際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Industry and Product Introduction


        Monday - January 30th, 2011
                10:00 am
Webinar - Purpose
- Industry introduction
     File Formats
     Legal
          Court Systems
          Paper Way vs. Technology Way
     Medical
            HITECH Act/ ARRA
            Paper Way vs. Technology Way
            Disadvantages of In-house scanning
            Competition
 Product Introduction
     Why ScanVENTURE
            Navigational PDFs
            Case Manager/ Chart Manager
            OCR Search
            Need Integration?
            Demo
            In Conclusion
 Questions & Answers
Industry Introduction  File Formats

                 Scanning Formats
                    JPEG
                    TIFF
                    PDF
                    PDF Bookmarks
                    Metadata
                 OCR
                 Index
Legal  Court Systems

 Federal Court Systems
   2001 mandatory Electronic Case Filing (ECF) be in a PDF
     Electronic filing or e-filing is a method of filing court documents that uses an
     electronic format rather than a traditional paper format. Parties convert their
     documents into the file format designated by the court and file their documents via
     email or over the Internet. By reducing courier and copying fees, use of paper, and
     staff time, E-Filing can be a tremendous cost savings


   Most court systems require all PDFs to be searchable


 State Court Systems
   Next to require ECF be in a PDF
Legal  Paper Way




    Disadvantages                                       True Costs
                                                        Coopers & Lybrand shows...
       Very inefficient
       Lost files and documents                        90% of all documents are merely shuffled

       Very labor intensive searching,                 A document is copied an average of 19 times
                                                        It costs about...
        copying, and storing documents
                                                                $20 to file a document
       Long term-expensive storage                             $120 to find a misfiled document
        requirements for 7 soon to be                           $220 to replace a lost document
                                                        7.5% of all documents get lost
        10 years                                        3% get misfiled

For $50 you can store the equivalent of 100 4-drawer file cabinets on a single 50GB drive compared to the
                             cost of the cabinets estimated at $9,600 a year
Legal - Technology Way




Advantages                            Disadvantages
   Server or centrally stored           Very Expensive
    database                             Difficult to learn and use- lots of
   Helps your office go paperless        training  templates
   Meets Fed/ State ECF                 Still labor intensive scan and
   OCR and file indexing offered         index
   Diminished long term filing and      Need ongoing IT support
    storage costs                        Data Conversion Fees
Medical  HITECH Act/ ARRA
           American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)
           of 2009 and Health Information Technology for
           Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act)

              This act was signed into law by President
               Obama on February 17, 2009 and
               encompasses the Health Information
               Technology for Economic and Clinical Health
               Act (HITECH Act).

           The HITECH Act objective is to provide
           reimbursement incentives for eligible
           professionals and hospitals who can:

              demonstrate the meaningful use of electronic
               health records (EHR)
              to establish standards, implementation
               specifications, and certification criteria for
               EHRs
              protecting privacy and security of health
               information
Medical  Paper Way




Disadvantages                         True Costs
                                      AZ COMP
   Very inefficient                  - What is it costing annually for an average practice
   Lost medical records                to manage paper charts?
                                        - $12,000 Transcriptions
   Very labor intensive searching,     - $ 2,400 Paper Chart Supplies
    copying, and filing records         - $41,600 Labor to Manage Pulling & Refiling Charts
                                        - $ 2,500 Labor to Find Misplaced Charts
   Long term-expensive storage         - $36,000 For Inbound Faxes
    requirements for 10 years to 21     - $21,875 For Outbound Faxes
    years                               - $25,000 Money Lost in Down-Coding
   HIPAA issues                        $141,375 Per Year to Manage Paper Charts
Medical - Technology Way




Advantages                            Disadvantages
   Server or centrally stored           Expensive  laborious
    database                             Not a DMS system  clinical based
   Helps your office go paperless-      Still labor intensive  poor solution
    efficient clinical tool               for scanning in old medical records
   Meets HIPAA                          Continue to store paper
   Gets you your $$$$                  Major violations for data breach 
   Diminished long printing costs        CMS fines
Industry Introduction  In-house

        Why
             Spend thousands for scanning technology
              and additional staff that will take months,
              even years to convert paper charts and case
              files
        When
             ScanVENTURE can easily process hundreds
              of medical charts and case files an hour
              with our state-the-art scanning and OCR
              technology
        Avoid
             Lost TIME, Wasted MONEY and Needless
              HEADACHES
Product Introduction - Competition

 Major Players ($200 million - $8 billion)
      ACS
      Iron Mountain
      GRM
      Cintas
      Recall
 Local Players ($2 million - $10 million)
    Filing Source
    Data Guard
 Scanning Competition ($2 million <)
    ScanTronix
    Laser Fiche
Product Introduction - Competition

 Competition (Iron Mtn. etc.)
    Majority of document storage companies charge to scan
     per image:
         $.10 up >
         No segmentation
         Few scan onsite
         No experience in healthcare / integration
         Disruptive business
Product Introduction - ScanVENTURE

         PDF navigator
              Proprietary technology that differentiate
                the sections of medical records and case
                files
              Digital documents presented in a form
                that they will actually use and have been
                using for years
              PDF can be seamlessly integrated with
                existing third party DMS system or EMR


         Chart and Case Manager Application
                 A search tool to find and manage your
                  digital scanned medical records and
                  case files
Product Intro - PDF Navigator

ScanVENTURE has created proprietary PDF navigators which eliminates the need of
bookmarking and/or manual indexing  a digital chart or case view
Product Intro. - Chart / Case Manager

An application tool provided to help locate scanned medical records or case files on their
clients server or desktop PCs. This tool enables the office to easily add or scan sections
and other additional PDF documents to their digitally converted medical record or case
files.
Product Intro. - OCR Search

ScanMD runs optical character recognition (OCR) on all scanned charts and case files
to make them text/ numeric searchable for future abstraction or data mining .
Product Intro. - Need Integration?
Product Intro. - In Conclusion
                Waste           Revenue



Medical




          Organized      Disorganized



                                          Legal
Thank you for your time

More Related Content

Scan Venture Introduction

  • 1. Industry and Product Introduction Monday - January 30th, 2011 10:00 am
  • 2. Webinar - Purpose - Industry introduction File Formats Legal Court Systems Paper Way vs. Technology Way Medical HITECH Act/ ARRA Paper Way vs. Technology Way Disadvantages of In-house scanning Competition Product Introduction Why ScanVENTURE Navigational PDFs Case Manager/ Chart Manager OCR Search Need Integration? Demo In Conclusion Questions & Answers
  • 3. Industry Introduction File Formats Scanning Formats JPEG TIFF PDF PDF Bookmarks Metadata OCR Index
  • 4. Legal Court Systems Federal Court Systems 2001 mandatory Electronic Case Filing (ECF) be in a PDF Electronic filing or e-filing is a method of filing court documents that uses an electronic format rather than a traditional paper format. Parties convert their documents into the file format designated by the court and file their documents via email or over the Internet. By reducing courier and copying fees, use of paper, and staff time, E-Filing can be a tremendous cost savings Most court systems require all PDFs to be searchable State Court Systems Next to require ECF be in a PDF
  • 5. Legal Paper Way Disadvantages True Costs Coopers & Lybrand shows... Very inefficient Lost files and documents 90% of all documents are merely shuffled Very labor intensive searching, A document is copied an average of 19 times It costs about... copying, and storing documents $20 to file a document Long term-expensive storage $120 to find a misfiled document requirements for 7 soon to be $220 to replace a lost document 7.5% of all documents get lost 10 years 3% get misfiled For $50 you can store the equivalent of 100 4-drawer file cabinets on a single 50GB drive compared to the cost of the cabinets estimated at $9,600 a year
  • 6. Legal - Technology Way Advantages Disadvantages Server or centrally stored Very Expensive database Difficult to learn and use- lots of Helps your office go paperless training templates Meets Fed/ State ECF Still labor intensive scan and OCR and file indexing offered index Diminished long term filing and Need ongoing IT support storage costs Data Conversion Fees
  • 7. Medical HITECH Act/ ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 and Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act) This act was signed into law by President Obama on February 17, 2009 and encompasses the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act). The HITECH Act objective is to provide reimbursement incentives for eligible professionals and hospitals who can: demonstrate the meaningful use of electronic health records (EHR) to establish standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for EHRs protecting privacy and security of health information
  • 8. Medical Paper Way Disadvantages True Costs AZ COMP Very inefficient - What is it costing annually for an average practice Lost medical records to manage paper charts? - $12,000 Transcriptions Very labor intensive searching, - $ 2,400 Paper Chart Supplies copying, and filing records - $41,600 Labor to Manage Pulling & Refiling Charts - $ 2,500 Labor to Find Misplaced Charts Long term-expensive storage - $36,000 For Inbound Faxes requirements for 10 years to 21 - $21,875 For Outbound Faxes years - $25,000 Money Lost in Down-Coding HIPAA issues $141,375 Per Year to Manage Paper Charts
  • 9. Medical - Technology Way Advantages Disadvantages Server or centrally stored Expensive laborious database Not a DMS system clinical based Helps your office go paperless- Still labor intensive poor solution efficient clinical tool for scanning in old medical records Meets HIPAA Continue to store paper Gets you your $$$$ Major violations for data breach Diminished long printing costs CMS fines
  • 10. Industry Introduction In-house Why Spend thousands for scanning technology and additional staff that will take months, even years to convert paper charts and case files When ScanVENTURE can easily process hundreds of medical charts and case files an hour with our state-the-art scanning and OCR technology Avoid Lost TIME, Wasted MONEY and Needless HEADACHES
  • 11. Product Introduction - Competition Major Players ($200 million - $8 billion) ACS Iron Mountain GRM Cintas Recall Local Players ($2 million - $10 million) Filing Source Data Guard Scanning Competition ($2 million <) ScanTronix Laser Fiche
  • 12. Product Introduction - Competition Competition (Iron Mtn. etc.) Majority of document storage companies charge to scan per image: $.10 up > No segmentation Few scan onsite No experience in healthcare / integration Disruptive business
  • 13. Product Introduction - ScanVENTURE PDF navigator Proprietary technology that differentiate the sections of medical records and case files Digital documents presented in a form that they will actually use and have been using for years PDF can be seamlessly integrated with existing third party DMS system or EMR Chart and Case Manager Application A search tool to find and manage your digital scanned medical records and case files
  • 14. Product Intro - PDF Navigator ScanVENTURE has created proprietary PDF navigators which eliminates the need of bookmarking and/or manual indexing a digital chart or case view
  • 15. Product Intro. - Chart / Case Manager An application tool provided to help locate scanned medical records or case files on their clients server or desktop PCs. This tool enables the office to easily add or scan sections and other additional PDF documents to their digitally converted medical record or case files.
  • 16. Product Intro. - OCR Search ScanMD runs optical character recognition (OCR) on all scanned charts and case files to make them text/ numeric searchable for future abstraction or data mining .
  • 17. Product Intro. - Need Integration?
  • 18. Product Intro. - In Conclusion Waste Revenue Medical Organized Disorganized Legal
  • 19. Thank you for your time