This document discusses the role of professional risk in implementing industrial energy improvements. It begins with an introduction of the author and his background in energy management. It then discusses how industrial energy use accounts for a large portion of total energy consumption but also presents opportunities for cost savings. The document outlines several types of risks to energy improvement projects, including technical, accountability, measurement, investment, and management risks. It provides examples and considerations for each type of risk. The overall message is that energy improvements involve risks but also opportunities to lower costs if risks are properly addressed.
1 of 19
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Russell IETC 2014
1. THE ROLE OF PROFESSIONAL RISK
In Implementing Industrial Energy Improvements
Christopher Russell,
Principal
Energy PathFINDER .com
(443) 636-7746
2014
2. CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL
≒ Principal, Energy Pathfinder Management Consulting, LLC
≒ Visiting Fellow, American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy
≒ Energy Manager for Howard County, MD, 2010-2012
≒ Director of industrial programs, Alliance to Save Energy (1999-2006)
≒ Author: The Industrial Energy Harvest
≒ MBA, University of Maryland
≒ Master of Arts Urban Studies, University of Maryland
≒ B.A., McGill University
Connecting the dots between
energy choices and business success.
2息2014 Energy PathFINDER.com
3. The beginning of knowledge
is the discovery of
something we do not
understand.
-- Frank Herbert
1920-1986
Author of Dune
3息2014 Energy PathFINDER.com
4. Background: Industrial Energy
≒ One third of the US energy pie, 12.5% of GDP
≒ Efficient use offsets need for regional utility infrastructure
investment
≒ No energy, no production, no revenue
≒ Cost of doing business (tax deduction)
≒ Energy managers in the cost bulls-eye
≒ Spend money to save money?
4息2014 Energy PathFINDER.com
5. U.S. Department of Energy, Advanced Manufacturing Office). 2012. Manufacturing Energy and Carbon Footprint, NAICS
31-33). Washington, DC: DOE http://www1.eere.energy.gov/manufacturing/resources/footprints.html
5
8. Methodology
≒ Casual distillation of 80 interviews of industrial energy
practitioners & experts, 2012-14
≒ No hypothesis only a review of evident trends
8息2014 Energy PathFINDER.com
9. Opportunity is missed
by most people
because it is dressed in
overalls and looks like
work.
-- Thomas Alva Edison
1847 - 1931
American inventor and businessman
9息2014 Energy PathFINDER.com
10. Technical Risk
≒ Fugitive energy: destroys physical assets
≒ Real time energy data = pulse on operations
≒ Failure to M&V = accepting risk of failure
≒ Monetize energy + non-energy benefits
≒ No energy assessment? IAC database
10息2014 Energy PathFINDER.com
12. Accountability Risk
≒ Competing priorities: output comes first
≒ Invisibility: no performance metrics for energy
≒ Reluctance to change whats not broken
≒ Energy waste = small percent of expenses
≒ Delegation to unempowered staff.
≒ Bias for hardware over soft/human issues
≒ Energy choices: shaping cash flows for years, decades
≒ Energy manager: Inside or outside hire?
≒ Convert recommendations into implementations
≒ Map the decisions: coordinate with/support other agendas
12息2014 Energy PathFINDER.com
13. Measurement Risk
≒Quantify: energy savings, investment rates of
return, participation/support
≒Ill-chosen metrics? Failure to measure?
≒Good metrics:
≒ Easy to collect on an ongoing basis
≒ Easy to understand
≒ Link to staff accountabilities
≒Subject of regular management discussion?
13息2014 Energy PathFINDER.com
14. Investment Risk
≒ Profit = retained earnings = capital.
Capital has to go somewhere
Compare investment options?
≒ Common justification = short payback
≒ Benchmark = return on invested assets
14息2014 Energy PathFINDER.com
16. Management Risk
≒ Energy management: conceived in isolation
≒ Top management support? Yeah, but
≒ Sideways, incremental victories
≒ Departmental affinities, complementarities
≒ Departmental turf issues
≒ Budget stand-off?
≒ Monetize: cost, benefits, cost of doing nothing
≒ Document, communicate, celebrate
16息2014 Energy PathFINDER.com
17. Energy Management 竪 Change 竪 Risk & Reward?
17息2014 Energy PathFINDER.com
High
YIELD
BUSINESS PLAN:
PLAN-DO-CHECK-ACT
≒ Monetize energy position
≒ Document costs to do/not do
≒ Seek mutual affinities
SYSTEMATIC VALUE HARVESTING
COMPONENT APPROACH
≒ Driven by breakdowns, rebates
≒ Compete for capex
≒ Address symptoms, not root causes
FEAST OR FAMINE PROJECT HUNTING
Low
YIELD
EMPHASIZE BEHAVIOR,
PERSONAL CHOICE
≒ Authority? Moral suasion?
≒ Accountability? Burn out?
SPRAY & PRAY
DONT MANAGE ENERGY
≒ Minimal change, low hassle factor
≒ Absorb energy price, tech risk
DENY & DEFLECT
Low RISK High RISK
18. Change is not compulsory
[but then] neither is
survival.
-- W. Edwards Deming
1900 - 1993
American statistician, professor, author, lecturer and
consultant
18息2014 Energy PathFINDER.com