際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Salivary antibodies as
  markers of recent acute
cryptosporidiosis in children
under the age of 5 in Zambia
                        upgrading presentation by

                  MICHELO SIMUYANDI
                   15th February, 2013

Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious & Tropical Diseases
                     SUPERVISOR: JOE BROWN
Outline for presentation
Introduction
     Diarrhoeal disease and Cryptosporidium
        Emerging results from GEMS
     Current methods and practices used in
     diagnostics and surveillance
     Suggested alternative methods
        Saliva
Literature review
  Previous uses of salivary assays
Problem statement
 Research questions
Outline contd
Part 1: Case-control study
  Aims and objectives
  Covariates
  Sample size calculation
  Collection, processing, and analytical
  Plan for data analysis
Retrospective study
  Description and plan of analysis
Work to date, logistics
Introduction: burden of disease
  An estimated 10% of deaths in children in 2010 were
 attributed to diarrhoea Liu et al. (2012)  most
 preventable by WASH
  Highest mortality among malnourished and HIV+ in
 Zambia
  67.3% (261/388) of children with SAM had diarrhoea with an
    OR 2.5 of mortality over those with adequate nutrition (Zambia,
    Irena et al. 2011)
  In peri urban Lusaka, 35% of the children have HIV and severe
   opportunistic infections with 76% if them classified as stunted
   (unpublished data personal communication)
Liu et al. 2012
Introduction: Crypto
 Global Enteric Multi-Center Survey (GEMS):
Cryptosporidium spp. among top aetiologic agents of
diarrhoea in children
 Associated with mortality in children, particularly <2
 Much higher priority than previously thought
 Call for simple rapid diagnostics
    Limitations of current methods
 In Zambia: prevalence of 6% - 30.7%, highest in
children and HIV+ children with severest outcomes
(Amadi et al (2001), Nchito et al. (1998), Siwila et al
(2010) and Siwila et al. (2011)
Salivary antibodies as markers of recent acute cryptosporidiosis in children under the age of 5 in Zambia
Next 3 slides from the GEMS study

http://www.slideshare.net/PGPR/the-global-enteric-multicenter-study-gems-
etiology-burden-of-moderate-severe-diarrheal-disease-in-africa-asia
Salivary antibodies as markers of recent acute cryptosporidiosis in children under the age of 5 in Zambia
Salivary antibodies as markers of recent acute cryptosporidiosis in children under the age of 5 in Zambia
Salivary antibodies as markers of recent acute cryptosporidiosis in children under the age of 5 in Zambia
Current methods: good for
  diagnostics, bad for field
  surveillance/monitoring
 Stool: low compliance
 Serum: multiple needle sticks usually not
  possible
 Saliva: promising alternative

Other outcome measures used in surveillance
 Self-report: highly subject to bias
 WAZ: may not be specific to diarrhoea
Current methods
Sample   Methods      Strengths        Limitations

Stool    Microscopy   Cheap easy to    Less sensitive
                      use in field     can not distinguish C.parvum from
                      setting          C.hominis
                                       Affected by intermittent shedding
                                       Labour intensive
                                       Highly specialised analyst
                                       Low compliance in community
                                       settings
Stool    Immuno-      Very sensitive   Cost, labour intensive, highly
         labelling                     specialised analyst
                                       Low compliance in community
                                       settings
Stool    PCR/RT-PCR   Very sensitive   Cost, standardisation, variability of
                                       results due to choice of DNA/RNA
                                       extraction methods, choice of primers
                                       and detection probes, needs
                                       validation
                                       Low compliance in community
                                       settings
Current methods
Sample      Methods       Strengths        Limitations

Blood       ELISA         Very sensitive   Invasiveness of sample collection
(serum)


Blood       PCR/RT-PCR    Very sensitive   Invasiveness of sample collection, Cost,
(serum)                                    standardisation, variability of results due
                                           to choice of DNA/RNA extraction
                                           methods, choice of primers and
                                           detection probes, needs other methods
                                           for validation
Reported    Interviews,   Cheap and easy   Potential for bias, observer induced
diarrhoea   diaries                        behaviour modification, captures limited
                                           information on cause
Alternative: saliva
Sample   Methods Strengths              Questions/Limitations
Saliva   ELISA    Sensitive, specific   Low conc. of protein of interest
                  Easy to collect       Variability due to physiological
                  sample                changes in body
                                        Lack of consensus on collection and
                                        post collection processing and storage
                                        Do markers stay elevated for long
                                        enough for this to be used in
                                        surveillance?
Knowns
 All the three classes of immunoglobulin (IgA, IgM
  and IgG) have been measured in saliva
    Total recoverable dependent on many factors
 Variety of pathogens: protozoa, viruses, bacteria,
  fungi
 Collection, processing, and storage conditions
  reported (though little consensus)
 Has been piloted in proof-of-concept studies in the
  USA in multi-plex format (on adults only)
 Giardia and non-WASH related pathogens have
  been tested in clinical diagnostic applications in
  lower-income countries
From Griffin et al 2011 (USEPA)




   Griffin et al. 2011
Problem statement
 Reliable, objective, persistent biomarker
  needed for tracking diarrhoeal diseases
    Surveillance and intervention studies
 Salivary antibody measures present potential
  advantages over available alternatives
 Ease of collection and processing
 No studies of salivary antibodies for tracking
  diarrhoeal diseases have been conducted in a
  lower-income setting
    Immune response may be very different
    Focus on incident cases in children
Approach: two studies
 A case-control study comparing saliva with
  standard methods (serum antibodies, stool
  samples) in children over 3-60months(study 1)
   Cases: confirmed Crypto infection, symptomatic
   Controls: confirmed seronegative for Crypto
 A retrospective study of saliva samples from
  a longitudinal cohort study (study 2)
   Existing stored samples of saliva from 482 persons
   Associated data: stool parasites, self-report, WAZ,
    and extensive WSH exposure-related data
Case-control study
Research questions
 Primary
    Do salivary antibodies (sIgA and IgG)
     correlate with serum antibody measures
     specific to Cryptosporidium spp. in acute
     cryptosporidiosis patients?
    Can salivary antibody measures indicate
     cryptosporidiosis in the recent past (up to 6
     months following clinical presentation)?
Aims
 Primary
    To assess the utility of salivary antibody
     measures in indicating recent
     Cryptosporidium spp. infection up to 6
     months following clinical presentation in
     children under 5
 Secondary
    To assess growth measures (IGF-1, WAZ) in
     acute cryptosporidiosis patients less than 5
     years up to 6 months post clinical
     presentation
Objectives
 To determine the sensitivity and specificity of
  salivary antibody measures in Cryptosporidium spp.
  diagnosis
 To examine the associations between salivary
  immunological response and the following co-
  factors: age, sex, HIV status, major co-infections,
  malnutrition, breastfeeding, and anthropometric
  data and IGF-1 in study participants
 To asses salivary antibody profiles in children less
  than 5 years up to 6 months post clinical
  presentation with Cryptosporidium spp. infection
    PERSISTANCE OF THE ANTIBODY RESPONSE
Objectives contd
 To estimate the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp.
  infection in children under 5 years presenting at the
  University Teaching Hospital in Lusaka
    Data collected during recruitment
 To compare the effects of storage temperature, time
  and post collection processing on amount of
  recoverable total antibody
    Methods development (before recruitment)
 To propose a method for saliva collection, processing
  and storage for field studies in Zambia
    Production of simple, brief guidelines for use and
     further development of assays
Overview of case-control study
  CASES: 200 patients with cryptosporidiosis
   (confirmed by stool samples and symptomatic)
   under 5 years of age
  CONTROLS: 200 matched controls (seronegative, no
   Cryptosporidium spp. infection based on stools),
   matching based on HIV status, age within 1 year
     Cases and controls from paediatric out-patient admission centre of
      UTH and followed up from their respective homes or hospital if
      admitted
  MEASURING: stool, saliva, serum, WAZ, IGF-1, all
   covariates
  SAMPLE POINTS: t = 0 (enrolment), monthly up to
   t=6 months
Matching on HIV status & age
                        HIV &
                     associated
                       factors




   Cryptosporidium
    spp. infection                Antibody levels




                        Age &
                     associated
                       factors
Covariates                         Justification                            Reference
                                   Reduction in the total antibody (Skott           et   al.    1999)
HIV infection                      production                               (Brandtzaeg 2007)
                                   Variation of sIgA from 0 to 3months (Gleeson et al. 1995)
Age                                of age and reported consistent up to
                                   4 years, age related immunity has
                                   been reported

                                   Inflammation caused by any gut (Hieshima et al. 2003)
Co-infections           (Giardia
                                   infection will stimulate production of
,Ascaris,   Malaria,  Shistosoma total sIgA and IgG
mansoni, Roravirus, Salmonella)
                                   Vitamin A has been known to (Ross 2012)
Nutritional status                 mediate immune response including
                                   mediation of inflammation which
                                   has an effect on mucosal immunity
Covariates              Justification                              Reference
                        Presence of Cryptosporidium spp. (Korpe et al. 2013)
Breastfeeding
                        Specific IgA antibodies in breast milk
                        is protective against infection
                        Depending on type, altered natural
Parent   administered
                        flora   can   affect   the   levels   of
medication              antibodies and response
                        Nitazoxanide is not effective against (Beatrice Amadi et al.
Treatment given by
                        cryptosporidium        in     immune 2009b; Beatrice Amadi
health centre           compromised patients but effective et al. 2002)
                        in immune competent
                        Inflammation or colonization may (Lycke et al. 2013)
Recent vaccination
                        cause affect the expression levels of
                        antibodies
Sample size calculation
Covariate        %    Sample size                                    50
HIV              10   200                                            45




                                    Number of children enrolled in
Breastfeeding    40   25                                             40
                                                                     35
                                                                     30
Recent           50   15




                                            each group
vaccination                                                          25                        Power

                                                                     20                             70%
Nutritional      50   15
status                                                               15                             80%
                                                                     10                             90%
Co-infection     20   50
                                                                     5
                                                                     0
                                                                          25%    50%     75%

                                                                 Detectable difference in means alpha =
                                                                   0.05, SD = mean, assume antibody
                                                                  responses are normally distributed
Work
                              Pilot and validation of methods




                                                                                                        Pilot
                            Recruitment , screening ,consent




                                                                                                        Cross section
                                    and enrolment




                                                                                                           study
Controls(matched by age and
                                                                  Cases
            sex)
                                                          Receive standard care
       Standard care
     Monthly Follow




                                                                                   Paired samples of




                                                                  Monthly Follow
                      Controls that sero-convert or have +ve
                                                                                         saliva &
                           stool will be moved to cases
                                                                                      blood, stool
          up




                                                                       up
                                                                                   Anthropometrics




                                                                                                           Case-control study
                             ELISA and microscopy
                           screening for parasites on                                  Outcome
                               monthly samples                                          measures


Total controls at end of study                          Total cases at end of study




                                    Data analysis
Stool screening




http://www.mayomedicallaboratories.com/articles/hottopics/transcripts/2009/2009-3a-intestinal/2009-3a-intestinal.html
Serum




 For HIV testing if the child
has not been tested
 CD4+ count and other
differentials (at first visit only)
 Malaria
 For serum for
Cryptosporidium spp. specific
antibodies ELISA tests
ELISA
              Cryptosporidium
                  antigen
Crypto spp.
IGF-1
Data analysis
 Still in development
   Taking SME
 Antibody response: comparison of means
   Stratified by major co-variates
   Regression analysis to identify influence of co-
    variates on salivary antibody response
 Persistence of marker
   At what point is the signal no longer there
      Also stratified by major co-variates
Retrospective study of
   salivary samples from
existing longitudinal cohort
            study
Overview
 Our team carried out a longitudinal cohort study
  from September 2011 to October 2012 (with
  planned follow up in May 2013) in an urban
  community in Lusaka, Zambia
   Primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the use and
    effectiveness of a novel water quality intervention in an HIV-
    impacted population
 We therefore have access to a wide range of
  water, sanitation, and hygiene exposure data as
  well as key health outcome data (stool, self-
  report, anthropometrics) from 2,364 individuals
Archived saliva samples
 Saliva samples from 482 people over the
  course of the study collected
 123 by expectoration, placed on ice for
  transportation and stored at -80oC
 259 samples collected using an oral swab,
  placed on ice for transportation and stored at-
  80oC
 We plan to collect more in May 2012
Self-report data
 The primary self-report health outcome measure
  we used was Highly Credible Gastrointestinal Illness
  (HCGI) (Payment et al. 1997; Hellard et al. 2001;
  Colford et al. 2002; Colford et al. 2005)
 Cases are defined as any of the following: (i)
  vomiting, (ii) watery diarrhoea, (iii) soft diarrhea and
  abdominal cramps, or (iv) nausea and abdominal
  cramps.
 7 day, 48 hour, 24 hour recall at multiple time points
Clinic-based surveillance
 Nurse practitioner in clinic assigned to study
  cohort
 Free clinic within 30 minutes walk from all
  households
 Cases encouraged to report for diagnosis and
  treatment on a voluntary basis throughout
  surveillance period
Anthropometrics and stool
 All children under 5 years of age were
  measured for height and weight to calculate
  weight-for-age (WAZ) and height-for-age
  (HAZ) z-scores to classify wasting, stunting,
  and underweight, respectively.
 Stool samples taken from volunteers for
  analysis
 Multiple time points
 Primary question
 Do adults and children with confirmed
  Cryptosporidium infection show significantly higher
  Cryptosporidium-specific salivary antibody titres
  compared with stool-negative controls?

 Secondary question
 Is measured salivary IGF-1 in children significantly
  reduced at low WAZ or reported/clinically confirmed
  diarrhoea prevalence?
Data analysis
 Plan still in development
 Primary question: comparison of means in
  antibody response between those shedding
  oocysts and others
 Secondary question: correlation in IGF-1
  (outcome measure) with anthropometrics,
  self-reported diarrhoea, and associated WSH
  exposure variables through regression
  analysis
Work to date
 Collection of samples for retrospective study
    Existing Ethics covers analysis of these samples
 Systematic literature review on methods and existing
  knowledge of these metrics
 Secured office space at the UTH, laboratory space
  and all equipment (ELISA plate reader and washer,
  FACS machine and a microscope) that we need for
  the study has been offered to us the Tropical
  Gastroenterology and Nutrition Group (TORPGAN)
 Secured funding for the study
Filling knowledge and skills gaps

 I am currently taking DL courses at LSHTM
  (Analysis and Design of Research Studies and
  Statistical Methods in Epidemiology)
 Author aid scientific writers workshop
 Online Ethics course by NIH
 Assembled my advisory committee and local
  advisory team
Acknowledgements
 NIH for the funding
 LSHTM Environmental Health Group
 TROPGAN for laboratory and office space
                          Advisory committee
    Name of member        Affiliated Institutions
1   Dr.Paul Kelly         Barts and London and TROPGAN
2   Prof. Ian Sanderson   Barts and London
3   Dr. Beatrice Amadi    University Teaching Hospital and TROPGAN
4   Mellissa Kapulu       University of Zambia, and Biological Sciences
                          Department, Jenner Institute University of Oxford
Thank you all for listening
No consensus on
the best collection
method for
maximum
antibody yield
Evaluation of saliva sample
           collection and processing (pilot
            methods development work)

                 t0=2hrs              t1=24hrs     t2=48hrs    t3=7days    t4=14days




                                                 Test for total immunoglobulin at the 5 time points
    Samples from healthy adult                   and compared amongst the different
 volunteers stored in four aliquots
            at different                          time points
temperatures(28oC, 4oC, -4oC and -
               80oC)
Other data
 Height and weight to calculate weight-for-age (WAZ), height-
  for-age (HAZ), and weight-for-height (WHZ) z-scores to
  classify wasting, stunting, and underweight
 Major co-infections identified at enrolment
    Some may be identified later through stool sampling (e.g.,
      parasites)
 Other relevant household and individual characteristics will
  be recorded during home visitation
    Breastfeeding
    Other major covariates
    Factors affecting saliva production (time since eating, etc)
 Self-report health data collected from caregiver at each visit
IGF-1
          Linear
          growth




IGF-1              Diarrhoea




           Zinc
Stool screening data
25




20




15




10




 5




 0

More Related Content

Salivary antibodies as markers of recent acute cryptosporidiosis in children under the age of 5 in Zambia

  • 1. Salivary antibodies as markers of recent acute cryptosporidiosis in children under the age of 5 in Zambia upgrading presentation by MICHELO SIMUYANDI 15th February, 2013 Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious & Tropical Diseases SUPERVISOR: JOE BROWN
  • 2. Outline for presentation Introduction Diarrhoeal disease and Cryptosporidium Emerging results from GEMS Current methods and practices used in diagnostics and surveillance Suggested alternative methods Saliva Literature review Previous uses of salivary assays Problem statement Research questions
  • 3. Outline contd Part 1: Case-control study Aims and objectives Covariates Sample size calculation Collection, processing, and analytical Plan for data analysis Retrospective study Description and plan of analysis Work to date, logistics
  • 4. Introduction: burden of disease An estimated 10% of deaths in children in 2010 were attributed to diarrhoea Liu et al. (2012) most preventable by WASH Highest mortality among malnourished and HIV+ in Zambia 67.3% (261/388) of children with SAM had diarrhoea with an OR 2.5 of mortality over those with adequate nutrition (Zambia, Irena et al. 2011) In peri urban Lusaka, 35% of the children have HIV and severe opportunistic infections with 76% if them classified as stunted (unpublished data personal communication)
  • 5. Liu et al. 2012
  • 6. Introduction: Crypto Global Enteric Multi-Center Survey (GEMS): Cryptosporidium spp. among top aetiologic agents of diarrhoea in children Associated with mortality in children, particularly <2 Much higher priority than previously thought Call for simple rapid diagnostics Limitations of current methods In Zambia: prevalence of 6% - 30.7%, highest in children and HIV+ children with severest outcomes (Amadi et al (2001), Nchito et al. (1998), Siwila et al (2010) and Siwila et al. (2011)
  • 8. Next 3 slides from the GEMS study http://www.slideshare.net/PGPR/the-global-enteric-multicenter-study-gems- etiology-burden-of-moderate-severe-diarrheal-disease-in-africa-asia
  • 12. Current methods: good for diagnostics, bad for field surveillance/monitoring Stool: low compliance Serum: multiple needle sticks usually not possible Saliva: promising alternative Other outcome measures used in surveillance Self-report: highly subject to bias WAZ: may not be specific to diarrhoea
  • 13. Current methods Sample Methods Strengths Limitations Stool Microscopy Cheap easy to Less sensitive use in field can not distinguish C.parvum from setting C.hominis Affected by intermittent shedding Labour intensive Highly specialised analyst Low compliance in community settings Stool Immuno- Very sensitive Cost, labour intensive, highly labelling specialised analyst Low compliance in community settings Stool PCR/RT-PCR Very sensitive Cost, standardisation, variability of results due to choice of DNA/RNA extraction methods, choice of primers and detection probes, needs validation Low compliance in community settings
  • 14. Current methods Sample Methods Strengths Limitations Blood ELISA Very sensitive Invasiveness of sample collection (serum) Blood PCR/RT-PCR Very sensitive Invasiveness of sample collection, Cost, (serum) standardisation, variability of results due to choice of DNA/RNA extraction methods, choice of primers and detection probes, needs other methods for validation Reported Interviews, Cheap and easy Potential for bias, observer induced diarrhoea diaries behaviour modification, captures limited information on cause
  • 15. Alternative: saliva Sample Methods Strengths Questions/Limitations Saliva ELISA Sensitive, specific Low conc. of protein of interest Easy to collect Variability due to physiological sample changes in body Lack of consensus on collection and post collection processing and storage Do markers stay elevated for long enough for this to be used in surveillance?
  • 16. Knowns All the three classes of immunoglobulin (IgA, IgM and IgG) have been measured in saliva Total recoverable dependent on many factors Variety of pathogens: protozoa, viruses, bacteria, fungi Collection, processing, and storage conditions reported (though little consensus) Has been piloted in proof-of-concept studies in the USA in multi-plex format (on adults only) Giardia and non-WASH related pathogens have been tested in clinical diagnostic applications in lower-income countries
  • 17. From Griffin et al 2011 (USEPA) Griffin et al. 2011
  • 18. Problem statement Reliable, objective, persistent biomarker needed for tracking diarrhoeal diseases Surveillance and intervention studies Salivary antibody measures present potential advantages over available alternatives Ease of collection and processing No studies of salivary antibodies for tracking diarrhoeal diseases have been conducted in a lower-income setting Immune response may be very different Focus on incident cases in children
  • 19. Approach: two studies A case-control study comparing saliva with standard methods (serum antibodies, stool samples) in children over 3-60months(study 1) Cases: confirmed Crypto infection, symptomatic Controls: confirmed seronegative for Crypto A retrospective study of saliva samples from a longitudinal cohort study (study 2) Existing stored samples of saliva from 482 persons Associated data: stool parasites, self-report, WAZ, and extensive WSH exposure-related data
  • 21. Research questions Primary Do salivary antibodies (sIgA and IgG) correlate with serum antibody measures specific to Cryptosporidium spp. in acute cryptosporidiosis patients? Can salivary antibody measures indicate cryptosporidiosis in the recent past (up to 6 months following clinical presentation)?
  • 22. Aims Primary To assess the utility of salivary antibody measures in indicating recent Cryptosporidium spp. infection up to 6 months following clinical presentation in children under 5 Secondary To assess growth measures (IGF-1, WAZ) in acute cryptosporidiosis patients less than 5 years up to 6 months post clinical presentation
  • 23. Objectives To determine the sensitivity and specificity of salivary antibody measures in Cryptosporidium spp. diagnosis To examine the associations between salivary immunological response and the following co- factors: age, sex, HIV status, major co-infections, malnutrition, breastfeeding, and anthropometric data and IGF-1 in study participants To asses salivary antibody profiles in children less than 5 years up to 6 months post clinical presentation with Cryptosporidium spp. infection PERSISTANCE OF THE ANTIBODY RESPONSE
  • 24. Objectives contd To estimate the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. infection in children under 5 years presenting at the University Teaching Hospital in Lusaka Data collected during recruitment To compare the effects of storage temperature, time and post collection processing on amount of recoverable total antibody Methods development (before recruitment) To propose a method for saliva collection, processing and storage for field studies in Zambia Production of simple, brief guidelines for use and further development of assays
  • 25. Overview of case-control study CASES: 200 patients with cryptosporidiosis (confirmed by stool samples and symptomatic) under 5 years of age CONTROLS: 200 matched controls (seronegative, no Cryptosporidium spp. infection based on stools), matching based on HIV status, age within 1 year Cases and controls from paediatric out-patient admission centre of UTH and followed up from their respective homes or hospital if admitted MEASURING: stool, saliva, serum, WAZ, IGF-1, all covariates SAMPLE POINTS: t = 0 (enrolment), monthly up to t=6 months
  • 26. Matching on HIV status & age HIV & associated factors Cryptosporidium spp. infection Antibody levels Age & associated factors
  • 27. Covariates Justification Reference Reduction in the total antibody (Skott et al. 1999) HIV infection production (Brandtzaeg 2007) Variation of sIgA from 0 to 3months (Gleeson et al. 1995) Age of age and reported consistent up to 4 years, age related immunity has been reported Inflammation caused by any gut (Hieshima et al. 2003) Co-infections (Giardia infection will stimulate production of ,Ascaris, Malaria, Shistosoma total sIgA and IgG mansoni, Roravirus, Salmonella) Vitamin A has been known to (Ross 2012) Nutritional status mediate immune response including mediation of inflammation which has an effect on mucosal immunity
  • 28. Covariates Justification Reference Presence of Cryptosporidium spp. (Korpe et al. 2013) Breastfeeding Specific IgA antibodies in breast milk is protective against infection Depending on type, altered natural Parent administered flora can affect the levels of medication antibodies and response Nitazoxanide is not effective against (Beatrice Amadi et al. Treatment given by cryptosporidium in immune 2009b; Beatrice Amadi health centre compromised patients but effective et al. 2002) in immune competent Inflammation or colonization may (Lycke et al. 2013) Recent vaccination cause affect the expression levels of antibodies
  • 29. Sample size calculation Covariate % Sample size 50 HIV 10 200 45 Number of children enrolled in Breastfeeding 40 25 40 35 30 Recent 50 15 each group vaccination 25 Power 20 70% Nutritional 50 15 status 15 80% 10 90% Co-infection 20 50 5 0 25% 50% 75% Detectable difference in means alpha = 0.05, SD = mean, assume antibody responses are normally distributed
  • 30. Work Pilot and validation of methods Pilot Recruitment , screening ,consent Cross section and enrolment study Controls(matched by age and Cases sex) Receive standard care Standard care Monthly Follow Paired samples of Monthly Follow Controls that sero-convert or have +ve saliva & stool will be moved to cases blood, stool up up Anthropometrics Case-control study ELISA and microscopy screening for parasites on Outcome monthly samples measures Total controls at end of study Total cases at end of study Data analysis
  • 32. Serum For HIV testing if the child has not been tested CD4+ count and other differentials (at first visit only) Malaria For serum for Cryptosporidium spp. specific antibodies ELISA tests
  • 33. ELISA Cryptosporidium antigen Crypto spp. IGF-1
  • 34. Data analysis Still in development Taking SME Antibody response: comparison of means Stratified by major co-variates Regression analysis to identify influence of co- variates on salivary antibody response Persistence of marker At what point is the signal no longer there Also stratified by major co-variates
  • 35. Retrospective study of salivary samples from existing longitudinal cohort study
  • 36. Overview Our team carried out a longitudinal cohort study from September 2011 to October 2012 (with planned follow up in May 2013) in an urban community in Lusaka, Zambia Primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the use and effectiveness of a novel water quality intervention in an HIV- impacted population We therefore have access to a wide range of water, sanitation, and hygiene exposure data as well as key health outcome data (stool, self- report, anthropometrics) from 2,364 individuals
  • 37. Archived saliva samples Saliva samples from 482 people over the course of the study collected 123 by expectoration, placed on ice for transportation and stored at -80oC 259 samples collected using an oral swab, placed on ice for transportation and stored at- 80oC We plan to collect more in May 2012
  • 38. Self-report data The primary self-report health outcome measure we used was Highly Credible Gastrointestinal Illness (HCGI) (Payment et al. 1997; Hellard et al. 2001; Colford et al. 2002; Colford et al. 2005) Cases are defined as any of the following: (i) vomiting, (ii) watery diarrhoea, (iii) soft diarrhea and abdominal cramps, or (iv) nausea and abdominal cramps. 7 day, 48 hour, 24 hour recall at multiple time points
  • 39. Clinic-based surveillance Nurse practitioner in clinic assigned to study cohort Free clinic within 30 minutes walk from all households Cases encouraged to report for diagnosis and treatment on a voluntary basis throughout surveillance period
  • 40. Anthropometrics and stool All children under 5 years of age were measured for height and weight to calculate weight-for-age (WAZ) and height-for-age (HAZ) z-scores to classify wasting, stunting, and underweight, respectively. Stool samples taken from volunteers for analysis Multiple time points
  • 41. Primary question Do adults and children with confirmed Cryptosporidium infection show significantly higher Cryptosporidium-specific salivary antibody titres compared with stool-negative controls? Secondary question Is measured salivary IGF-1 in children significantly reduced at low WAZ or reported/clinically confirmed diarrhoea prevalence?
  • 42. Data analysis Plan still in development Primary question: comparison of means in antibody response between those shedding oocysts and others Secondary question: correlation in IGF-1 (outcome measure) with anthropometrics, self-reported diarrhoea, and associated WSH exposure variables through regression analysis
  • 43. Work to date Collection of samples for retrospective study Existing Ethics covers analysis of these samples Systematic literature review on methods and existing knowledge of these metrics Secured office space at the UTH, laboratory space and all equipment (ELISA plate reader and washer, FACS machine and a microscope) that we need for the study has been offered to us the Tropical Gastroenterology and Nutrition Group (TORPGAN) Secured funding for the study
  • 44. Filling knowledge and skills gaps I am currently taking DL courses at LSHTM (Analysis and Design of Research Studies and Statistical Methods in Epidemiology) Author aid scientific writers workshop Online Ethics course by NIH Assembled my advisory committee and local advisory team
  • 45. Acknowledgements NIH for the funding LSHTM Environmental Health Group TROPGAN for laboratory and office space Advisory committee Name of member Affiliated Institutions 1 Dr.Paul Kelly Barts and London and TROPGAN 2 Prof. Ian Sanderson Barts and London 3 Dr. Beatrice Amadi University Teaching Hospital and TROPGAN 4 Mellissa Kapulu University of Zambia, and Biological Sciences Department, Jenner Institute University of Oxford
  • 46. Thank you all for listening
  • 47. No consensus on the best collection method for maximum antibody yield
  • 48. Evaluation of saliva sample collection and processing (pilot methods development work) t0=2hrs t1=24hrs t2=48hrs t3=7days t4=14days Test for total immunoglobulin at the 5 time points Samples from healthy adult and compared amongst the different volunteers stored in four aliquots at different time points temperatures(28oC, 4oC, -4oC and - 80oC)
  • 49. Other data Height and weight to calculate weight-for-age (WAZ), height- for-age (HAZ), and weight-for-height (WHZ) z-scores to classify wasting, stunting, and underweight Major co-infections identified at enrolment Some may be identified later through stool sampling (e.g., parasites) Other relevant household and individual characteristics will be recorded during home visitation Breastfeeding Other major covariates Factors affecting saliva production (time since eating, etc) Self-report health data collected from caregiver at each visit
  • 50. IGF-1 Linear growth IGF-1 Diarrhoea Zinc

Editor's Notes

  • #23: Secondary aim will be justified later and clarified in the discussion