3. 2011 IP&TV論壇獎& 2012續得獎公司
2012 Best TV App
+ Best TV
Consumer Device
2012
Best 2012 Best Rights &
Component Asset Manag. for TV
or Enabler
2012 Best
Multiscreen TV
solution
grace @NEXT-OPTO.com 3
4. 2012 IP&TV論壇獎 (1)
(IPTV, OTT, Connected TV & Hybrid TV)
? 於倫敦電影博物館揭曉(2012/3/21)吸引超過30個國家的
170領域專家,且超過100廠商的內容供應商參賽
? 此獎項是獎勵來自各個領域合併IP傳送的電視社群的電
視工業
2012 IP&TV獎 公司 產品/說明
服務創新(Best TV service
Telstra T-Box service
Innovation)
服務成長成就(Best Service Significant growth # subscribers to
BT Vision
Growth Achievement) IP-enabled TV service
IPTV網路科技(Best Network Alcatel
Velocix CDN
technology for IPTV) Lucent
xVuTM module – Greenlighting the
品質改善方案(Best Quality Mariner
Install? for seeing an increase in
Improvement Solution) Partners
overall installation
TV權利與資產管理(Best Rights Motorola Motorola SecureMedia HLS+
& Asset Management for TV) Mobility solution
ref: http://iptvawards.com/ 4
grace @NEXT-OPTO.com
5. 2012 IP&TV論壇獎 (2)
(IPTV, OTT, Connected TV & Hybrid TV)
? 多螢幕、TV App與消費者設備,強調整合性
TV平台,為2012年與2011年獎項之差異
2012 IP&TV獎 公司 產品
IPTV服務傳送平台(Best
Orca Orca and Viaccess Unified Service
Service Delivery Platform for
Interactive Platform
IPTV)
SPR1200 multi-screen stream
組件或推動商(Best
Ericsson processor + NPR1200 multi-screen
Component or Enabler)
network processor
TV App(Best TV App) AT&T AT&T U-verse for Tablet
電視消費者設備(Best TV
Cisico + AT&T AT&T U-verse Wireless Receiver
Consumer Device)
DirecTV Home media RVU HR34 server
多螢幕 TV服務(service)
Best Samsung center solution RVU client
Multiscreen
TV方案(solution) Huawei(華為) MediaCloud solution
Ref: http://www.digitaltveurope.net/22329/bt-vision-telstra-and-directv-amongst-winners/ 5
grace @NEXT-OPTO.com
6. 服務創新獎(Best TV service Innovation)
Telstra(澳大利亞電訊)
? Telstra(澳大利亞電訊) 的T-BOX = STB + DVR,
類似有線電視盒,其內容:
– 付費電視營運商Foxtel的電視
– 連網的Youtube,Bigpond影片(購買/租賃)
– Video Game “錢”景走俏,預計升級T-BOX系列的韌體
T-BOX
ref: Telstra
grace @NEXT-OPTO.com 6
7. IPTV網路科技獎(Best Network technology for IPTV)
Alcatel-Lucent (阿爾卡特-朗訊)
? Velocix CDN(新型態CDN)
– A key characteristic of the Velocix Digital
Media Platform is built on dynamic caching
? Close to subscribers & easy to access
Velocix CDN
Ref: Alcatel-Lucent
grace @NEXT-OPTO.com 7
8. TV權利與資產管理獎(Best Rights & Asset
Management for TV) - Motorola Mobility
? HLS+ enables operators to deliver video content across
unmanaged networks
– best quality possible with the bandwidth available (傳輸頻寬保證)
– protecting the content from piracy (保護隱私)
– Combining adaptive streaming w/ DRM (可調適串流之DRM設計)
Video delivery on PCs &
mobile devices is a “ TV
everywhere” <- meeting
Hollywood studio
secure-delivery
requirements (視訊傳遞
跨PC與智慧行動裝置,
滿足好萊屋製片嚴格安全
傳遞需求)
Ref: motorola http://www.motorola.com/mediaexperiences2go/
grace @NEXT-OPTO.com 8
9. IPTV服務傳送平台獎 (Best Service Delivery
Platform for IPTV) - Orca Interactive
? Orange.fr has migrated ~ 400,000 IPTV subscribers (2011/11)
to Orca unified platform (法電信集團將40萬訂戶轉到奧斯卡統
一平台)
– The unified platform: the service delivery & content discovery
platform, conditional access system and native multi-screen
solution
– adapted for IPTV, OTT web delivery and hybrid satellite-IP
over 5.1 million TV customers in
Europe at the end of 2011
grace @NEXT-OPTO.com 9
10. 組件或推動商獎 (Best Component or Enabler)
- Ericsson (愛立信)
? Tradeoff btw hardware vs. software encoding
advances (硬體軟體間的綜合採用考量)
– Ericsson released a high-density transcoding platform
(高密度轉碼平台)
? SPR1200 multiscreen stream processor (Hardware)+
NPR1200 multiscreen formatting system (software-based)
– Adaptive rate segmentation and DRM execution across multiple
devices (提供可調碼率分割與跨多設備平台之DRM機制)
– A true 'TV anywhere' experience
– A scalable, flexible and cost-effective solution
BSkyB's 'Go' service
Ref: Ericsson
grace @NEXT-OPTO.com 10
11. TV App - AT&T ; 電視消費者設備獎(Best TV
Consumer Device) - Cisico + AT&T
AT&T U-verse for tablet
? The app provides (OpenPeak OpenTablet)
users with access
to AT&T U-verse‘s
“TV Everywhere”
content (實現到處可
收看電視)
AT&T U-verse for tablet (iPad)
Cisco’s ISB7005 & VEN401 wireless
receiver allows U-verse subscribers
to send SD & HD programming
around a home via 802.11n Wi-Fi
Ref: AT&T U-verse
grace @NEXT-OPTO.com 11
13. AT&T U-verse vs. DirecTV service
? J.D.Power調查全美電視服務滿意度 (US
residential TV service satisfaction)
– Programming, cost of service, billing, offerings
& reliability, performance reliability, customer
service
US 區域 Overall satisfaction (1st) years
East (美東) DirecTV
North Central
2010 + 2011
South AT&T U-verse
West
Ref: http://www.jdpower.com/consumer-ratings/ratings.htm?study=909201195
grace @NEXT-OPTO.com 13
14. 多螢幕TV方案獎 (Best Multiscreen solution)
- Huawei(華為)
2011 Best Service Delivery for IPTV
2012 Best Multiscreen TV solution
grace @NEXT-OPTO.com 14
15. Apple New iPad 之影響
? Apple 再次打敗自己的戰略,繼續維持領先地位
– 面板種總畫素數跳增四倍 (2048*1536) 以超高解析面板提高硬體
進入障礙
– 提升突顯 500萬畫素的靜態影像以及1080P的動態影像擷取
– 透過高規格硬體累積差異化應用市場(Apps)
– New iPad也支援 Siri 功能(Voice Dictation only)
– iPhoto 軟體也支援 New iPad
– 已逐漸將其 Mac 上之軟體逐漸往 iOS 轉移
– 將其封閉系統內之產品使用介面與優勢完全串聯
– 雙產品線策略降低 iPad 價格門檻
? Apple 藉由高解析度 iPad 與 iCloud 往家庭影音市場邁進
– 也宣佈 New Generation Apple TV BOX上市
– 透過 iCloud 服務, 使用者可將 iPad, iPhone 購買之內容與影片
透過 Apple TV BOX 傳輸至電視上觀賞
– Apple 藉由可攜式終端高市場佔有率優勢,將觸角往家庭影音衍
伸
grace @NEXT-OPTO.com 15
17. Patentability – 4 legal requirements
Law
4 legal req. Criteria
section
Unobiousness 103 Can provide one or more new
& unexpected results (?)
Can make of innovation in the
specific technology (?)
Novelty 102 new physical feature (?)
new combination of separate old feature (?)
new use of an old feature (?)
Utility 101 Can be regarded as a useful one (?)
5 classifications
Statutory class 101 process machine manufacture composition
New use
Patent law 35 USC 101 or 35 USC 102 or 35 USC 103
grace @NEXT-OPTO.com 17
18. Patent Requirement #1:
a statutory class - lawsuits
? Parker v. Flook 437 U.S. 584, 1978 (wiki)
Flook case
? CCPA -> Supreme Court
(1978)
? Use of a math algorithm is non-patentability
Critical lawsuit
? Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303,1980 (BIO)
Chakrabar
ty case
? Milestone: anything under sun that is made by man
(1980)
? Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. 175, 1981
? 1st software case – successful case
Diehr case
(1981) ? Milestone: can protect the step for using the formula
? Bilski v. Kappos, 130 S.Ct. 3218 @ Supreme Court
? Start with 08/833892 was rejected by examiner
Bilski case ? 2010 – re Bilski case (10/400846, 10/108089) was
(2010) also gotten “Abandoned”
grace @NEXT-OPTO.com 18