ROBO VS HUMAN loupe article
1 like176 views
1) Robo-advisory firms have emerged as a new type of wealth management firm that leverage technology, algorithms, and client data to automatically allocate portfolios, challenging traditional human advisory models. 2) While automated responses may address common issues, human advisors can provide real-time, specific answers to individual questions. 3) Robo-advisors aim to create and manage client portfolios in an inexpensive, automated way but some argue traditional advisors can provide more personalized advice and support for major financial decisions.
More Related Content
What's hot (20)
Viewers also liked (12)
Similar to ROBO VS HUMAN loupe article (20)
ROBO VS HUMAN loupe article
- 1. Over the past few years, Robo-Advisory has emerged as a new breed of the wealth management firm. These firms are leveraging technology, client information, and algorithms to develop automated portfolio allocation to counter the human advisory business models. A Simple Question: If you had a problem or a goal in mind, would you want a series of checkboxes, questions, telephone prompts, or a real person to assist you? The automated response system may include perhaps a dozen issues and solutions based on algorithms, which are supposed to meet the needs of most people. However, a real person can give you real-time responses, specific to your questions when asked with accurate answers. The financial advising industry has been buzzing about the emergence of Robo-Advisors for the past few years as web-based advising companies, with the new technology stack most of these companies like the Vanguards, Wealth-front, bigdecision.com, etc. have either acquired or developed Robo advisory platforms. These online tools attempt to create and manage a clients portfolio in a fast and inexpensive way. Why and how did Robo-advisors come into existence? Historically, the problem with trying to get an FIA was many have minimum asset requirements of $500,000 or larger and it is not uncommon for FIAs to charge 1-2% annually (or greater via the loaded investment tools like Mutual funds entry and exit loads), hence, the return has to be 1-2% better than the market just to keep up. On the other hand, Robo-advisors manage portfolios automatically with their decisions driven by the algorithm. Most Robo-advisors include portfolio rebalancing and automatic asset re-allocation. Some would do the tax harvesting for you for a 0.5 percent annual fee, while some disruptive Robo- advisors may not charge you a penny. How do Robo-advisors do it differently? Let me try and explain using a simple example. Imagine you walked into a store to buy a pair of denims. You speak to the sales guy and mention the waist size and the fit. He gives you an option of a few types of denims from different companies, but the ultimate decision is yours, which one you want to buy; this is similar to human FIA, on the other hand you enter a store and based on your physical appearance and your choice (input) the computer takes out the best denim suitable for you, now that is Robo advisory. The Robo-advisory business model works on a concept of One Size that Fits Most of the People. The computer is learning every time based on the historical data, assets performance, your choices and the choices made by other individuals having similar risk appetite. The Robo-advisor changes the asset allocation automatically, where the investor does not have to make the asset allocation decision every time, and all that at very low fees when compared to the human FIA. ROBO vs. HUMAN ADVISORS CAPITALIZING TECHNOLOGY FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT Although, it is only the beginning of this new breed of wealth managers, the hybrid service model will likely become the new norm. Digitalization and the automated advice happens to be the tip of the iceberg, advancement of predictive analytics can evolve the Robo-advisory business model to take the center stage of technology disruption.
- 2. Typically, these types of accounts can be compared with the Managed accounts that FIA manages, wherein the FIA gets an amount from the investor, and the FIA takes the decision based on the market dynamics, the investment decision or asset allocation are completely based on the FIA experience. FIA may charge the end customers a standard fee 1-2% and a percentage of net profit of the portfolio. Does Robo-advisor suit everyone? Firms like Betterment.com focus on the end-goal and are ideal for the individuals who do not care or want to learn about the details of investing. For these people, the 35 basis points (or less) they pay is well worth the fee, and in many cases much better than hiring an FIAwith respect to both cost and sound financial advice. Although, there are a few obvious perks and benefits of the Robo-advisor model, there are undeniable advantages that human, financial advisors bring to their clients. The Gen X may feel comfortable using an online tool to manage their money; however, when it comes to taking major decisions involving larger some of money and longer commitments, they like to opt for a face-to-face financial advisor. Most of the Robo advisory platforms work on the Modern Portfolio Theory and the tools robo-advisors offer arent new. However, traditional financial advisors had the same tools available to them for years and could roll up a personalized asset allocation plan unique to you. How to choose a Robo-advisor for yourself or family and what are the things that you need to consider? Following are some of the parameters that you should consider while choosing a Robo-advisor and comparing it with the Human FIA: Minimum Deposit: With some firms you can start out with nothing and others require sizable amounts to start with. Annual Fees: Be aware of hidden costs, portfolio management fees, mutual fund entry/ exit loads, ULIP management fees, etc. Asset Allocation: Does it offer different products like Insurance, Mutual funds, Stocks油etc.? Account Type Support: 100% automated vs. human assisted advice Tax Optimization: Does it provide services like Tax-Loss Harvesting, Tax planning, reclaims油etc.? Retirement planning only or supports other short term goal based planning Managed by you in which they give trading advice, or directly by the firm Manage all your assets or just a portion Looking at the current capital markets and availability of Robo/RIA tools and the individual investors, the hybrid approach would be appropriate where the Robo-advisors take over the day- to-day portfolios asset allocation, and the humans take up building of a new wealth management portfolio for an investor. ** Abhinav Gupta Business Specialist Hyderabad