This document discusses social networking applications and key aspects of social networks. It examines social graphs and nodes/hubs/links that make up social networks. It also notes that social graphs are often layered and intermingled with other graphs. Finally, it provides SWOT analyses for several social networking platforms: ELGG, Saywire, Open Journal, and Buddypress/Wordpress MU.
Social Networks are contextual sharing engines that use a social-circles network model aka social graph
Cite: Albert-L叩szl坦 Barab叩si Social Networks are scale free which means that the associations are based on a power law or Pareto distribution
Scale free networks have three components: Nodes, Hubs (collections of Nodes) and links.
Links have qualitative properties
Google Pagerank is an example of qualitative intelligence Mathematical PageRanks (out of 100) for a simple network (PageRanks reported by Google are rescaled logarithmically). Page C has a higher PageRank than Page E, even though it has fewer links to it; the link it has is of a much higher value. A web surfer who chooses a random link on every page (but with 15% likelihood jumps to a random page on the whole web) is going to be on Page E for 8.1% of the time. (The 15% likelihood of jumping to an arbitrary page corresponds to a damping factor of 85%.) Without damping, all web surfers would eventually end up on Pages A, B, or C, and all other pages would have PageRank zero. Page A is assumed to link to all pages in the web, because it has no outgoing links.
The different software available has biases towards the Key graph managed by the tools. Fos SFI, Hub-centric graphs are the appropriate solution, since the SFI content is the Hub.