際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
亟亠亠
舒弍仂
亠仍舒亠仄 仂亳舒仍仆仂亠
仗亠亟仗亳亳亠
亠舒仍仆仂
弌仂亳仄 仂亳舒仍仆仂亠
舒弍仂亠亠 仄亠仂
succeed
舒从 亠从亳于仆仂 于仆亠亟亳 从仂仗仂舒亳于仆
仂亳舒仍仆 亠 仆舒 SharePoint. 亅舒仗 亠亠仆亳.
束仂亟于仂亟仆亠 从舒仄仆亳損
仂仄仗舒仆亳 Sitrion
 仆仂于舒仆舒 于 2004 亞.
 丿舒弍-从于舒亳舒 于 亞. 亠仆于亠, 弌丿
 亳 于 弌亠于亠仆仂亶 仄亠亳从亠, 于仂仗亠, 于舒仍亳亳,
亰亳亳 舒 亠仗亠 亳 于 仂亳亳
 亠亟亳亶 仄亳仂于仂亶 仗仂舒于亳从 亠亠仆亳亶 Enterprise 2.0
仆舒 仗仍舒仂仄亠 Microsoft SharePoint
 仂仍亳仆于仂 从仍亳亠仆仂于 亳亰 Fortune 500
 >5.5 仄仍仆. 从仂仗仂舒亳于仆 仗仂仍亰仂于舒亠仍亠亶
Sitrion Social: 从仗仆亠亶亳亠 于仆亠亟亠仆亳
舒从舒亰亳从 仂仍亳亠于仂
仂亟仆亳从仂于
亳亰仆亠-亳舒亳 亠亠仆亳亠 亠亰仍舒
Airbus 150 000
仂亠弍仆仂 亠从亳于仆仂
仂弍亳舒 亳 仗舒于仍
亳仆仆仂于舒亳礆亳
仆亠亟亠仆 舒亰 于亠 仄仂亟仍亳
Sitrion Social
亟亳仆舒 亠亟舒 亟仍 仂弍亠仆亳
仂亟仆亳从仂于, 仗仂亰于仂仍ム舒
于仗仂仍仆 从舒亟仂亳仆亞,
仂亠仆亳于舒 亳 于仆亠亟 亳亟亠亳, 舒
舒从亢亠 仆舒亞舒亢亟舒 亰舒 仍亳亠
亳亟亠亳.
Barclays 200 000
亳亰仆亠-仂仂弍亠于舒
仂弍舒仍亳 于 仗弍仍亳仆
仂亠 仗仂 舒弍仂亳仄 亠仄舒仄
弍亠仆亳亠 仗亠亠仆亠亠仆仂 于仂
于仆亠仆仆ム 亠
(SharePoint + Sitrion)
亠亰仂仗舒仆舒 亳仆舒仆亠-亠亟舒 仆舒
弍舒亰亠 SharePoint
Kraft Foods 140 000
亠仂弍仂亟亳仄仂 于亠仍亳亳
亠从亳于仆仂 仂于仄亠仆仂亶
舒弍仂 仂亟仆亳从仂于.
亶 仗仂亳从 从仗亠仂于.
亳弍亳亟仆仂亠 于仆亠亟亠仆亳亠 -
O365D 亳 于 仂弍于亠仆仆仂仄
丶.
78% 弍亠亠 亟仂仗 从
亰仆舒仆亳礆, 52% 弍亠亠 仗仂亳从
从仗亠仂于, 28% 于亠仍亳亠仆亳亶
仗仂亟从仂于 亳仆仆仂于舒亳亶, 25%
仆亳亢亠仆亳亠 仍亠从仂仆仆仂亶 仗仂.
Citi group 100 000
舒亰仂亰仆亠仆仆仂
仗仂亟舒亰亟亠仍亠仆亳亶. 弌仍仂亢仆仂
仗仂亳从舒 从仗亠亳亰.
丐亠弍仂于舒仍舒 仗仂亟亟亠亢从舒
亳仆仆仂于舒亳亶.
Sitrion Social 仂弍亠仗亠亳仍
仗仂仂亶 仗仂亳从 从仗亠亳亰
亳 弍仂 亳仆仆仂于舒亳仂仆仆
亳亟亠亶.
ミ頴笑 仂亟仆亳从 从仂仄仗舒仆亳亳
亳仄亠亠 仆舒 75% 弍仂仍亠亠 弍亶
亟仂仗 从 从仗亠亳亰亠 亳
亰仆舒仆亳礆. 仂仍亠亠 亠仄 20%
于亠仍亳亠仆亳亠 仗仂亟从仂于
亳仆仆仂于舒亳亶.
Sitrion INTRANET
Video
Sitrion INTRANET
Sitrion INTRANET
亅仂 亟仂仍亢仆仂
于亞仍磲亠
亳仍仆仂!
 亟舒, 从舒从 亢亠!
个仆从亳仂仆舒仍仆仂,
从仂仆仂仄仆仂,
亳仆亠亞亳仂于舒仆仂.
Sitrion INTRANET
Sitrion INTRANET
Sitrion INTRANET
Sitrion INTRANET
Sitrion INTRANET
Sitrion INTRANET
NT OO EOO
New Technology
Old Organization
Expensive Old Organization
ミ莞
丐亠仆仂仍仂亞亳
亳亰仆亠
Sitrion INTRANET
亠 仆舒亳仆舒亠  仂弍仍亠亟仂于舒仆亳
Sitrion INTRANET
亠亰仍舒
束舒仄仗舒仆亳亳損
800
1140
仂亟仗亳仂从 亳
从仂仄仄亠仆舒亳亠于
仂亟仗亳仂从 亳
从仂仄仄亠仆舒亳亠于
亠亟 1 亠亟 5
舒从舒亰亳从
Oppenheimer Funds
亠亰仍舒
束丕仗舒于仍亠仆亳亠 亳亰仄亠仆亠仆亳礆亳損
亠亰仍舒
束弍仍亠亟仂于舒仆亳亠 仂亞舒仆亳亰舒亳亳損
仂仍亠 仂弍亠仆亳 50%
90%仂仍亠 从仂仆从舒
丕仂于亠仆 亰舒仗仂仍仆亠仆亳 仗仂亳仍亠亶 从仂于仂亟于舒
亠亰仍舒
束弌仂亳舒仍亳亰亳仂于舒仆仆亠
弍亳亰仆亠-仗仂亠損
舒从舒亰亳从
亰仄亠磺亠 于舒 弌弌:
Engagement Scorecard
舒亳仍亳亶 亊仄舒仍亠亟亳仆仂于
Vasily.Yamaletdinov@artezio.com
仍仂亞 仂 Sitrion Social:
http://socialgator.blogspot.ru
弌仗舒亳弍仂 亰舒 于仆亳仄舒仆亳亠!

More Related Content

Sitrion INTRANET

  • 1. 亟亠亠 舒弍仂 亠仍舒亠仄 仂亳舒仍仆仂亠 仗亠亟仗亳亳亠 亠舒仍仆仂 弌仂亳仄 仂亳舒仍仆仂亠 舒弍仂亠亠 仄亠仂 succeed 舒从 亠从亳于仆仂 于仆亠亟亳 从仂仗仂舒亳于仆 仂亳舒仍仆 亠 仆舒 SharePoint. 亅舒仗 亠亠仆亳. 束仂亟于仂亟仆亠 从舒仄仆亳損
  • 2. 仂仄仗舒仆亳 Sitrion 仆仂于舒仆舒 于 2004 亞. 丿舒弍-从于舒亳舒 于 亞. 亠仆于亠, 弌丿 亳 于 弌亠于亠仆仂亶 仄亠亳从亠, 于仂仗亠, 于舒仍亳亳, 亰亳亳 舒 亠仗亠 亳 于 仂亳亳 亠亟亳亶 仄亳仂于仂亶 仗仂舒于亳从 亠亠仆亳亶 Enterprise 2.0 仆舒 仗仍舒仂仄亠 Microsoft SharePoint 仂仍亳仆于仂 从仍亳亠仆仂于 亳亰 Fortune 500 >5.5 仄仍仆. 从仂仗仂舒亳于仆 仗仂仍亰仂于舒亠仍亠亶
  • 3. Sitrion Social: 从仗仆亠亶亳亠 于仆亠亟亠仆亳 舒从舒亰亳从 仂仍亳亠于仂 仂亟仆亳从仂于 亳亰仆亠-亳舒亳 亠亠仆亳亠 亠亰仍舒 Airbus 150 000 仂亠弍仆仂 亠从亳于仆仂 仂弍亳舒 亳 仗舒于仍 亳仆仆仂于舒亳礆亳 仆亠亟亠仆 舒亰 于亠 仄仂亟仍亳 Sitrion Social 亟亳仆舒 亠亟舒 亟仍 仂弍亠仆亳 仂亟仆亳从仂于, 仗仂亰于仂仍ム舒 于仗仂仍仆 从舒亟仂亳仆亞, 仂亠仆亳于舒 亳 于仆亠亟 亳亟亠亳, 舒 舒从亢亠 仆舒亞舒亢亟舒 亰舒 仍亳亠 亳亟亠亳. Barclays 200 000 亳亰仆亠-仂仂弍亠于舒 仂弍舒仍亳 于 仗弍仍亳仆 仂亠 仗仂 舒弍仂亳仄 亠仄舒仄 弍亠仆亳亠 仗亠亠仆亠亠仆仂 于仂 于仆亠仆仆ム 亠 (SharePoint + Sitrion) 亠亰仂仗舒仆舒 亳仆舒仆亠-亠亟舒 仆舒 弍舒亰亠 SharePoint Kraft Foods 140 000 亠仂弍仂亟亳仄仂 于亠仍亳亳 亠从亳于仆仂 仂于仄亠仆仂亶 舒弍仂 仂亟仆亳从仂于. 亶 仗仂亳从 从仗亠仂于. 亳弍亳亟仆仂亠 于仆亠亟亠仆亳亠 - O365D 亳 于 仂弍于亠仆仆仂仄 丶. 78% 弍亠亠 亟仂仗 从 亰仆舒仆亳礆, 52% 弍亠亠 仗仂亳从 从仗亠仂于, 28% 于亠仍亳亠仆亳亶 仗仂亟从仂于 亳仆仆仂于舒亳亶, 25% 仆亳亢亠仆亳亠 仍亠从仂仆仆仂亶 仗仂. Citi group 100 000 舒亰仂亰仆亠仆仆仂 仗仂亟舒亰亟亠仍亠仆亳亶. 弌仍仂亢仆仂 仗仂亳从舒 从仗亠亳亰. 丐亠弍仂于舒仍舒 仗仂亟亟亠亢从舒 亳仆仆仂于舒亳亶. Sitrion Social 仂弍亠仗亠亳仍 仗仂仂亶 仗仂亳从 从仗亠亳亰 亳 弍仂 亳仆仆仂于舒亳仂仆仆 亳亟亠亶. ミ頴笑 仂亟仆亳从 从仂仄仗舒仆亳亳 亳仄亠亠 仆舒 75% 弍仂仍亠亠 弍亶 亟仂仗 从 从仗亠亳亰亠 亳 亰仆舒仆亳礆. 仂仍亠亠 亠仄 20% 于亠仍亳亠仆亳亠 仗仂亟从仂于 亳仆仆仂于舒亳亶.
  • 8. 亅仂 亟仂仍亢仆仂 于亞仍磲亠 亳仍仆仂! 亟舒, 从舒从 亢亠! 个仆从亳仂仆舒仍仆仂, 从仂仆仂仄仆仂, 亳仆亠亞亳仂于舒仆仂.
  • 15. NT OO EOO New Technology Old Organization Expensive Old Organization
  • 18. 亠 仆舒亳仆舒亠 仂弍仍亠亟仂于舒仆亳
  • 20. 亠亰仍舒 束舒仄仗舒仆亳亳損 800 1140 仂亟仗亳仂从 亳 从仂仄仄亠仆舒亳亠于 仂亟仗亳仂从 亳 从仂仄仄亠仆舒亳亠于 亠亟 1 亠亟 5 舒从舒亰亳从 Oppenheimer Funds 亠亰仍舒 束丕仗舒于仍亠仆亳亠 亳亰仄亠仆亠仆亳礆亳損
  • 21. 亠亰仍舒 束弍仍亠亟仂于舒仆亳亠 仂亞舒仆亳亰舒亳亳損 仂仍亠 仂弍亠仆亳 50% 90%仂仍亠 从仂仆从舒 丕仂于亠仆 亰舒仗仂仍仆亠仆亳 仗仂亳仍亠亶 从仂于仂亟于舒 亠亰仍舒 束弌仂亳舒仍亳亰亳仂于舒仆仆亠 弍亳亰仆亠-仗仂亠損 舒从舒亰亳从
  • 23. 舒亳仍亳亶 亊仄舒仍亠亟亳仆仂于 Vasily.Yamaletdinov@artezio.com 仍仂亞 仂 Sitrion Social: http://socialgator.blogspot.ru 弌仗舒亳弍仂 亰舒 于仆亳仄舒仆亳亠!

Editor's Notes

  • #3: Focused on helping organizations drive innovation, discover untapped expertise and simplify business processes HQ in Denver with offices across the globe Growing portfolio of enterprise customers WW including MSFT Recognized by some of the largest analyst firms and MSFT for what we have done in the market
  • #18: Change in the organizational management philosophy is often linear -- Social change, however, is more humanistic, developmental, and iterative We found there are 3 key pillars of driving adoption and youll find that you cant ever be successful if you just focus on one or two of these areas The pillars that we need to bring in alignment are Technology, Business and People right where they meet in the middle is the sweet spot and where you will find the most success With the 3 pillars, we can think of two separate tracks Technology side of the house and the People / Business side of the house. They tend to run in parallel and leverage different resources but remember they all become aligned in the middle to make social real
  • #22: Oppenheimer Funds Mini Case Study Highlights Campaigns & Change Management Tile 1 (Logo) Talking Points About OppenheimerFunds Our work with OppenheimerFunds nicely highlights these 2 critical areas for social adoption OFI is one of the largest and most reputable investment management firms in the country The original Oppenheimer fund was first offered to the public in 1959 Now OFI manages more than $208 billion in assets for more than 12 million shareholder accounts (as of March 2013) They purchased 2K licenses of Social Sites 2010 Tile 2 (Campaigns Outcome) Talking Points Awareness is all about helping people to understand how social will change and improve their work. OFI was keen to learn methods for driving awareness and use of the portal. NewsGator services team assisted by: Hosting an on-site workshop where they covered best practices and ideas around communication campaigns Provided access to eNGage so that OFI could learn from other companies that have implemented social Provided samples such as tri-folds, cheat sheets, scripts, documentation Reviewed communications plan and materials as needed OFI combined their own ideas with NGs suggestions and executed a pre and post launch campaign that included: Announcements on the old portal Email about whats coming that highlighted features Videos about the portal and its features Posters around their various offices/locations CTO blogs and microblogs Jim Bailey blogs every day at 4am; he included portal info in his blogs - tips, suggestions on activity to perform, and info about the benefits of the portal. He even recorded a video of himself using the portal Scavenger hunt with prizes asking users to use the social features of the portal to find answers to questions such as what is the title for John Smith and first person to answer given question would get a prize OFI tracked key metrics to judge success two key areas were communities joined and commenting Week 1 saw great levels a total of 800 combined community joins and comments made and even better they saw those activity levels increase each week for example during week 5 there were 1,140 community joins and comments a 43% growth over week 1 levels! OFI offers an excellent example of how helping people understand the social initiatives features and benefits can drive adoption and usage of the system. Data Source March 22, 2012 Oppenheimer webinar. Tile 3 (Change Management Outcome) Talking Points As OppenheimerFunds was developing their Social Sites features they saw major viral adoption within the test system (more than with the straight mysites that were in production) and they realized they needed a Change Management team and process to help integrate social/collaborative work styles into their corporate culture. NewsGator assisted the Change Management team by providing An on-site workshop where the OFI business and culture was assessed and where best practices for change management were shared Recommendations on how to drive social change within OFI that was inline with their culture but that also accounted for how cultures change with social, examples include Which functional areas to include on the change management committee What communities to implement to drive change and system adoption How to communicate the change to end users How to incent users to change behavior and use the new system How to roll out change in manageable pieces for the end users starting small and broadening out over time This quote nicely highlights how OFI valued change management processes and how the culture shifted with social adoption. As employees saw that they were encouraged and recognized for collaborative work the use of the system increased. Quote Source Oppenheimer Webinar, March 12, 2012
  • #23: Oil & Gas Mini Case Study Organizational Assessment & Socially Enabled Processes Tile 1 (oil drilling photo) Talking Points This customer is an oil and natural gas exploration and production company They are a Fortune 500 company They purchased Social Sites 2010 for 6500 of their employees Their goal was to socially enable online Knowledge Management for revenue producing employees (engineers) Tile 2 (Org Assessment Outcome) Talking Points One area that we will evaluate during an organizational assessment is the level of executive engagement and their level of actual/anticipated activity in the social system When performing the assessment at this company we found about 75 to 80 people on the leadership team the very large majority of these were not social proponents, had not used social, and didnt understand the business value of social So, we recommended more training and hand holding for the executive team at this company We delivered training sessions to the executive team members to show them how to use the product, how their employees were using the product, and what the business value was We followed up executive trainings with reminders on what type of tasks to complete and with highlights on system features We created 1 page executive engagement document for the leaders with tips and tricks on activity and frequency of activity We did train the trainer sessions with the knowledge management (KM) team who would continue to be responsible for executive engagement after the launch We made suggestions to the KM team on contests, training and other things that our customers have done to drive executive engagement And we suggested measuring results in this case executive profile completion rates was one critical KPI Post training we saw that 50% of the executives completed their social profiles an okay start but we all wanted more leaders to complete their profiles in order to help drive the engineers to participate as well So the companys KM team continued to work on executive engagement and they used an IT VP that was a big proponent of social to help them together they hosted a contest a bet among the executive team whereby those that did not complete profiles had to buy lunch for the other executives that got the profile completion level up to 90% In companies where there are lower levels of executive engagement, multiple pronged programs like this are needed and we find it well worth the investment of time in such programs as executive engagement levels are proven to drive a critical mass to participate Tile 3 (SEP Outcome) Talking Points This same company also offers and excellent example of Value that is insuring that social initiatives are aligned to business goals and core business processes. In working with this company we identified a few key areas of the business where they knew social could have high business impact. We spent time with key stakeholders from these groups ahead of time understanding their business and their goals. We ran use case discovery workshops with representatives from the groups to understand how they currently communicate and collaborate, what their pain points are, how theyd like to be able to work, and what the potential obstacles might be. After the workshops we mapped out the right tools and processes to match the problems (and didnt fix anything that wasnt broken just to make it social). We spent extra time with the community managers of each group to migrate any existing content and to configure their communities to meet their needs. We also trained the community managers in engagement techniques, specifically to the needs and potential obstacles we heard during the workshops. We then ran in-person launch tours to small groups of end-users, by specific group so we could focus on their use cases so that the stories resonated with the individuals. One of the use cases outlined was to better connect and share knowledge among a group of subsurface/completions engineers that spanned 5 geographic regions Therefore we created a Completions Community and spent time selecting and training community manager(s) for that group, seeding the community, training members of the community, etc. This upfront work to align the social initiative to business goals and core business processes paid off! During the initial launch, A superintendent made a post in that community about a $200K batch of chemicals that they purchased but no longer needed because a project was cancelled An engineer in another region saw the post and responded within one hour that they had a need for the chemicals This saved $200K in purchasing chemicals and the cost and time that would have occurred had the first region needed to dispose of the chemicals Business wins like this help to further drive social adoption!
  • #24: Review sections, highlight color significance