�ݺ�ߣ

LM-3A Series Launch Vehicle User’s Manual
Issue 201110-1
CHAPTER 10 SATELLITE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
10.1 Introduction
This Chapter introduces the satellite design requirements from the launch vehicle
compatibility perspective, which include load conditions, coupled load analysis, safety
requirements, satellite mass and CoG, specifications of satellite qualification and
acceptance tests.
10.2 Load Conditions for Satellite Design
10.2.1 Frequency Requirement
To avoid the SC dynamic coupling with the launch vehicle, the primary frequency of SC
structure should meet the following requirement (under the condition that SC/LV separation
plane is considered as a rigid body):
The first order lateral frequency of the main mode: > 10 Hz
The first order longitudinal frequency of the main mode: > 30 Hz
10.2.2 Loads Applied for SC Structure Design
The maximum lateral load occurs when the launch vehicle flies with a transonic speed or
under Maximum Dynamic Pressure (MDP).
The maximum longitudinal static load occurs at the first stage engines shutdown for LM-3A.
The maximum longitudinal static load occurs at the boosters’ engines shutdown for LM-3B,
LM-3BE and LM-3C.
The maximum longitudinal dynamic load occurs immediately following the first and second
stage separation.
Therefore, the following limit loads corresponding to different flight conditions are
recommended for SC design consideration. See Table 10-1 and Table 10-2.

Issue 2011 10-2
Table 10-1 LM-3A Limit Loads
Flight Condition
Transonic Phase
& MDP
Stage-1 Engines
Shutdown
1st
/2nd
Stage
Separation
Static + 2.0 + 5.0 + 1.4
Dynamic
+ 0.8
- 0.8
+ 0.8
- 5.5
+ 3.0
- 3.8
Longitudinal
Load Factor
(g)
Combined + 2.8
+ 5.8
- 0.5
+ 4.4
- 2.4
Lateral Load
Factor (g)
/ 2.0 1.0 1.0
Table 10-2 LM-3B/3BE/3C Limit Loads
Flight Condition
Transonic Phase
& MDP
Stage-1 Engines
Shutdown
1st
/2nd
Stage
Separation
Static + 2.2 + 5.3 + 1.0
Dynamic
+ 0.8
- 0.8
+ 0.8
- 3.6
+ 2.7
- 3.6
Longitudinal
Load Factor
(g)
Combined + 3.0 + 6.1
+ 3.7
- 2.6
Lateral Load
Factor (g)
/ 1.5* 1.0 1.0
Notes for Table 10-1 and Table 10-2:
a) * means that 1.5g is effective only under the following conditions:
i) The SC frequency meets the requirement in Paragraph 10.2.1;
ii) Mass of SC: ≤ 5,100 kg for LM-3B; ≤ 5,500 kg for LM-3BE; ≤ 3,800 kg for LM-3C.
iii) The distance between SC CoG to the SC/LV separation plane: ≤1.6 m.
For specific SC, the “1.5 g” may be larger. The users should consult with CALT to
determine the actual load conditions according to the specific SC conditions.
b) Usage of the above loads in the Tables:
Loads for SC design = Limit loads x Safety Factor**
** The safety factor is determined by the SC designer. A safety factor ≥1.25 is recommended
by CALT.
c) The lateral load means the load acting in any direction perpendicular to the longitudinal
axis.
d) For a given flight condition, both lateral and longitudinal loads should be considered
simultaneously.
e) The plus sign "+" in longitudinal load factor means compression.
10.3 Coupled Load Analysis

Issue 201110-3
The SC manufacturer should provide its SC mathematical model to CALT for the Coupled
Loads Analysis (CLA). CALT will predict the SC maximum dynamic response by coupled
load analysis. The SC manufacturer should confirm that the SC can survive the predicted
environment and has an adequate safety margin. The safety factor recommended by CALT
is ≥ 1.25.
10.4 Safety Requirements
XSLC has implemented a safety program to protect the launch site personnel, the launch
site facilities and the visitors to the launch site for the launch services. The program has
several facets all based on a typical launch processing schedule for a commercial satellite
using conventional propellants and gases. The major aspects of the program are as follows:
a) Launch site safety control;
b) Safety approval based on the satellite safety submissions;
c) Training of the customer and satellite manufacturer’s team in safety procedures
implemented at XSLC;
d) Safety requirements during hazardous operations;
e) Response to accidents and medical support.
XSLC has overall responsibility for preparing and implementing the safety procedures and is
responsible for ensuring that the safety procedures are followed. The customer and satellite
manufacturer will have the responsibility for ensuring that their respective teams have all
participated in the safety training before being allowed to work within XSLC and are
responsible for ensuring that their respective teams observe all the safety regulations at
XSLC.
All customer operations at XSLC require the approval of the XSLC safety authorities, in
particular the hazardous operations, all transportation at XSLC and combined operations.
The customer is required to demonstrate that the satellite, the support equipment and all
operations at XSLC comply with the XSLC safety regulations. This is achieved in a
maximum of three stages by the submission of reports detailing all the hazardous
subsystems, hazardous materials, hazardous procedures used or implemented at XSLC.
The customer submits these reports to CGWIC for review and approval by the relevant
authorities and a typical submission schedule, with the requirements at different stages
according to the baseline specified in Table 11-2 of this User’s Manual.

Issue 2011 10-4
10.5 Satellite Mass and CoG Requirements
LM-3A Series launch vehicles can accommodate a wide range of satellite mass and CoG
positions. See Table 10-3.
Table 10-3 Satellite Mass and CoG Requirement
Tolerance of CoG
LV Mass (kg)
Axis (mm) Transverse (mm)
LM-3A 2,600 ±20 ±10
LM-3B 5,100 ±20 ±10
LM-3BE 5,500 ±20 ±10
LM-3C 3,800 ±20 ±10
10.6 Qualification and Acceptance Test Specifications
10.6.1 Static Loads Test (Qualification)
The main SC structure should pass the static load qualification tests without damage. The
test load level should not be lower than SC design load required in Paragraph 10.2.2.
10.6.2 Sinusoidal Vibration Test
During sinusoidal vibration tests, the SC should be rigidly mounted on the shaker. The table
below specifies the vibration amplitude and acceleration level (zero-peak) at the SC/LV
interface for the SC qualification and acceptance tests. (See Figure 10-1)

Issue 201110-5
Test Load
Frequency (Hz)
Acceptance Qualification
5-8 3.11 mm 4.66 mm
Longitudinal
8-100 0.8 g 1.2 g
5-8 2.33 mm 3.50 mm
Lateral
8-100 0.6 g 0.9 g
Scan rate (Oct/min) / 4 2
Notes:
a) Frequency tolerance is allowed to be 2%
b) Amplitude tolerance is allowed to be 10%
c) Acceleration notching is permitted after consultation with CALT and
concurred by all parties. In no case should the notched accelerations
be lower than the results of coupled loads analysis on the interface
plane. CALT recommends that the safety factor be ≥1.25.
Figure 10-1 SC Sinusoidal Vibration Test Specification
10.6.3 Acoustic Test
The qualification and acceptance levels of the acoustic test are given in the following table
(also see Figure 10-2).

Issue 2011 10-6
Central Frequency of
Octave Bandwidth
(Hz)
Acceptance
Test Level
(dB)
Qualification
Test Level
(dB)
Deviation of
Test Level
(dB)
31.5 124 128
63 129 133
125 134 138
250 138 142
500 133 137
1000 129 133
2000 128 132
-2 / +4
4000 127 131 -5 / +4
8000 122 126 -5 / +5
Total Acoustic
Pressure Level
141.5 145.5 -1 / +3
Notes:
0 dB referenced to 2×10-5
Pa.
Duration of acceptance test: one minute.
Duration of qualification test: two minutes.
Figure 10-2 SC Acoustic Test Specification
10.6.4 Shock Test
The shock test level is specified in this Paragraph (See Figure 10-3 and 10-4). Such test
shall be performed once for acceptance, and twice for qualification. A tolerance of ±6.0 dB in
test specification is allowed, however, the test levels applied shall ensure that the shock

Issue 201110-7
response spectral analysis is at least 1/6 octave above the maximum and the response
acceleration values at central frequencies shall be at least 30% greater than or equal to the
nominal values given in Figures 10-3 and 10-4.
Frequency (Hz) Shock Response Spectrum (Q=10)
100~1000 10.5 dB/octave
1000~4000 4000 g
Figure 10-3 Shock Response Spectrum at SC/LV Separation
Plane - C100 Clampband

Issue 2011 10-8
Figure 10-4 Shock Response Spectrum at SC/LV Separation
Plane - C60 Clampband
Additionally, CGWIC could also support the customer to procure low shock level separation
system (clampband and the pyros) developed by European suppliers, if needed.
Alternatively, the shock test can be performed through a SC/LV separation test by use of
flight SC, Payload Adapter (PLA), and separation system, all being flight hardware. This test
shall be performed once for acceptance, and twice for qualification.
10.6.5 Proto-flight Test
If the satellite is to be launched by the LM-3A Series launch vehicles for the first time but the
same type of satellite has been launched by other launch vehicles and has been
environmentally tested to levels that are equal to or greater than the qualification test level
described in Paragraph 10.6.1 to Paragraph 10.6.4, CALT will accept the following
Proto-flight test conditions:
a) Vibration test should be performed in accordance with the scan rate of the acceptance
test and at the qualification test level as specified in Paragraph 10.6.2.
b) Acoustic test should be performed in accordance with the test duration of the
acceptance test and at the qualification test level as specified in Paragraph 10.6.3.
c) Shock test should be performed once according to Paragraph 10.6.4.
The test conditions for proto-flight testing should be determined by the satellite manufacturer
and CALT, and should be higher than the acceptance test levels but lower than the
qualification test levels.

�ݺ�ߣ

satellite design requirements

Recommended

More Related Content

Viewers also liked (13)

Recently uploaded (20)

satellite design requirements