This document provides guidance for students on completing a dissertation module. It outlines the aims of allowing independent study and in-depth investigation of a topic. It discusses techniques for literature searching and reviewing primary sources. The dissertation layout involves 4 main sections - an introduction, literature review, discussion, and references. The literature review section requires appraisal of 6-8 primary sources less than 10 years old using a critique framework. It emphasizes comprehensive literature searching and critical analysis of methodologies. Overall recommendations and areas for further research must be provided based on findings. Guidance is given on literature searching strategies, evaluating sources, and referencing.
The document discusses what constitutes a literature review and provides guidance on how to conduct one. It begins by defining a literature review and explaining that it must be guided by a research objective or problem. It then discusses common problems in literature reviews, such as excluding seminal works or adopting a narrow perspective. The document also outlines the purposes of a literature review and different types. Finally, it provides a comprehensive overview of the literature review process, including searching, reading, evaluating, summarizing sources, and writing the review.
The document provides an overview of what constitutes a literature review and guidance on how to conduct one. It defines different types of literature reviews such as systematic, historical, integrative, and argumentative reviews. Key aspects that are discussed include searching for and evaluating primary and secondary sources; identifying major ideas, debates and gaps in existing research; and avoiding common pitfalls like failing to critically analyze sources or relate them to the research problem. Stages of conducting a literature review involving problem formulation, searching literature, data evaluation, and analysis/interpretation are also outlined.
Literature Review - How to write effectively.pptxnguyenlekhanhx02
油
The document provides guidance on conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as analyzing and synthesizing existing works to place the current study in context, avoid duplication, and identify gaps. An effective literature review compares and contrasts authors' views, groups similar conclusions, and critically evaluates methodologies. It should highlight exemplary studies, identify patterns, and show how the current study relates to prior work. When searching literature, one should use a variety of sources and evaluate their credibility. The conclusion should draw key points and discuss the need for further research.
This document discusses key aspects of developing a research problem and conducting a literature review. It begins by defining a research problem and outlining various sources that can inspire problems. Next, it describes important criteria for evaluating potential problems such as the researcher's interest and competence. The document emphasizes the need for a theoretical framework to guide the research process. Finally, it outlines the main steps of conducting a literature review, including searching relevant sources, evaluating them, identifying themes, and writing the review.
This document provides guidance on reviewing literature for a research project. It discusses that a literature review is important to understand what has already been done on the topic and the key issues. A comprehensive literature review allows the researcher to become an expert in their field and identify the current frontier of research. The literature review process involves identifying relevant sources, analyzing and synthesizing the information, and then writing the review. The review should focus the study, identify key variables, and link the findings to previous work.
The document provides guidance on developing a research proposal. It defines a research proposal as a detailed plan of study that presents ideas in an accessible way and describes what will be done, why it should be done, how it will be done, and expected results. Key aspects of a proposal discussed include properly defining the research problem, identifying sources of research ideas, selecting an appropriate topic based on criteria like contribution and feasibility, and including essential components like a literature review. The literature review aims to provide understanding of prior work on the topic and prevent unnecessary duplication.
The document provides guidance on conducting research through a systematic process. It discusses selecting an area and topic, developing research questions and hypotheses, designing a study, collecting and analyzing data, and publishing findings. It also covers different types of research like basic vs applied research and exploratory vs descriptive vs explanatory research. Additionally, it provides tips on doing a literature review by searching, evaluating, and analyzing previous studies on the topic to inform the research.
the critical literature research review.pptxJubilinAlbania
油
The document discusses the process of conducting a critical literature review. It explains that the literature review aims to narrow the research problem, develop a clear problem statement, and position the research relative to existing knowledge. The literature review process involves identifying published and unpublished work, evaluating this work in relation to the problem, and documenting sources. Key sources for the literature review include textbooks, journals, theses, conference proceedings, reports, newspapers, and the internet. The document provides guidance on searching for literature, evaluating sources, and documenting the literature review to avoid misrepresenting others' work and engaging in plagiarism.
This document provides guidance on conducting a literature review for research. It defines a literature review as a critical evaluation of previous research that allows one to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps. The purpose of a literature review is to situate a research project within existing scholarly knowledge. It discusses the key steps of a literature review: searching literature, evaluating sources, identifying themes and gaps, outlining the structure, and writing the review. The document emphasizes that a literature review should analyze, synthesize and critically evaluate sources to demonstrate knowledge of scholarly debates.
This document provides guidance on writing a literature review. It defines a literature review as an analysis and synthesis of previous research on a topic. The purpose is to place one's own research in the context of existing literature and identify areas that need further study. The document outlines the components of a literature review, including defining the problem, searching relevant literature, evaluating sources, and analyzing findings. It also provides tips for writing such as developing a thesis, considering organization, using evidence from sources, and revising. The concluding sections emphasize the importance of thoroughly understanding sources and ensuring the literature review relates directly to the research topic.
The document summarizes the key steps in writing a literature review:
1. The introduction gives a quick overview of the topic and organizational structure.
2. The body contains a discussion of sources, organized chronologically, thematically, or by methodology. It analyzes and synthesizes previous research on the topic.
3. The conclusions discuss what has been learned from reviewing the literature and identifies potential gaps for future research. The overall purpose is to critically evaluate previous research and establish a foundation and need for the current study.
This document provides guidance on conducting scientific research. It discusses selecting an area and topic for research, developing a research question, conducting a literature review, formulating goals and objectives, and developing a hypothesis.
The key steps outlined are: 1) selecting an area of interest and topic based on relevance, resources, and need; 2) developing a clear, answerable research question that has not been addressed; 3) conducting a thorough literature review to understand previous work and prevent duplication; 4) establishing goals in broad terms and specific, measurable objectives; and 5) translating the research question into a testable hypothesis about the relationship between variables. Following these systematic steps is crucial for rigorous research.
This document provides information on conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic that provides an overview of current knowledge and identifies relevant theories, methods, and gaps. The document outlines the importance of literature reviews in identifying research problems and prior findings. It also discusses the primary sources of information like original research reports and secondary sources like textbooks. Finally, it lists the main steps in conducting a literature review, including creating an annotated bibliography, organizing sources thematically, writing individual sections, and integrating the sections.
The document provides guidance on conducting an effective literature review. It defines a literature review as a written overview of major writings on a selected topic, including scholarly articles, books, reports, and websites. The purpose is to understand what others have researched on the topic, identify inconsistencies and gaps, and justify further research. The literature review should include an objective, topic overview, categorization of sources, discussion of source similarities and differences, and identify relationships between works. Sources should be evaluated based on author expertise, evidence supporting arguments, consideration of opposing viewpoints, and contribution to understanding the topic.
The document discusses the structure and process of conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as a critical analysis and summary of previous research on a particular topic. The key parts of a literature review include an introduction outlining the topic and scope, a body section discussing and analyzing sources, and a conclusion. Effective reviews establish trends in research, assess strengths and weaknesses, and identify gaps. The steps outlined are planning, reading, analyzing, drafting and revising. Sources are organized thematically, chronologically or methodologically. The document also describes different types of literature reviews and sources to consider.
Review of literature final research methodologyMittalGandhi
油
The document provides an overview of conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as an analysis and description of previous work done on a particular topic. The purpose is to convey existing knowledge and ideas and avoid duplicating past research. Different types of literature reviews are described, including narrative, critical, scoping, and systematic reviews. Guidelines are provided for writing a literature review, such as being comprehensive, unbiased, and including accurate citations and references.
This document provides an overview of literature reviews, including their definition, importance, purpose, types, sources, and steps. A literature review aims to critically evaluate previous research on a topic. It is important as it helps identify gaps and orient the reader. The main purposes are to focus on past research, show how a new study fills gaps, and set boundaries. Types include traditional narratives, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Sources are primary, secondary, and tertiary. The steps are to identify key terms, locate literature, evaluate and select sources, organize findings, and write the review. Elements to address in the review are an introduction, body, and conclusion.
This document provides an overview of the literature review process. It discusses what a literature review is, including that it involves published information on a topic within a certain time period and combines both summary and synthesis. The key steps of the literature review process are searching for relevant literature, sorting and prioritizing sources, analytical and evaluative reading of sources, comparing across studies, organizing the content, and writing the review. The document also provides guidance on assessing source quality, developing a focused topic and argument, surveying and critiquing the literature, and addressing gaps in existing research.
INTELLECTUAL AND PROPERTY RIGHTSunit 1 R23 (1).pptxSamuelAbragham
油
This document discusses statistical design of experiments in research methodology. It explains that statistical design of experiments identifies sources of variation and accounts for them in designing the experiment and analysis. The goal is to obtain the maximum information from a well-designed experiment. Some key principles discussed include randomization, replication, and local control to eliminate extraneous influences and obtain valid results. Examples of statistical experiments include coin tosses and rolling dice due to their random outcomes.
The document provides guidance on how to write a review of related literature. It explains that a literature review gives an overview of previous writings on a research topic and identifies key elements to include, such as background knowledge, relevant theories, data, and study results. It outlines a five-step process for conducting a literature review: searching for sources, evaluating sources, identifying themes, outlining a structure, and writing the review. The document emphasizes synthesizing, analyzing, and critically evaluating sources, and connecting the literature to the researcher's own work.
3. lecture 3 literature review & analytical framework developmentC担ng Nguy畛n
油
This document provides guidance on conducting a literature review. It outlines the purpose of a literature review as demonstrating knowledge of current research and identifying gaps to justify new research. An effective literature review adopts a critical perspective, evaluates sources, and develops a clear argument through synthesis rather than just reporting on individual studies. It should draw from a wide range of academic literature and other sources, while avoiding plagiarism. The document provides tips for structuring, writing and referencing a literature review to meet assessment criteria.
The document provides an overview of the research process for students. It discusses the key stages of research including defining the scope, conducting a literature review, developing research questions and hypotheses, collecting and analyzing data, and reporting findings. It also compares the research process for students, academics, and industry professionals. Students start from a different position than professionals and must learn about topics before developing their own research. The document emphasizes searching literature databases and libraries to discover relevant sources and gain background on topics.
Difference between Prokaryotic cell and Eukaryotic cell.pptxDrSulabhaDeokar
油
This presentation explores the fundamental differences between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells,distinguishing characteristics of Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes.Describe common cell morphologies and cellular arrangements in typical Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes.
Presentation explains how cells maintain their morphology.
Explore internal and external structures of Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes in terms of their physical structure, chemical structure and function.
This presentation is designed for biology students, educators, and anyone interested in cellular biology. Based on the latest research and scientific discoveries in the field of Microbiology, Microbial Biotechnology and cellular biology. This Presentation has been compiled using information from trusted educational resources and scientific literature.
The purpose of this presentation is to educate and inform the students about the fundamental differences between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, highlighting their unique structures, functions, and characteristics, which provide a comprehensive understanding of cellular biology.
Educate the students and teachers about the differences between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells in detail.
This presentation will engage and entertain the students, often with a mix of detail information, colourful pictures and storytelling.
This presentation will motivate and inspire the students to think differently, take action, or pursue a goal.
Definitely it will raise awareness about a ultrastructures of Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes .
This presentation will Provide an update or report on a science projects and progress as well as inspire the graduate students to learn more about cellular biology and its applications.
This presentation will inspire studets, teachers and educational professionals to explore digital resource for e - learnig .
Presentation likely to be used by under graduate and post graduate students, educators or individuals for online learning.
It can work as digital resource for a broader e- learning ecosystem.
This presentation highlights '' NEP-aligned Biotechnology and Biology education.''
"Discover the distinctions between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, from cell walls to genetic material. This presentation provides a comprehensive overview of cellular biology.Learn about the two main types of cells - prokaryotic,eukaryotic and their differences in structure, function, and organization. A great resource for biology learners.Uncover the unique characteristics of prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells in this informative PPT.
More Related Content
Similar to Sourcing and reviewing the Literature in tourism (20)
The document provides guidance on conducting research through a systematic process. It discusses selecting an area and topic, developing research questions and hypotheses, designing a study, collecting and analyzing data, and publishing findings. It also covers different types of research like basic vs applied research and exploratory vs descriptive vs explanatory research. Additionally, it provides tips on doing a literature review by searching, evaluating, and analyzing previous studies on the topic to inform the research.
the critical literature research review.pptxJubilinAlbania
油
The document discusses the process of conducting a critical literature review. It explains that the literature review aims to narrow the research problem, develop a clear problem statement, and position the research relative to existing knowledge. The literature review process involves identifying published and unpublished work, evaluating this work in relation to the problem, and documenting sources. Key sources for the literature review include textbooks, journals, theses, conference proceedings, reports, newspapers, and the internet. The document provides guidance on searching for literature, evaluating sources, and documenting the literature review to avoid misrepresenting others' work and engaging in plagiarism.
This document provides guidance on conducting a literature review for research. It defines a literature review as a critical evaluation of previous research that allows one to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps. The purpose of a literature review is to situate a research project within existing scholarly knowledge. It discusses the key steps of a literature review: searching literature, evaluating sources, identifying themes and gaps, outlining the structure, and writing the review. The document emphasizes that a literature review should analyze, synthesize and critically evaluate sources to demonstrate knowledge of scholarly debates.
This document provides guidance on writing a literature review. It defines a literature review as an analysis and synthesis of previous research on a topic. The purpose is to place one's own research in the context of existing literature and identify areas that need further study. The document outlines the components of a literature review, including defining the problem, searching relevant literature, evaluating sources, and analyzing findings. It also provides tips for writing such as developing a thesis, considering organization, using evidence from sources, and revising. The concluding sections emphasize the importance of thoroughly understanding sources and ensuring the literature review relates directly to the research topic.
The document summarizes the key steps in writing a literature review:
1. The introduction gives a quick overview of the topic and organizational structure.
2. The body contains a discussion of sources, organized chronologically, thematically, or by methodology. It analyzes and synthesizes previous research on the topic.
3. The conclusions discuss what has been learned from reviewing the literature and identifies potential gaps for future research. The overall purpose is to critically evaluate previous research and establish a foundation and need for the current study.
This document provides guidance on conducting scientific research. It discusses selecting an area and topic for research, developing a research question, conducting a literature review, formulating goals and objectives, and developing a hypothesis.
The key steps outlined are: 1) selecting an area of interest and topic based on relevance, resources, and need; 2) developing a clear, answerable research question that has not been addressed; 3) conducting a thorough literature review to understand previous work and prevent duplication; 4) establishing goals in broad terms and specific, measurable objectives; and 5) translating the research question into a testable hypothesis about the relationship between variables. Following these systematic steps is crucial for rigorous research.
This document provides information on conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic that provides an overview of current knowledge and identifies relevant theories, methods, and gaps. The document outlines the importance of literature reviews in identifying research problems and prior findings. It also discusses the primary sources of information like original research reports and secondary sources like textbooks. Finally, it lists the main steps in conducting a literature review, including creating an annotated bibliography, organizing sources thematically, writing individual sections, and integrating the sections.
The document provides guidance on conducting an effective literature review. It defines a literature review as a written overview of major writings on a selected topic, including scholarly articles, books, reports, and websites. The purpose is to understand what others have researched on the topic, identify inconsistencies and gaps, and justify further research. The literature review should include an objective, topic overview, categorization of sources, discussion of source similarities and differences, and identify relationships between works. Sources should be evaluated based on author expertise, evidence supporting arguments, consideration of opposing viewpoints, and contribution to understanding the topic.
The document discusses the structure and process of conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as a critical analysis and summary of previous research on a particular topic. The key parts of a literature review include an introduction outlining the topic and scope, a body section discussing and analyzing sources, and a conclusion. Effective reviews establish trends in research, assess strengths and weaknesses, and identify gaps. The steps outlined are planning, reading, analyzing, drafting and revising. Sources are organized thematically, chronologically or methodologically. The document also describes different types of literature reviews and sources to consider.
Review of literature final research methodologyMittalGandhi
油
The document provides an overview of conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as an analysis and description of previous work done on a particular topic. The purpose is to convey existing knowledge and ideas and avoid duplicating past research. Different types of literature reviews are described, including narrative, critical, scoping, and systematic reviews. Guidelines are provided for writing a literature review, such as being comprehensive, unbiased, and including accurate citations and references.
This document provides an overview of literature reviews, including their definition, importance, purpose, types, sources, and steps. A literature review aims to critically evaluate previous research on a topic. It is important as it helps identify gaps and orient the reader. The main purposes are to focus on past research, show how a new study fills gaps, and set boundaries. Types include traditional narratives, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Sources are primary, secondary, and tertiary. The steps are to identify key terms, locate literature, evaluate and select sources, organize findings, and write the review. Elements to address in the review are an introduction, body, and conclusion.
This document provides an overview of the literature review process. It discusses what a literature review is, including that it involves published information on a topic within a certain time period and combines both summary and synthesis. The key steps of the literature review process are searching for relevant literature, sorting and prioritizing sources, analytical and evaluative reading of sources, comparing across studies, organizing the content, and writing the review. The document also provides guidance on assessing source quality, developing a focused topic and argument, surveying and critiquing the literature, and addressing gaps in existing research.
INTELLECTUAL AND PROPERTY RIGHTSunit 1 R23 (1).pptxSamuelAbragham
油
This document discusses statistical design of experiments in research methodology. It explains that statistical design of experiments identifies sources of variation and accounts for them in designing the experiment and analysis. The goal is to obtain the maximum information from a well-designed experiment. Some key principles discussed include randomization, replication, and local control to eliminate extraneous influences and obtain valid results. Examples of statistical experiments include coin tosses and rolling dice due to their random outcomes.
The document provides guidance on how to write a review of related literature. It explains that a literature review gives an overview of previous writings on a research topic and identifies key elements to include, such as background knowledge, relevant theories, data, and study results. It outlines a five-step process for conducting a literature review: searching for sources, evaluating sources, identifying themes, outlining a structure, and writing the review. The document emphasizes synthesizing, analyzing, and critically evaluating sources, and connecting the literature to the researcher's own work.
3. lecture 3 literature review & analytical framework developmentC担ng Nguy畛n
油
This document provides guidance on conducting a literature review. It outlines the purpose of a literature review as demonstrating knowledge of current research and identifying gaps to justify new research. An effective literature review adopts a critical perspective, evaluates sources, and develops a clear argument through synthesis rather than just reporting on individual studies. It should draw from a wide range of academic literature and other sources, while avoiding plagiarism. The document provides tips for structuring, writing and referencing a literature review to meet assessment criteria.
The document provides an overview of the research process for students. It discusses the key stages of research including defining the scope, conducting a literature review, developing research questions and hypotheses, collecting and analyzing data, and reporting findings. It also compares the research process for students, academics, and industry professionals. Students start from a different position than professionals and must learn about topics before developing their own research. The document emphasizes searching literature databases and libraries to discover relevant sources and gain background on topics.
Difference between Prokaryotic cell and Eukaryotic cell.pptxDrSulabhaDeokar
油
This presentation explores the fundamental differences between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells,distinguishing characteristics of Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes.Describe common cell morphologies and cellular arrangements in typical Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes.
Presentation explains how cells maintain their morphology.
Explore internal and external structures of Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes in terms of their physical structure, chemical structure and function.
This presentation is designed for biology students, educators, and anyone interested in cellular biology. Based on the latest research and scientific discoveries in the field of Microbiology, Microbial Biotechnology and cellular biology. This Presentation has been compiled using information from trusted educational resources and scientific literature.
The purpose of this presentation is to educate and inform the students about the fundamental differences between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, highlighting their unique structures, functions, and characteristics, which provide a comprehensive understanding of cellular biology.
Educate the students and teachers about the differences between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells in detail.
This presentation will engage and entertain the students, often with a mix of detail information, colourful pictures and storytelling.
This presentation will motivate and inspire the students to think differently, take action, or pursue a goal.
Definitely it will raise awareness about a ultrastructures of Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes .
This presentation will Provide an update or report on a science projects and progress as well as inspire the graduate students to learn more about cellular biology and its applications.
This presentation will inspire studets, teachers and educational professionals to explore digital resource for e - learnig .
Presentation likely to be used by under graduate and post graduate students, educators or individuals for online learning.
It can work as digital resource for a broader e- learning ecosystem.
This presentation highlights '' NEP-aligned Biotechnology and Biology education.''
"Discover the distinctions between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, from cell walls to genetic material. This presentation provides a comprehensive overview of cellular biology.Learn about the two main types of cells - prokaryotic,eukaryotic and their differences in structure, function, and organization. A great resource for biology learners.Uncover the unique characteristics of prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells in this informative PPT.
Overview of basic statistical mechanics of NNsCharles Martin
油
Overview of topics in the paper
A walk in the statistical mechanical formulation of neural networks (2014)
https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5300
Audio: https://youtu.be/zIxg69Q8UTk
Coordination and Response: The Nervous System | IGCSE BiologyBlessing Ndazie
油
This comprehensive IGCSE Biology presentation explains the nervous system, focusing on how the body coordinates and responds to stimuli. Learn about the central and peripheral nervous systems, reflex actions, neurons, synapses, and the role of neurotransmitters. Understand the differences between voluntary and involuntary responses and how the nervous system interacts with other body systems. Ideal for Cambridge IGCSE students preparing for exams!
Excretion in Humans | Cambridge IGCSE BiologyBlessing Ndazie
油
This IGCSE Biology presentation covers excretion in humans, explaining the removal of metabolic wastes such as carbon dioxide, urea, and excess salts. Learn about the structure and function of the kidneys, the role of the liver in excretion, ultrafiltration, selective reabsorption, and the importance of homeostasis. Includes diagrams and explanations to help Cambridge IGCSE students prepare effectively for exams!
Simple Phenomena of Magnetism | IGCSE PhysicsBlessing Ndazie
油
This extensive slide deck provides a detailed exploration of the simple phenomena of magnetism for IGCSE Physics. It covers key concepts such as magnetic materials, properties of magnets, magnetic field patterns, the Earth's magnetism, electromagnets, the motor effect, and the principles of electromagnetic induction. The presentation also explains magnetization and demagnetization, methods of making magnets, applications of magnets in real life, and experimental demonstrations. Featuring illustrative diagrams, worked examples, and exam-style questions, this resource is ideal for IGCSE students, teachers, and independent learners preparing for exams.
Improving the Perturbation-Based Explanation of Deepfake Detectors Through th...VasileiosMezaris
油
Presentation of our paper, "Improving the Perturbation-Based Explanation of Deepfake Detectors Through the Use of Adversarially-Generated Samples", by K. Tsigos, E. Apostolidis and V. Mezaris. Presented at the AI4MFDD Workshop of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV 2025), Tucson, AZ, USA, Feb. 2025. Preprint and software available at http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.03957 https://github.com/IDT-ITI/Adv-XAI-Deepfakes
LC-MS/MS (Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry) is a powerful analytical tool for comparing innovator and biosimilar drugs. It ensures precise characterization, detecting structural variations, impurities, and post-translational modifications, ensuring biosimilar quality, efficacy, and regulatory compliance in pharmaceutical development.
2. Sourcing and Reviewing the Literature
Key Concepts and Issues
Why is a Literature Review Necessary?
What is Literature?
What is a Literature Review?
Sourcing, Searching and Accessing the Literatur
e
3. WHY IS A LITERATURE SEARCH
IMPORTANT?
Literature searches are important because they enable the
targeted discovery of new research, whether in the form of an
academic paper, a news article, or a new scientific method.
This is a key skill to learn as it allows students and researchers
to stay on top of the most up to date and relevant literature in
their field. Because of the time it takes to get a textbook
published, academic articles are usually the best way to stay
on top of the current advances in your field of choice.
4. In the digital age, journals are often only available online. Gone are the days of
librarians cataloguing physical papers or disseminating information via printed copies.
To source new literature now, students and researchers just need to go to a publishers
website, or use a search engine, and a wealth of information is at their fingertips.
Quickly finding a relevant paper directly through a journal website is a largely
impractical approach due to the potential time it can take to find a relevant study. This is
why search engines like Google Scholar, and PubMed have been invented. These types
of search engines allow advanced search criteria and filtering to be employed, which
can significantly improve how quickly you can source new papers. A growing number of
free-to-use knowledge discovery platforms exist with an emphasis on open-source
literature. Tools like OpenAlex, and RDiscovery have seen an uptick in popularity as
users are looking for new ways to speed-up their literature discovery process. Greater
availability of open access articles and improved methods of knowledge discovery have
led to an increase in the number of references that can be found in academic articles
(Dai et al., 2021).
5. WHAT ARE LITERATURE REVIEWS?
A literature review is an account of what has been published on a topic
by accredited scholars and researchers. In writing the literature review,
your purpose is to convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas
have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and
weaknesses are. As a piece of writing, the literature review must be
defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research objective, the problem
or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). It is not just a
descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries." - Quote
from Taylor, D.
6. GOALS OF LITERATURE REVIEWS
What are the goals of creating a Literature Review?
To develop a theory or evaluate an existing theory
To summarize the historical or existing state of a research topic
Identify a problem in a field of research
7. BESIDES ENLARGING YOUR KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE
TOPIC, WRITING A LITERATURE REVIEW LETS YOU GAIN
AND DEMONSTRATE SKILLS IN TWO AREAS
1.information seeking: the ability to scan the literature efficiently, using manual or computerized
methods, to identify a set of useful articles and books
2.critical appraisal: the ability to apply principles of analysis to identify unbiased and valid
studies.
A literature review must do these things
be organized around and related directly to the thesis or research question you are developing
synthesize results into a summary of what is and is not known
identify areas of controversy in the literature
formulate questions that need further research
8. WHAT TO DO IN THE LITERATURE REVIEW
provide an outline of the issue or theory under investigation,
extrapolates to include the objectives.
Categorize different literature in the field of study based on various
criteria.
Compare and contrast between different works.
Conclude with providing an assessment and singling out works that
give the best arguments and make a significant contribution to the
knowledge of the field
9. DEVELOPMENT OF THE LITERATURE REVIEW
Four Stages of development while doing a literature review includes the following:
Formulation of a problem- this is a crucial step, whereby you setup a criteria through which
to select relevant literature.
Searching for relevant literature- find appropriate literature for the criteria you have set from
reliable sources.
Evaluating and appraising the literature- many methods could be employed for this step. You
could read the introduction and the abstract to filter and select the ones you deem
suitable.
Analysing and synthesizing pertinent literature- This forms the crux of the review paper, the
final part where you read, analyse, and synthesize the literature to provide the chain of
development of knowledge in the field
10. WHAT TO CONSIDER WHEN CHOOSING THE
LITERATURE FOR THE REVIEW
Literature must be critically evaluated before being reviewed. When choosing scientific works for the review, look for
the following:
1. Originality of the work
Choose works based on their originality.
2. Methodology and its credibility
Evaluate the methodology of each work and assess their credibility
3. The objectivity of the author
This is important to understand and will provide you with a better guideline of the purpose of the work
4. The persuasiveness of the arguments
Each work has different tones and some of the arguments are more persuasive than the rest
5. The significance of the work to field
This is a key aspect when choosing literature for review. Do not overlook the works that added significant value to the
field
11. WHAT ARE THE ANALYTICAL FEATURES OF
A LITERATURE REVIEW
The literature review isnt just a summary of all the critical points in the knowledge of
the field, it is an analysis, primarily. The literature review provides a summary and
synthesis of the literature, categorized in a defined organizational pattern. Do the
following in a literature review:
Reinterpret old materials in the light of new information in the field, thereby,
combine old with new materials.
Doing the above step will help you in providing the chain of progression of
knowledge in the field.
Evaluate the sources and provide an overview of significant works to your problem.
Identify gaps that exist in the chain of knowledge, which can be exploited for further
research. Provide the information on research gaps when concluding the literature
review.
13. SOURCING AND SCREENING LITERATURE
The first step in sourcing and screening literature is understanding what
you need to read in order to gain a better understanding of the field.
For seasoned academics this is an easy and unconscious process. They have
developed such an understanding of their subject that searching for and
determining an articles relevance can be done seamlessly.
For newer academics and students, its a skill that must be mastered. They
will often have to think for longer about what their research topic covers,
and formulating effective search term before even identifying potential
papers to read.
It is common to filter these search results to only show papers from the last
3-5 years these are normally the most relevant papers due to the fast
advancements being made.
14. BEGINNING THE SCREENING PROCESS
At this point, researchers often begin the screening process by
checking the title for keywords to see if anything picks their
interest and looking at the papers citation count to gauge its
significance or impact.
15. This means the reader will have to be very critical when reading
abstracts to find papers which may have embellished facts, or
overlook key information.
After the abstract has been screened, the paper will fall into one
of three categories: Definitely read; Definitely dont read;
and, more information is needed.
When further information is needed to make a decision, the
reader will usually consult the conclusion, and possibly the
results section a process that can take time and effort, and not
necessarily provide the certainty that busy academics need when
screening literature.