This document contains scores from roundtable discussions in an art history course at Mahidol University International College. The discussions centered around questions about whether visual art is only for the rich; if propaganda can be considered art; how the purpose of art has changed over time; and if street art affects the political situation in Thailand. Scores are provided under categories of research, content, visuals, and delivery, with total scores for each group ranging from 81 to 93 out of 100.
1 of 1
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Roundtable Scores
1. ICCU 202 Introduction to Eastern and Western Art
Mahidol University International College
Asst. Prof. Dale Konstanz
Scores for Roundtable Discussions
Is visual art only for the rich?
Taktai, Tarn, Soyoung, Tin
Research 28 / 30
Content 26 / 30
Visuals 18 / 20
Delivery 18 / 20
Total Score 90 / 100
Is propaganda art?
Tawan, New, Keaw, Gift
Research 25 / 30
Content 26 / 30
Visuals 27 / 20
Delivery 16 / 20
Total Score 84 / 100
Has the purpose of art changed over time?
Pingping, Jinny, Liew, Beam, Korn, Jun
Research 24 / 30
Content 25 / 30
Visuals 17 / 20
Delivery 15 / 20
Total Score 81 / 100
Does street art affect the political situation in Thailand?
Carrot, Ice, Claire, Che, Book, Logan
Research 28 / 30
Content 28 / 30
Visuals 18 / 20
Delivery 19 / 20
Total Score 93 / 100