際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo

Spiritual Geographies

Download as PPT, PDF
A
aurora70

Results of 20 interviews about the impact of spiritual/religious beliefs on perceptions of biotechnology in New Zealand.

1 of 38
Download to read offline
Spiritual Geographies: Biotechnology, Nature and Judeo-Christian Ethics in New Zealand Fiona J. Coyle John R. Fairweather AERU, Lincoln University Monday 2 nd February 2004
Introduction New Zealand impacted by the biotechnological revolution. Imagination stirred by issues such as toad-potatoes, xenotransplantation, cloned sheep, Corngate.
油
Introduction A reaction to insertion of human genes into cows the creation of human-animal hybrids. Boundary breach stirs up mixed emotions. Focus groups suggest spiritual crisis provoked by hybrids. Biotechnology can remake the world unsettles what it is to be human and understandings of God-given place in the world.
Focus Examine responses of some participants reluctance to discuss spirituality. Embarrassed silence, or Christian, Maori and atheists spoke. Comments hidden behind Nature. Issues around creation, nature and human being = foundation to negotiate chaos of scientific progress.
CONTEXT Life according to Christianity
God creates the natural environment
A male God, benevolent and good
who was able to create life from no-thing.
A God with full, prescient knowledge
In contrast, humans were created by God
A special place in nature
Enter biotechnology
Humans are made in the image of God Provides the basis for human dignity; not be be perverted. I weighed up the pros and cons for most of those except for the stem cells because I believe we are all made in the image of God and we shouldnt destroy it. Female, Wellington The Bible actually says that God has made man in his own image and we have to consider that avenue to We are starting to really play with fire. Male, Waimate
Playing with fire? GE sees humans as a series of manipulable material processes = denies human dignity (Fukuyama, 2002:89). Abolition of man an extreme violation of Gods will. Virilio ( Crepuscular Dawn :158) sees humans a the end of the world.
Thus There is no going beyond humanitythey conclude itthey are at once the perfection, the ones who bring an end, who take responsibility: whence the incarnation of Christ. At the same time, however, humanity is what ends it ( CD :158). Humans are perfect/the end of the world
Humans pervert the image of the human form
Male 1: That guy trying to find God? I gather thats what hes trying to do anyway. Hes doing it out of a test tube. Female: Hes trying to copy God Male 2: I dont think its trying to copy God that is the problem. Its trying to BE God. God does something knowing whats happening, we do it and its like for example, a little boy watches his Dad shaving; that looks fun, I can do that, grabs the razor, having a wee shave not knowing exactly what hes doing. Dad knows he has to put shaving foam on and knows you have to pull in a certain direction. Focus Group, Auckland (comments on cloning cartoon)
Creators vs. engineers Are we trying to become God? The deification of the scientist, the demi-urgic impulse (Virilio, CD :117). Maybe these people who are scientists try to create or recreate something. They are trying to be God. And why should you be playing around with it. Male, Dunedin
Divine creation vs. human creation Male 1: Well were not playing God. Were not creating things. All were doing is modifying, as weve done from the moment we got our hands on our first animal we started modifying it. We started Male 2: Crossbreeding Male 1: Training. Well sorry, domesticating it. Then we started crossing it with another one that was a bit better, or a different type that was a bit better. Male 3: Well were creating something new. Male 1: No, were not creating a damn thing. All were doing is cross breeding. Focus Group, Waimate
An interpretation Speaker 1 (atheist): Humans merely modifying whats there. We cannot create genes or life itself (something out of no-thing). Man is more definitely an engineer (Virilio, Art of the Motor :71). Speaker 3 (Christian): We create something new with gene manipulation.
A semantic difference Rests on the definition of the creative act and our right to partake in it. Does biotechnology create something new, or does it merely changing the materials that already exist? Is it morally right to steal this creative power from God?
Copy God, make mistakes We are not all-seeing. We intrude into forbidden territory ; boundaries deny access. Humankind will become product of creators who are not the initial cause of our existence (Virilio, CD :117). Creators are Monsanto, creations are monsters.
Can we create in ignorance? Just because we dont understand something doesnt mean its wrong or badI think that were going into something as individuals that we dont necessarily understand and therefore feel uncomfortable about it. But that doesnt make it wrong in my mind. Male, Waimate Ignorance EVIL
Natural to play with the stuff of life? I could believe in God and say well God put us on this earth, God created us and God gave us minds, and those minds are starting to play with genetic material. As his people claim him to be then playing with GE stuff is something hes brought for us to do. Male, Dunedin Humans designed with curiosity and intelligence. Experimentation is thus the Will of God.
Humans as stewards? Humans given dominion over the Earth. God created everything on the earth but God created humans with a special ability but with that special ability came responsibilities that we had to look after things, recognise that position of power so that we can help that. Respecting what nature is - guardians of nature, stewardship of nature - weve also got the responsibility not to and that goes over that. Male, Auckland
But then if we believe God created us, were part of the natural order. We are responsible. God made us responsible. He didnt make dogs or the trees, he made us responsible to dominate but also to keep the planet and everything on it. Female, Wellington Humans as guardians of planet, Gods creation. Pertinent to New Zealand, Gods Own Country (Thomas Bracken).
Experimentation beyond our role Unnatural acts against human nature. I think the whole thing here - this biotechnology - this is not just taking the same plant/family and modifying it slightly or something simple like that. This is going; this is blending animals with plants or humans with plants or humans with animals. This is really changing the face of the earth as we know it. Male, Waimate Forewarns of the despoiling of Eden, Gods Own Country.
Consequences? Fear of monstrosities: meddling produces reproductive mutants. Side-effects will impact on future generations. I think its the idea that Frankenstein was a man-made man and saying you cant play God because look at what you create. Its a synthetic [muffled] all scientists and monsters. Male, Dunedin
Original Sin In response to toad-potatoes. The bible also says, the sins of the forefathers will visit the third and fourth generations, and it could be the same thing that happens with what were doing with these genes. Male, Waimate
Original Sin: the sin that Adam committed by eating an apple from the Tree of Knowledge .
As Adams descendants, we will all pay As humans we are eternally doomed. Biotechnology is wrong because Sin is in the world (female, Wellington). No solution to this, our descendants will pay.
Virilio suggests One cannot improve humans by genetic meanshence all this research, in my opinion, can only lead to a catastrophe of science itself ( CD :159).
We abolish perfect humanity by creating monsters. But without humanity there can be no technoscience.
Conclusions A minority opinion others thought biblical rules were outdated and thwarted human evolution. For some, spiritual beliefs stronger than scientific training.
The Indian mythology says that even if the baby is not born, when it is developing in your body, it can understand and it can hear you. So its like exploiting a life, which has not even seen the world. Asian female scientist, Auckland (embryonic stem cells) If you dont have limits to how far you can go, you run the risk of scientists becoming demigods in terms of controlling future generationsWell no, its not natural. Pigs hearts are not supposed to be transplanted into humans. But I know your body will naturally reject them. I mean they are so drugged but I mean you cant just pop one in and it will function fine. Its not natural. Female scientist, Dunedin
Conclusions Spiritual values embedded in everyday life and practices. Christian heritage entrenched in Western concepts of Nature (Wenz, 1996). Sometimes emerged as overt values, sometimes masked as feelings toward Nature. Is Nature becoming a substitute for formal religion?
Individual spiritual views provide people with moral anchors from which to determine appropriate ethical practices towards human and non-human nature.

More Related Content

Spiritual Geographies

  • 1. Spiritual Geographies: Biotechnology, Nature and Judeo-Christian Ethics in New Zealand Fiona J. Coyle John R. Fairweather AERU, Lincoln University Monday 2 nd February 2004
  • 2. Introduction New Zealand impacted by the biotechnological revolution. Imagination stirred by issues such as toad-potatoes, xenotransplantation, cloned sheep, Corngate.
  • 3. 油
  • 4. Introduction A reaction to insertion of human genes into cows the creation of human-animal hybrids. Boundary breach stirs up mixed emotions. Focus groups suggest spiritual crisis provoked by hybrids. Biotechnology can remake the world unsettles what it is to be human and understandings of God-given place in the world.
  • 5. Focus Examine responses of some participants reluctance to discuss spirituality. Embarrassed silence, or Christian, Maori and atheists spoke. Comments hidden behind Nature. Issues around creation, nature and human being = foundation to negotiate chaos of scientific progress.
  • 6. CONTEXT Life according to Christianity
  • 7. God creates the natural environment
  • 8. A male God, benevolent and good
  • 9. who was able to create life from no-thing.
  • 10. A God with full, prescient knowledge
  • 11. In contrast, humans were created by God
  • 12. A special place in nature
  • 14. Humans are made in the image of God Provides the basis for human dignity; not be be perverted. I weighed up the pros and cons for most of those except for the stem cells because I believe we are all made in the image of God and we shouldnt destroy it. Female, Wellington The Bible actually says that God has made man in his own image and we have to consider that avenue to We are starting to really play with fire. Male, Waimate
  • 15. Playing with fire? GE sees humans as a series of manipulable material processes = denies human dignity (Fukuyama, 2002:89). Abolition of man an extreme violation of Gods will. Virilio ( Crepuscular Dawn :158) sees humans a the end of the world.
  • 16. Thus There is no going beyond humanitythey conclude itthey are at once the perfection, the ones who bring an end, who take responsibility: whence the incarnation of Christ. At the same time, however, humanity is what ends it ( CD :158). Humans are perfect/the end of the world
  • 17. Humans pervert the image of the human form
  • 18. Male 1: That guy trying to find God? I gather thats what hes trying to do anyway. Hes doing it out of a test tube. Female: Hes trying to copy God Male 2: I dont think its trying to copy God that is the problem. Its trying to BE God. God does something knowing whats happening, we do it and its like for example, a little boy watches his Dad shaving; that looks fun, I can do that, grabs the razor, having a wee shave not knowing exactly what hes doing. Dad knows he has to put shaving foam on and knows you have to pull in a certain direction. Focus Group, Auckland (comments on cloning cartoon)
  • 19. Creators vs. engineers Are we trying to become God? The deification of the scientist, the demi-urgic impulse (Virilio, CD :117). Maybe these people who are scientists try to create or recreate something. They are trying to be God. And why should you be playing around with it. Male, Dunedin
  • 20. Divine creation vs. human creation Male 1: Well were not playing God. Were not creating things. All were doing is modifying, as weve done from the moment we got our hands on our first animal we started modifying it. We started Male 2: Crossbreeding Male 1: Training. Well sorry, domesticating it. Then we started crossing it with another one that was a bit better, or a different type that was a bit better. Male 3: Well were creating something new. Male 1: No, were not creating a damn thing. All were doing is cross breeding. Focus Group, Waimate
  • 21. An interpretation Speaker 1 (atheist): Humans merely modifying whats there. We cannot create genes or life itself (something out of no-thing). Man is more definitely an engineer (Virilio, Art of the Motor :71). Speaker 3 (Christian): We create something new with gene manipulation.
  • 22. A semantic difference Rests on the definition of the creative act and our right to partake in it. Does biotechnology create something new, or does it merely changing the materials that already exist? Is it morally right to steal this creative power from God?
  • 23. Copy God, make mistakes We are not all-seeing. We intrude into forbidden territory ; boundaries deny access. Humankind will become product of creators who are not the initial cause of our existence (Virilio, CD :117). Creators are Monsanto, creations are monsters.
  • 24. Can we create in ignorance? Just because we dont understand something doesnt mean its wrong or badI think that were going into something as individuals that we dont necessarily understand and therefore feel uncomfortable about it. But that doesnt make it wrong in my mind. Male, Waimate Ignorance EVIL
  • 25. Natural to play with the stuff of life? I could believe in God and say well God put us on this earth, God created us and God gave us minds, and those minds are starting to play with genetic material. As his people claim him to be then playing with GE stuff is something hes brought for us to do. Male, Dunedin Humans designed with curiosity and intelligence. Experimentation is thus the Will of God.
  • 26. Humans as stewards? Humans given dominion over the Earth. God created everything on the earth but God created humans with a special ability but with that special ability came responsibilities that we had to look after things, recognise that position of power so that we can help that. Respecting what nature is - guardians of nature, stewardship of nature - weve also got the responsibility not to and that goes over that. Male, Auckland
  • 27. But then if we believe God created us, were part of the natural order. We are responsible. God made us responsible. He didnt make dogs or the trees, he made us responsible to dominate but also to keep the planet and everything on it. Female, Wellington Humans as guardians of planet, Gods creation. Pertinent to New Zealand, Gods Own Country (Thomas Bracken).
  • 28. Experimentation beyond our role Unnatural acts against human nature. I think the whole thing here - this biotechnology - this is not just taking the same plant/family and modifying it slightly or something simple like that. This is going; this is blending animals with plants or humans with plants or humans with animals. This is really changing the face of the earth as we know it. Male, Waimate Forewarns of the despoiling of Eden, Gods Own Country.
  • 29. Consequences? Fear of monstrosities: meddling produces reproductive mutants. Side-effects will impact on future generations. I think its the idea that Frankenstein was a man-made man and saying you cant play God because look at what you create. Its a synthetic [muffled] all scientists and monsters. Male, Dunedin
  • 30. Original Sin In response to toad-potatoes. The bible also says, the sins of the forefathers will visit the third and fourth generations, and it could be the same thing that happens with what were doing with these genes. Male, Waimate
  • 31. Original Sin: the sin that Adam committed by eating an apple from the Tree of Knowledge .
  • 32. As Adams descendants, we will all pay As humans we are eternally doomed. Biotechnology is wrong because Sin is in the world (female, Wellington). No solution to this, our descendants will pay.
  • 33. Virilio suggests One cannot improve humans by genetic meanshence all this research, in my opinion, can only lead to a catastrophe of science itself ( CD :159).
  • 34. We abolish perfect humanity by creating monsters. But without humanity there can be no technoscience.
  • 35. Conclusions A minority opinion others thought biblical rules were outdated and thwarted human evolution. For some, spiritual beliefs stronger than scientific training.
  • 36. The Indian mythology says that even if the baby is not born, when it is developing in your body, it can understand and it can hear you. So its like exploiting a life, which has not even seen the world. Asian female scientist, Auckland (embryonic stem cells) If you dont have limits to how far you can go, you run the risk of scientists becoming demigods in terms of controlling future generationsWell no, its not natural. Pigs hearts are not supposed to be transplanted into humans. But I know your body will naturally reject them. I mean they are so drugged but I mean you cant just pop one in and it will function fine. Its not natural. Female scientist, Dunedin
  • 37. Conclusions Spiritual values embedded in everyday life and practices. Christian heritage entrenched in Western concepts of Nature (Wenz, 1996). Sometimes emerged as overt values, sometimes masked as feelings toward Nature. Is Nature becoming a substitute for formal religion?
  • 38. Individual spiritual views provide people with moral anchors from which to determine appropriate ethical practices towards human and non-human nature.