際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
So what exactly is
this play all about?
The possibilities are endless
Hamlet is an enigma
 It is probably evident to you
by now that Hamlet is
puzzling and difficult to
understand.
 People have been trying to
interpret the play for
centuries and, to make it
more confusing a variety of
interpretations are possible.
 Many regard the play
through a contextual lens.
This means they believe that
literature is a reflection of the
values and worldviews of the
world from which it comes.
 Current trends in literary
criticism lean toward
deconstructionist and
dialectical criticism, both of
which revolve around this
belief. This trend is a logical
extension of critical interest in
the issues of slant and bias of
the media in a worldview
dominated by television.
 Dialectical criticism is a result
of the twentieth centurys
interest in social revolution -
through such movements as
Marxism and Feminism but
also has ties to Ancient
Greece.
 It is concerned with the
reflection of the individual in
the mirror of the collective
society; or, conversely, the
way the individual is
influenced by the society
they live in.
Various Interpretations
 Over the centuries Hamlet has
been interpreted by a range of
critics from a great variety of
schools of thought.
 William Hazlitt a Romantic
(1800), focussed on the tragic
character flaw of Hamlet.
 Northrop Frye used Archetypal
Criticism through the 1970s and
1980s to connect patterns in
Shakespeare to those in the
bible, tying meaning in texts to
the universal motifs and allusions
that reflect human experience
and shape culture.
And of course theres Freud
 Freudian criticism is another
school of thought worth
mentioning in relation
to Hamlet.
 The psychoanalytic
approach Freud pioneered
has been applied to the
character of Hamlet, resulting
in explorations of his oedipal
complex.
 In the previous lesson you
worked through the
concept of allusions,
which lends itself to
another popular reading
of Hamlet: as an allegory
or analogy for the
religious conflicts
prevalent in England and
Europe in the years
following the
Reformation.
Hamlet as an Allegory
The Reformation was a period in
Europe during which Christianity
was being re-formed. Theologians
like Martin Luther and John Calvin,
were questioning the Catholic
theology. They challenged the idea
that one could atone for ones sins
(through the practice of confession
for instance). Calvin challenged
the existence of the church - its
opulence and ritual and
advocated for a quieter, more
pure form of reverence and
worship.
Shakespeare set Hamlet in
Denmark, which was a Lutheran
state at the time the play was
written in England in 1601. This is
further support for the idea
that Hamlet was in part a political
parody. Hamlet attended
Wittenberg, understood by the
Elizabethans to be a Protestant
university.
Martin Luther was a professor
there. Dr. Faustus, by
Christopher Marlowe, was set in
Wittenberg. Elsinore and the
Kingdom of Denmark in Hamlet,
however, appear to have been
Catholic, or in transition - like
Elizabethan England.
The tension between the
Protestant idea of self-
determinism and personal
responsibility and the Catholic
ideology of divine power - or
fate - is personified in Hamlet,
the Prince of Denmark. If this
were so, what would
Shakespeare want his audience
to understand regarding the
politics of religion?
Hamlet as an Allegory

More Related Content

So what exactly is this play all about

  • 1. So what exactly is this play all about? The possibilities are endless
  • 2. Hamlet is an enigma It is probably evident to you by now that Hamlet is puzzling and difficult to understand. People have been trying to interpret the play for centuries and, to make it more confusing a variety of interpretations are possible.
  • 3. Many regard the play through a contextual lens. This means they believe that literature is a reflection of the values and worldviews of the world from which it comes. Current trends in literary criticism lean toward deconstructionist and dialectical criticism, both of which revolve around this belief. This trend is a logical extension of critical interest in the issues of slant and bias of the media in a worldview dominated by television.
  • 4. Dialectical criticism is a result of the twentieth centurys interest in social revolution - through such movements as Marxism and Feminism but also has ties to Ancient Greece. It is concerned with the reflection of the individual in the mirror of the collective society; or, conversely, the way the individual is influenced by the society they live in.
  • 5. Various Interpretations Over the centuries Hamlet has been interpreted by a range of critics from a great variety of schools of thought. William Hazlitt a Romantic (1800), focussed on the tragic character flaw of Hamlet. Northrop Frye used Archetypal Criticism through the 1970s and 1980s to connect patterns in Shakespeare to those in the bible, tying meaning in texts to the universal motifs and allusions that reflect human experience and shape culture.
  • 6. And of course theres Freud Freudian criticism is another school of thought worth mentioning in relation to Hamlet. The psychoanalytic approach Freud pioneered has been applied to the character of Hamlet, resulting in explorations of his oedipal complex.
  • 7. In the previous lesson you worked through the concept of allusions, which lends itself to another popular reading of Hamlet: as an allegory or analogy for the religious conflicts prevalent in England and Europe in the years following the Reformation.
  • 8. Hamlet as an Allegory The Reformation was a period in Europe during which Christianity was being re-formed. Theologians like Martin Luther and John Calvin, were questioning the Catholic theology. They challenged the idea that one could atone for ones sins (through the practice of confession for instance). Calvin challenged the existence of the church - its opulence and ritual and advocated for a quieter, more pure form of reverence and worship. Shakespeare set Hamlet in Denmark, which was a Lutheran state at the time the play was written in England in 1601. This is further support for the idea that Hamlet was in part a political parody. Hamlet attended Wittenberg, understood by the Elizabethans to be a Protestant university.
  • 9. Martin Luther was a professor there. Dr. Faustus, by Christopher Marlowe, was set in Wittenberg. Elsinore and the Kingdom of Denmark in Hamlet, however, appear to have been Catholic, or in transition - like Elizabethan England. The tension between the Protestant idea of self- determinism and personal responsibility and the Catholic ideology of divine power - or fate - is personified in Hamlet, the Prince of Denmark. If this were so, what would Shakespeare want his audience to understand regarding the politics of religion? Hamlet as an Allegory