際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo

Section E: Existing evaluation and monitoring of TOD

Download as PPTX, PDF
Radha Hayagreev
Radha Hayagreev

Presentation for EMBARQ India. The review of evaluation and monitoring of TOD's in India. This was part of a larger presentation and compilation of TOD's in the developing world for the World Bank as an e-learning course.

1 of 14
Downloaded 27 times
Transit Oriented Development for Developing Countries E-Learning + Guidebook content August 2014
August 2014 Sections of Transit Oriented Development Guide A. Principles of TOD B. Existing Institutional and Regulatory Framework C. How-to-Design and Implementation Methodology D. Case Study E. Evaluation and Monitoring
Evaluating and Monitoring TOD E-Learning + Guidebook content August 2014 Scope of work a. Review existing monitoring and evaluating standards for TOD zones. b. Broad recommendations for post-construction evaluation of TOD zones. c. Monitoring and evaluation for both design and performance of completed TOD zone
Evaluation and Monitoring Section E August 2014 Existing agencies working on TOD zones ITDP (US/Global) - Institute for Transportation and Development Policy UTTIPEC (Delhi) - Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure (Plg & Engg.) Centre SUTP (India) - Sustainable Urban Transport Project EMBARQ (US/Global) - The World Resources Institution for Sustainable Transport URDPFI (Delhi/India) - Urban and Regional Development Plans Formulation and Implementation Guidelines, Feb 2014 TERI (Delhi/India) - The Energy and Resources Institute NMSH (Delhi/India) - National Mission of Sustainable Habitat, 2011 ITDP UTTIPEC SUTP EMBARQ URDPFI NMSHTERI
ITDP Evaluation and Monitoring Section E Scoring the TOD zone using a point-based system. Similar to LEED, needs high data documentation. Might not be feasible for data starved conditions of developing countries. August 2014 Source: https://go.itdp.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=54887465 Date Accessed July 31 2014
ITDP Evaluation and Monitoring Section E August 2014 Source: https://go.itdp.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=54887465 Date Accessed July 31 2014 Online database with points for each principle mentioned in website.1. Walk - 15 2. Cycle - 5 3. Connect - 15 4. Transit - Requirement 5. Mix - 15 6. Densify - 15 7. Compact - 15 8. Shift - 20 1. Gold Rating - 85-100 points 2. Silver - 70-84 points 3. Bronze - 55-69 points
Evaluation and Monitoring Section E August 2014 Source: http:/ /uttipec.nic.in/index1.asp?linkid=65&langid=1 Date Accessed July 31 2014 UTTIPEC UTTIPEC has clear objectives for designing a TOD zone in Delhi But, there is no indication of any evaluation/monitoring strategies within this document.
Section E August 2014 Source http://uttipec.nic.in/writereaddata/linkimages/6890588280.pdf Acessed July 31 2014 UTTIPEC There is, however, a Final deliverable requirement of evaluation and monitoring in the TOD methodology document. Also, Evaluation of TOD using the Sustainability framework Evaluation and Monitoring
Section E August 2014 SourceL Sustainable Urban Transport Project November 2012 Quarterly Newsletter Acessed July 31 2014 SUTP Explicit mention about a consultant agency appointed for Monitoring and Evaluation of Naya Raipur TOD. DIMTS is the consulting agency for Monitoring and Evaluation of TOD Evaluation and Monitoring
Section E August 2014 SourceL Sustainable Urban Transport Project November 2012 Quarterly Newsletter Acessed July 31 2014 Evaluation and Monitoring URDPFIURDPFI is a guideline document from the Ministry of Urban Development for all urban activities in India Prescriptive TOD planning, financial implication and impact of TOD as a planning tool is mentioned but there is no indication of evaluation and monitoring techniques of TOD projects.
Section E August 2014 Source: http://moud.gov.in/NMSH Date Accessed Aug 5th 2014 Evaluation and Monitoring NMSH National Mission of Sustainable Habitats clearly specify indicators of evaluations for Land-use and Transport integration projects
Evaluation and Monitoring Section E ITDP, Global UTTIPEC, Delhi SUTP, India URDPFI, India TERI, India/Global NMSH, India EMBARQ India/Global Scoring the TOD zone using a point- based system 1. No indication for evaluation and monitoring methodology. 2. Sustainability framework are overarching goals for final implementation strategies and evaluation methods Delhi Multi-Modal Transit Systems Ltd. (DIMTS) appointed as monitoring and evaluation consultants 1. Guidance document for Urban and Regional Planning for the nation. 2. No specific detail about evaluation and monitoring criteria * Needs more in- depth research into sustainable communities advocacy. Will probably take more time with this one. 1. 13 indicators are prescribed for evaluating land- use and transport integration projects. 1. Feasibility testing of TOD norms in Public Participatory Workshops. (Ghatkopar Station). 2. Learning about critical evaluation criteria through project/case study process. Needs to be worked in detail.
Section E August 2014 SourceL Sustainable Urban Transport Project November 2012 Quarterly Newsletter Acessed July 31 2014 Evaluation and Monitoring Source Takeaway Brennan, Christian a, and Chris Hoene. 2002. Study Reveals Benefits of Linking Transportation, Development. Nation's Cities Weekly. 25, no. 36: 11. Outline Criteria for structuring and evaluating the performance of TOD a. Location Efficiency (additional mobility, improved access to services and high quality transit) b. Value Recapture (from not depending on automobiles: reduced parking/gasoline costs) c. Livability (improved quality of life) d. Financial Return (Evaluation should also weigh the return to public and private investors) e. Choices (More choices to a greater range of income and age levels) f. Efficient Regional Land Use Pattern Journals The evaluation and monitoring strategies for the TOD in the developing world must verify the overarching goals of inclusive, sustainable and equitable design for the project.
Section E In a pieces vs. whole strategy, how does one evaluate the success of a TOD project? Does every Principle needs to be defined and set up for evaluation and monitoring as shown below? August 2014 Evaluation and Monitoring

More Related Content

Section E: Existing evaluation and monitoring of TOD

  • 1. Transit Oriented Development for Developing Countries E-Learning + Guidebook content August 2014
  • 2. August 2014 Sections of Transit Oriented Development Guide A. Principles of TOD B. Existing Institutional and Regulatory Framework C. How-to-Design and Implementation Methodology D. Case Study E. Evaluation and Monitoring
  • 3. Evaluating and Monitoring TOD E-Learning + Guidebook content August 2014 Scope of work a. Review existing monitoring and evaluating standards for TOD zones. b. Broad recommendations for post-construction evaluation of TOD zones. c. Monitoring and evaluation for both design and performance of completed TOD zone
  • 4. Evaluation and Monitoring Section E August 2014 Existing agencies working on TOD zones ITDP (US/Global) - Institute for Transportation and Development Policy UTTIPEC (Delhi) - Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure (Plg & Engg.) Centre SUTP (India) - Sustainable Urban Transport Project EMBARQ (US/Global) - The World Resources Institution for Sustainable Transport URDPFI (Delhi/India) - Urban and Regional Development Plans Formulation and Implementation Guidelines, Feb 2014 TERI (Delhi/India) - The Energy and Resources Institute NMSH (Delhi/India) - National Mission of Sustainable Habitat, 2011 ITDP UTTIPEC SUTP EMBARQ URDPFI NMSHTERI
  • 5. ITDP Evaluation and Monitoring Section E Scoring the TOD zone using a point-based system. Similar to LEED, needs high data documentation. Might not be feasible for data starved conditions of developing countries. August 2014 Source: https://go.itdp.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=54887465 Date Accessed July 31 2014
  • 6. ITDP Evaluation and Monitoring Section E August 2014 Source: https://go.itdp.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=54887465 Date Accessed July 31 2014 Online database with points for each principle mentioned in website.1. Walk - 15 2. Cycle - 5 3. Connect - 15 4. Transit - Requirement 5. Mix - 15 6. Densify - 15 7. Compact - 15 8. Shift - 20 1. Gold Rating - 85-100 points 2. Silver - 70-84 points 3. Bronze - 55-69 points
  • 7. Evaluation and Monitoring Section E August 2014 Source: http:/ /uttipec.nic.in/index1.asp?linkid=65&langid=1 Date Accessed July 31 2014 UTTIPEC UTTIPEC has clear objectives for designing a TOD zone in Delhi But, there is no indication of any evaluation/monitoring strategies within this document.
  • 8. Section E August 2014 Source http://uttipec.nic.in/writereaddata/linkimages/6890588280.pdf Acessed July 31 2014 UTTIPEC There is, however, a Final deliverable requirement of evaluation and monitoring in the TOD methodology document. Also, Evaluation of TOD using the Sustainability framework Evaluation and Monitoring
  • 9. Section E August 2014 SourceL Sustainable Urban Transport Project November 2012 Quarterly Newsletter Acessed July 31 2014 SUTP Explicit mention about a consultant agency appointed for Monitoring and Evaluation of Naya Raipur TOD. DIMTS is the consulting agency for Monitoring and Evaluation of TOD Evaluation and Monitoring
  • 10. Section E August 2014 SourceL Sustainable Urban Transport Project November 2012 Quarterly Newsletter Acessed July 31 2014 Evaluation and Monitoring URDPFIURDPFI is a guideline document from the Ministry of Urban Development for all urban activities in India Prescriptive TOD planning, financial implication and impact of TOD as a planning tool is mentioned but there is no indication of evaluation and monitoring techniques of TOD projects.
  • 11. Section E August 2014 Source: http://moud.gov.in/NMSH Date Accessed Aug 5th 2014 Evaluation and Monitoring NMSH National Mission of Sustainable Habitats clearly specify indicators of evaluations for Land-use and Transport integration projects
  • 12. Evaluation and Monitoring Section E ITDP, Global UTTIPEC, Delhi SUTP, India URDPFI, India TERI, India/Global NMSH, India EMBARQ India/Global Scoring the TOD zone using a point- based system 1. No indication for evaluation and monitoring methodology. 2. Sustainability framework are overarching goals for final implementation strategies and evaluation methods Delhi Multi-Modal Transit Systems Ltd. (DIMTS) appointed as monitoring and evaluation consultants 1. Guidance document for Urban and Regional Planning for the nation. 2. No specific detail about evaluation and monitoring criteria * Needs more in- depth research into sustainable communities advocacy. Will probably take more time with this one. 1. 13 indicators are prescribed for evaluating land- use and transport integration projects. 1. Feasibility testing of TOD norms in Public Participatory Workshops. (Ghatkopar Station). 2. Learning about critical evaluation criteria through project/case study process. Needs to be worked in detail.
  • 13. Section E August 2014 SourceL Sustainable Urban Transport Project November 2012 Quarterly Newsletter Acessed July 31 2014 Evaluation and Monitoring Source Takeaway Brennan, Christian a, and Chris Hoene. 2002. Study Reveals Benefits of Linking Transportation, Development. Nation's Cities Weekly. 25, no. 36: 11. Outline Criteria for structuring and evaluating the performance of TOD a. Location Efficiency (additional mobility, improved access to services and high quality transit) b. Value Recapture (from not depending on automobiles: reduced parking/gasoline costs) c. Livability (improved quality of life) d. Financial Return (Evaluation should also weigh the return to public and private investors) e. Choices (More choices to a greater range of income and age levels) f. Efficient Regional Land Use Pattern Journals The evaluation and monitoring strategies for the TOD in the developing world must verify the overarching goals of inclusive, sustainable and equitable design for the project.
  • 14. Section E In a pieces vs. whole strategy, how does one evaluate the success of a TOD project? Does every Principle needs to be defined and set up for evaluation and monitoring as shown below? August 2014 Evaluation and Monitoring