際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo

Self disclosure in addiction counseling: To tell or not to tell?

Download as PPSX, PDF
W
wrule1154

This is also an NYS OASAS approved continuing education course for renewal certification. More info and online course catalog at: https://imustnotuse.com

1 of 24
Download to read offline
Institute for Learning and Development OASAS Certified Education and Training Provider (#0932) Online continuing education courses and certificates for renewal certification https://imustnotuse.com Presented by the: Self-Disclosure in Addiction Counseling: To Tell or Not To Tell? 2020息 Institute for Learning and Development As published in: Counselor: The Magazine for Addiction Professionals, Feb 2010
This presentation will explain the importance of professional and ethical decision making with regard to counselor self-disclosure in the field of substance abuse counseling. Specifically will be examined the clinical effects of self-disclosure as it relates to alcohol and substance abuse counselors, who are themselves in recovery, treating clients who are addicts and or alcoholics. Is self-disclosure in this scenario a professional and effective therapeutic technique? INTRODUCTION To tell or not to tell?; that is the question that will be answered.
The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) position is that counselors in recovery should use their own judgment, preferably in consultation with a supervisor, about when, how, and whether to reveal their own personal recovery experiences. This self-disclosure should be made only with a clear understanding of the potential benefits to the client. At no time should a counselor use the group [or individual] sessions to discuss or resolve his or her own personal problems. (NIDA, 2000)
The first step is to identify the situation that requires consideration and decision making. A Professional and Ethical Decision vs. A Personal Decision Next: who would be affected by the counselors decision to self-disclose that they are also in recovery and that they can personally relate to the clients struggle?
The level of trust in the relationship could go either up or down. The client will definitely view the therapist differently. Also, the therapist will lose some level of professionalism. The resulting shift in differentiation will affect the therapeutic relationship for both the client and the counselor. Yes - There Would Be An Affect
Psychodynamic theorists since Freud have generally regarded therapist self-disclosure as detrimental to treatment because it might interfere with the therapeutic process, shifting the focus of therapy away from the client (Barrett & Berman, 2001). Therapeutic Anonymity
Motivational interviewing is a treatment intervention designed to enhance a clients intrinsic motivation and capacity for change. It is: Client- Centered Directive MI seeks to increase internal motivation for change through resolution of ambivalence and an increase in perceived self-efficacy. Motivational Interviewing
Motivational Interviewing is an intervention style that is used as a way of being with a client. The spirit of MI is characterized by a warm, genuine, respectful and egalitarian stance that is supportive of client self- determination and autonomy. Spirit of Motivational Interviewing
The primary reason that professional relationships and boundary setting are so difficult for individuals in the fields of psychology, social work and counseling is that treatment takes place in a healthcare and or mental health setting. In this setting it will be necessary for the counselor to place the needs and care of the client above their own needs. Boundary Setting Can Be Difficult
COUNSELING IS NOT THE RIGHT FIELD FOR SOME PEOPLE We can all agree that the needs of the client must come first. This means that the counselor may have to be able to listen more than talk. This practice allows the client, through guidance by the counselor, to discover their own solutions. The counselor should not self-disclose how they themselves overcame a similar problem in their personal recovery. In some cases individual counselors like to talk more than listen and may end up using the client for their own self gratification. Having said that, the field of psychotherapy is not for everyone. Good listeners make good counselors (Rule, 2010).
The next step in the decision making process is for a counselor to consider how, if at all, their personal feelings, biases, or self-interest might affect their ethical judgment and reasoning (Pope & Vasquez, 2007). Genuineness is the ability to be oneself and feel comfortable in the context of a professional relationship with a client. It does not imply a high degree of self-disclosure, but a genuine presence in the therapeutic relationship (OASAS, 2008). Making The Right Decision
It was reported by White (2006) that self-disclosure has become increasingly discouraged in the addictions counselor role. The Importance of Role Clarity and Role Integrity
If there was even the slightest concern surrounding the question of self-disclosure for a counselor they should seek consultation from supervision. Consult Supervision Marsia Booker, LMSW, CASAC (personal interview, January 30, 2009) is the Executive Clinical Director of Interline Outpatient Services, Queens, NY. Ms. Booker was able to be succinct in her consultation for the specific situation being discussed in this presentation.
Ms. Booker explained that when a counselor discloses that they are also in recovery from addiction the client will relate to their shared experience rather than the professional ability of the counselor to treat them. Ms. Booker went on to explain that the client will start to relate to their counselor as a peer. In this process the counselor loses their professional status and lessens their ability to effectively treat their client. There is a loss of differentiation that can damage the therapeutic relationship. Therefore, Ms. Bookers clinical position is that her counselors and social workers, who are also in recovery, not self-disclose to their clients who are in treatment at Interline Outpatient Services. Marsia Booker, LMSW, CASAC (From a personal interview, January 30, 2009)
ADOPT THE PERSPECTIVE OF YOUR CLIENT From the clients perspective, would you rather have your counselor in the roll of a highly trained and highly educated professional? The client needs to see their counselor as a professional individual who has the knowledge and ability to effectively treat them and help them recover. As the client you would not wish to relate to your counselor as a peer thereby damaging the therapeutic relationship.
Is self-disclosure ever appropriate? This presentation can report that not all self-disclosure is inappropriate. There are times when self disclosure works if it relates to information that the client may be stalled in understanding. Or, if it relates to what is taking place right in that moment. For example, if a client is revealing parenting issues a counselor may self disclose that they are also a parent and offer professional therapeutic insight as a counselor/parent. This is not to be confused with the argument that counselor self-disclosure aids in client self-disclosure.
Wait! Doesnt counselor self-disclosure aid in client self-disclosure? Barrett and Berman (2001) state that although our evidence indicates that therapist self-disclosure can be helpful for treatment, it does not confirm the argument that therapist self- disclosure exerts its impact by encouraging client self- disclosure (pg. 602). Counselor self disclosure is not an effective therapeutic technique to aid the client to be more open and forthcoming.
A brief example of counselor self-disclosure going very wrong A client was having a problem being shamed by her peers in the treatment program because she was still on methadone. The clinical supervisor cleared a counselor who had also come off methadone to share this information with the client. The counselor disclosed this personal information in a session with the supervisor present. The supervisor explained, I got such a good feeling when I saw the relief come over the clients face. This first client told the two other clients who were shaming her that her counselor was also in recovery from methadone. These other two clients spread this personal information and within half a day the entire client population knew that this counselor was a recovering addict thereby compromising the counselors therapeutic anonymity and professional ability to treat her clients. All unbeknownst to the counselor. For Discussion: 1) Where were the mistakes made? 2) Clinically, what opportunities were completely overlooked? 3) How could this have been handled differently?
One might ask at this point - what could be an alternative? A client my simply ask; Are you in recovery too? Or, with an attitude; What do you know about addiction? How can you help me? Everything you have learned is from a book. The counselor must invoke an alternative response other than self-disclosure. Have a prepared response that returns the focus of treatment back where it belongs. Back onto the client. The answer to this question is a challenging one. Remember: This is a form of deflection!
This is not about me it is about you. How can I help you to develop a recovery plan that works for you? How I got here is not important. What is important is how you got here and how I can help you move forward in your personal recovery. What is most important is how the client came to be in that seat not how the counselor came to be in their seat. This strategy will turn the focus back onto the client and make their recovery the primary objective of treatment. Possible Alternatives Responses
In Conclusion In conclusion, therapists and counselors may self disclose in other areas when therapeutically advantageous for the client. However, the disadvantages as analyzed herein, even any perceived disadvantages, to the homeostasis of the therapeutic relationship far outweigh any possible advantage that counselors self-disclosure of their recovery might offer.
A Professional Challenge Therapists and counselors who are also recovering addicts and alcoholics and who wish to be considered professional and affective should not, under any circumstances, self- disclose to his or her clients that they are also in recovery. The new question you now need to ask yourself is ARE YOU UP TO THE CHALLENGE?
This Training Course was presented by the: Institute for Learning and Development NYS OASAS Certified Education and Training Provider (#0932) Online continuing education courses and certificates for renewal certification For more information go to: h t t p s : / / i m u s t n o t u s e . c o m 息 2013 Institute for Learning and Development William A. Rule, MS, CASAC Master Counselor Author, Executive Director Institute for Learning and Development
References American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author Bridges, N. A. (2001). Therapists self-disclosure: Expanding the comfort zone. Psychotherapy 38;1. January 23, 2009 from: http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com Barrett, M. S., & Berman J. S., (2001). Is psychotherapy more effective when therapists disclose information about themselves? Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology. Retrieved January 23, 2009 from: http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com Pope, K.S., & Vasquez, M.J.T. (2007). Ethics in psychotherapy and counseling. San Francisco, CA: Josey Bass. Retrieved January 12, 2009 from: https://ecampus.phoenix.edu Rule, W. A., (2010). Self-disclosure in addiction counseling: To tell or not to tell. Counselor: The Magazine for Addiction Professionals 11, 28-31 Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services, NYS (2008). Motivational interviewing in a chemical dependency treatment setting. Retrieved January 23, 2009 from: http://www.oasas.state.ny.us/AdMed/documents/motinter06.pdf White, W. L., (2006). Sponsor, recovery coach, addiction counselor: The importance of role clarity and role integrity. Philadelphia, PA: Philadelphia Department of Behavioral Health and Mental Retardation. Retrieved January 23, 2009 from: http://www.oasas.state.ny.us/recovery/documents/WhiteSponsorEssay06.pdf

More Related Content

Self disclosure in addiction counseling: To tell or not to tell?

  • 1. Institute for Learning and Development OASAS Certified Education and Training Provider (#0932) Online continuing education courses and certificates for renewal certification https://imustnotuse.com Presented by the: Self-Disclosure in Addiction Counseling: To Tell or Not To Tell? 2020息 Institute for Learning and Development As published in: Counselor: The Magazine for Addiction Professionals, Feb 2010
  • 2. This presentation will explain the importance of professional and ethical decision making with regard to counselor self-disclosure in the field of substance abuse counseling. Specifically will be examined the clinical effects of self-disclosure as it relates to alcohol and substance abuse counselors, who are themselves in recovery, treating clients who are addicts and or alcoholics. Is self-disclosure in this scenario a professional and effective therapeutic technique? INTRODUCTION To tell or not to tell?; that is the question that will be answered.
  • 3. The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) position is that counselors in recovery should use their own judgment, preferably in consultation with a supervisor, about when, how, and whether to reveal their own personal recovery experiences. This self-disclosure should be made only with a clear understanding of the potential benefits to the client. At no time should a counselor use the group [or individual] sessions to discuss or resolve his or her own personal problems. (NIDA, 2000)
  • 4. The first step is to identify the situation that requires consideration and decision making. A Professional and Ethical Decision vs. A Personal Decision Next: who would be affected by the counselors decision to self-disclose that they are also in recovery and that they can personally relate to the clients struggle?
  • 5. The level of trust in the relationship could go either up or down. The client will definitely view the therapist differently. Also, the therapist will lose some level of professionalism. The resulting shift in differentiation will affect the therapeutic relationship for both the client and the counselor. Yes - There Would Be An Affect
  • 6. Psychodynamic theorists since Freud have generally regarded therapist self-disclosure as detrimental to treatment because it might interfere with the therapeutic process, shifting the focus of therapy away from the client (Barrett & Berman, 2001). Therapeutic Anonymity
  • 7. Motivational interviewing is a treatment intervention designed to enhance a clients intrinsic motivation and capacity for change. It is: Client- Centered Directive MI seeks to increase internal motivation for change through resolution of ambivalence and an increase in perceived self-efficacy. Motivational Interviewing
  • 8. Motivational Interviewing is an intervention style that is used as a way of being with a client. The spirit of MI is characterized by a warm, genuine, respectful and egalitarian stance that is supportive of client self- determination and autonomy. Spirit of Motivational Interviewing
  • 9. The primary reason that professional relationships and boundary setting are so difficult for individuals in the fields of psychology, social work and counseling is that treatment takes place in a healthcare and or mental health setting. In this setting it will be necessary for the counselor to place the needs and care of the client above their own needs. Boundary Setting Can Be Difficult
  • 10. COUNSELING IS NOT THE RIGHT FIELD FOR SOME PEOPLE We can all agree that the needs of the client must come first. This means that the counselor may have to be able to listen more than talk. This practice allows the client, through guidance by the counselor, to discover their own solutions. The counselor should not self-disclose how they themselves overcame a similar problem in their personal recovery. In some cases individual counselors like to talk more than listen and may end up using the client for their own self gratification. Having said that, the field of psychotherapy is not for everyone. Good listeners make good counselors (Rule, 2010).
  • 11. The next step in the decision making process is for a counselor to consider how, if at all, their personal feelings, biases, or self-interest might affect their ethical judgment and reasoning (Pope & Vasquez, 2007). Genuineness is the ability to be oneself and feel comfortable in the context of a professional relationship with a client. It does not imply a high degree of self-disclosure, but a genuine presence in the therapeutic relationship (OASAS, 2008). Making The Right Decision
  • 12. It was reported by White (2006) that self-disclosure has become increasingly discouraged in the addictions counselor role. The Importance of Role Clarity and Role Integrity
  • 13. If there was even the slightest concern surrounding the question of self-disclosure for a counselor they should seek consultation from supervision. Consult Supervision Marsia Booker, LMSW, CASAC (personal interview, January 30, 2009) is the Executive Clinical Director of Interline Outpatient Services, Queens, NY. Ms. Booker was able to be succinct in her consultation for the specific situation being discussed in this presentation.
  • 14. Ms. Booker explained that when a counselor discloses that they are also in recovery from addiction the client will relate to their shared experience rather than the professional ability of the counselor to treat them. Ms. Booker went on to explain that the client will start to relate to their counselor as a peer. In this process the counselor loses their professional status and lessens their ability to effectively treat their client. There is a loss of differentiation that can damage the therapeutic relationship. Therefore, Ms. Bookers clinical position is that her counselors and social workers, who are also in recovery, not self-disclose to their clients who are in treatment at Interline Outpatient Services. Marsia Booker, LMSW, CASAC (From a personal interview, January 30, 2009)
  • 15. ADOPT THE PERSPECTIVE OF YOUR CLIENT From the clients perspective, would you rather have your counselor in the roll of a highly trained and highly educated professional? The client needs to see their counselor as a professional individual who has the knowledge and ability to effectively treat them and help them recover. As the client you would not wish to relate to your counselor as a peer thereby damaging the therapeutic relationship.
  • 16. Is self-disclosure ever appropriate? This presentation can report that not all self-disclosure is inappropriate. There are times when self disclosure works if it relates to information that the client may be stalled in understanding. Or, if it relates to what is taking place right in that moment. For example, if a client is revealing parenting issues a counselor may self disclose that they are also a parent and offer professional therapeutic insight as a counselor/parent. This is not to be confused with the argument that counselor self-disclosure aids in client self-disclosure.
  • 17. Wait! Doesnt counselor self-disclosure aid in client self-disclosure? Barrett and Berman (2001) state that although our evidence indicates that therapist self-disclosure can be helpful for treatment, it does not confirm the argument that therapist self- disclosure exerts its impact by encouraging client self- disclosure (pg. 602). Counselor self disclosure is not an effective therapeutic technique to aid the client to be more open and forthcoming.
  • 18. A brief example of counselor self-disclosure going very wrong A client was having a problem being shamed by her peers in the treatment program because she was still on methadone. The clinical supervisor cleared a counselor who had also come off methadone to share this information with the client. The counselor disclosed this personal information in a session with the supervisor present. The supervisor explained, I got such a good feeling when I saw the relief come over the clients face. This first client told the two other clients who were shaming her that her counselor was also in recovery from methadone. These other two clients spread this personal information and within half a day the entire client population knew that this counselor was a recovering addict thereby compromising the counselors therapeutic anonymity and professional ability to treat her clients. All unbeknownst to the counselor. For Discussion: 1) Where were the mistakes made? 2) Clinically, what opportunities were completely overlooked? 3) How could this have been handled differently?
  • 19. One might ask at this point - what could be an alternative? A client my simply ask; Are you in recovery too? Or, with an attitude; What do you know about addiction? How can you help me? Everything you have learned is from a book. The counselor must invoke an alternative response other than self-disclosure. Have a prepared response that returns the focus of treatment back where it belongs. Back onto the client. The answer to this question is a challenging one. Remember: This is a form of deflection!
  • 20. This is not about me it is about you. How can I help you to develop a recovery plan that works for you? How I got here is not important. What is important is how you got here and how I can help you move forward in your personal recovery. What is most important is how the client came to be in that seat not how the counselor came to be in their seat. This strategy will turn the focus back onto the client and make their recovery the primary objective of treatment. Possible Alternatives Responses
  • 21. In Conclusion In conclusion, therapists and counselors may self disclose in other areas when therapeutically advantageous for the client. However, the disadvantages as analyzed herein, even any perceived disadvantages, to the homeostasis of the therapeutic relationship far outweigh any possible advantage that counselors self-disclosure of their recovery might offer.
  • 22. A Professional Challenge Therapists and counselors who are also recovering addicts and alcoholics and who wish to be considered professional and affective should not, under any circumstances, self- disclose to his or her clients that they are also in recovery. The new question you now need to ask yourself is ARE YOU UP TO THE CHALLENGE?
  • 23. This Training Course was presented by the: Institute for Learning and Development NYS OASAS Certified Education and Training Provider (#0932) Online continuing education courses and certificates for renewal certification For more information go to: h t t p s : / / i m u s t n o t u s e . c o m 息 2013 Institute for Learning and Development William A. Rule, MS, CASAC Master Counselor Author, Executive Director Institute for Learning and Development
  • 24. References American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author Bridges, N. A. (2001). Therapists self-disclosure: Expanding the comfort zone. Psychotherapy 38;1. January 23, 2009 from: http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com Barrett, M. S., & Berman J. S., (2001). Is psychotherapy more effective when therapists disclose information about themselves? Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology. Retrieved January 23, 2009 from: http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com Pope, K.S., & Vasquez, M.J.T. (2007). Ethics in psychotherapy and counseling. San Francisco, CA: Josey Bass. Retrieved January 12, 2009 from: https://ecampus.phoenix.edu Rule, W. A., (2010). Self-disclosure in addiction counseling: To tell or not to tell. Counselor: The Magazine for Addiction Professionals 11, 28-31 Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services, NYS (2008). Motivational interviewing in a chemical dependency treatment setting. Retrieved January 23, 2009 from: http://www.oasas.state.ny.us/AdMed/documents/motinter06.pdf White, W. L., (2006). Sponsor, recovery coach, addiction counselor: The importance of role clarity and role integrity. Philadelphia, PA: Philadelphia Department of Behavioral Health and Mental Retardation. Retrieved January 23, 2009 from: http://www.oasas.state.ny.us/recovery/documents/WhiteSponsorEssay06.pdf

Editor's Notes

  • #3: INTRO: There is a professional and ethical dilemma that occurs when the subjective urge arises for a counselor to disclose that they can relate to their clients struggle on a personal level as they too are in recovery. What are the clinical and therapeutic advantages, or disadvantages, of self-disclosure of their own recovery in the field of alcohol and substance abuse counseling? There is a decision making process and implementation that will be explained in this presentation whereby the counselor can make a responsible ethical decision based on criteria that will be the most advantageous to the client.
  • #4: In regard to this issue of self-disclosure of recovering counselors in the field of alcohol and substance abuse there is no relevant legal standard. The decision remains in the hands of clinical directors or as a component of the policies and procedures of the treatment provider. Again, the primary objective is to keep the focus on the clients recovery.
  • #5: Often times in this field when working with addicts a counselor will hear this statement from the client - What do you know about addiction? How can you help me? Everything you have learned is from a book. If the counselor is in fact, themselves in recovery, sometimes for many years and doing well, that would make the clients perception false. The therapist may know full well and firsthand the insanity of active addiction. The dilemma that requires a clinical decision is, should the therapist inform the client that their perception of the situation is false and untrue? Would the therapists self-disclosure clinically and therapeutically help the client move forward in their treatment? Or, would it be detrimental to the client to share this information with them? Who would be affected by the decision of the counselor to self disclose?
  • #6: The primary goal of therapy is to aid the client. The question needs to be addressed who is the client.
  • #7: According to this perspective, the therapist is thought to act as a mirror on which the client's emotional reactions can be projected. If a therapist discloses personal information during therapy, this therapeutic anonymity could be disrupted. Further, it is argued that therapist self disclosure may adversely affect treatment outcome by exposing therapist weaknesses or vulnerabilities, thereby undermining client trust in the therapist (Barrett & Berman, 2001). Barrett, M. S., & Berman J. S., (2001). Is psychotherapy more effective when therapists disclose information about themselves? Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology. Retrieved January 23, 2009 from: http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com
  • #8: Client-centered treatment approaches rely on the wisdom of the client. Counseling centers on the clients perspective of the problem. The counselors stance is that of an equal partner collaborating with the client to resolve the problem. Directive: MI is not impartial. The goal is to move the client in the direction of making a positive change.
  • #9: Client wants a counselor who is present in the moment.
  • #10: Discuss with the class working in a healthcare setting where the clients needs come before the therapist/counselor. Discuss counselor wellness.
  • #11: Does everyone agree?
  • #12: Herein may lie the most difficult step in the decision making process for a counselor who is in recovery and treating a newly recovering addict either individually or in a group setting. Therapists and counselors are human beings and as such have feelings. These feelings might affect clinical judgment and reasoning with regard to setting boundaries so as to avoid a dual relationship. This is not to say that therapists and counselors cannot be genuine.
  • #13: Read this out loud to the class: To paraphrase White (2006), the use of self, using ones own personal and cultural experiences to enhance the quality of service, has changed dramatically over the past four decades. In the paraprofessional era of addiction counseling in the 1950s to early 1970s, disclosing ones status as a recovering person and using selected details of ones personal addiction and recovery history as a teaching intervention were among the most prominent counselor interventions. This dimension of the counselor role was based in great part on the role these dimensions played in successful sponsorship within Alcoholics Anonymous through the 1980s and 1990s. In present day professional alcohol and substance counseling such self-disclosure has come to be seen as unprofessional and a sign of poor boundary management (White, 2006). From: White, W. L., (2006). Sponsor, recovery coach, addiction counselor: The importance of role clarity and role integrity. Philadelphia, PA: Philadelphia Department of Behavioral Health and Mental Retardation. Retrieved January 23, 2009 from: http://www.oasas.state.ny.us/recovery/documents/WhiteSponsorEssay06.pdf
  • #14: Discuss supervision Mention continuing training which will be coming up in slides #17 & 18
  • #15: Marsia Booker, LMSW, CASAC (personal interview, January 30, 2009) is the Executive Clinical Director of Interline Outpatient Services, Queens, NY and was able to be succinct in her consultation for this specific situation being discussed in this article. The loss of differentiation will damage the therapeutic relationship. This will clearly have an effect on the client.
  • #16: From the clients perspectives this writer would rather have their counselor in the roll of a highly trained and highly educated professional. The client needs to see their counselor as a professional individual who has the knowledge and ability to help them recover. As the client this writer would not wish to relate to their counselor as a peer and thereby damage the therapeutic relationship. Upon careful review of this decision making process this writer would be very comfortable with making the decision not to self-disclose.
  • #17: We are only discussing in this presentation counselors who are also in recovery self-disclosing their addiction to their clients. This includes all addictions (alcohol, drugs, food, sex etc) Can the class discuss other examples of appropriate self-disclosure
  • #18: Counselor self-disclosure exists and will continue to exist in the field of psychology and counseling. Bridges (2001) points out that while most therapists engage in some form of disclosure, intentional decisions to share feelings and personal views with patients remain a complex area of clinical practice Barrett and Berman (2001) state that although our evidence indicates that therapist self-disclosure can be helpful for treatment, it does not confirm the argument that therapist self-disclosure exerts its impact by encouraging client self-disclosure (pg. 602). Counselor self disclosure is not an effective technique to aid the client to be more open and forthcoming.
  • #19: This is a TRUE story! For open discussion: What were the mistakes? The clinical supervisor used the I statement taking the focus off the client. I got a good feeling when I saw the relief come over the clients face. Counseling is not about the counselor feeling good about themselves. The supervisor was using the situation for her own gratification. 2) Clinically, what opportunities were completely overlooked? The clinically supervisor and the counselor did not address the clients feelings of shame. The counselor rescued the client and the root causes of her shame (probably family oriented) were not addressed. Additionally, the other two female clients were not worked with to address their finger pointing away from themselves. They were completely diverting attention away from their own issues by shaming their peer and gossiping about the counselor 3) How could this have been handled differently without self-disclosing? a) The counselor could have addressed the original clients issues of why she was feeling shame. b)The clinical supervisor could have worked with the other two female clients to resolve their deflection and help them focus their attention back on their own recovery c) The supervisor and counselor could have got together with the three clients had a focus group therapy session. Through role playing the two clients would be allowed to feel the hurt of the shamed client and empathize with her pain. These two would be able to see that they were hurting their peer to divert from feeling their own pain/shame. The three clients would gain a whole new perspective of their behavior and their relationship with each others recovery. They would exit the session as allies in recovery.
  • #20: Clinicians repeatedly encounter dilemmas for which a clear professional clinical response can be elusive. Standards and procedures cannot take the place of an active, deliberative, and creative approach to fulfilling clinical responsibilities. Being prepared in advance and having a decision-making process in place is important because in the human services and healthcare industry these situations may arise without warning and may need to be addressed fairly quickly. Therefore, know in advance that you are going to be challenged by your clients in regard to this question. It may come as a form of deflection whereby the client is deflecting the attention away from themselves. Do not be fooled! Be prepared in advance with your answer as suggested above and return the focus where it belongs; back onto the client.
  • #21: A possible alternative could be: This is not about me it is about you. How can I help you to develop a recovery plan that works for you? This strategy will get the focus back on the client. Or possibly: How I got here is not important. What is important is how you got here and how I can help you move forward in your personal recovery. What is most important is how the client came to be in that seat not how the counselor came to be in their seat. Again, this strategy will turn the focus back onto the client and make their recovery the primary objective of treatment. Discuss with the class other possible alternatives. Practice alternatives in the class with the importance on being prepared to be challenged by clients in advance.
  • #22: In conclusion, therapists and counselors may self disclose in other areas when therapeutically advantageous for the client. However, the disadvantages as analyzed herein, even the perceived disadvantages, to the homeostasis of the therapeutic relationship far outweigh any possible advantage that self-disclosure might offer. Therapists and counselors who are also recovering addicts and alcoholics and who wish to be considered professional and affective should not, under any circumstances, self-disclose to his or her clients that they are also in recovery. The new question you now need to ask yourself is are you up to the challenge?
  • #23: Rely on you education, training, and clinical skills to facilitate your recovering clients progress without disclosing that you are also a recovering addict/alcoholic. Do not share with your clients how you overcame a similar problem in your personal recovery. Guide them using your training and skills to effectively allow them to discover their own personal recovery solutions. This is the real challenge of alcohol and substance abuse counseling.
  • #25: References