The document discusses the issue of altering quotes from individuals when reporting or summarizing their statements. It argues that quotes should be reported exactly as spoken by the person to accurately convey their message and ideas, rather than cleaning up or changing their words. Altering quotes could potentially misrepresent the speaker and how they expressed themselves. Journalists have a responsibility to use quotes verbatim within quotation marks to truthfully report what someone said.
1 of 32
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Stand alone presentation
1. DO YOU THINK
we should
CHANGE QUOTES?
Jacky Northgrave
12. WE NEED TO REMEMBER
THAT HOW A PERSON TALKS,
Is part of their story.
IT MIGHT BE THE MOST
IMPORTANT PART.
-MATT CLARK,
a freelance writer and medicine
editor for Newsweek
14. RALPH LANGER,
Senior Vice President
& Executive Editor of the
Dallas Morning News said
OUR JOB IS TO REPORT WHAT
people say and think,
NOT PUT WORDS IN THEIR MINDS
about what they
Might have said.
15. BY ALTERING OR CHANGING
THEM JUST A LITTLE,
we could potentially be altering or changing their ideas.
16. MANY PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT IT MAKES NO
Difference
WHETHER OR NOT
YOU CLEAN UP A QUOTE.
28. WE WANT TO KNOW
exactly
HOW PEOPLE ARE FEELING.
29. SUSAN FEENEY,
Dallas Morning News National
Political Reporter said,
WHEN YOU ARE PUTTING
quote marks around it,
YOU ARE TELLING THE
READER THAT THIS IS
exactly what the
PERSON SAID.
30. By using quotation marks
correctly and not editing what is inside of them