This document discusses various interpretations of Shakespeare's play Hamlet. It notes that Hamlet is a complex work that can be interpreted in many ways and has puzzled critics for centuries. Different schools of literary criticism, such as contextual, deconstructionist, dialectical, archetypal, Freudian, and allegorical approaches have all been applied to analyzing Hamlet. The document also suggests that Hamlet could be interpreted as an allegory for the religious conflicts during the Protestant Reformation in England and Europe in the late 16th/early 17th century.
1 of 9
Download to read offline
More Related Content
So what exactly is this play all about
1. So what exactly is
this play all about?
The possibilities are endless
2. Hamlet is an enigma
It is probably evident to you
by now that Hamlet is
puzzling and difficult to
understand.
People have been trying to
interpret the play for
centuries and, to make it
more confusing a variety of
interpretations are possible.
3. Many regard the play
through a contextual lens.
This means they believe that
literature is a reflection of the
values and worldviews of the
world from which it comes.
Current trends in literary
criticism lean toward
deconstructionist and
dialectical criticism, both of
which revolve around this
belief. This trend is a logical
extension of critical interest in
the issues of slant and bias of
the media in a worldview
dominated by television.
4. Dialectical criticism is a result
of the twentieth centurys
interest in social revolution -
through such movements as
Marxism and Feminism but
also has ties to Ancient
Greece.
It is concerned with the
reflection of the individual in
the mirror of the collective
society; or, conversely, the
way the individual is
influenced by the society
they live in.
5. Various Interpretations
Over the centuries Hamlet has
been interpreted by a range of
critics from a great variety of
schools of thought.
William Hazlitt a Romantic
(1800), focussed on the tragic
character flaw of Hamlet.
Northrop Frye used Archetypal
Criticism through the 1970s and
1980s to connect patterns in
Shakespeare to those in the
bible, tying meaning in texts to
the universal motifs and allusions
that reflect human experience
and shape culture.
6. And of course theres Freud
Freudian criticism is another
school of thought worth
mentioning in relation
to Hamlet.
The psychoanalytic
approach Freud pioneered
has been applied to the
character of Hamlet, resulting
in explorations of his oedipal
complex.
7. In the previous lesson you
worked through the
concept of allusions,
which lends itself to
another popular reading
of Hamlet: as an allegory
or analogy for the
religious conflicts
prevalent in England and
Europe in the years
following the
Reformation.
8. Hamlet as an Allegory
The Reformation was a period in
Europe during which Christianity
was being re-formed. Theologians
like Martin Luther and John Calvin,
were questioning the Catholic
theology. They challenged the idea
that one could atone for ones sins
(through the practice of confession
for instance). Calvin challenged
the existence of the church - its
opulence and ritual and
advocated for a quieter, more
pure form of reverence and
worship.
Shakespeare set Hamlet in
Denmark, which was a Lutheran
state at the time the play was
written in England in 1601. This is
further support for the idea
that Hamlet was in part a political
parody. Hamlet attended
Wittenberg, understood by the
Elizabethans to be a Protestant
university.
9. Martin Luther was a professor
there. Dr. Faustus, by
Christopher Marlowe, was set in
Wittenberg. Elsinore and the
Kingdom of Denmark in Hamlet,
however, appear to have been
Catholic, or in transition - like
Elizabethan England.
The tension between the
Protestant idea of self-
determinism and personal
responsibility and the Catholic
ideology of divine power - or
fate - is personified in Hamlet,
the Prince of Denmark. If this
were so, what would
Shakespeare want his audience
to understand regarding the
politics of religion?
Hamlet as an Allegory