This document provides a summary of the sales incentive plan design process. It outlines four key steps:
1) Defining the sales platform by product strategy, sales type, complexity, and level of persuasion required.
2) Determining the appropriate mix of base pay and incentive pay based on the sales platform and market practices. Common mixes range from 100% base pay to 100% incentive pay.
3) Setting the on-target earnings and defining leverage to reward performance above target, typically 3x target pay at an excellence level.
4) Choosing a payment formula such as commission, salary plus bonus, or a matrix to determine payouts.
Convert to study guideBETA
Transform any presentation into a summarized study guide, highlighting the most important points and key insights.
1 of 7
Downloaded 10 times
More Related Content
SIP Design Process summary
1. SALES INCENTIVE PLAN DESIGN PROCESS SUMMARY MB Reward & HR Solutions
Page 1 of 7
1. SALES PLATFORM
Sales Incentive Plans should support the strategic direction of the business and be aligned with the type of sales being performed. The first step in the
process is the identification of the Sales Platform.
A. Define the Product Sales Strategy
Matrix Prospective/Current Customers / Existing/New Products & Services
B. Define the Sales Type
Missionary / Direct Sales / Contract Sales / Distributor / Order-taker / Pre-/post-sales support
C. Define the Complexity of the sales event (High, Moderate, Low)
D. Define the level of Persuasion / Influence the sales person must have in order to make the sale (High, Moderate, Low).
2. SALES DESIGN TEMPLATE
Specifically for larger teams, a matrix of:
o Sales Platform factors (Strategy, Type, Complexity and Persuasion) and
o Job type (Sales Situations)
3. ON-TARGET EARNINGS (OTE) / TARGET TOTAL CASH (TTC) - MIX
OTE or TTC is the desired total amount of cash payment that will be delivered at the targeted performance level.
OTE/TTC is comprised of two elements:
o fixed Base Salary and
o variable Sales Bonus or Commission.
Most sales incentive plans will deliver OTE / TTC earnings at pay market median or average.
An organisation will therefore need access to market pay data information in order to establish this comparison.
Stretch goals, and overachievement, will then allow sales team members to potentially achieve actual total cash earnings well in excess of
market median or average, i.e., at 75
th
%ile, 90
th
%ile, or even higher.
Using the Sales Design Template, record the Sales Platform and OTE/TTC details for each role.
4. BASE PAY / INCENTIVE PAY MIX AND TARGET INCENTIVES
The decision on the incentive mix should take three factors into consideration:
A. The Sales Platform for which the plan is being designed.
B. The Mix that is seen in the market place.
Market pay survey data is key here. Ideally need to look at both the market sector generally, and the competitors specifically.
C. Sales management philosophy. Aggressive/risk takers v. conservative.
2. SALES INCENTIVE PLAN DESIGN PROCESS SUMMARY MB Reward & HR Solutions
Page 2 of 7
Mix examples:
Mix Equal To: Target as % of Base Incentive Impact:
100 / 0 Straight Salary n/a All Base Pay None
90 / 10 90% base / 10% incentive 11% Performance Reminder
75 / 25 75% base / 25% incentive 33% Directional (affects daily behaviour)
60 / 40 60% base / 40% incentive 67% Highly Directional
50 / 50 50% base / 50% incentive 100% Highly Directional
0 / 100 Straight Commission Commission Rate Independent Action
Determining the Mix - Factors to Consider:
FACTORS
DEGREE OF MIX
0 / 100
ALL INCENTIVE
70 / 30
100 / 0
ALL BASE
COMPANY
Objectives Volume only < ---------------------------------- > Many objectives
Company Expertise Limited < ---------------------------------- > Extensive
Supervision Absent < ---------------------------------- > Proactive
Product Type Commodity < ---------------------------------- > Specialty
Sales Focus Price < ---------------------------------- > Value-added
SALESPERSON
Customer Contact Salesperson only < ---------------------------------- > Many company employees
Buy Decision Seller-driven < ---------------------------------- > Many reasons
Sales Calls Single < ---------------------------------- > Multiple
3. SALES INCENTIVE PLAN DESIGN PROCESS SUMMARY MB Reward & HR Solutions
Page 3 of 7
1. Define mix by Sales Platform items
a. Product Sales Strategy - use the matrix below to identify appropriate mix range.
Prospective Customers
1. Conversion Selling
70/30 (Medium)
3. New Concept Selling
50/50 (High)
Combination
Current Customers
6. Retention Selling
80/20 (Low)
8. Penetration Selling
70/30 (Medium)
Existing Products Combination New Products
b. Define mix by Sales Type - use the matrix below to identify appropriate mix ranges.
Sales Type Mix
Direct Seller 60/40 to 70/30 (Medium)
Contract Seller 60/40 to 70/30 (Medium)
Distributor Servicer 60/40 to 70/30 (Medium)
Missionary Seller 50/50 to 60/40 (High)
Order Taker 75/25 to 80/20 (Low)
Pre- and Post-Sale 75/25 to 80/20 (Low)
c. Define mix by Sales Complexity
Although this is one of the four items included in defining the Sales Platform, Complexity is not a primary factor in determining mix. Mix levels do not directly
correlate to complexity.
4. SALES INCENTIVE PLAN DESIGN PROCESS SUMMARY MB Reward & HR Solutions
Page 4 of 7
d. Define mix by Persuasion
For each Sales Type, use the matrix below to identify appropriate mix ranges.
Persuasion Mix
High 50/50 to 60/40 (High)
Moderate 60/40 to 70/30 (Medium)
Low 75/25 to 80/20 (Low)
MIX GUIDELINE SUMMARY
Summarise the guidelines for each criterion and propose a recommended mix. List for each plan.
Product
Sales
Strategy
Sales Type Complexity Persuasion
Market
Practice
Mgmt.
Philosophy
Design
Recommendation
ABC
Regional
Account
Manager
Retention
Selling
70/30 to
80/20
Contract
Seller
60/40 to
70/30
(Medium)
High
(No Mix
guidelines
from this)
High
50/50 to
60/40
(High)
60/40
Based on
market data
Aggressive 60/40
5. SALES INCENTIVE PLAN DESIGN PROCESS SUMMARY MB Reward & HR Solutions
Page 5 of 7
4.5 Payment Mechanics
There are several factors to consider when designing payment mechanics. The approach to leverage, thresholds, and payment caps will be key in defining
payment mechanics. In addition, the various types of payment formula approaches are a primary consideration. This section of the Practice Guide will
review each of the components that influence plan payment mechanics.
4.5.1 Types of Payment Formulas
Type Choices
Commission
Only
Flat Commission (fixed rate)
Ramped Commission (rate changes at a designated
performance level)
Variable Commission (is a function of products being sold)
Adjusted Value (rate is adjusted for value of product)
Typically used to:
Reward individual effort drive results
Focus on volume
Tie payout directly to sales success
Ensure variability of costs
Advantages:
Helps focus efforts
Drives overall production
Ensures variability of cost
Makes sales personnel accountable
Promotes fairness, understanding
Disadvantages:
Encourages self-serving behaviour
May dilute customer service
Makes territory and account changes difficult
May over or under pay
Increases potential for turnover
Combination Salary Plus Commission:
TTC and mix are set at appropriate level. Commission is used
for the variable piece.
Typically used to:
Improve control over payouts as compared to commission
only
Retain motivation characteristics of commission-only plan
Salary Plus Bonus: Typically used to:
Manage payout to a preferred market rate
Accommodate quota-based measurement
Advantages:
Permits more management control
Stabilises earnings (more than commission only)
Recognises contributions better than salary only
Provides realistic balance between risk and reward
Disadvantages:
Reduces variability of straight commission costs
Lowers motivational impact of commission only plans
Increases administrative burden
Can be confusing if too complex
Linked Hurdles, Multipliers, Matrices - Typically a two-dimensional
matrix using two performance metrics. One on the x-axis and
the other on the y-axis.
Typically used to balance two conflicting measurements when focus
should be on maximising each. Penalises the participant if he/she
Maximises performance in one area at the expense of the other.
6. SALES INCENTIVE PLAN DESIGN PROCESS SUMMARY MB Reward & HR Solutions
Page 6 of 7
4.5.2 Leverage
Definition
Leverage is the amount of incentive that can be earned, relative to target incentive, for outstanding sales performance.
Excellence is the performance level that approximately 10% of plan participants should achieve.
Leverage is used for volume-based metrics where there is intent to reward above target performance. Leverage does not apply to
strategic objectives or related metrics.
Organisation
Position
Leverage should be defined as the amount of incentive payment that will be paid at excellence level of performance.
Organisation
Standards
Organisation sales incentive plans should generally have a payment equal to 3x target at the excellence level. This level of
leverage is a very common practice among sales incentive plan design. Refer to the Organisation Sales Incentive Leverage
Guideline matrix on the following page for suggested leverage levels.
Mix and Leverage Example:
TTC: 贈35,000 Base: 贈24,500
Mix: 70 / 30 Incentive Target: 贈10,500
Leverage: 3 : 1 TTC: 贈35,000
Excellence Pay
Total Incentive is 3x Target Incentive
TTC
Midpoint
Base Incentive Pay Excellence Pay
Upside
Potential
贈21,000
Base Salary
贈24,500
Base Salary
贈24,500
Base Salary
贈24,500
Target
Incentive
贈10,500
Target
Incentive
贈10,500
7. SALES INCENTIVE PLAN DESIGN PROCESS SUMMARY MB Reward & HR Solutions
Page 7 of 7
Organisation Sales Incentive Leverage Guideline
Leverage Guideline for application
1.0 x to 2.0x This approach may be used in the following situations:
The business is trying to slow down the results above target. It may be very important that the business not exceed their
forecast by significant levels and therefore, it would not be wise to have significant upside on the plan.
Manage the cost of the incentive plan.
Sales force has limited impact (low persuasion) over results. Likely a lower incentive mix also.
Historical data is not reliable and the business wants to limit cost on upside performance.
Historical data is erratic or volatile. As a result, it may be difficult to set the appropriate excellence level at which to define
leverage. Again, in this situation, the business its risk of overpayment if leverage is set at a lower level.
3.0x This is the most common approach to setting leverage. A 3.0x leverage should be the starting point when designing sales
incentive plans.
A 3.0x leverage should be used in the following situations:
Historical performance and payment data is reliable and
Performance from year to year is fairly consistent and predictable.
Higher than
3.0x
Leverage higher than 3.0x should almost never be necessary.