Panel discussion on how the urban environment is evolving, implications for urban operations and how future force designs and capabilities must adapt.
1 of 21
More Related Content
RUSI Urban Warfare Conference Session 3 - David Kilcullen
1. Emerging patterns of
adversary urban ops
Insights from the NATO Urbanisation Program
David Kilcullen
02.2018
djk@cordillera-apps.com
2. Infrastructure &
Governance
under stress
The City as a System
Environmental Degradation
Poor Rural Infrastructure
Lack of Access to Energy
Poverty, hunger, disease
Rural Crime and conflict
Physical
Economic
Governmental
RAPID, UNPLANNED
URBANIZATION driven by:
URBAN POVERTY
CONFLICT prompted by: ABSENT GOVERNMENT
POLITICAL INSTABILITY
UNEMPLOYMENT
CRIME
RURAL
HINTERLAND
PERI-URBAN
ZONE
URBAN CORE
& CBD
TRANSITIONAL
ZONE
Emigration
Shipping
Offshore Extractives
Trade
Smuggling
Piracy
REMITTANCE
system
ILLICIT
activity
LICIT
activity
Diaspora
OFFSHORE
(INTERNATIONAL)
FLOWS
4. The environment for adversaries
Western air superiority, but limited weight of allied air power
and less capable local ground forces
Pervasive electronic surveillance but high traffic volumes
High degree of connectivity (cellphones, internet, social
media, gaming networks) enabling propaganda and C2
Pervasive smart handheld consumer electronics and
support platforms
Technological hugging of our systems (Google Earth, GPS)
Technical and mechanical skill among urban populations
8. Disruptive technology
If a commercial product goes through a generation every
two years, and the military cycle takes six years per
generation, then in twelve years the military product goes
from being four times as powerful as the competition to a
quarter as powerful
Technologies developed for phones fit well with the
requirements for small drones. Like phones, drones need
miniature cameras, GPS navigation, and data processing
power. Both share the same need for minimal size, weight,
and power. A drone is simply a smartphone with wings, and
the wings are the cheap part.
David Hambling, Swarm Troopers, 2015, p4
12. Emerging enemy approaches
1. Actions across the full breadth and depth of an urban/peri-urban/rural
nodal matrix (urban centre, belts, exurbs, satellite cities)
2. Leaderless resistance, no brain or HQacephalous swarms, remote or
stand-off control nodes, or one-way broadcast of operational guidance
3. Infestation of urban environment (embedded in physical structures,
hollow and interior spaces, and populations)
4. Large numbers of small multi-role platforms operating in a dynamic swarm
5. Modular organisations to lowest possible level (combat pairs)
6. Cooperative and remote engagement, through repurposing consumer
electronics and industrial capacity
7. Cyber-kinetic opscyber as an adjunct integrated manoeuvre space
8. Improvisable capabilities (eg 3D printing), technological hugging and high
latent technological capacity in the population
9. Diaspora linkages and retaliation options, manipulation of social
movements and public protests (incl. general strike)
10. No-go and no-see areas, control by interdiction, commuter insurgency,
tactical use of terror to shape adversary deployment
13. Tactics in the urban defence
Less focused on area defence of urban areas, more on actively
defending surrounding rural zones (belts)
Urban center may be economy of force, with main effort withheld and
stronger counterattack and QRF operating in belts
Little tendency to fight last stand defensive actions: area denial and
active (flexible) defence, mobile mesh or network defence
Likely to fade away in face of strong attack, then engage in rapid
counterattacks using stay-behind groups or multi-planar reinfiltration
Active patrollingfighting and recce patrols, raids, use of many small
actions to desensitize and shape defenders ahead of major strikes
River-borne and seaborne attacks, typically by night and in bad weather
15. Tactics in the urban attack
o Reflexive control: place the enemy in a cognitive box
o Use of terrorism to manipulate (fix) defender laydown
o Multiple small modular fighting groups
o Urban, peri-urban and rural networked cells support a
conventional manoeuvre force (underground, auxiliary,
guerrilla [partisan] and main force)
o Urban siege (raid and hold)
o Baited ambushes on relief force routes
o Sabotage/denial of sea/air points of entry
o House bombs, VBIEDs, drone IEDs, artificial bird strike
15
16. Months of logistic and guerrilla diplomacy preparation. Infil of small urban guerrilla cells
(5-15-man teams) to exurbs/outskirts from D-30. Exploitation of Eid festival. Three
converging columns simultaneously atk from multiple axes, guerrillas attack key objs
from rear. Focus on driving police and ANA to airport, then ambushing relief column.
17. Hybrid force modular tactical swarm
4-5 technicals, 6-8 dismounts per technical
Heavy weapon in fire support or AAA role
Fluid light cavalry tactics
2-3 precision indirect fire weapons
Captive drones & loitering munitions
Cyber capabilities embedded
Specialist IED, sniper, anti-armour teams
Networked, collaborative or autonomous modes
18. Urban insurgency & terrorism
Multi-path re-infiltration of previously cleared areas
Mobile IEDs repositioned by drone
Commuter insurgency, urban areas denied not defended
Anti-aircraft ambushes
Runway and harbour denial operations
Snipers, mortars in depth (keyhole shots, observers
forward or remotely located using Google
Earth/GPS/GLONASS)
Anti-tank kill teams working in on armour from flanks
Tunneling and placement of IEDs under buildings
The tunnel as a network (cf. ATN approach to IEDs)
Mounted counterattack in technicals against HQs
House bombs, SVBIEDs, IEDs in thick defensive clusters