際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Lecture Series: Why the Redefinition of
Marriage to Include Same-sex Marriages
harms Future Societies and What Other
Options Exist

Lecture 4:
The growing loss of the social understanding
that marriage is primarily about offering
children the best possible start in life
(Please see lecture 1 first  see familyman2 below  light
1
blue lecture)
The question we are asking in this lecture
how does redefining marriage
From this

To this

Two opposite-sex adults
making a commitment to
work together to fulfil the
RIGHT of their future
biological children to the best
possible start in life

Any two adults
making a commitment
to each other based
on mutual, sexual
attraction

Cause the 98% of heterosexual teens to be ever more
persuaded that same-sex sex is OK, fun, and progressive 
even if in the real world this means that many will eventually
struggle with their sexual identity and, as such, they will find it
harder to build the lasting relationships they actually desire
When we look at what happens in countries
where marriage has been redefined we see
a worrying trend
In Canada, for example, school books are redesigned to
have a large number of examples and pictures of people
from diverse forms of sexual orientation  in far greater
proportions than in actual society
We also find that many teachers who fear the outcomes
of teaching immature teens about same-sex sex start to
withdraw from teaching sex-education classes.
In their place same-sex marriage activists start taking
over sex-education curriculum

See: www.nomblog.com/26781/
We find that in these countries what ideally should
be a lesson on respect for all people, no matter what
their sexual identity, often turns into something
MUCH more. Some examples
- 12 year old children hold pretend same-sex
marriage ceremonies
- Children are taught same-sex sex positions
- Kindergarten children read books about same-sex
relationships
And the parents have no rights to withdraw their
children from lessons. The same-sex activists often
become the childs educator around sexual norms
See: www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvdSm7OZt9U#t=28
The challenge here, of course, is that young
people are very impressionable.
 Many healthy, well rounded heterosexual teens DO
experience same-sex attraction during their teens 
but the overwhelming majority grow out of these
emotional feelings as they move into adulthood,
and move onto becoming heterosexuals who
would only consider having sex with a person of
the opposite sex.
 But what happens when an over zealous teacher
says things like If you have feelings of attraction
towards a member of the same-sex, its OK to have
sex with them to children who have an adolescent
crush on a friend of the same sex?
To understand how easy it is to create
confused sexual identities in young teens
 Research finds that children raised by a mother
or father who enters into a same-sex
relationship have a FAR greater chance
experimenting with same-sex sex themselves
Such education in a school setting creates a
heightened risk that the heterosexual child WILL
experiment with same-sex sex even though they
really have no real gay or lesbian tendencies.
 This risk is heightened even more by the fact that many
teens now watch pornography, much of which is about
two women making out and these two women are
not seen to be lesbians in any shape or form.
 When one adds to this the growing trend of Hollywood
to show soap operas depicting heterosexual women
and teens experimenting with same-sex sex, then the
potential for young heterosexual teens to experiment
with same-sex sex rises dramatically.
Put simply, over time, we expect to see the
growth of heterosexuals acting as lesbian and
gay friends do  engaging in same-sex sex.
 Even if we just see a 2% rise per year in the
numbers of heterosexual children experimenting
with same-sex sex  in 20 years some 40% of
young adults may well have bi-sexual
tendencies.
 In a marriage redefined world the state becomes
the owner of the childs sexual development and
parents can only watch in fear.
Parental concerns for the future of their children are
disregarded in the belief that to keep a child out of such
lessons might turn the child in to a bigot, and being a
bigot is far worse than becoming a bi-sexual who finds it
hard to create a stable marital-family home.
 The concerns for the 2% of gay or lesbian students
take full precedence over the concerns for the
future well-being of millions of heterosexual
children.
 Put simply, to protect 1-2% of children from a few
bigoted teens the state is willing to eventually harm
the sexual identity of 20-30% of heterosexual
children, and bring about social chaos
Im going for a sleep over at my friends house
might take on a whole new meaning in
heterosexual, same-sex friendships.
 Arguments between parents and children about
such behaviour will fill homes across the country.
 The parents might have to spend years dealing with
the devastation caused by the confused sexual
identity of their children  and meanwhile the
school teachers carry on teaching what they believe
is healthy.

 And anyone who disagrees is a bigot.
What were perfectly healthy same-sex
friendships might become highly charged - My
friend touched me? Does that mean she fancies
me? Maybe I should stay away from her.
 Many vulnerable girls might have to give out to
other girls just to be accepted into their clique.
 What was a wholesome and wonderful aspect of
growing up, to have same-sex friends just to chill
with, will have the potential to now become
places where feelings of sexual betrayal and
jealousy dominate
Over time, we will see sexuality increasingly
becoming a part of every form of relationship in
society  especially in same-sex friendships.
 Though Hollywood will present the idea that this
is all harmless, all analysis of such a sexualised
world shows outcomes to be extremely negative.
 In ten years or so we can expect that TV shows
and movies will be showing same-sex,
heterosexual teens enjoying sex with each other
every evening.
 It will become ever harder for people to be clear
about where the social boundaries around
sexuality lie.
In a world where children have sex at ever younger
ages  professionals will call for the age of consent to
be lowered, first to 15, then 14 in order to legally
provide sexual advice to them
 Of course, such a law change opens the doors to even
more harming of children.
 And as same-sex sex grows and is on the TV every
night, maybe sisters will experiment, or an older
brother with his young brother  and who will judge
this as wrong  as worthy of prosecution.
 In such a highly sexualised world where many
peoples sexual identity will be confused the concept
of heterosexual-marriage will become more and
more unclear for more and more people, and ever
more children will grow up in more fragile forms of
family.
One has to ask why politicians are even
contemplating the creation of such a cruel
future for future generations of children
 Why should some 20-30-40% of the
population lose their natural sexual
identity in order to promote the sexual
identity of some 2% of the population?
 There are MUCH less damaging ways to
deal with sexual education and with
bigotry based on sexual identity
For the next lecture  lecture 5
 Through redefining marriage the state agrees
with same-sex activists that those who
oppose redefinition are small-minded bigots
 even law breakers. This is a social lie  a lie
so dangerous that it traps society in a spiral
of social decay. Laws ever more get passed
that work to destroy heterosexual marriage 
the best place to raise kids  and the lie traps
society in a mind set that it cannot get out of
until social collapse has run its course.
 See below  Familyman2  lecture 5 is black
and green

More Related Content

Same-sex Marriage Lecture 4. Heterosexuals turn towards same sex sex

  • 1. Lecture Series: Why the Redefinition of Marriage to Include Same-sex Marriages harms Future Societies and What Other Options Exist Lecture 4: The growing loss of the social understanding that marriage is primarily about offering children the best possible start in life (Please see lecture 1 first see familyman2 below light 1 blue lecture)
  • 2. The question we are asking in this lecture how does redefining marriage From this To this Two opposite-sex adults making a commitment to work together to fulfil the RIGHT of their future biological children to the best possible start in life Any two adults making a commitment to each other based on mutual, sexual attraction Cause the 98% of heterosexual teens to be ever more persuaded that same-sex sex is OK, fun, and progressive even if in the real world this means that many will eventually struggle with their sexual identity and, as such, they will find it harder to build the lasting relationships they actually desire
  • 3. When we look at what happens in countries where marriage has been redefined we see a worrying trend In Canada, for example, school books are redesigned to have a large number of examples and pictures of people from diverse forms of sexual orientation in far greater proportions than in actual society We also find that many teachers who fear the outcomes of teaching immature teens about same-sex sex start to withdraw from teaching sex-education classes. In their place same-sex marriage activists start taking over sex-education curriculum See: www.nomblog.com/26781/
  • 4. We find that in these countries what ideally should be a lesson on respect for all people, no matter what their sexual identity, often turns into something MUCH more. Some examples - 12 year old children hold pretend same-sex marriage ceremonies - Children are taught same-sex sex positions - Kindergarten children read books about same-sex relationships And the parents have no rights to withdraw their children from lessons. The same-sex activists often become the childs educator around sexual norms See: www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvdSm7OZt9U#t=28
  • 5. The challenge here, of course, is that young people are very impressionable. Many healthy, well rounded heterosexual teens DO experience same-sex attraction during their teens but the overwhelming majority grow out of these emotional feelings as they move into adulthood, and move onto becoming heterosexuals who would only consider having sex with a person of the opposite sex. But what happens when an over zealous teacher says things like If you have feelings of attraction towards a member of the same-sex, its OK to have sex with them to children who have an adolescent crush on a friend of the same sex?
  • 6. To understand how easy it is to create confused sexual identities in young teens Research finds that children raised by a mother or father who enters into a same-sex relationship have a FAR greater chance experimenting with same-sex sex themselves
  • 7. Such education in a school setting creates a heightened risk that the heterosexual child WILL experiment with same-sex sex even though they really have no real gay or lesbian tendencies. This risk is heightened even more by the fact that many teens now watch pornography, much of which is about two women making out and these two women are not seen to be lesbians in any shape or form. When one adds to this the growing trend of Hollywood to show soap operas depicting heterosexual women and teens experimenting with same-sex sex, then the potential for young heterosexual teens to experiment with same-sex sex rises dramatically.
  • 8. Put simply, over time, we expect to see the growth of heterosexuals acting as lesbian and gay friends do engaging in same-sex sex. Even if we just see a 2% rise per year in the numbers of heterosexual children experimenting with same-sex sex in 20 years some 40% of young adults may well have bi-sexual tendencies. In a marriage redefined world the state becomes the owner of the childs sexual development and parents can only watch in fear.
  • 9. Parental concerns for the future of their children are disregarded in the belief that to keep a child out of such lessons might turn the child in to a bigot, and being a bigot is far worse than becoming a bi-sexual who finds it hard to create a stable marital-family home. The concerns for the 2% of gay or lesbian students take full precedence over the concerns for the future well-being of millions of heterosexual children. Put simply, to protect 1-2% of children from a few bigoted teens the state is willing to eventually harm the sexual identity of 20-30% of heterosexual children, and bring about social chaos
  • 10. Im going for a sleep over at my friends house might take on a whole new meaning in heterosexual, same-sex friendships. Arguments between parents and children about such behaviour will fill homes across the country. The parents might have to spend years dealing with the devastation caused by the confused sexual identity of their children and meanwhile the school teachers carry on teaching what they believe is healthy. And anyone who disagrees is a bigot.
  • 11. What were perfectly healthy same-sex friendships might become highly charged - My friend touched me? Does that mean she fancies me? Maybe I should stay away from her. Many vulnerable girls might have to give out to other girls just to be accepted into their clique. What was a wholesome and wonderful aspect of growing up, to have same-sex friends just to chill with, will have the potential to now become places where feelings of sexual betrayal and jealousy dominate
  • 12. Over time, we will see sexuality increasingly becoming a part of every form of relationship in society especially in same-sex friendships. Though Hollywood will present the idea that this is all harmless, all analysis of such a sexualised world shows outcomes to be extremely negative. In ten years or so we can expect that TV shows and movies will be showing same-sex, heterosexual teens enjoying sex with each other every evening. It will become ever harder for people to be clear about where the social boundaries around sexuality lie.
  • 13. In a world where children have sex at ever younger ages professionals will call for the age of consent to be lowered, first to 15, then 14 in order to legally provide sexual advice to them Of course, such a law change opens the doors to even more harming of children. And as same-sex sex grows and is on the TV every night, maybe sisters will experiment, or an older brother with his young brother and who will judge this as wrong as worthy of prosecution. In such a highly sexualised world where many peoples sexual identity will be confused the concept of heterosexual-marriage will become more and more unclear for more and more people, and ever more children will grow up in more fragile forms of family.
  • 14. One has to ask why politicians are even contemplating the creation of such a cruel future for future generations of children Why should some 20-30-40% of the population lose their natural sexual identity in order to promote the sexual identity of some 2% of the population? There are MUCH less damaging ways to deal with sexual education and with bigotry based on sexual identity
  • 15. For the next lecture lecture 5 Through redefining marriage the state agrees with same-sex activists that those who oppose redefinition are small-minded bigots even law breakers. This is a social lie a lie so dangerous that it traps society in a spiral of social decay. Laws ever more get passed that work to destroy heterosexual marriage the best place to raise kids and the lie traps society in a mind set that it cannot get out of until social collapse has run its course. See below Familyman2 lecture 5 is black and green