally designed according to existing Iranian codes. Seismic loads are calculated and distributed over the height of the frame using both rectangular and triangular forms. It has been found that the obtained capacity curves have been affected greatly by the forms of loading. Results have been also produced in form of story drifts to establish the performance level of these buildings. The results show that all of the frames in both directions are within the life safety performance level.
This document presents a method for statically calibrating the boresight angles of mobile LiDAR systems. It involves collecting scan lines from different positions on a planar surface and estimating the boresight angles through least squares adjustment to minimize misalignment. The method was tested on a commercial MLS, producing repeatable results comparable to more complex dynamic calibration methods. It has advantages of simplicity and not requiring precise metrological equipment. Validation with a surveying instrument showed improved alignment when using the estimated angles over the manufacturer's values.
This document provides an introduction to spatial queries in SQL Server 2008. It discusses new spatial data types like geometry and geography, spatial references and operations, spatial indexes, and includes a case study on spatial queries for an estate agent. Some key points covered include how 80-90% of data has a spatial element; how to insert spatial data using methods like STGeomFromText; spatial operations like STIntersection and STIntersects; and using spatial queries to filter data by location, such as finding properties near railway stations.
The document discusses minimum spanning trees and two algorithms for finding them: Prim's algorithm and Kruskal's algorithm. Prim's algorithm works by growing a spanning tree from an initial node, always adding the lowest cost edge that connects to a node not yet in the tree. Kruskal's algorithm sorts the edges by cost and builds up a spanning tree by adding edges in order as long as they do not form cycles. Both algorithms find optimal minimum spanning trees for weighted, undirected graphs.
The document discusses two algorithms for finding minimum spanning trees: Prim's algorithm and Kruskal's algorithm. Prim's algorithm is similar to Dijkstra's algorithm for finding shortest paths. It works by gradually adding the closest vertex to the growing spanning tree. Kruskal's algorithm focuses on edges rather than vertices. It sorts the edges by weight and builds the spanning tree by adding the lowest weight edges that do not create cycles. Both algorithms find optimal minimum spanning trees for weighted and unweighted graphs.
SHAPE AND SIZES OF BRICK
First class bricks
Second class bricks
Third class bricks
Fourth class bricks
SIZE AND SHAPE
COLOUR
TEXTURE AND COMPACTNESS
HARDNESS AND SOUNDNESS
WATER ABSORBTION
CRUSHING STRENGTH
The document discusses an experimental investigation into producing cost-effective geopolymer bricks. Geopolymer bricks are made from fly ash or GGBS activated by an alkaline solution. The study will make geopolymer bricks using fly ash and GGBS with sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate activators. Tests will evaluate the compressive strength, water absorption, acid resistance, and efflorescence of the geopolymer bricks. The goal is to manufacture affordable, high-quality geopolymer bricks as an alternative to traditional clay bricks.
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF HIGH RISE BUILDING BY USING ETABSila vamsi krishna
油
RESULT OF ANALYSIS:
/ilavamsikrishna/results-of-etabs-on-high-rise-residential-buildings
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BUILDING BY USING STAAD PRO PPT link :
/ilavamsikrishna/analysis-and-design-of-mutistoried-residential-building-by-using-staad-pro
FOR FULL REPORT:
vamsiila@gmail.com
Calculating quantity of cement in m20 grade concreteila vamsi krishna
油
SOMETIMES WE NEED TO FILL CONCRETE OF CERTAIN CUBIC METER, BUT THE PROBLEM WE DONT KNOW HOW MUCH CEMENT,F.A,C.A, WE HAVE TO TAKE IN KGS.. THAT PROBLEM SOLVED HERE.!
This document discusses self-compacting concrete (SCC), which does not require vibration for compaction. It can be designed to have good filling ability, passing ability, and segregation resistance. The document outlines the objectives, specifications, advantages, applications, characteristics, and test methods for SCC. It also reviews literature on using fibers or fly ash to improve properties of hardened SCC and its alkaline resistance.
Planning and cost analysis of the commercial buildingila vamsi krishna
油
This document provides information about the planning and cost analysis of a commercial building project. It discusses the site planning process, building envelope design, architectural planning of spaces, and cost estimation. The project deals with planning and cost analysis of a 3-storey commercial building with different arrangements on each floor used for functions and marriages. It outlines considerations for site planning like zoning requirements, neighborhood character, and site conditions. It also covers types of building spaces like offices, conference rooms, and employee support areas.
Planning and cost analysis of the commercial buildingila vamsi krishna
油
The document discusses planning and cost analysis for a commercial building project. It describes using AutoCAD for planning the G+2 commercial building. It also discusses different estimation methods that can be used like the long wall-short wall method and center line method. The document provides details on types of estimates, requirements for estimates, quantity estimating methods, and rate analysis. The conclusion emphasizes that AutoCAD reduces time for planning and estimation and costing allows analyzing each building member and material.
Experimental investigation of ohns surface property and process parameter on ...ila vamsi krishna
油
This document discusses optimization of CNC milling operations. It investigates machining performance using different cutting speeds, feeds, and depths of cut with side and face milling cutters. Surface roughness was evaluated using Taguchi design of experiments and analysis of variance. The Taguchi method was used to formulate the experimental design and optimize milling parameters like speed, feed, and depth of cut. Analysis of variance and signal-to-noise ratios were used to study performance characteristics in milling operations.
1) The document outlines the preliminary design steps for a slab with inner dimensions of 4x3.6 meters.
2) In step 1, load calculations are performed to determine the factored load of 9 kN/m.
3) In step 2, design moments are calculated at supports and mid-spans along the short and long spans.
4) In step 3, the effective depth is checked and found to be sufficient at 42.56mm, so the total depth is set at 120mm.
Preliminary design of beam
before going to give properties to the structure in the staad pro preliminary design have to be done to find out the dimensions of beam
Priliminary design of column
before going to give properties to the structure in the staad pro preliminary design have to be done to find out the dimensions of column
The document provides steps to design a dog-legged staircase. It specifies dimensions for the room and staircase including a rise of 150mm and tread of 300mm. It then calculates the total rise, number of flights, and load on each flight. The maximum bending moment of 37.75 kN-m is calculated. The required depth of 116mm is less than the permitted 180mm. The main steel reinforcement is calculated to be 626.38mm2 using 12mm diameter bars spaced at 180mm. The transverse reinforcement is calculated to be 225mm2 using 8mm diameter bars at 200mm spacing.
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF G+4 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING contentsila vamsi krishna
油
This document outlines the process and methods used to analyze and design a multi-story residential building using STAAD Pro software. It includes chapters on software used, literature review of analysis methods, load calculations, design of building elements like beams, columns, slabs and footings. Load combinations are defined according to Indian standards. Material properties and design assumptions are provided. The document then describes the analysis and design of each building element and provides sample output diagrams from STAAD Pro.
analysis and design of mutistoried residential building by using staad pro
we considered g+4 residential building
ANYLYSIS AND DESIGN OF HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING BY USING ETABS
copy below Link to view presentation
/ilavamsikrishna/analysis-and-design-of-high-rise-building-by-using-etabs
vamsiila@gmail.com
This document outlines the terms and conditions for a rental agreement between John Doe and Jane Smith for the property located at 123 Main St. It specifies the monthly rental rate of $1,000 due on the 1st of each month, the security deposit of $500, and responsibilities of landlord and tenant for repairs and maintenance. The initial lease term is one year beginning January 1st.
The document outlines the key details of a home sale including the purchase price of $450,000, a closing date of June 15th, 2022, and that the buyer will pay for homeowners insurance and property taxes starting on the closing date while the seller will pay for these items prior to the closing date.
Papercrete is a building material made from recycled paper fiber, Portland cement, and soil. It has low density, good insulation properties, and moderate strength. While papercrete provides environmental and cost benefits, it lacks approval in building codes of most cities, limiting its use in load-bearing structures. More research is still needed to establish standardized production methods and assess long-term durability.
Indian Soil Classification System in Geotechnical EngineeringRajani Vyawahare
油
This PowerPoint presentation provides a comprehensive overview of the Indian Soil Classification System, widely used in geotechnical engineering for identifying and categorizing soils based on their properties. It covers essential aspects such as particle size distribution, sieve analysis, and Atterberg consistency limits, which play a crucial role in determining soil behavior for construction and foundation design. The presentation explains the classification of soil based on particle size, including gravel, sand, silt, and clay, and details the sieve analysis experiment used to determine grain size distribution. Additionally, it explores the Atterberg consistency limits, such as the liquid limit, plastic limit, and shrinkage limit, along with a plasticity chart to assess soil plasticity and its impact on engineering applications. Furthermore, it discusses the Indian Standard Soil Classification (IS 1498:1970) and its significance in construction, along with a comparison to the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). With detailed explanations, graphs, charts, and practical applications, this presentation serves as a valuable resource for students, civil engineers, and researchers in the field of geotechnical engineering.
Engineering at Lovely Professional University (LPU).pdfSona
油
LPUs engineering programs provide students with the skills and knowledge to excel in the rapidly evolving tech industry, ensuring a bright and successful future. With world-class infrastructure, top-tier placements, and global exposure, LPU stands as a premier destination for aspiring engineers.
SHAPE AND SIZES OF BRICK
First class bricks
Second class bricks
Third class bricks
Fourth class bricks
SIZE AND SHAPE
COLOUR
TEXTURE AND COMPACTNESS
HARDNESS AND SOUNDNESS
WATER ABSORBTION
CRUSHING STRENGTH
The document discusses an experimental investigation into producing cost-effective geopolymer bricks. Geopolymer bricks are made from fly ash or GGBS activated by an alkaline solution. The study will make geopolymer bricks using fly ash and GGBS with sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate activators. Tests will evaluate the compressive strength, water absorption, acid resistance, and efflorescence of the geopolymer bricks. The goal is to manufacture affordable, high-quality geopolymer bricks as an alternative to traditional clay bricks.
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF HIGH RISE BUILDING BY USING ETABSila vamsi krishna
油
RESULT OF ANALYSIS:
/ilavamsikrishna/results-of-etabs-on-high-rise-residential-buildings
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BUILDING BY USING STAAD PRO PPT link :
/ilavamsikrishna/analysis-and-design-of-mutistoried-residential-building-by-using-staad-pro
FOR FULL REPORT:
vamsiila@gmail.com
Calculating quantity of cement in m20 grade concreteila vamsi krishna
油
SOMETIMES WE NEED TO FILL CONCRETE OF CERTAIN CUBIC METER, BUT THE PROBLEM WE DONT KNOW HOW MUCH CEMENT,F.A,C.A, WE HAVE TO TAKE IN KGS.. THAT PROBLEM SOLVED HERE.!
This document discusses self-compacting concrete (SCC), which does not require vibration for compaction. It can be designed to have good filling ability, passing ability, and segregation resistance. The document outlines the objectives, specifications, advantages, applications, characteristics, and test methods for SCC. It also reviews literature on using fibers or fly ash to improve properties of hardened SCC and its alkaline resistance.
Planning and cost analysis of the commercial buildingila vamsi krishna
油
This document provides information about the planning and cost analysis of a commercial building project. It discusses the site planning process, building envelope design, architectural planning of spaces, and cost estimation. The project deals with planning and cost analysis of a 3-storey commercial building with different arrangements on each floor used for functions and marriages. It outlines considerations for site planning like zoning requirements, neighborhood character, and site conditions. It also covers types of building spaces like offices, conference rooms, and employee support areas.
Planning and cost analysis of the commercial buildingila vamsi krishna
油
The document discusses planning and cost analysis for a commercial building project. It describes using AutoCAD for planning the G+2 commercial building. It also discusses different estimation methods that can be used like the long wall-short wall method and center line method. The document provides details on types of estimates, requirements for estimates, quantity estimating methods, and rate analysis. The conclusion emphasizes that AutoCAD reduces time for planning and estimation and costing allows analyzing each building member and material.
Experimental investigation of ohns surface property and process parameter on ...ila vamsi krishna
油
This document discusses optimization of CNC milling operations. It investigates machining performance using different cutting speeds, feeds, and depths of cut with side and face milling cutters. Surface roughness was evaluated using Taguchi design of experiments and analysis of variance. The Taguchi method was used to formulate the experimental design and optimize milling parameters like speed, feed, and depth of cut. Analysis of variance and signal-to-noise ratios were used to study performance characteristics in milling operations.
1) The document outlines the preliminary design steps for a slab with inner dimensions of 4x3.6 meters.
2) In step 1, load calculations are performed to determine the factored load of 9 kN/m.
3) In step 2, design moments are calculated at supports and mid-spans along the short and long spans.
4) In step 3, the effective depth is checked and found to be sufficient at 42.56mm, so the total depth is set at 120mm.
Preliminary design of beam
before going to give properties to the structure in the staad pro preliminary design have to be done to find out the dimensions of beam
Priliminary design of column
before going to give properties to the structure in the staad pro preliminary design have to be done to find out the dimensions of column
The document provides steps to design a dog-legged staircase. It specifies dimensions for the room and staircase including a rise of 150mm and tread of 300mm. It then calculates the total rise, number of flights, and load on each flight. The maximum bending moment of 37.75 kN-m is calculated. The required depth of 116mm is less than the permitted 180mm. The main steel reinforcement is calculated to be 626.38mm2 using 12mm diameter bars spaced at 180mm. The transverse reinforcement is calculated to be 225mm2 using 8mm diameter bars at 200mm spacing.
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF G+4 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING contentsila vamsi krishna
油
This document outlines the process and methods used to analyze and design a multi-story residential building using STAAD Pro software. It includes chapters on software used, literature review of analysis methods, load calculations, design of building elements like beams, columns, slabs and footings. Load combinations are defined according to Indian standards. Material properties and design assumptions are provided. The document then describes the analysis and design of each building element and provides sample output diagrams from STAAD Pro.
analysis and design of mutistoried residential building by using staad pro
we considered g+4 residential building
ANYLYSIS AND DESIGN OF HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING BY USING ETABS
copy below Link to view presentation
/ilavamsikrishna/analysis-and-design-of-high-rise-building-by-using-etabs
vamsiila@gmail.com
This document outlines the terms and conditions for a rental agreement between John Doe and Jane Smith for the property located at 123 Main St. It specifies the monthly rental rate of $1,000 due on the 1st of each month, the security deposit of $500, and responsibilities of landlord and tenant for repairs and maintenance. The initial lease term is one year beginning January 1st.
The document outlines the key details of a home sale including the purchase price of $450,000, a closing date of June 15th, 2022, and that the buyer will pay for homeowners insurance and property taxes starting on the closing date while the seller will pay for these items prior to the closing date.
Papercrete is a building material made from recycled paper fiber, Portland cement, and soil. It has low density, good insulation properties, and moderate strength. While papercrete provides environmental and cost benefits, it lacks approval in building codes of most cities, limiting its use in load-bearing structures. More research is still needed to establish standardized production methods and assess long-term durability.
Indian Soil Classification System in Geotechnical EngineeringRajani Vyawahare
油
This PowerPoint presentation provides a comprehensive overview of the Indian Soil Classification System, widely used in geotechnical engineering for identifying and categorizing soils based on their properties. It covers essential aspects such as particle size distribution, sieve analysis, and Atterberg consistency limits, which play a crucial role in determining soil behavior for construction and foundation design. The presentation explains the classification of soil based on particle size, including gravel, sand, silt, and clay, and details the sieve analysis experiment used to determine grain size distribution. Additionally, it explores the Atterberg consistency limits, such as the liquid limit, plastic limit, and shrinkage limit, along with a plasticity chart to assess soil plasticity and its impact on engineering applications. Furthermore, it discusses the Indian Standard Soil Classification (IS 1498:1970) and its significance in construction, along with a comparison to the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). With detailed explanations, graphs, charts, and practical applications, this presentation serves as a valuable resource for students, civil engineers, and researchers in the field of geotechnical engineering.
Engineering at Lovely Professional University (LPU).pdfSona
油
LPUs engineering programs provide students with the skills and knowledge to excel in the rapidly evolving tech industry, ensuring a bright and successful future. With world-class infrastructure, top-tier placements, and global exposure, LPU stands as a premier destination for aspiring engineers.
Optimization of Cumulative Energy, Exergy Consumption and Environmental Life ...J. Agricultural Machinery
油
Optimal use of resources, including energy, is one of the most important principles in modern and sustainable agricultural systems. Exergy analysis and life cycle assessment were used to study the efficient use of inputs, energy consumption reduction, and various environmental effects in the corn production system in Lorestan province, Iran. The required data were collected from farmers in Lorestan province using random sampling. The Cobb-Douglas equation and data envelopment analysis were utilized for modeling and optimizing cumulative energy and exergy consumption (CEnC and CExC) and devising strategies to mitigate the environmental impacts of corn production. The Cobb-Douglas equation results revealed that electricity, diesel fuel, and N-fertilizer were the major contributors to CExC in the corn production system. According to the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) results, the average efficiency of all farms in terms of CExC was 94.7% in the CCR model and 97.8% in the BCC model. Furthermore, the results indicated that there was excessive consumption of inputs, particularly potassium and phosphate fertilizers. By adopting more suitable methods based on DEA of efficient farmers, it was possible to save 6.47, 10.42, 7.40, 13.32, 31.29, 3.25, and 6.78% in the exergy consumption of diesel fuel, electricity, machinery, chemical fertilizers, biocides, seeds, and irrigation, respectively.
Embedded System intro Embedded System intro.ppt23ucc580
油
Results of ETABS on HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
1. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING BY ETABS
RESULTS
ila vamsikrishna
2. RESULTS
Table 6.1 Comparative values of displacement in Linear static analysis along
zone-4, soil-1 with bracings & without bracings.
Displacement
No of stories with out bracings with bracing
15 20.1 10
14 19.1 9.2
13 17.8 8.3
12 16.2 7.4
11 14.5 6.5
10 12.8 5.6
9 11.4 4.8
8 10 3.9
7 8.6 3.1
6 7.2 2.4
5 5.8 1.7
4 4.4 1.2
3 3 0.7
2 1.8 0.3
1 0.6 0.1
Base 0 0
e-4Displacement vs no. of stories zon
25
soil-1 in linear static analysis
20
15
without brancing10
5
with brancings0
no of storys
Graph 6.1 Variation of displacement with bracings & without bracings
in linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil-1.
3. Table 6.2 Comparative values of displacement in Linear static analysis
along zone-4, soil-2 with bracings & without bracings.
DISPLACEMENT
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
No of stories with out with bracing
bracings
15 26.9 11.7
14 25.6 10.7
13 23.9 9.7
12 21.7 8.7
11 19.3 7.6
10 17.1 6.6
9 15.3 5.6
8 13.4 4.6
7 11.5 3.7
6 9.6 2.8
5 7.7 2.1
4 5.9 1.4
3 4.1 0.8
2 2.4 0.4
1 0.8 0.1
ZONE 4 SOIL 2 DISPLACEMENT
WITHOUT BRACINGS
15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
no of storys
Graph 6.2 Variation of displacement with bracings & without bracings in
linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil-2.
4. Table 6.3 Comparative values of displacement force in Linear static
analysis along zone-4, soil-3 with bracings & without bracings.
No of stories with out bracings with bracing
15 0.9 0.5
14 0.8 0.5
13 0.7 0.4
12 0.7 0.4
11 0.6 0.3
10 0.5 0.3
9 0.4 0.2
8 0.3 0.2
7 0.2 0.1
6 0.2 0.1
5 0.1 0.1
4 0.1 0.03972
3 0.04454 0.02325
2 0.01956 0.01259
1 0.004903 0.007983
DISPLACEMENT
ZONE IV SOIL III DISPLACEMENT
1
0.8
0.6
0.4 Without bracings
0.2
0
no of storys
Graph 6.3 Variation of displacement with bracings &
without bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 4
soil-3.
5. Table 6.4 Comparative values of moment in Linear static analysis
along zone-4, soil-1 with bracings & without bracings.
Moment
No of stories with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 -9.6867 -1.9812
13 -4.6195 -0.4492
12 -5.2753 -0.1853
11 -4.9834 -0.7851
10 -4.8566 -0.9563
9 -8.4895 -2.4698
8 -6.2533 -3.0398
7 -6.2962 -3.6656
6 -5.9413 -4.2256
5 -5.6314 -4.7436
4 -5.285 -5.2256
3 -4.9076 -5.5896
2 -4.4901 -6.451
1 -4.0027 -3.519
base -3.4739 0.7189
Moment Vs No of stories zone-4
soil-2 in linear static analysis
2
0
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1-2
-4
WITHO UT BRACING S-6
-8
-10
-12
No of stories
Graph 6.4 Variation of moment with bracings & without
bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil-1.
6. Table 6.5 Comparative values of moment in Linear static analysis
along zone-4, soil-2 with bracings & without bracings.
Moment
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 -9.6867 -1.9812
13 -4.6195 -0.4492
12 -5.2753 -0.1853
11 -4.9834 -0.7851
10 -4.8566 -0.9563
9 -8.4895 -2.4698
8 -6.2533 -3.0398
7 -6.2962 -3.6656
6 -5.9413 -4.2256
5 -5.6314 -4.7436
4 -5.285 -5.2256
3 -4.9076 -5.5896
2 -4.4901 -6.451
1 -4.0027 -3.519
base -3.4739 0.7189
Moment Vs No of stories zone-4
soil-2 in linear static analysis
5
0
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1 WITHO UT BRACING S-5
-10 WITH BRACINGS
-15
No of stories
Graph 6.5 Variation of moment with bracings & without
bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil-2.
7. Table 6.6 Comparative values of moment in Linear static analysis along
zone-4, soil-3 with bracings & without bracings.
No of stories with out bracings with bracing
15 -11.13 -2.69
14 -5.1 -0.34
13 -6.07 0
12 -5.7 -1.29
11 -5.5 -2.86
10 -5.41 -4.49
9 -5.23 -6.19
8 -5.04 -7.94
7 -4.85 -9.73
6 -4.63 -11.55
5 -4.41 -13.39
4 -4.16 -15.24
3 -3.89 -16.88
2 -3.56 -20.18
1 -3.3 -13.24
base 0 0
Moment Vs No of stories zone-4
soil-3 in linear static analysis
moment
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16-5
-10
Without bracings
-15
-20
-25
no storys
Graph 6.6 Variation of moment with bracings & without bracings in linear
static analysis along Zone 4 soil-3.
Page 63
8. Table 6.7 Comparative values of shear in Linear static analysis along
zone-4, soil-1 with bracings & without bracings.
Shear
10
8
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
No of stories with out bracings with bracing
15 6.7641 1.2852
14 4.4337 0.2581
13 4.7087 -0.1737
12 4.5499 -0.6491
11 4.2482 -0.8351
10 7.4024 -1.9522
9 6.1009 -2.3392
8 6.0096 -2.8787
7 5.6951 -3.3579
6 5.3915 -3.3115
5 5.0534 -4.213
4 4.6792 -4.6012
3 4.2678 -5.2421
2 3.7597 -3.7019
1 3.4445 -1.2694
Shear vs no.of stories zone-4 soil-1 in
linear static analysis
without brancing
with brancings
No. of stories
Graph 6.7 Variation of shear with bracings & without
bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil-1.
9. Table 6.8 Comparative values of shear in Linear static analysis along
zone-4, soil-2 with bracings & without bracings.
No of stories with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 -9.1318 -1.8833
13 -2.591 -0.499
12 -1.3023 -0.0444
11 0.9519 0.4473
10 2.2318 0.973
9 -2.1149 2.5452
8 1.7006 2.9942
7 2.8694 3.6494
6 4.1905 4.2123
5 5.3164 4.7453
4 6.3542 5.2658
3 7.3384 5.7469
2 8.3015 6.597
1 9.3418 5.6998
base 9.8725 -0.4907
SHEARFORCE
Shear vs no.of stories zone-4 soil-2 in
15 linear static analysis
10
5
WITHOUT BRACINGS0
-5 WITH BRACINGS
-10
-15
no of storys
Graph 6.8 Variation of shear with bracings & without bracings in linear
static analysis along Zone 4 soil-2.
10. Table 6.9 Comparative values of shear in Linear static analysis along
zone-4, soil-3 with bracings & without bracings.
SHEAR
No of stories with out bracings with bracing
15 0 2.37
14 0 1.41
13 0 0.91
12 0 0.29
11 0.51 0
10 2.26 0
9 3.79 0
8 5.09 0
7 6.2 0
6 7.14 0
5 7.95 0
4 8.66 0
3 9.31 0
2 9.91 0
1 10.73 0
base 9.592 0
Shear vs no.of stories zone-4 soil- in
linear static analysis
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Axis Title
Graph 6.9 Variation of shear with bracings & without
bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil-3.
11. Table 6.10 Comparative values of displacement in Linear static
analysis along zone-5, soil-1 with bracings & without bracings.
DISPLACEMENT
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 29.3 14.6
14 27.9 13.3
13 26 12.1
12 23.8 10.8
11 21.2 9.5
10 18.8 8.2
9 16.8 7
8 14.8 5.8
7 12.7 4.6
6 10.6 3.5
5 8.5 2.6
4 6.5 1.7
3 4.5 1
2 2.6 0.5
1 0.9 0.1
base 0 0
40
ZONE 5 SOIL 1 DISPLACEMENT
30
20
WITHO UT BRACING S
10
WITH BRACINGS
0
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1
Axis Title
Graph 6.10 Variation of displacement with bracings
& without bracings in linear static analysis along
Zone 5 soil -1.
12. Table 6.11 Comparative values of displacement in Linear static analysis
along zone-5, soil-2 with bracings & without bracings.
Displacementinmm
50
40
30
20
10
0
No of stories
With out bracings with bracing
15 38.6 17.6
14 36.9 16.1
13 34.5 14.6
12 31.5 13
11 28.2 11.5
10 25 9.9
9 22.4 8.4
8 19.7 7
7 17 5.6
6 14.2 4.3
5 11.4 3.1
4 8.7 2.1
3 6 1.2
2 3.5 0.6
1 1.2 0.1
Displacement Vs No of stories zone 5
soil 2 in Linear static analysis
WITHOUT BRACINGS
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1
No of stories
Graph 6.11 Variation of displacement with bracings &
without bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 5
soil-2.
13. Table 6.12 Comparative values of displacement in Linear static
analysis along zone-5, soil-3 with bracings & without bracings.
AxisTitle
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 49.9 24.6
14 48.5 22.9
13 46.7 21.2
12 44.5 19.3
11 41.9 17.4
10 39 15.4
9 35.8 13.4
8 32.4 11.4
7 29 9.5
6 25.4 7.7
5 21.8 5.9
4 18.1 4.3
3 14.6 2.9
2 11 1.7
1 7 0.7
base 49.9 24.6
Chart Title
without bracings
with bracings
Axis Title
Graph 6.12 Variation of displacement with bracings & without bracings
in linear static analysis along Zone 5 soil-3.
14. Table 6.13 Comparative values of moment in Linear static analysis
along zone-5, soil-1 with bracings & without bracings.
MOMENT
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 -9.1865 -1.9644
13 -4.7655 -0.4509
12 -5.3846 -0.142
11 -5.0931 -0.67
10 -4.9331 -0.7051
9 -8.4023 -1.747
8 -6.202 -2.1416
7 -6.2375 -2.538
6 -5.3823 -2.8962
5 -5.3719 -3.168
4 -5.226 -3.3336
3 -4.8501 -3.453
2 -4.4352 -3.9098
1 -3.9508 -1.5856
base -3.4218 -0.1273
ZONE 5 SOIL 1 MOMENT
0
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
Axis Title
Graph 6.13 Variation of moment with bracings &
without bracings in linear static analysis along Zone
5 soil-1.
15. Table 6.14 Comparative values of moment in Linear static analysis
along zone-5, soil-2 with bracings & without bracings.
Moment
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 -5.8044 -1.0423
13 -2.939 -0.1253
12 -3.2756 -0.1759
11 -3.0199 -0.4061
10 -3.1871 0.2429
9 -7.7804 -0.7219
8 -5.4959 -0.3023
7 -5.6468 -0.2393
6 -5.353 -0.2014
5 -5.1031 -0.2144
4 -4.8092 -0.2646
3 -4.4797 -0.3511
2 -4.1068 -0.4622
1 -3.6618 -0.6834
base -3.1569 -1.5996
Moment vs No of stories zone 5 soil 2
in Linear static analysis
2
0
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1-2
WITHO UT BRACING S-4
-6 WITH BRACINGS
-8
-10
No of stories
Graph 6.14 Variation of moment with bracings &
without bracings in linear static analysis along Zone
5 soil-2.
16. Table 6.15 Comparative values of moment in Linear static analysis
along zone-5, soil-3 with bracings & without bracings.
No of stories with out bracings with bracing
15 13.5198 3.8554
14 7.8516 1.5436
13 8.6153 1.1667
12 8.1314 0.8476
11 7.8828 0.6943
10 7.5748 0.6217
9 7.2371 0.6036
8 6.8607 0.6178
7 6.4424 0.6486
6 5.9777 0.6822
5 5.4597 0.7052
4 4.8885 0.701
3 4.2113 0.6468
2 3.5615 0.5201
1 1.9079 0.5001
base 1.10 0.40
15
10
MOMENT zone v soil 3
moment
5 without bracings
0
Axis Title
Graph 6.15 Variation of moment with bracings & without
bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 5 soil-3.
17. Table 6.16 Comparative values of shear in Linear static analysis along
zone-5, soil-1 with bracings & without bracings.
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 -9.1716 -1.8781
13 -2.3183 -0.4016
12 -0.7969 0.0956
11 1.6103 0.6154
10 3.2697 1.1171
9 -0.3312 2.6892
8 3.0915 3.0842
7 4.3397 3.6684
6 5.7204 4.1473
5 6.8856 4.5854
4 7.946 5.0022
3 8.9383 5.3836
2 9.8976 6.0753
1 10.9168 5.4342
base 11.4281 -1.2607
SHEARFORCE
ZONE 5 SOIL 1 SHEAR FORCE
15
10
5
0
WITH BRACINGS -5
-10
-15
Graph 6.16 Variation of shear with bracings & without bracings in linear
static analysis along Zone 5 soil-1.
18. Table 6.17 Comparative values of shear in Linear static analysis along
zone-5, soil-2 with bracings & without bracings.
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 -4.5576 -1.0252
13 2.0044 0.0909
12 4.3713 0.4713
11 7.4913 0.8633
10 9.2548 0.9423
9 4.719 1.8467
8 9.3709 2.2664
7 10.7151 2.7312
6 12.1956 3.0997
5 13.3722 3.4173
4 14.3853 3.7067
3 15.2777 3.9755
2 16.0966 4.4434
1 16.8864 4.3395
base 17.2417 -2.5484
Shearforce
Shear force Vs No of stories zone 5 soil
2 in linear static analysis
20
15
10
WITHO UT BRACING S5
0 WITH BRACINGS
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1-5
-10
No of stories
Graph 6.17 Variation of shear with bracings & without bracings in linear
static analysis along Zone 5 soil-2.
19. Table 6.18 Comparative values of shear in Linear static analysis along
zone-5, soil-3 with bracings & without bracings.
No of stories with out bracings with bracing
15 11.2601 0.8792
14 11.8459 -0.0293
13 14.6359 -0.4963
12 16.5594 -0.9986
11 18.1719 -1.4825
10 19.4341 -1.9626
9 20.3936 -2.4391
8 21.081 -2.913
7 21.529 -3.3844
6 21.7645 -3.8539
5 21.8338 -4.3175
4 21.634 -4.8005
3 21.6853 -5.1348
2 17.3676 -6.4345
1 23.8213 -1.9928
base 11.2601 0.8792
shear
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1-5
-10
Axis Title
without bracings
Graph 6.18 Variation of shear with bracings & without
bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 5 soil-3.
20. DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
Table 6.19 Comparative values of displacement in dynamic analysis
along zone-4, soil-1 with bracings & without bracings.
Displacement
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 99.9 46.1
14 96.1 42.4
13 91 38.6
12 84.5 34.6
11 76.9 30.7
10 69.6 26.7
9 63.3 22.8
8 56.6 19
7 49.5 15.3
6 42.1 11.9
5 34.4 8.7
4 26.6 5.9
3 18.7 3.5
2 11.1 1.6
1 3.6 0.3
dispalcement vs no. of stories zone-4
soil-1 in dynamic analysis
without bracings
with bracings
15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
No. of stories
Graph 6.19 Variation of displacement with bracings & without
bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil -1.
21. Table 6.20 Comparative values of displacement in dynamic analysis
along zone-4, soil-2 with bracings & without bracings.
Displacementinmm
150
100
50
0
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 136.5 52.6
14 131.2 48.4
13 124 44
12 114.9 39.5
11 104.3 35
10 94.1 30.5
9 85.7 26.1
8 76.6 21.7
7 67 17.5
6 57 13.6
5 46.5 9.9
4 35.9 6.7
3 25.4 4
2 15 1.8
1 4.9 0.4
base 3.21 0
Dispacement Vs No of stories zone-4
soil-2 in Dynamic analysis
WITHOUT BRACINGS
No of stories
Graph 6.20 Variation of displacement with bracings & without bracings
in linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil -1.
22. Table 6.21 Comparative values of displacement in dynamic analysis
along zone-4, soil-3 with bracings & without bracings.
DISPLACEMENT
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 117.2 0.001379
14 113.9 0.001284
13 109.7 0.001181
12 104.5 0.001075
11 98.3 0.000965
10 91.2 0.0008535
9 83.3 0.0007417
8 74.6 0.0006313
7 65.4 0.000524
6 55.6 0.0004216
5 45.5 0.0003262
4 35.1 0.0002395
3 24.8 0.000164
2 14.5 9.45E-05
1 4.7 3.41E-05
base 0 0
RESPONSE -- DISPLACEMENT
150
100
50
0
Axis Title
Series2
Graph 6.21 Variation of moment with bracings & without
bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil-1.
23. Table 6.22 Comparative values of moment in dynamic analysis along
zone-4, soil-1 with bracings & without bracings.
2
0
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 -9.2296 -1.9478
14 -4.8406 -0.3926
13 -5.4935 -0.3828
12 -5.2234 -1.0989
11 -5.0506 -1.226
10 -8.5803 -2.9796
9 -6.3566 -3.6886
8 -6.4109 -4.4411
7 -6.0657 -5.1335
6 -5.7627 -5.8286
5 -5.4208 -6.4226
4 -5.045 -6.9836
3 -4.6259 -8.1068
2 -4.1359 -4.6891
1 -3.6167 1.2645
base 0 0
moment vs no. of stories zone-4
soil-1 in dynamic analysis
Moment
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
No. of stories
without bracings
Graph 6.22 Variation of moment with bracings & without bracings in
linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil-1.
24. Table 6.23 Comparative values of displacement in dynamic analysis
along zone-4, soil-2 with bracings & without bracings.
Moment
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 1.1287 0.2799
13 2.0125 1.0728
12 3.0112 2.3594
11 4.1779 4.2441
10 5.2709 5.5117
9 6.3244 13.3267
8 7 16.7543
7 7.9663 21.2967
6 8.8516 26.0712
5 9.6189 31.0919
4 10.2299 36.3313
3 10.6398 41.2792
2 10.7991 49.4821
1 10.4012 36.0179
base 7.6687 16.1809
Moment Vs No of stories zone-4 soil-2
in Dynamic analysis
60
40
20 WITHOUT BRACINGS
0
No of stories
Graph 6.23 Variation of moment with bracings & without
bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil-2.
25. Table 6.24 Comparative values of moment in dynamic analysis along
zone-4, soil-3 with bracings & without bracings.
MOMENT
10
8
6
4
2
0
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 1.18 0.14
13 1.9 0.24
12 2.79 0.5
11 3.52 0.71
10 4.48 0.91
9 5.49 1.08
8 6.42 1.24
7 7.27 1.38
6 8.02 1.49
5 8.64 1.59
4 9.11 1.68
3 9.43 1.75
2 9.5 1.82
1 9.35 1.81
base 5.51 2.04
RESPONSE -- MOMENT
Series1
Graph 6.24 Variation of moment with bracings & without bracings in
linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil-3.
26. Table 6.25 Comparative values of shear in dynamic analysis along zone-
4, soil-1 with bracings & without bracings.
Shear
10
5
0
-5
-10
-15
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 -9.9128 -1.8878
14 -4.0191 -0.4966
13 -3.1903 -0.031
12 -1.444 0.5467
11 -0.5096 1.0272
10 -4.7948 2.4997
9 -1.5591 3.0007
8 -0.6183 3.6943
7 0.5067 4.3082
6 1.5021 4.8986
5 2.4555 5.4824
4 3.3978 6.0241
3 4.3525 6.9737
2 5.4299 5.9057
1 6.0021 0.0013
base 0 0
Shear vs no. of stories zone-4
soil-1 in dynamic analysis
with bracings
No. of stoires
Graph 6.25 Variation of shear with bracings & without bracings in linear
static analysis along Zone 4 soil-1
27. Table 6.26 Comparative values of shear in dynamic analysis along
zone-4, soil-2 with bracings & without bracings.
Shearforce
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 7.3502 0.0297
13 18.2769 0.915
12 27.0614 1.0159
11 36.2086 0.7824
10 46.4265 1.1774
9 51.0367 2.5777
8 62.7406 1.6643
7 69.8711 0.6867
6 76.4887 0.8095
5 81.9491 2.3872
4 86.3218 4.2268
3 89.5393 6.0502
2 91.5717 9.0784
1 92.0187 4.0008
base 91.295 14.5967
Shear force Vs No of stories zone-4 soil-
2 in Dynamic analysis
100
80
60
40
WITHOUT BRACING S20
0 WITH BRACINGS
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1
No of stories
Graph 6.26 Variation of shear with bracings & without
bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 4 soil-2.
28. Table 6.27 Comparative values of shear in dynamic analysis along zone-
4, soil-3 with bracings & without bracings.
SHEAR
No of storie s
with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 5.84 0
13 14.92 0.13
12 22.05 0.17
11 29.12 0.32
10 35.67 0.53
9 41.75 2.48
8 47.27 2.87
7 52.19 3.08
6 56.45 3.13
5 60.01 6.06
4 62.82 8.16
3 64.89 10.32
2 66.15 12.7
1 67.24 14.34
base 60.99 12.42
RESPONSE -- SHEAR
80
60
40
20
0
Series2
Graph 6.27 Variation of shear with bracings & without bracings in linear
static analysis along Zone 4 soil-3.
29. Table 6.28 Comparative values of displacement in dynamic analysis
along zone-5, soil-1 with bracings & without bracings.
Displacementinmm
No of storie s
with out bracings with bracing
15 149.8 69.2
14 144.1 63.6
13 136.4 57.8
12 126.7 51.9
11 115.4 46
10 104. 3 40.1
9 95 34.2
8 85 28.5
7 74.3 23
6 63.1 17.8
5 51.6 13
4 39.8 8.8
3 28.1 5.2
2 16.6 2.4
1 5.5 0.5
base 0 0
Displacement Vs No of stories zone-5
soil-1 in Dynamic analysis
200
150
100
WITHO UT BRACING S50
0
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1
No of stories
Graph 6.28 Variation of displacement with bracings &
without bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 5
soil -1.
30. Table 6.29 Comparative values of displacement in dynamic analysis
along zone-5, soil-2 with bracings & without bracings.
Displacementinmm
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 201.2 81.4
14 193.6 74.8
13 183.2 68
12 170.1 61.1
11 154.9 54.1
10 140 47.1
9 127.4 40.3
8 114.1 33.5
7 99.8 27.1
6 84.8 20.9
5 69.3 15.3
4 53.5 10.4
3 37.8 6.1
2 22.3 2.8
1 7.4 0.6
base 0 0
Displacement Vs No of stories zone 5
soil 2 in Dynamic analysis
300
200
100 WITHO UT BRACING S
0 15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1
No of stories
Graph 6.29 Variation of displacement with bracings & without bracings
in linear static analysis along Zone 5 soil -2.
31. Table 6.30 Comparative values of displacement in dynamic analysis
along zone-5, soil-3 with bracings & without bracings.
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 251.4 92.1
14 241.7 85.8
13 228.4 79.1
12 211.6 72.1
11 192.1 64.9
10 173.4 57.5
9 157.8 50.1
8 141.2 42.6
7 123.5 35.3
6 104.9 28.1
5 85.7 21.3
4 66.2 15
3 46.7 9.4
2 27.6 4.7
1 9.1 1.1
base 0 0
Displacementinmm
300 displacment zone 5 soil 3
250
200
150
WITHOUT BRACING S
100 WITH BRACINGS
50
0
15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
No of stories
Graph 6.30 Variation of displacement with bracings &
without bracings in linear static analysis along Zone 5
soil -3.
32. Table 6.31 Comparative values of moment in dynamic analysis along
zone-5, soil-1 with bracings & without bracings.
Moment
80
60
40
20
0
No of stories
with out bracings with
bracing
15 0 0
14 1.1132 0.4053
13 2.1162 1.5037
12 3.2219 3.2808
11 4.4944 5.9251
10 5.6232 7.3715
9 6.8659 17.5538
8 7.6419 22.0868
7 8.7015 28.0523
6 9.6865 34.3207
5 10.531 40.9086
4 11.2027 47.7811
3 11.6532 54.2693
2 11.828 65.0312
1 11.3927 47.3405
base 8.3976 21.2429
Moment Vs No of stories zone-5
soil-1 in Dynamic analysis
WITHOUT BRACINGS
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1
No of stories
Graph 6.31 Variation of moment with bracings &
without bracings in dynamic
analysis along Zone 5 soil-1.
33. Table 6.32 Comparative values of moment in dynamic analysis along
zone-5, soil-2 with bracings & without bracings
No of stories with out bracings with bracing
15 201.2 81.4
14 193.6 74.8
13 183.2 68
12 170.1 61.1
11 154.9 54.1
10 140 47.1
9 127.4 40.3
8 114.1 33.5
7 99.8 27.1
6 84.8 20.9
5 69.3 15.3
4 53.5 10.4
3 37.8 6.1
2 22.3 2.8
1 7.4 0.6
base 0 0
Displacementinmm
Displacement Vs No of stories zone 5
soil 2 in Dynamic analysis
300
200
100 WITHO UT BRACING S
0 WITH BRACINGS
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1
No of stories
Graph 6.32 Variation of displacement with bracings & without bracings
in dynamic analysis along Zone 5 soil-2.
34. Table 6.33 Comparative values of moment in dynamic analysis along
zone-5, soil-3 with bracings & without bracings.
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 4.2682 3.1126
14 3.4428 4.3699
13 3.5379 6.6909
12 3.4723 9.5912
11 3.3336 13.6734
10 5.6909 32.2662
9 5.1171 44.6132
8 5.002 52.0788
7 4.797 59.5223
6 4.567 66.9492
5 4.3112 66.9492
4 4.0175 72479
3 3.6868 80.9252
2 3.2423 54.7716
1 3.053 26.87
base 0 0
AxisTitle
Moment Vs No of stories zone-5
soil-
3 in Dynamic anlysis
100
50
0 WITH BRACINGS
Axis Title
Graph 6.33 Variation of moment with bracings & without bracings in
dynamic analysis along Zone 5 soil-3
35. Table 6.34 Comparative values of shear in dynamic analysis along
zone-5, soil-1 with bracings & without bracings.
Shearforce
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 8.3645 0.0867
13 20.4661 1.2753
12 30.2465 1.4233
11 40.3775 1.1146
10 51.8078 1.5615
9 56.9065 3.4099
8 69.6882 2.1683
7 77.5767 0.862
6 84.8861 1.0535
5 90.9206 3.1449
4 95.7518 5.5639
3 99.306 7.9572
2 101.5505 11.9296
1 102.041 5.2572
base 101.2421 19.1719
Shear force Vs No of stories zone-5
soil-1 in Dynamic analysis
150
100
50 WITHO UT BRACING S
0
WITH BRACINGS
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1
No of stories
Graph 6.34 Variation of shear with bracings & without
bracings in dynamic analysis along Zone 5 soil-1.
36. Table 6.35 Comparative values of shear in dynamic analysis along zone-
5, soil-2 with bracings & without bracings.
shearforce
No of storie s
with out bracings with bracing
15 0 0
14 12.4292 0.1101
13 28.7774 1.4619
12 41.9959 1.6045
11 55.8756 1.1974
10 71.9689 1.6646
9 78.1866 3.6586
8 96.289 2.1441
7 106.7411 0.5133
6 116.5427 1.7723
5 124.5559 4.3642
4 130.9119 7.3178
3 135.5039 10.2291
2 138.2943 15.0389
1 138.5338 7.0249
base 137.244 23.1543
Shear Vs No of stories zone 5 soil 2 in
Dynamic analysis
150
100
50 WITHO UT BRACING S
0
15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1
No of stories
Graph 6.35 Variation of shear with bracings & without
bracings in dynamic analysis along Zone 5 soil-2.
37. Table 6.36 Comparative values of shear in dynamic analysis along zone-
5, soil-3 with bracings & without bracings.
shearforce
25
20
15
10
5
0
No of stories
with out bracings with bracing
15 3.3322 0.1129
14 2.2076 3.1159
13 2.3818 4.1446
12 2.3125 4.406
11 2.2889 7.1143
10 4.864 13.8847
9 3.3806 13.6741
8 3.3586 13.4609
7 3.2102 12.74095
6 3.0645 106781
5 2.8954 8.2496
4 2.7044 5.46
3 2.4867 0.1416
2 2.2093 9.6931
1 2.0447 19.7242
base 1.108 17.1236
shear zone 5 soil 3 dynamic analysis
WITHOUT BRACINGS
No of stories
Graph 6.36 Variation of shear with bracings & without
bracings in dynamic analysis along Zone 5 soil-3.
38. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.37
Comparison v
soil 1 displacement
with bracings
zone 4
Without bracings
20.1 10
zone 5 29.3 14.6
soil 1 displacement
zone 4 zone 5
29.3
20.1
10 14.6
with bracings
Graph 6.37 Comp rison values of displacement in linear sta ic analysis
along zone 4 an zone 5 soil 1 with bracings and without bracing
39. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.38
Compari
soil 1 moment
Without bracings with bracings
zone 4
9.6867 1.9812
9.1865 1.9644
zone 5
of zone 4&5
9.1865
1.9812 1.9644
Graph 6.38 Compa ison values of moment in linear static
ana ysis along zone 4 and z ne 5 soil 1 with bracings and
without brac ng
40. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.39
Soil 1 shear
Without bracings with bracings
zone 4
6.7641 1.2852
9.1716 1.8781
zone 5
zone 4&5
9.1716
1.2852 1.8781
zone 5
Graph 6.39 Compar son values of shear in linear static
analysi along zone 4 and zon 5 soil 1 with bracings and
without bracin s
41. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.40
Co
soil 2 displacement
Without bracings with bracings
zone 4
26.9 11.7
201.2 81.4
zone 5
displacement in zone 4&5
201.2 81.4
11.7
Graph 6.40 Comp rison values of displacement in linea stat
c analysis along zone 4 an zone 5 soil 2 with bracings and
without bracing
42. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.41
Compari
soil 2 moment
Without bracings with bracings
zone 4
9.6867 1.9812
1.4863 0.4785
zone 5
zone 4 zone 5
1.4863 1.9812
0.4785
with bracings
Graph 6.41 Compa ison values of moment in linear static
ana ysis along zone 4 and z ne 5 soil 2 with bracings and
without brac ng
43. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.42 Compa
soil 2 shear
Without bracings with bracings
zone 4
9.1318 1.8833
12.4292 0.1101
zone 5
soil 2 shear comparision
9.1318 12.4292
1.8833 0.1101
Graph 6.42 Compar son values of shear in linear static
analysi along zone 4 and zon 5 soil 2 with bracings and
without bracin s
44. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.43
Comparison values
soil 3 displacement
Without bracings with bracings
zone 4
0.9 0.5
49.9 24.6
zone 5
zone 4 zone 5
49.9
24.6
0.5
Graph 6.43 Comp rison values of displacement in linear stat c analysis
along zone 4 an zone 5 soil 3 with bracings and without bracing
45. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.44 Compari
soil 3 moment
Without bracings with bracings
zone 4
11.13 2.69
13.5198 3.8554
zone 5
13.5198
2.69 3.8554
with bracings
Graph 6.44 Compa ison values of moment in linear static ana ysis along
zone 4 and z ne 5 soil 3 with bracings and without brac ng
46. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.45
Compa
soil 3 shear
Without bracings
0
11.2601 0.8792
soil 3 shear comparision
zone 4 zone 5
11.2601
0 2.37 0.8792
with bracings
Graph 6.45 Compar son values of shear in linear static analysi along
zone 4 and zon 5 soil 3 with bracings and without bracin s
47. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.46
soil 1 displac em nt
Without bracings with bracings
zone 4
99.9 46.1
149.8 69.2
zone 5
comparision
99.9
149.8
69.246.1
Graph 6.46 Compar son values of displacement in dynamic an lysis
along zone 4 and z ne 5 soil 1 with bracings and without bra ing
48. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.47
zone 4
zone 5
9.1865 9.2296
1.9644 1.9478
Graph 6.47 Compar son values of moment in dynamic analysi along
zone 4 and zon 5 soil 1 with bracings and without bracin s
49. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.48
r in dynamic
zone 4
zone 5
8.3645 9.9128
0.0867 1.8878
Graph 6.48 Comp rison values of shear in dynamic analysis long zone 4
and zon 5 soil 1 with bracings and without bracin s
Dr.K.V.S.R.I.T Knl
Page 105
50. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.49
zone 4
zone 5
comparision
201.2 136.5 81.4 52.6
withoutbracings with bracings
Graph 6.49 Compar son values of displacement in dynamic an lysis
along zone 4 and z ne 5 soil 2 with bracings and without brac ng
51. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.50
Compari
zone 4
zone 5
1.4863
zone 4 zone 5
1.1287 0.4785
0.2799
withoutbracings with bracings
Graph 6.50 Compa ison values of moment in dynamic analysi along
zone 4 and zon 5 soil 2 with bracings and without bracin s
52. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.51
Compari
zone 4
zone 5
zone 4 zone 5
7.3502
0.1101 0.0297
with bracings
Graph 6.51 Comp rison values of shear in dynamic analysis long zone 4
and zon 5 soil 2 with bracings and without bracin s
53. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.52
soil 3 displacement
Without bracings with bracings
zone 4
117.2 0.001379
251.4 92.1
zone 5
comparision
251.4
117.2 92.1 0.001379
Graph 6.52 Compar son values of displacement in dynamic an lysis
along zone 4 and z ne 5 soil 3 with bracings and without brac ng
54. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.53
Comparis
soil 3 moment
Without bracings with bracings
zone 4
1.18 0.14
4.2682 3.1126
zone 5
zone 4 zone 5
4.2682
3.1126
1.18
0.14
with bracings
Graph 6.53 Compar son values of moment in dynamic analysi along
zone 4 and zon 5 soil 3 with bracings and without bracin s
55. HIGH RISE
USING ETABS
Table 6.54 Compari
soil 3 shear
Without bracings with bracings
zone 4
5.84 0
3.3322 0.1129
zone 5
5.84
3.3322
0.1129 0
Graph 6.54 Comp rison values of shear in dynamic analysis long zone 4
and zon 5 soil 3 with bracings and without bracin s