ºÝºÝߣ

ºÝºÝߣShare a Scribd company logo
Group: Jose Antonio Weymann,
                                                           Diego de Leon, Enrique Neutze.


                                 SCIENCE FAIR DATA
                                   Trial 1: Week 1
Group   Day 1       Day 2        Day 3        Day 4        Day 5          Day 6    Day 7
  B     0 mm.       0 mm.        2 mm.       5 mm.         8 mm.         10 mm.   13 mm.
  A     0 mm.       0 mm.        1 mm.       3 mm.         5 mm.         8 mm.    10 mm.

                                       Week 2
Group    Day 8      Day 2        Day 3      Day 4          Day 5          Day 6    Day 7
  B     14 mm.     15 mm.       16 mm.     19 mm.         21 mm.         25 mm.   27 mm.
  A     10 mm.     11 mm.       13 mm.     13 mm.         15 mm.         16 mm.   18 mm.

                 Results: This trial supported the group’s hypothesis.
                                      Trial 2: Week 1
Group   Day 1       Day 2          Day 3         Day 4      Day 5      Day 6      Day 7
  B     0 mm.       0 mm.          0 mm.        3 mm.       5 mm.      6 mm.      8 mm.
  A     0 mm.       0 mm.          0 mm.        2 mm.       3 mm.      5 mm.      6 mm.

                                       Week 2
Group    Day 1      Day 2        Day 3      Day 4          Day 5          Day 6    Day 7
  B     10 mm.     11 mm.       11 mm.     13 mm.         14 mm.         17 mm.   20 mm.
  A     6 mm.      7 mm.        8 mm.      10 mm.         10 mm.         12 mm.   13 mm.

                 Results: This trial supported the group’s hypothesis.
                                      Trial 3: Week 1
Group   Day 1       Day 2          Day 3         Day 4      Day 5       Day 6      Day 7
  B     0 mm.       0 mm.          3 mm.        5 mm.       7 mm.      10 mm.     13 mm.
  A     0 mm.       0 mm.          1 mm.        3 mm.       5 mm.      7 mm.      10 mm.

                                       Week 2
Group    Day 1      Day 2        Day 3      Day 4          Day 5          Day 6    Day 7
  B     14 mm.     15 mm.       18 mm.     21 mm.         21 mm.         22 mm.   23 mm.
  A     11 mm.     12 mm.       12 mm.     13 mm.         15 mm.         16 mm.   17 mm.

                 Results: This trial supported the group’s hypothesis.




                             GRAPHS ON SECOND PAGE.
                       X axis: Days; Y axis: millimeters grown.
Trial 1.
30


25


20


15
                                                                                 Pot A
                                                                                 Pot B
10


 5


 0
     Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day
      1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14



                                           Trial 2.
25


20


15

                                                                                 Pot A
10
                                                                                 Pot B


 5


 0
     Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 Day 8 Day 9 Day Day Day Day Day
                                                           10 11 12 13 14
Trial 3.
   25


   20


   15

                                                                                        Pot A
   10
                                                                                        Pot B


    5


    0
        Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6Day 7 Day 8 Day 9 Day Day Day Day Day
                                                             10 11 12 13 14



Analysis: Based on my data, the plants that were stimulated by an electrical charge grew more
than the plants that were not stimulated by electricity by heights that ranged between 2-9
millimeters more.

Observations:
       Electrically stimulated plants grew more.
       During the trials there wasn’t any results in which the normally grown plant ended up
       being taller.
       The range of growth varied a lot.
       This was probably caused by different sources of error and other factors: climate changes,
       natural variation in sun exposure, natural exposure to animal life, etc.

CONCLUSION: Our Hypothesis was supported by our overall results; the bean group that received
 an electrical charge daily (5 minutes) for a period of two weeks grew more than the bean group
                               that did not receive an electrical charge.

More Related Content

SCIENCE FAIR DATA

  • 1. Group: Jose Antonio Weymann, Diego de Leon, Enrique Neutze. SCIENCE FAIR DATA Trial 1: Week 1 Group Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 B 0 mm. 0 mm. 2 mm. 5 mm. 8 mm. 10 mm. 13 mm. A 0 mm. 0 mm. 1 mm. 3 mm. 5 mm. 8 mm. 10 mm. Week 2 Group Day 8 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 B 14 mm. 15 mm. 16 mm. 19 mm. 21 mm. 25 mm. 27 mm. A 10 mm. 11 mm. 13 mm. 13 mm. 15 mm. 16 mm. 18 mm. Results: This trial supported the group’s hypothesis. Trial 2: Week 1 Group Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 B 0 mm. 0 mm. 0 mm. 3 mm. 5 mm. 6 mm. 8 mm. A 0 mm. 0 mm. 0 mm. 2 mm. 3 mm. 5 mm. 6 mm. Week 2 Group Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 B 10 mm. 11 mm. 11 mm. 13 mm. 14 mm. 17 mm. 20 mm. A 6 mm. 7 mm. 8 mm. 10 mm. 10 mm. 12 mm. 13 mm. Results: This trial supported the group’s hypothesis. Trial 3: Week 1 Group Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 B 0 mm. 0 mm. 3 mm. 5 mm. 7 mm. 10 mm. 13 mm. A 0 mm. 0 mm. 1 mm. 3 mm. 5 mm. 7 mm. 10 mm. Week 2 Group Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 B 14 mm. 15 mm. 18 mm. 21 mm. 21 mm. 22 mm. 23 mm. A 11 mm. 12 mm. 12 mm. 13 mm. 15 mm. 16 mm. 17 mm. Results: This trial supported the group’s hypothesis. GRAPHS ON SECOND PAGE. X axis: Days; Y axis: millimeters grown.
  • 2. Trial 1. 30 25 20 15 Pot A Pot B 10 5 0 Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Trial 2. 25 20 15 Pot A 10 Pot B 5 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 Day 8 Day 9 Day Day Day Day Day 10 11 12 13 14
  • 3. Trial 3. 25 20 15 Pot A 10 Pot B 5 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6Day 7 Day 8 Day 9 Day Day Day Day Day 10 11 12 13 14 Analysis: Based on my data, the plants that were stimulated by an electrical charge grew more than the plants that were not stimulated by electricity by heights that ranged between 2-9 millimeters more. Observations: Electrically stimulated plants grew more. During the trials there wasn’t any results in which the normally grown plant ended up being taller. The range of growth varied a lot. This was probably caused by different sources of error and other factors: climate changes, natural variation in sun exposure, natural exposure to animal life, etc. CONCLUSION: Our Hypothesis was supported by our overall results; the bean group that received an electrical charge daily (5 minutes) for a period of two weeks grew more than the bean group that did not receive an electrical charge.