Sse cola wars_7b_2011
Download as ppt, pdf0 likes540 views
The document analyzes the soft drink concentrate producers industry and bottlers industry using Porter's five forces framework. It finds that the concentrate producers industry experiences high profitability due to industry concentration among Coke and Pepsi, strong brand awareness and identity, and low threat of substitutes. In contrast, the bottlers industry has high fragmentation, price wars due to customer bargaining power, and extremely low profitability. Overall, the concentrate producers industry is seen as more attractive due to the extreme differences in profitability and higher entry barriers compared to the bottlers industry.
1 of 9
Downloaded 10 times
Ad
Recommended
Cola Wars Con
Cola Wars ConJessica Wennerstein
油
The document analyzes the cola wars between Coke and Pepsi using Porter's five forces model. It finds that the bargaining power of suppliers and substitutes is low due to the dominance of Coke and Pepsi in concentrate production and their diversification efforts. The bargaining power of buyers is also low as retailers need Coke and Pepsi products to meet consumer demand. Barriers to entry are high due to the strong brands and distribution relationships of Coke and Pepsi. Rivalry between the two companies is high as they compete for market share leadership. Challenges for the future include maintaining their brand images and exploring growth in new markets and product categories beyond carbonated soft drinks.SSE ColaWars Group5
SSE ColaWars Group5chimprox
油
This document discusses the Coca Cola concentrate and bottling businesses using Porter's Five Forces analysis. It finds that the concentrate business has high barriers to entry due to costly R&D and manufacturing. Competition is intense between Coca Cola and Pepsi who dominate the duopoly market. For bottlers, barriers to entry are also high due to capital requirements and exclusive territories. Competition is more limited for bottlers linked to concentrate producers. Overall, both the concentrate producers and bottlers are profitable but to different extents, with concentrate producers adding more value through branding and recipes.Case analysis coke_pepsi
Case analysis coke_pepsiAutonomic Technologies
油
This document analyzes the soft drink industry, specifically Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, and discusses factors that contribute to the profitability of concentrate producers over bottlers. It examines Porter's five forces and determines that suppliers, buyers, substitutes and potential entrants do not greatly threaten the industry's profitability. While internal rivalry is intense between Coke and Pepsi, they primarily compete through advertising rather than lowering prices. The document concludes that vertical integration of concentrate producers into bottling may not be necessary, as bottlers already have incentives to cooperate, and contract amendments could ensure efficient investment in bottling infrastructure.Sse cola wars_group5a_2011
Sse cola wars_group5a_2011EMM88
油
This document analyzes the soft drink concentrate and bottling industries using Porter's Five Forces framework. It finds that the concentrate industry exhibits high rivalry between Coca-Cola and Pepsi, who together control over 75% of the US market. Suppliers and buyers have relatively low power. There are high barriers to entry. The bottling industry sees higher capital requirements and dependency on concentrate producers through exclusive contracts. The concentrate business is more profitable than bottling due to its duopoly structure and lower capital costs. Challenges facing the industry include health trends, environmental debates, and increasing international competition.Cola Wars
Cola Wars vameyer
油
This document discusses the cola wars between Pepsi and Coca-Cola and analyzes the profitability and attractiveness of the concentrate and bottling industries. It finds that while the concentrate industry remains profitable due to its duopoly structure and low costs, the bottling industry's attractiveness varies over time and by region due to challenges like health debates, environmental issues, and changing industry dynamics. The cola wars had mixed effects, hurting profits initially but later spurring innovation and growth as prices rose after the price war ended.Sse cola wars_group2b_2011
Sse cola wars_group2b_2011Romain Aubert
油
This document analyzes the Coca-Cola and PepsiCo concentrate producer and bottler industries using Porter's Five Forces framework. It finds that the concentrate producer industry exhibits a duopoly between Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, with high barriers to entry. The bottler industry has consolidated considerably and bottlers have weak bargaining power against concentrate producers. Both industries face challenges from stagnating carbonated soft drink consumption and increasing costs, driving both to diversify into new products and markets like Asia to maintain profitability.Sse cola wars_group2b_2011
Sse cola wars_group2b_2011Romain Aubert
油
This document analyzes the soft drink concentrate and bottling industries using Porter's Five Forces framework. It finds that the concentrate industry exhibits a duopoly between Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, with high barriers to entry. The bottling industry also has high consolidation and bottlers have limited choice of concentrate producers. While the carbonated soft drink market is declining, it still represents 40% of the soft drink market, and the big companies are focusing on value-added products and investing in growing markets like Asia to counter pressures in mature markets.Case Analysis Coke Pepsi2
Case Analysis Coke Pepsi2alexandra_fer_sse
油
The document analyzes the soft drink industry using Porter's Five Forces model. It finds the industry is very profitable due to its oligopolistic structure with high barriers to entry. Concentrate producers (CPs) earn higher profits than bottlers. This is because CPs have more added value from their branded products and strategic capabilities, while bottlers have less value from operational effectiveness alone. Contracts between CPs and bottlers strategically favor the CPs through territorial exclusivity and pricing flexibility. The document concludes CPs should not vertically integrate into bottling given their current high profitability in concentrates versus bottlers' declining profits.Sse Cola Wars Group 10
Sse Cola Wars Group 10zhaoxuan00707
油
The document discusses Porter's five forces model as it applies to the concentrate industry. It finds that there is high rivalry between existing concentrate firms due to balanced competitors and low growth in the industry. This high competition leads to increased marketing costs and lower overall profit potential. The document also compares the concentrate business to the bottling business, finding that profitability differs between the two.Sse Cola Wars Group 10
Sse Cola Wars Group 1040100
油
The document analyzes Porter's five forces model for the concentrate industry. It finds that there is high rivalry between major concentrate producers like Coca-Cola due to balanced competition and low barriers to entry. This high competition leads to increased marketing costs and lower overall profit potential for firms in the industry. The profitability of concentrate producers is also impacted by having few suppliers and substitutes, strong buyer power of major retailers, and threat from new innovations like Red Bull entering the market.Cola Wars Continue
Cola Wars Continueshreyans86
油
The soft drink industry has been highly profitable since 1970 due to steady consumption growth and intense competition between Coke and Pepsi that reinforced brand recognition without diminishing profits. The industry faces high barriers to entry including recipe development, manufacturing plants, and distribution networks. While the North American market is mature, growth opportunities exist in developing markets like China and India to sustain profits and historical growth rates over the next decade.Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2tingche
油
The CSD (carbonated soft drink) industry is dominated by two major players, Coca-Cola and Pepsi, which have high brand identity and reputation. The industry has high barriers to entry due to large capital requirements and faces strong competition between the major brands. Threats of substitution are moderate as customers have many beverage options but low inclination to switch brands. Supplier power is weak due to many ingredient providers, while some large buyers have bargaining power over the brands. The bottling industry serving CSD brands also has high concentration among a few players and high costs of entry.Coca Cola - 5 Porters forces
Coca Cola - 5 Porters forces Marie Delphine SANCHIS
油
Coca-Cola faces competition from other soda brands like Pepsi and Dr Pepper. It uses various strategies to maintain its competitive advantage such as keeping its recipe secret, investing in marketing, sponsoring major events, and offering a wide range of branded beverages. While new entrants pose a threat, customer loyalty and brand recognition help Coca-Cola maintain its position. Buyers have power through substitutes like water, tea, and juice. Suppliers are numerous but smaller in size, allowing Coca-Cola to negotiate favorably. Government regulations impact Coca-Cola's operations through standards, certifications, and intellectual property laws.Catalyst Corporate Finance Heritage & Independent Brands Autumn 2013
Catalyst Corporate Finance Heritage & Independent Brands Autumn 2013Emma Dowson
油
The autumn 2013 M&A update highlights a significant increase in mergers and acquisitions for heritage and independent food and drink brands in the UK, driven by rising consumer demand for authenticity, provenance, and innovation. The report notes that these brands are outperforming larger competitors and are increasingly attractive to both trade and financial acquirers seeking growth opportunities, especially in international markets. The challenging economic environment and food scandals are pushing consumers toward trusted brands, further supporting the strong M&A activity in this sector.Dess chapter02
Dess chapter02Hira Masood
油
The document discusses the importance of environmental analysis for strategic planning. It describes various tools and methods for analyzing a firm's external environment, including scanning, monitoring, competitive intelligence, and forecasting. These allow a firm to understand factors in the general environment like demographics, technology and the economy. The competitive environment is also important and can be analyzed using Porter's five forces model and strategic groups to understand industry competition and identify opportunities and threats.Colawars
Colawarsshubhdapandey
油
The document analyzes the strategic rivalry between Coca-Cola and Pepsi in the cola industry and its implications. It finds that: 1) consolidation has made it difficult for smaller competitors to compete and exposed the large firms to antitrust issues; 2) bottlers face slim margins and declining growth; and 3) while international markets provide most profits, health concerns and changing consumer preferences threaten domestic performance. It recommends companies innovate health-focused products, refocus on advertising, and use game theory to understand competition.Cola wars 2010
Cola wars 2010Prerna Makhijani
油
The major cost drivers for bottlers were direct store delivery, promotional payments to retailers, capital-intensive bottling process, concentrate costs dependent on supplier prices, and investments in distribution networks. Coke and Pepsi managed rivalry by targeting different demographics, aggressive Pepsi marketing, plant modernization, concentrate price differences, flavor experimentation, and rebates/price cuts. The companies should focus on emerging market expansion, healthier products, sustainability initiatives, and innovation to face challenges rather than short-term tactics against each other.Cola wars continue coke and pepsi in 2006-1
Cola wars continue coke and pepsi in 2006-1Hye Joo Lee
油
The document discusses the ongoing competition between Coca-Cola and Pepsi in the carbonated soft drink industry. It provides background on the industry structure, noting that Coke and Pepsi dominate as concentrate producers while bottling operations are carried out by other companies. The intense rivalry between Coke and Pepsi has driven up advertising spending and innovation, strengthening their brands while weakening smaller competitors. Despite declining demand for sugary drinks, Coke and Pepsi may be able to sustain profits by diversifying their product lines and marketing to address health consciousness.Cola Wars
Cola Warsbarlace
油
This document analyzes the competition between Coca-Cola and Pepsi using various frameworks including Porter's Five Forces, PEST analysis, and the resource-based view. It finds that Coca-Cola and Pepsi dominate the soft drink oligopoly through brand loyalty and large marketing budgets that create barriers to entry. While demand is slowing domestically, growth opportunities exist in international markets like China. Both companies operate in fast economic times and imitate each other's strategies, though their secret cola formulas and brand images remain rare and valuable resources.Direct and Global Sourcing
Direct and Global SourcingGary Kawahara
油
Distributors and large chains have increasingly adopted direct sourcing over the past 5 years to reduce costs. This shifts purchasing power away from manufacturers to customers. As a result, manufacturers now face challenges like competing for production capacity globally with their largest customers. To adapt, manufacturers may focus on brand loyalty with independent operators, offer tiered product lines, and monitor direct sourcing models closely as purchasing practices continue evolving. Global sourcing is emerging as the next phase in the supply chain's evolution.Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2tingche
油
This document analyzes the carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry using Porter's Five Forces framework. It finds that the CSD industry is highly concentrated with two dominant players, Coca-Cola and Pepsi, and faces low barriers to entry. The bottled water industry, as a supplier to CSD companies, has faced more challenges with market saturation and lower profitability compared to the CSD industry. The document recommends CSD companies address intense competition and challenges from industry giants pursuing low pricing and expansion strategies.Final_Case_Study
Final_Case_StudyVikrant Sagar
油
Comet Soda is launching a new sports drink called Hyper-Light. To maximize its success, Comet Soda should focus on key customer segments and ensure Hyper-Light has a unique value proposition. Comet Soda also needs to capture 12.5% of the electrolyte drink market to break even. To achieve this, Comet Soda will need aggressive marketing campaigns, celebrity endorsements, and guaranteed distribution channels to drive awareness and sales in the initial launch markets.Operation strategy kroger and wholefoods
Operation strategy kroger and wholefoodsChannels-Brief
油
Kroger and Whole Foods have different operations strategies driven by their target markets. Kroger aims for low prices across its large network of stores to appeal to a broad customer base. It manufactures over 40% of its private label products in-house for quality control and margins. Whole Foods targets the organic and locally-sourced market through a smaller store network focused on fresh, perishable items. It relies more heavily on regional and local suppliers. Both companies leverage facility networks and sourcing strategies to efficiently deliver on their distinct strategic positions in the grocery industry.Sse Cola Wars Group4
Sse Cola Wars Group4guest7906ce
油
This document discusses the cola wars between Coca-Cola and Pepsi and analyzes the major participants in the concentrate and bottling industries using Porter's Five Forces model. It identifies the key players as concentrate producers, bottlers, retailers, and suppliers. It then analyzes the industries using the five forces of supplier power, threat of entry, industry rivalry, substitute competition, and buyer power. Finally, it compares the economics and attractiveness of concentrate producers versus bottlers and discusses challenges facing the cola industry's repositioning.Coca Cola vs Pepsi
Coca Cola vs PepsiSampat Patnaik
油
The document analyzes the global soft drink industry using Porter's Five Forces model. It discusses the high level of rivalry between Coca-Cola and Pepsi, who together control 74.8% of the market. The threat of substitutes is also high given the many alternative beverage options. The document recommends that in India, Coca-Cola should develop its strategy to tap into the large rural market, pursue consolidation opportunities, and develop "nutritious" beverages to address health concerns.Blaha krakow 2004
Blaha krakow 2004ABDERRAHMANE REGGAD
油
This document provides an overview of the WIEN2k software package for calculating crystal properties using the augmented plane wave plus local orbital (APW+lo) method. It summarizes the history and development of APW-based methods, describes the program structure and usage of WIEN2k, and highlights some applications including calculations of phase transitions, crystal structures, total energies, forces and structural relaxations. The document also discusses international collaborations and the use of WIEN2k as a benchmark for electronic structure calculations.Forces of the Future That's Now - Peter Coffee at SoTeC 2015
Forces of the Future That's Now - Peter Coffee at SoTeC 2015Peter Coffee
油
Peter Coffee's keynote at SOTEC 2015 discusses the transformative forces of connection, collaboration, and AI in shaping future industries and consumer expectations. He emphasizes the need for businesses to adapt to an increasingly interconnected world where customer engagement, real-time data, and innovative services are critical for success. The presentation also highlights various sectors such as healthcare, finance, and manufacturing, stressing the importance of leveraging technology and data to enhance customer experiences and operational efficiencies.Helmet Usage In Thailand
Helmet Usage In ThailandDI Marketing
油
A study was conducted in Thailand to understand the helmet market. Key findings include: Honda, Yamaha and Suzuki were the top brands known. Honda dominated the market with 34% share. Safety certification was the top reason for choosing a brand. Many were unsatisfied with helmet weight. Half spent $5-15 on helmets and 35% used half shell styles. Most bought helmets at shops in their country.Smartphone Industry and Apple iPhone Rising
Smartphone Industry and Apple iPhone RisingRobin Thieu
油
This document discusses strategic analysis of the communication equipment industry and Apple Inc.'s smartphone business. It provides an overview of industry drivers and trends, a PESTEL analysis, Porter's Five Forces analysis, a SWOT analysis of Apple, and recommends that Apple pursue product diversification, expansion through M&A/partnerships, and continuous innovation.FOR YOUR CASE STUDY STAGE 1 ASSIGNMENT, YOU PERFORMED A FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS ...
FOR YOUR CASE STUDY STAGE 1 ASSIGNMENT, YOU PERFORMED A FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS ...TeraNowa
油
For her Stage 4 assignment, the student will propose an IT solution and next steps to implement the solution for UMUC Haircuts. The introduction will summarize Myra's generic strategy and the business process to be improved. For the proposed IT solution, the student will identify a specific SaaS or cloud-based system to meet the requirements. The implementation steps section will outline what Myra needs to do, including arranging use of the system, acquiring hardware, configuring the solution, testing the system, preparing employees, migrating data, system use, and maintenance. The conclusion will summarize the project benefits for Myra. At least two external references will be incorporated and cited in APA format.More Related Content
What's hot (17)
Sse Cola Wars Group 10
Sse Cola Wars Group 10zhaoxuan00707
油
The document discusses Porter's five forces model as it applies to the concentrate industry. It finds that there is high rivalry between existing concentrate firms due to balanced competitors and low growth in the industry. This high competition leads to increased marketing costs and lower overall profit potential. The document also compares the concentrate business to the bottling business, finding that profitability differs between the two.Sse Cola Wars Group 10
Sse Cola Wars Group 1040100
油
The document analyzes Porter's five forces model for the concentrate industry. It finds that there is high rivalry between major concentrate producers like Coca-Cola due to balanced competition and low barriers to entry. This high competition leads to increased marketing costs and lower overall profit potential for firms in the industry. The profitability of concentrate producers is also impacted by having few suppliers and substitutes, strong buyer power of major retailers, and threat from new innovations like Red Bull entering the market.Cola Wars Continue
Cola Wars Continueshreyans86
油
The soft drink industry has been highly profitable since 1970 due to steady consumption growth and intense competition between Coke and Pepsi that reinforced brand recognition without diminishing profits. The industry faces high barriers to entry including recipe development, manufacturing plants, and distribution networks. While the North American market is mature, growth opportunities exist in developing markets like China and India to sustain profits and historical growth rates over the next decade.Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2tingche
油
The CSD (carbonated soft drink) industry is dominated by two major players, Coca-Cola and Pepsi, which have high brand identity and reputation. The industry has high barriers to entry due to large capital requirements and faces strong competition between the major brands. Threats of substitution are moderate as customers have many beverage options but low inclination to switch brands. Supplier power is weak due to many ingredient providers, while some large buyers have bargaining power over the brands. The bottling industry serving CSD brands also has high concentration among a few players and high costs of entry.Coca Cola - 5 Porters forces
Coca Cola - 5 Porters forces Marie Delphine SANCHIS
油
Coca-Cola faces competition from other soda brands like Pepsi and Dr Pepper. It uses various strategies to maintain its competitive advantage such as keeping its recipe secret, investing in marketing, sponsoring major events, and offering a wide range of branded beverages. While new entrants pose a threat, customer loyalty and brand recognition help Coca-Cola maintain its position. Buyers have power through substitutes like water, tea, and juice. Suppliers are numerous but smaller in size, allowing Coca-Cola to negotiate favorably. Government regulations impact Coca-Cola's operations through standards, certifications, and intellectual property laws.Catalyst Corporate Finance Heritage & Independent Brands Autumn 2013
Catalyst Corporate Finance Heritage & Independent Brands Autumn 2013Emma Dowson
油
The autumn 2013 M&A update highlights a significant increase in mergers and acquisitions for heritage and independent food and drink brands in the UK, driven by rising consumer demand for authenticity, provenance, and innovation. The report notes that these brands are outperforming larger competitors and are increasingly attractive to both trade and financial acquirers seeking growth opportunities, especially in international markets. The challenging economic environment and food scandals are pushing consumers toward trusted brands, further supporting the strong M&A activity in this sector.Dess chapter02
Dess chapter02Hira Masood
油
The document discusses the importance of environmental analysis for strategic planning. It describes various tools and methods for analyzing a firm's external environment, including scanning, monitoring, competitive intelligence, and forecasting. These allow a firm to understand factors in the general environment like demographics, technology and the economy. The competitive environment is also important and can be analyzed using Porter's five forces model and strategic groups to understand industry competition and identify opportunities and threats.Colawars
Colawarsshubhdapandey
油
The document analyzes the strategic rivalry between Coca-Cola and Pepsi in the cola industry and its implications. It finds that: 1) consolidation has made it difficult for smaller competitors to compete and exposed the large firms to antitrust issues; 2) bottlers face slim margins and declining growth; and 3) while international markets provide most profits, health concerns and changing consumer preferences threaten domestic performance. It recommends companies innovate health-focused products, refocus on advertising, and use game theory to understand competition.Cola wars 2010
Cola wars 2010Prerna Makhijani
油
The major cost drivers for bottlers were direct store delivery, promotional payments to retailers, capital-intensive bottling process, concentrate costs dependent on supplier prices, and investments in distribution networks. Coke and Pepsi managed rivalry by targeting different demographics, aggressive Pepsi marketing, plant modernization, concentrate price differences, flavor experimentation, and rebates/price cuts. The companies should focus on emerging market expansion, healthier products, sustainability initiatives, and innovation to face challenges rather than short-term tactics against each other.Cola wars continue coke and pepsi in 2006-1
Cola wars continue coke and pepsi in 2006-1Hye Joo Lee
油
The document discusses the ongoing competition between Coca-Cola and Pepsi in the carbonated soft drink industry. It provides background on the industry structure, noting that Coke and Pepsi dominate as concentrate producers while bottling operations are carried out by other companies. The intense rivalry between Coke and Pepsi has driven up advertising spending and innovation, strengthening their brands while weakening smaller competitors. Despite declining demand for sugary drinks, Coke and Pepsi may be able to sustain profits by diversifying their product lines and marketing to address health consciousness.Cola Wars
Cola Warsbarlace
油
This document analyzes the competition between Coca-Cola and Pepsi using various frameworks including Porter's Five Forces, PEST analysis, and the resource-based view. It finds that Coca-Cola and Pepsi dominate the soft drink oligopoly through brand loyalty and large marketing budgets that create barriers to entry. While demand is slowing domestically, growth opportunities exist in international markets like China. Both companies operate in fast economic times and imitate each other's strategies, though their secret cola formulas and brand images remain rare and valuable resources.Direct and Global Sourcing
Direct and Global SourcingGary Kawahara
油
Distributors and large chains have increasingly adopted direct sourcing over the past 5 years to reduce costs. This shifts purchasing power away from manufacturers to customers. As a result, manufacturers now face challenges like competing for production capacity globally with their largest customers. To adapt, manufacturers may focus on brand loyalty with independent operators, offer tiered product lines, and monitor direct sourcing models closely as purchasing practices continue evolving. Global sourcing is emerging as the next phase in the supply chain's evolution.Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2tingche
油
This document analyzes the carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry using Porter's Five Forces framework. It finds that the CSD industry is highly concentrated with two dominant players, Coca-Cola and Pepsi, and faces low barriers to entry. The bottled water industry, as a supplier to CSD companies, has faced more challenges with market saturation and lower profitability compared to the CSD industry. The document recommends CSD companies address intense competition and challenges from industry giants pursuing low pricing and expansion strategies.Final_Case_Study
Final_Case_StudyVikrant Sagar
油
Comet Soda is launching a new sports drink called Hyper-Light. To maximize its success, Comet Soda should focus on key customer segments and ensure Hyper-Light has a unique value proposition. Comet Soda also needs to capture 12.5% of the electrolyte drink market to break even. To achieve this, Comet Soda will need aggressive marketing campaigns, celebrity endorsements, and guaranteed distribution channels to drive awareness and sales in the initial launch markets.Operation strategy kroger and wholefoods
Operation strategy kroger and wholefoodsChannels-Brief
油
Kroger and Whole Foods have different operations strategies driven by their target markets. Kroger aims for low prices across its large network of stores to appeal to a broad customer base. It manufactures over 40% of its private label products in-house for quality control and margins. Whole Foods targets the organic and locally-sourced market through a smaller store network focused on fresh, perishable items. It relies more heavily on regional and local suppliers. Both companies leverage facility networks and sourcing strategies to efficiently deliver on their distinct strategic positions in the grocery industry.Sse Cola Wars Group4
Sse Cola Wars Group4guest7906ce
油
This document discusses the cola wars between Coca-Cola and Pepsi and analyzes the major participants in the concentrate and bottling industries using Porter's Five Forces model. It identifies the key players as concentrate producers, bottlers, retailers, and suppliers. It then analyzes the industries using the five forces of supplier power, threat of entry, industry rivalry, substitute competition, and buyer power. Finally, it compares the economics and attractiveness of concentrate producers versus bottlers and discusses challenges facing the cola industry's repositioning.Coca Cola vs Pepsi
Coca Cola vs PepsiSampat Patnaik
油
The document analyzes the global soft drink industry using Porter's Five Forces model. It discusses the high level of rivalry between Coca-Cola and Pepsi, who together control 74.8% of the market. The threat of substitutes is also high given the many alternative beverage options. The document recommends that in India, Coca-Cola should develop its strategy to tap into the large rural market, pursue consolidation opportunities, and develop "nutritious" beverages to address health concerns.Viewers also liked (15)
Blaha krakow 2004
Blaha krakow 2004ABDERRAHMANE REGGAD
油
This document provides an overview of the WIEN2k software package for calculating crystal properties using the augmented plane wave plus local orbital (APW+lo) method. It summarizes the history and development of APW-based methods, describes the program structure and usage of WIEN2k, and highlights some applications including calculations of phase transitions, crystal structures, total energies, forces and structural relaxations. The document also discusses international collaborations and the use of WIEN2k as a benchmark for electronic structure calculations.Forces of the Future That's Now - Peter Coffee at SoTeC 2015
Forces of the Future That's Now - Peter Coffee at SoTeC 2015Peter Coffee
油
Peter Coffee's keynote at SOTEC 2015 discusses the transformative forces of connection, collaboration, and AI in shaping future industries and consumer expectations. He emphasizes the need for businesses to adapt to an increasingly interconnected world where customer engagement, real-time data, and innovative services are critical for success. The presentation also highlights various sectors such as healthcare, finance, and manufacturing, stressing the importance of leveraging technology and data to enhance customer experiences and operational efficiencies.Helmet Usage In Thailand
Helmet Usage In ThailandDI Marketing
油
A study was conducted in Thailand to understand the helmet market. Key findings include: Honda, Yamaha and Suzuki were the top brands known. Honda dominated the market with 34% share. Safety certification was the top reason for choosing a brand. Many were unsatisfied with helmet weight. Half spent $5-15 on helmets and 35% used half shell styles. Most bought helmets at shops in their country.Smartphone Industry and Apple iPhone Rising
Smartphone Industry and Apple iPhone RisingRobin Thieu
油
This document discusses strategic analysis of the communication equipment industry and Apple Inc.'s smartphone business. It provides an overview of industry drivers and trends, a PESTEL analysis, Porter's Five Forces analysis, a SWOT analysis of Apple, and recommends that Apple pursue product diversification, expansion through M&A/partnerships, and continuous innovation.FOR YOUR CASE STUDY STAGE 1 ASSIGNMENT, YOU PERFORMED A FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS ...
FOR YOUR CASE STUDY STAGE 1 ASSIGNMENT, YOU PERFORMED A FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS ...TeraNowa
油
For her Stage 4 assignment, the student will propose an IT solution and next steps to implement the solution for UMUC Haircuts. The introduction will summarize Myra's generic strategy and the business process to be improved. For the proposed IT solution, the student will identify a specific SaaS or cloud-based system to meet the requirements. The implementation steps section will outline what Myra needs to do, including arranging use of the system, acquiring hardware, configuring the solution, testing the system, preparing employees, migrating data, system use, and maintenance. The conclusion will summarize the project benefits for Myra. At least two external references will be incorporated and cited in APA format.Vodafone Case Study
Vodafone Case StudyLauren D. Perry
油
Vodafone grew substantially through strategic acquisitions to become the world's largest cell phone provider by 2006, operating in 26 countries. However, it faced challenges in integrating subsidiaries, high costs, and competition. While it differentiated through its global network and value-added services, its strategy was analyzed using models showing high rivalry in the industry and bargaining power for buyers. Recommendations included further acquisitions in emerging markets and technologies to maintain growth.Porter five forces
Porter five forcesDreams Design
油
This document provides an overview of Porter's Five Forces model for analyzing industry competition and outlines how to apply the model. It explains the objectives of the model are to assess the long-term industry attractiveness and industry competition. The model examines five competitive forces: threat of new entrants, threat of substitutes, bargaining power of buyers, bargaining power of suppliers, and competitive rivalry within an industry. It provides guidelines for using a table to analyze each force. Finally, it presents a case study analyzing Apple Inc. using the Five Forces model and ranks the competitive forces impacting the company.Porters Five Forces Templates
Porters Five Forces TemplatesAurelien Domont, MBA
油
The document provides an overview of Porters Five Forces Tool, designed to assist users in analyzing competitive forces within an industry. It includes tips for utilizing editable PowerPoint slides that contain templates and examples for organizing and presenting information on supplier power, buyer power, competitive rivalry, threats of new entrants, and substitute products. Additionally, it offers guidance on modifying diagrams and visual elements to enhance presentations.Michael porter 5 force model
Michael porter 5 force modelNarsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies
油
This document summarizes Michael Porter's Five Forces model of competition. It was developed by Michael Porter to analyze industry structure and competition. The five competitive forces are: the threat of new entrants, the bargaining power of suppliers, the bargaining power of buyers, the threat of substitute products, and competitive rivalry between existing competitors. The document explains each of these forces and factors that influence the degree of each force within an industry.Vodafone Strategy
Vodafone StrategyShahzad Khan
油
Vodafone Group is the world's leading mobile telecommunications company with operations in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific and the United States. Vodafone has a market capitalization of approximately 贈71.2 billion and equity interests in 31 countries across five continents. Vodafone Essar is Vodafone's Indian subsidiary with over 85.82 million customers across India. The Indian telecom market is the fastest growing in the world and the second largest market globally in terms of wireless and wireline subscribers. Vodafone's business strategy in India focuses on leveraging its generic strategy and addressing the threats from new competitors through diversification and a focus on rural markets, infrastructure sharing, andPorters five forces
Porters five forcesYuvraj Hidaduggi
油
The document discusses Porter's five forces model as it applies to the apparel industry. It analyzes the competitive intensity and profitability of the industry by looking at the barriers to entry, power of suppliers and buyers, threat of substitutes, and rivalry among existing competitors. The summary is:
[1] The apparel industry has high barriers to entry due to economies of scale, significant capital requirements, and intense competition from established brands.
[2] Suppliers have bargaining power when materials are unique or undifferentiated, while buyers wield power in bulk purchases or when many supplier options exist.
[3] Substitute brands pose a threat if switching costs are low based on quality or status. Porter's Five Forces
Porter's Five ForcesMayur Khatri
油
Porter's Five Forces is a model for industry analysis that examines five competitive forces that shape every industry. The five forces are: the threat of new entrants, the threat of substitutes, the bargaining power of suppliers, the bargaining power of customers, and the intensity of rivalry among existing competitors. The model helps understand the attractiveness of an industry and the sources of competitive advantage within it.Pizza hut - Porter's Case study
Pizza hut - Porter's Case studyarieffahlevi
油
Pizza Hut is a large international fast food chain that offers pizza and other dishes. It faces intense competition from other major pizza chains like Domino's and Papa John's. While barriers to entry in the pizza industry are low due to established competitors, the threat of substitutes from other fast food restaurants is high. Customers have some bargaining power due to the abundance of options, but suppliers have little power over Pizza Hut and other large chains. Pizza Hut's value chain focuses on efficient operations, logistics, marketing, and customer service to drive profits.Porter's 5 Force Model
Porter's 5 Force ModelAmitanshu Srivastava
油
The document discusses Porter's Five Forces model for analyzing industry competition and attractiveness. It describes each of the five competitive forces - threat of new entrants, bargaining power of suppliers and buyers, threat of substitutes, and rivalry among existing competitors. It provides examples of how each force can impact an industry using Coca-Cola's industry as an example. The document also discusses competitive advantages firms can achieve through cost leadership or differentiation strategies and notes some strengths and limitations of Porter's Five Forces model.Heineken Case Study business Analysis
Heineken Case Study business Analysisjin88lin
油
Heineken is one of the world's leading beer brands with over 130 years of history. It aims to grow sustainably through innovation, efficiency, and focus on markets it can win. It faces challenges from industry maturation and consolidation. Heineken can grow in the US by increasing advertising of brands like Tecate and Dos Equis to young and Hispanic drinkers. Developing lower calorie beers also taps into growing consumer interests. Global expansion through acquisitions maintains competitiveness.Ad
Similar to Sse cola wars_7b_2011 (20)
Sse cola wars_group1a_2011.ppt
Sse cola wars_group1a_2011.pptEkaterina Ignatieva
油
This document analyzes the cola wars case study through the lens of Porter's Five Forces model for both the concentrated producer industry and bottling industry.
For the concentrated producer industry, the document finds low threat of new entry, substitution, and supplier power, as well as moderate customer power. This results in an attractive industry. For bottlers, the document finds moderate threat of substitution, supplier power, and customer power, as well as low threat of new entry, resulting in a moderately attractive industry with higher forces and smaller margins than concentrated producers.Sse Cola Wars Group5
Sse Cola Wars Group5xiaoyiliu
油
The document analyzes the cola industry using Porter's Five Forces model. It finds that the concentrate industry has a moderate threat of new entrants due to low barriers to entry. Rivalry among Coke and Pepsi is intense due to their duopoly, slow industry growth, and high marketing costs. The threat of substitutes is also high given rising popularity of other beverages. Sse cola_wars_6a_2011
Sse cola_wars_6a_2011Erik Bergsch旦ld
油
The document analyzes the competitive environment of the soft drink concentrate and bottling industries using Porter's Five Forces framework. It finds:
1) The threat of new entrants is high for concentrates due to low barriers but lower for bottlers due to capital requirements.
2) Rivalry is high in both industries as customers have many options.
3) Supplier power is low for concentrates but higher for bottlers who depend on concentrate producers.
4) The threat of substitutes is high given low switching costs and many alternative beverages.
5) Buyer power varies but is overall increasing with more information and retail consolidation. Sse cola_wars_6a_2011
Sse cola_wars_6a_2011peperone
油
The document analyzes the competitive environment of the soft drink concentrate and bottling industries using Porter's Five Forces framework. It finds that:
1) The threat of new entrants is high for concentrates due to low barriers to entry, but lower for bottlers which require more capital.
2) Rivalry is high in both industries as many competitors battle for market share.
3) Supplier power is low for concentrates which have multiple suppliers, but higher for bottlers dependent on concentrate brands.
4) The threat of substitutes is high given many alternative beverages and new consumption methods.
5) Buyer power varies but is overall increasing with more retail and consumer options.SSE_cola wars_group4b_2011
SSE_cola wars_group4b_2011alexandradrissner
油
1) The Coca-Cola and Pepsi concentrate industries have high rivalry due to slow growth and two equally sized competitors fighting for leadership through branding and pricing. Entry barriers are also high.
2) The bottling industry has moderate rivalry between brands but low rivalry between bottlers of the same brand. Entry barriers are also low. Retailers have significant bargaining power over bottlers.
3) Both industries face challenges from increasing health concerns, a saturated carbonated soft drink market, and growing power of retailers.SSE_ ColaWars_Group3a_2011
SSE_ ColaWars_Group3a_2011Jessica Wennerstein
油
The document analyzes the cola wars between Coke and Pepsi using Porter's five forces framework. It finds that the bargaining power of suppliers and substitutes is low for both concentrate producers and bottlers due to the dominance of Coke and Pepsi in procurement and efforts to diversify. However, barriers to entry are high and rivalry is intense between the two concentrate producers due to their strong brands and distribution relationships. Bottlers face even higher barriers and less rivalry due to exclusive territories. A key challenge is preserving brand image to maintain barriers against other producers seeking to enter the market.Ssecolawarsgroup5b2011 110121071443-phpapp01
Ssecolawarsgroup5b2011 110121071443-phpapp01erikingemansson
油
This document analyzes the cola industry using Porter's Five Forces framework. It finds that the industry has high barriers to entry due to economies of scale, customer switching costs, and unequal access to distribution. Rivalry is high as the industry is dominated by two major competitors. Threats of substitution are currently low but may increase with greater health concerns. The analysis also finds that bottling operations have lower profitability than concentrate companies due to squeezed margins between suppliers and retailers. Key challenges for cola companies include health trends, substitutes, retailer power, and a mature market. Competition has lowered margins but also increased the power of major players like Coke and Pepsi.Sse cola wars_group5b_2011
Sse cola wars_group5b_201140201
油
This document analyzes the cola industry using Porter's Five Forces framework. It finds that the industry has high barriers to entry due to economies of scale, customer switching costs, and unequal access to distribution. Rivalry is high as the industry is dominated by two major competitors. Threats of substitution are currently low but rising due to health concerns. The analysis also examines bottlers in the industry, finding they have low bargaining power against concentrate suppliers and high customer switching costs, leading to lower profit margins. Overall the industry is very attractive for major players but less so for new entrants or bottlers.Sse Cola Wars Group6
Sse Cola Wars Group6Ultrax75
油
The document analyzes the profitability of the concentrate and bottling industries using Porter's five forces model. For the concentrate industry, rivalry among existing competitors is high due to fierce competition, while threats of new entrance and bargaining power of suppliers are low. This leads to medium overall competitiveness and profitability, though individual brands may not be profitable. For bottling, threats of new entrance and bargaining power of buyers are high, making the industry less profitable with intense competitive pressures and lower margins. Key challenges facing these industries today include powerful retailers, health trends reducing sugar drink demand, and opportunities in new markets globally and for alternative beverages.Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2tingche
油
The CSD (carbonated soft drink) industry is dominated by two major players, Coca-Cola and Pepsi, which have high brand identity and reputation. The industry has high barriers to entry due to large capital requirements and faces strong competition between the major brands. Threats of substitution are moderate as customers have many beverage options but low inclination to switch brands. Supplier power is weak due to many ingredient providers, while some large buyers have bargaining power over the brands. The bottling industry serving CSD brands also has high barriers to entry, concentration among a few major players, and threats of substitution from alternative packaging types. Both industries have potential challenges from market saturation and competitive strategies of the major brands.Sse cola wars_group8b_2011
Sse cola wars_group8b_2011Johanna Sj旦blom
油
The document analyzes the soda drink industry in the 21st century. It summarizes that the concentrate industry has low supplier influence, high rivalry between Coca Cola and Pepsi who control 75.5% of the market, and medium influence from substitutes and buyers. The threat of new entrants is low due to high capital costs and access to distribution channels. In contrast, the bottling industry has high buyer power from retailers, medium/low threat from substitutes, and high concentration with 300 bottlers in 2000 compared to 7000 in 1970. The bottling industry has lower margins than the concentrate industry. Challenges for the industry include increasing consumer health consciousness and demand for variety. The Coke-Pepsi rivalryAn industry analysis by Porters Five Forces reveals that the soft dr.pdf
An industry analysis by Porters Five Forces reveals that the soft dr.pdfalokkesh1
油
The soft drink industry is historically profitable due to a favorable competitive environment characterized by high entry barriers, strong brand loyalty, and a duopoly between Coca-Cola and Pepsi. Concentrate producers enjoy significantly higher profitability than bottlers owing to lower operational costs and their control over brand value, while bottlers face challenges with high fixed costs and less bargaining power. Ongoing competition between Coke and Pepsi has shaped the market dynamics, with globalization presenting both opportunities and challenges for sustaining profitability in an evolving consumer landscape.Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2tingche
油
This document analyzes the carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry using Porter's Five Forces framework. It finds that the CSD industry is highly concentrated with two dominant players, Coca-Cola and Pepsi, and faces low barriers to entry. The bottled water industry, as a supplier to CSD companies, has fewer competitors and lower profits due to saturation. The document recommends CSD companies address intense competition through diversification and warns new strategies could draw customers away from smaller brands.Sse Cola Wars Group8
Sse Cola Wars Group8guest89fff
油
The document discusses Porter's five forces analysis of the concentrate industry occupied by Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. It finds the industry has high rivalry between the two major competitors and barriers to entry. There are many potential substitute products and buyer power is high due to various retail channels. Regulations differ between countries, affecting business operations on a global scale.SSE_ColaWars_Group4
SSE_ColaWars_Group4Liang Wang
油
This document discusses the cola wars between Coca-Cola and Pepsi and analyzes the major participants in the concentrate and bottling industries using Porter's Five Forces model. It identifies the key players as concentrate producers, bottlers, retailers, and suppliers. It then analyzes the industries using the five forces of supplier power, threat of entry, industry rivalry, substitute competition, and buyer power. Finally, it compares the economics and attractiveness of concentrate producers versus bottlers and discusses challenges facing the cola industry's repositioning.Sse Cola Wars Group4
Sse Cola Wars Group4diablo518
油
This document discusses the cola wars between Coca-Cola and Pepsi from the 20th century into the 21st century. It analyzes the soft drink industry using Porter's Five Forces model. The document outlines that while Coke and Pepsi saw major growth in the late 20th century, consumption began declining in the late 1990s. It also notes that as the cola wars continued into the 21st century, the companies faced challenges in modifying their bottling, pricing, and branding strategies to adapt to changes in the industry and rise of substitutes. Finally, it provides references used in the analysis.Sse Colawars Group4
Sse Colawars Group4diablo518
油
This document discusses the cola wars between Coca-Cola and Pepsi from the 20th century into the 21st century. It analyzes the soft drink industry using Porter's Five Forces model. The document outlines that while Coke and Pepsi saw major growth in the late 20th century, consumption began declining in the late 1990s. It also notes that as the cola wars continued into the 21st century, the companies faced challenges in modifying their bottling, pricing, and branding strategies to adapt to changes in the industry and rise of substitutes. Finally, it provides references used in the analysis.Porters 5 forces model
Porters 5 forces modelPhan Cong
油
Porters 5 Forces Model identifies 5 competitive forces that shape an industry: (1) threat of new entrants, (2) bargaining power of suppliers, (3) bargaining power of customers, (4) threat of substitute products, and (5) competitive rivalry. This model helps analyze an industry's weaknesses and strengths. For IKEA, rivalry is intense but barriers to entry are high. Customer bargaining power is strong while supplier power is low. Substitute threats are also low. For Coca-Cola Enterprises, economies of scale are a barrier to entry while supplier relationships are strong. Customer switching costs are low and competitive rivalry is high.Coke Wars Presentation
Coke Wars Presentationruionkoh
油
The document discusses the soft drinks industry. It begins by defining soft drinks and outlining the industry's value chain. It then discusses the significant growth in revenue for the global beverages industry from 2008, with soft drinks accounting for over $416 billion. Several factors that can influence demand are also presented. The document covers various topics through different speakers, including Porter's five forces analysis, differentiation strategies of major companies, and opportunities and threats faced by leading brands like Coke and Pepsi. It concludes by examining the water bottled segment and strategies major players could adopt to succeed in this area.Flipkart Industry analysis
Flipkart Industry analysisChrist University, Bangalore
油
The document provides information about Coca-Cola and the beverage industry. It includes facts about Coca-Cola, its history, competitors, Porter's Five Forces analysis of the industry, and recommendations. The key points are:
Coca-Cola is a large beverage company founded in 1886 that sells products like Coca-Cola, Sprite, and Fanta in over 200 countries. It has over 123,000 employees and annual revenue of $43.86 billion. The beverage industry includes non-alcoholic and alcoholic drinks companies like PepsiCo and Nestle and has steady performance. Porter's Five Forces analysis found the threat of new entrants and substitutes are low while industry rivalry and buyers'Ad
Sse cola wars_7b_2011
- 1. Jonatan Schwamberg Pontus Wiehager Ender Yunus Xiqing Deng Media Management Group 7b Case Study
- 2. The five forces framework
- 3. Five forces applied to the case
- 4. The concentrate producers industry rivalry and profitability RIVALRY High industry concentration Coke and Pepsi both have huge market shares High importance of brand awareness and identity Marketing wars PROFITABILITY Extremely high profitability (ROE 15% - 55%) Due to industry concentration and brand awareness and identity
- 5. Supplier and customer bargaining power LOW SUPPLIER BARGAINING POWER Due to the concentrated concentrate producers industry vs the fragmented bottlers industry Resulted in vertical integration RATHER LOW CUSTOMER BARGAINING POWER Customers with rather low bargaining power (smaller stores) Customers with rather high bargaining power (McDonalds, Wal-Mart etc.) THE BARGAINING POWER FROM CUSTOMERS DECREASES PROFITABILITY, BUT ONLY SLIGHTLY
- 6. Threat of entry and substitutes LOW THREAT OF ENTRY The actual threat is low due to the entry barrier of brand awareness and identity LOW THREAT OF SUBSTITUTES The same goes for substitutes, brand awareness and identity are important here as well Although, this is another factor contributing to the rather static prices of Coke and Pepsi THE BARGAINING POWER FROM CUSTOMERS DECREASES PROFITABILITY, BUT ONLY SLIGHTLY
- 7. The bottlers industry rivalry and profitability RIVALRY High industry fragmentation Many players with small market shares puts emphasis on price High customer bargaining power Coke and Pepsi High importance of brand awareness and identity Marketing wars PROFITABILITY Extremely low profitability (ROE 2% - 13%) Due to price wars and high rivalry
- 8. Industry attractiveness concentrate producers vs bottlers EXTREME DIFFERENCES IN PROFITABILITY Makes the concentrate producers industry more attractive ENTRY BARRIERS Concentrate production industry: brand awareness and identity Bottlers industry: high minimum efficient scale
- 9. Future challenges INDUSTRY SPECIFIC CHALLENGES (source: 1) Diet related problems Food safety and consumer trust Global economy turndown 1. http://www.htrends.com/report-2158332-Issues__Trends_And_Challenges_Facing_The_Food_And_Drink_Industry___Forecasts_To_____.html