狠狠撸

狠狠撸Share a Scribd company logo

Sandhya is dancing with mining cartel dhayadevadas

?
?
V
Vetri Vel

Paid News Reporter Sandhya - A Gang Member of Mining Cartel Dhayadevadas create false stories to prejudice the judiciary. The real fact and reply is given.

1 of 11
Sandhya is dancing with mining cartel Dhayadevadas – Reply to her fake news on 31.01.2017 In the first para she speaks about journalism, Has she really followed all the ethics and principles of journalism? Has she read the details and reply given to her paid news available in http://vetri3337.blogspot.in/2017/01/2912017.html , http://vetri3337.blogspot.in/2017/01/30012017.html, http://vetri3337.blogspot.in/2017/01/paid-news- sandhya-ravi-shankar-article.html and http://vetri3337.blogspot.in/2017/02/paid-news- sandhya-ravi-shankar-article.html http://vetri3337.blogspot.in/2017/02/fact-about-fake- news-sandhyas-article.html Can she deny any one of the facts given in the blog? If yes, is she ready to swear on a public place? For money and motive, she should not write false articles with baseless allegations. Now we have to think about the Wire. Part of the funds they received fromIndependent and Public Spirited
Media Foundation. It is reflected in Wire. Now there is a question. Whether these all are bonafide transactions or the funds were routed in the Hawala type such as payment to media and get back a portion to avoid Income Tax ? This should be enquired by the Government as well as Income Tax department. Hence it is required to publish the details about the funded agency and the amount of fund received and the registration certificate of Income Tax etc., to be published by this media. Then only we can find out whether these transactions are bonafide or not? Yes. She has written the story on behalf of rivals of V.V.Mineral, simply for the money and the motive she has against VVM. One more information, she is very close to one Retd. DGP, who is also operating her to target Mr.S.Vaikundarajan and V.V.Mineral. The above details will be published very shortly. She has spoken about Jallikattu on a public domain and social media, it is quite natural that that was a sensitive issue few weeks back and the entire world was supporting it. Everyone saw the fundamental Tamil youths went a step head to target anyone opposing Jallikattu. Just because someone criticised her on her views opposing Jallikattu, she is conveniently passing on the blame to
VVM as well. This is purely to gather sympathy among fellow crowd and to portray a negative image on VVM. She is quite aware VVM has always taken the legal route for any issue. How unethical she behaves? She has told Nuclear weapon, monazite, One lakh crore etc., Can she ready to prove it? Can she provide a slender piece of evidence to support this fancy story? In fact, there is no possibility for export of monazite either legally or illegally. This has been confirmed by Department of Atomic Energy and Chairman of Atomic Energy Regulatory Board and she herself, saw all the documents during January 2015. But with ulterior motive, she has published the above said news. So when the affected party take legal action. Finally she will simply publish that “The error regretted”. Is this fair journalism? Is she a fair journalist.? If its not done for money, then what else do we believe? She mentioned about a raid and transfer of Tuticorin Collector. In fact, when transfer order issued Sandhya’s gang member Ashish kumar created a forgery document in the name of raid and prepare a letter to Chief Secretary and
hand over the colour Xerox copy or original to his college gang member Sandhya which was published her on 27.1.2017. In fact, based on the complaint and after enquiry, Ashish Kumar was prosecuted. It is mentioned in my previous posts. Ashish Kumar prepared one inspection report and get signature from subordinate officers which is given below. “As per Statement given by the petitioners, who are local residents, this illegal mining activity has been carried out by VV Mineral limited.” Only based on the above wordings, Ashish Kumar created the D.O. letter and hand over it to Sandhya. It is pertinent to point out here that, within four kilometer radius, there is no habitation or village. Moreover no petitioner has made complaint against either VV Mineral or other party. Hence VV Mineral approached under RTI to furnish the details about who were enquired, the name details and the statements etc., Since this was a created one, no one was ready to give it. Finally the case was reached Information Commission. When Information Commissioner enquired, the PIO admitted that, at the time of inspection, no enquiry made. By recording the same, the information commission directed to furnish details to
the petitioner Mr.S.Vaikundarajan. That is why Sandhya’s Gang Member Ashish Kumar was prosecuted. To protect her gang member, she create story that, for send report Ashish Kumar was transferred. This is a tactic. She is a very good director to create a fantasy thriller story. In her Article on 30.1.17, she mentioned that, Mr.S.Vaikundarajan is a nice and polite man and she praised his character also in some way. Whereas, on 31.1.17, due to the pressure from her boss, she told that, the village people warned her “Be careful” and when she entered VV Mineral mining area, five people rush in car. Whether she get any permission to enter in the mine? Is it not a trespass? Whether the employees who are In charge for the mine should not ask her about her illegal trespassing? Even then also, she was not attacked or abused. Can any person enter her house without her permission claiming that some antisocial activities are planned by her? Is it permissible? It is pertinent to note that she has not uttered a single word about FIR or complaint against in Ashish Kumar letter. After all her objective is simply to support Daya Devadass, and create problems to his competitors.
Again she speaks about the visit of Mr.S.Vaikundarajan’s brother house, cleverly this was also used against Mr.S.Vaikundarajan. Again and again, she refer as illegal mining. Where is that? What is the total quantity VV Mineral mined and paid royalty to government? What is the total quantity VV Mineral sold and exported? Where is the figure and proof. Merely writing by Sandhya after getting money is enough? As told that, she is fit to create mythical story, she has claimed that four people surrounded the car. But she didn’t say if they used any abusing words or attacked the car? How wonderful her imagination works, this way she can claim even by-passers or common public or any employees walking near the road can be claimed they surrounded the car. This again proves her ulterior motive. I have clearly explained about the back ground of Bedi Commission and Ashish Kumar with documentary proof. Please read this one more timehttp://vetri3337.blogspot.in/2017/01/paid-news- sandhya-ravi-shankar- article.html andhttp://vetri3337.blogspot.in/2017/02/p aid-news-sandhya-ravi-shankar-article.html
Again she wrote about the 02.02.2015 story prepared for Dhayadevadas and finally publish clarification that, “The story was based on a PIL filed by Victor Rajamanikkam that had come up for hearing on Madras High Court and the figure of corruption of 1 lakh Crore was based on it and not independently verified us …..The error regretted”. It is available in goo.gl/oIYJ1 When she gets high remuneration to prepare the story, definitely the risk also high. She get higher remuneration and she negotiate and collect by expecting the legal action also. So it is her duty to face the legal action. Why don’t she reveal that, the MoEF officials report was handed over to her by her gang head Dhayadevadas by getting under RTI Act. Now she again explain her husband’s connection with News 7 Channel. But she slightly modified that, other people approach her husband. If she publish the e-mail of her husband, the truth will come out. Let her to publish
the e-mail as published Vaikundarjan’s mail (Her published Vaikundarajan mail also establish the nexus between Dhayadevadas and Sandhya) She told that there is no enemity or revenge. Then what prevents her for not publishing the real facts and clarifications given by Mr.S.Vaikundarajan and the documents given by him. Why she project the story only against Mr.S.Vaikundarajan? When IRE Ltd is having 3274 Hect mining lease in India and VV Mineral and Transworld having only 365 Hect leases area and her boss Dhayadevadas company Indian Garnet Sand company having 399 Hect and Trimax having 720 Hect mining lease area, who is monopoly? Does it not reflect the hidden intensions of Sandhya? She mentioned that by referring her in the government report she was personally attacked. Will it not applicable to Mr.S.Vaikundarajan? Will he not be targeted after this false story? In fact that is the whole point for her. Now the cat is finally out of the bag. She admitted that, during January 2015, she contacted Vaikundarajan for a response to the allegation. Accordingly,
Mr.S.Vaikundarajan gave a detailed reply and the interview went on very smoothly. Let her produce the questions and reply between them which she sent by mail. Let her reproduce the mail which questions she asked with him and what reply received from him? This will establish her motive and enemity. She mentioned Mr.S.Vaikundarajan’s mail to her during August 2016. The following words in his mail alone will establish that Sandhya is a paid news reporter. “In the previous occasion also you an asked some clarification from me, which were answered and we showed you all the documents and handed over copy of all the relevant documents. But the article did not cover any of our explanation, it was purely biased and one sided and focused only on a bogus PIL. The clarification asked by you and replies given by me are not reflected in any your previous article, even though you recorded the whole audio. All this only makes me believe you may be biased and are supporting our competitors Mr.Dhayadevadas and Victor Rajamanikkam”. Will it not establish her character that she will create story as one sided even other party gave any reply.?
In this four part also, she did not refer any clarification given by Mr.S.Vaikundarajan which she got even January 2015 from him. Will it not establish that, she is a paid reporter.? Now again I challenge. Is Sandhya ready to swear on her father or on her child that the above mentioned documents and explanations were not seen by Sandhya and her husband in their office in the presence of Mr.Vaikundarajan and Venkatesh during January 2015? Is Sandhya ready to swear that, she do not know about the above said facts and she did not collect copies from Mr.S.Vaikundarajan?. Is writing by suppressing the truth called the Ethics of Journalism? Is it right to publish one sided stories without getting the other parties reply? Even reply send by mail by the association people, it is not published. Will it not established that, this press also part and partial of the gang and to usurp the public fund from
various forums, this type of one sided stories are published. Is it not the duty of every citizen to enquire about the media and the funding agency who supply the fund and the background about them? Whether the fund supplied after payment of proper Income Tax or supplied to escape from the Income Tax. Dear all, those who praise Sandhya, please ask her to swear in your presence denying all my above clarification. Please ask wire also to publish the funds received from various funding agencies. Also please ask government agencies to enquire and to ensure whether the funding agencies supply the fund after payment of Income Tax or they use it as Hawala route and thereby create negative opinion against Indian industries to help foreign companies. Is it not necessary that a CBI enquiry is mandatory to find out the amount involved in the transaction of Independent and Public Spirited Media Foundation and Wire and Sandhya and other peoples. Please think about this and join hand with us to eradicate fake reporters.

More Related Content

Sandhya is dancing with mining cartel dhayadevadas

  • 1. Sandhya is dancing with mining cartel Dhayadevadas – Reply to her fake news on 31.01.2017 In the first para she speaks about journalism, Has she really followed all the ethics and principles of journalism? Has she read the details and reply given to her paid news available in http://vetri3337.blogspot.in/2017/01/2912017.html , http://vetri3337.blogspot.in/2017/01/30012017.html, http://vetri3337.blogspot.in/2017/01/paid-news- sandhya-ravi-shankar-article.html and http://vetri3337.blogspot.in/2017/02/paid-news- sandhya-ravi-shankar-article.html http://vetri3337.blogspot.in/2017/02/fact-about-fake- news-sandhyas-article.html Can she deny any one of the facts given in the blog? If yes, is she ready to swear on a public place? For money and motive, she should not write false articles with baseless allegations. Now we have to think about the Wire. Part of the funds they received fromIndependent and Public Spirited
  • 2. Media Foundation. It is reflected in Wire. Now there is a question. Whether these all are bonafide transactions or the funds were routed in the Hawala type such as payment to media and get back a portion to avoid Income Tax ? This should be enquired by the Government as well as Income Tax department. Hence it is required to publish the details about the funded agency and the amount of fund received and the registration certificate of Income Tax etc., to be published by this media. Then only we can find out whether these transactions are bonafide or not? Yes. She has written the story on behalf of rivals of V.V.Mineral, simply for the money and the motive she has against VVM. One more information, she is very close to one Retd. DGP, who is also operating her to target Mr.S.Vaikundarajan and V.V.Mineral. The above details will be published very shortly. She has spoken about Jallikattu on a public domain and social media, it is quite natural that that was a sensitive issue few weeks back and the entire world was supporting it. Everyone saw the fundamental Tamil youths went a step head to target anyone opposing Jallikattu. Just because someone criticised her on her views opposing Jallikattu, she is conveniently passing on the blame to
  • 3. VVM as well. This is purely to gather sympathy among fellow crowd and to portray a negative image on VVM. She is quite aware VVM has always taken the legal route for any issue. How unethical she behaves? She has told Nuclear weapon, monazite, One lakh crore etc., Can she ready to prove it? Can she provide a slender piece of evidence to support this fancy story? In fact, there is no possibility for export of monazite either legally or illegally. This has been confirmed by Department of Atomic Energy and Chairman of Atomic Energy Regulatory Board and she herself, saw all the documents during January 2015. But with ulterior motive, she has published the above said news. So when the affected party take legal action. Finally she will simply publish that “The error regretted”. Is this fair journalism? Is she a fair journalist.? If its not done for money, then what else do we believe? She mentioned about a raid and transfer of Tuticorin Collector. In fact, when transfer order issued Sandhya’s gang member Ashish kumar created a forgery document in the name of raid and prepare a letter to Chief Secretary and
  • 4. hand over the colour Xerox copy or original to his college gang member Sandhya which was published her on 27.1.2017. In fact, based on the complaint and after enquiry, Ashish Kumar was prosecuted. It is mentioned in my previous posts. Ashish Kumar prepared one inspection report and get signature from subordinate officers which is given below. “As per Statement given by the petitioners, who are local residents, this illegal mining activity has been carried out by VV Mineral limited.” Only based on the above wordings, Ashish Kumar created the D.O. letter and hand over it to Sandhya. It is pertinent to point out here that, within four kilometer radius, there is no habitation or village. Moreover no petitioner has made complaint against either VV Mineral or other party. Hence VV Mineral approached under RTI to furnish the details about who were enquired, the name details and the statements etc., Since this was a created one, no one was ready to give it. Finally the case was reached Information Commission. When Information Commissioner enquired, the PIO admitted that, at the time of inspection, no enquiry made. By recording the same, the information commission directed to furnish details to
  • 5. the petitioner Mr.S.Vaikundarajan. That is why Sandhya’s Gang Member Ashish Kumar was prosecuted. To protect her gang member, she create story that, for send report Ashish Kumar was transferred. This is a tactic. She is a very good director to create a fantasy thriller story. In her Article on 30.1.17, she mentioned that, Mr.S.Vaikundarajan is a nice and polite man and she praised his character also in some way. Whereas, on 31.1.17, due to the pressure from her boss, she told that, the village people warned her “Be careful” and when she entered VV Mineral mining area, five people rush in car. Whether she get any permission to enter in the mine? Is it not a trespass? Whether the employees who are In charge for the mine should not ask her about her illegal trespassing? Even then also, she was not attacked or abused. Can any person enter her house without her permission claiming that some antisocial activities are planned by her? Is it permissible? It is pertinent to note that she has not uttered a single word about FIR or complaint against in Ashish Kumar letter. After all her objective is simply to support Daya Devadass, and create problems to his competitors.
  • 6. Again she speaks about the visit of Mr.S.Vaikundarajan’s brother house, cleverly this was also used against Mr.S.Vaikundarajan. Again and again, she refer as illegal mining. Where is that? What is the total quantity VV Mineral mined and paid royalty to government? What is the total quantity VV Mineral sold and exported? Where is the figure and proof. Merely writing by Sandhya after getting money is enough? As told that, she is fit to create mythical story, she has claimed that four people surrounded the car. But she didn’t say if they used any abusing words or attacked the car? How wonderful her imagination works, this way she can claim even by-passers or common public or any employees walking near the road can be claimed they surrounded the car. This again proves her ulterior motive. I have clearly explained about the back ground of Bedi Commission and Ashish Kumar with documentary proof. Please read this one more timehttp://vetri3337.blogspot.in/2017/01/paid-news- sandhya-ravi-shankar- article.html andhttp://vetri3337.blogspot.in/2017/02/p aid-news-sandhya-ravi-shankar-article.html
  • 7. Again she wrote about the 02.02.2015 story prepared for Dhayadevadas and finally publish clarification that, “The story was based on a PIL filed by Victor Rajamanikkam that had come up for hearing on Madras High Court and the figure of corruption of 1 lakh Crore was based on it and not independently verified us …..The error regretted”. It is available in goo.gl/oIYJ1 When she gets high remuneration to prepare the story, definitely the risk also high. She get higher remuneration and she negotiate and collect by expecting the legal action also. So it is her duty to face the legal action. Why don’t she reveal that, the MoEF officials report was handed over to her by her gang head Dhayadevadas by getting under RTI Act. Now she again explain her husband’s connection with News 7 Channel. But she slightly modified that, other people approach her husband. If she publish the e-mail of her husband, the truth will come out. Let her to publish
  • 8. the e-mail as published Vaikundarjan’s mail (Her published Vaikundarajan mail also establish the nexus between Dhayadevadas and Sandhya) She told that there is no enemity or revenge. Then what prevents her for not publishing the real facts and clarifications given by Mr.S.Vaikundarajan and the documents given by him. Why she project the story only against Mr.S.Vaikundarajan? When IRE Ltd is having 3274 Hect mining lease in India and VV Mineral and Transworld having only 365 Hect leases area and her boss Dhayadevadas company Indian Garnet Sand company having 399 Hect and Trimax having 720 Hect mining lease area, who is monopoly? Does it not reflect the hidden intensions of Sandhya? She mentioned that by referring her in the government report she was personally attacked. Will it not applicable to Mr.S.Vaikundarajan? Will he not be targeted after this false story? In fact that is the whole point for her. Now the cat is finally out of the bag. She admitted that, during January 2015, she contacted Vaikundarajan for a response to the allegation. Accordingly,
  • 9. Mr.S.Vaikundarajan gave a detailed reply and the interview went on very smoothly. Let her produce the questions and reply between them which she sent by mail. Let her reproduce the mail which questions she asked with him and what reply received from him? This will establish her motive and enemity. She mentioned Mr.S.Vaikundarajan’s mail to her during August 2016. The following words in his mail alone will establish that Sandhya is a paid news reporter. “In the previous occasion also you an asked some clarification from me, which were answered and we showed you all the documents and handed over copy of all the relevant documents. But the article did not cover any of our explanation, it was purely biased and one sided and focused only on a bogus PIL. The clarification asked by you and replies given by me are not reflected in any your previous article, even though you recorded the whole audio. All this only makes me believe you may be biased and are supporting our competitors Mr.Dhayadevadas and Victor Rajamanikkam”. Will it not establish her character that she will create story as one sided even other party gave any reply.?
  • 10. In this four part also, she did not refer any clarification given by Mr.S.Vaikundarajan which she got even January 2015 from him. Will it not establish that, she is a paid reporter.? Now again I challenge. Is Sandhya ready to swear on her father or on her child that the above mentioned documents and explanations were not seen by Sandhya and her husband in their office in the presence of Mr.Vaikundarajan and Venkatesh during January 2015? Is Sandhya ready to swear that, she do not know about the above said facts and she did not collect copies from Mr.S.Vaikundarajan?. Is writing by suppressing the truth called the Ethics of Journalism? Is it right to publish one sided stories without getting the other parties reply? Even reply send by mail by the association people, it is not published. Will it not established that, this press also part and partial of the gang and to usurp the public fund from
  • 11. various forums, this type of one sided stories are published. Is it not the duty of every citizen to enquire about the media and the funding agency who supply the fund and the background about them? Whether the fund supplied after payment of proper Income Tax or supplied to escape from the Income Tax. Dear all, those who praise Sandhya, please ask her to swear in your presence denying all my above clarification. Please ask wire also to publish the funds received from various funding agencies. Also please ask government agencies to enquire and to ensure whether the funding agencies supply the fund after payment of Income Tax or they use it as Hawala route and thereby create negative opinion against Indian industries to help foreign companies. Is it not necessary that a CBI enquiry is mandatory to find out the amount involved in the transaction of Independent and Public Spirited Media Foundation and Wire and Sandhya and other peoples. Please think about this and join hand with us to eradicate fake reporters.