ºÝºÝߣ

ºÝºÝߣShare a Scribd company logo
SAFETY IN DESIGN
&
MULTI-CULTURAL TEAMS
SIA NATIONAL SAFETY CONVENTION
MELBOURNE, 2015
S E P 2 0 1 5
Pedram Danesh-Mand
Director – Risk Management
NSW President of Risk Engineering Society (RES)
THE CONTEXT
SAFETY IN DESIGN STAKEHOLDERS IN A GLOBAL OPERATION
Stakeholder model: adapted from Winch, 2010
With 40000 people, AMEC Foster Wheeler
currently operate in approximately 55 countries.
THE KEY CHALLENGES FOR A DIVERSE TEAM
• The structure of decision making
• Leadership choice of direct versus indirect communication
• Misinterpretation of information (including language barriers)
• Issues with hierarchy and authority (upwards, downwards and horizontally)
• Inconsistent approaches to Safety in Design (SiD)
THE KEY RECOMMENDATIONS
• Understand the key risks (previous page) and develop action plans
• Put a team together but not just for experience but also relevant knowledge
• Have leading indicators in the communication network
• SiD to be directly linked with design change management processes to ensure
ongoing assessment and management of emergent OHS risks, and
• Last but not the least, communicate, then communicate it differently and then
make sure you have communicated!
QUESTIONS?
Pedram Danesh-Mand | Director – Risk Management,
Aquenta Consulting (part of Amec Foster Wheeler)
P: +61 432 041 560
E: Pedram.DaneshMand@aquenta.com.au

More Related Content

Safety in Design & Multicultural Teams - National Safety Convention - PDM presentation

  • 1. SAFETY IN DESIGN & MULTI-CULTURAL TEAMS SIA NATIONAL SAFETY CONVENTION MELBOURNE, 2015 S E P 2 0 1 5 Pedram Danesh-Mand Director – Risk Management NSW President of Risk Engineering Society (RES)
  • 2. THE CONTEXT SAFETY IN DESIGN STAKEHOLDERS IN A GLOBAL OPERATION Stakeholder model: adapted from Winch, 2010 With 40000 people, AMEC Foster Wheeler currently operate in approximately 55 countries.
  • 3. THE KEY CHALLENGES FOR A DIVERSE TEAM • The structure of decision making • Leadership choice of direct versus indirect communication • Misinterpretation of information (including language barriers) • Issues with hierarchy and authority (upwards, downwards and horizontally) • Inconsistent approaches to Safety in Design (SiD)
  • 4. THE KEY RECOMMENDATIONS • Understand the key risks (previous page) and develop action plans • Put a team together but not just for experience but also relevant knowledge • Have leading indicators in the communication network • SiD to be directly linked with design change management processes to ensure ongoing assessment and management of emergent OHS risks, and • Last but not the least, communicate, then communicate it differently and then make sure you have communicated!
  • 5. QUESTIONS? Pedram Danesh-Mand | Director – Risk Management, Aquenta Consulting (part of Amec Foster Wheeler) P: +61 432 041 560 E: Pedram.DaneshMand@aquenta.com.au