�ݺ�ߣ

��

��

��
With driver distraction concerns, driver communication has become more
challenging. As reported in STN, a 2014 school bus crash in Tennessee
was linked to bus driver texting. According to National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration statistics, texting increases the likelihood of a crash
by a factor of 23. Not 23 percent. These drivers are 23 times more likely to
be involved in a safety-critical event. Although odds are much lower for a
crash when using mobile phone for a call, statistics show the risk is still
increased by a factor of six.

While the focus has been on distracted driving, it is important to consider other
factors as they relate to driver communications. An example is the following
scenario that happened recently in Virginia:
A school bus breaks down. The driver is unable to reach anyone due to an
unreliable radio system. As a result, the driver leaves the bus to find a
phone so dispatch can send another bus from the garage. Fortunately, in
this instance, the driver happened to have an aide on the bus who
supervised the children. The breakdown wasn’t an emergency, but until the
school district replaces its radio system, the potential is there for a repeat
occurrence.
Sound familiar? It may not have happened to you but it could if your means of
communicating with drivers is unreliable, broken or possibly non-compliant with
new regulations.
Tremendous technological strides have resulted in transportation directors
having more information on the status of their vehicles that go beyond simply
location. The power of GPS is much more than that. These capabilities include
integration with routing software that improves route efficiency by comparing
planned versus actual routing, systems that track and monitor student ridership,
sensors that detect and record stop-arm events, even cameras that record
violations. In the coming years you will see technologies like automatic
speeding detection devices, systems that avoid forward collisions, detect and
warn of lane departures and control vehicle stability, technology that is available
in new passenger vehicles today.
However, if something out of the ordinary happens, there is still a need to be
able to speak with the driver. In the past, many districts have deployed cell
phones for driver communications. But driver distraction concerns have made
cell phones a non-viable option due to increased legislation restricting the use of
cell phones while driving. Although no state bans all cell phone use by drivers,
20 states and the District of Columbia ban the use of cell phones by school bus
drivers while driving and if children are present. The trend is for an increase in a
number of states enacting similar legislation.
So, what to do? Traditionally, districts have used two-way radio systems for
driver communications. The advantage of two-way radio is that these systems
fall outside the scope of the FMSCA regulations (FCC 47 CFR 20.3) limiting
mobile telephones while driving. While proper usage of two-way radios is still
required - “No Reaching, No Holding, No Dialing” - two-way radios are not
prohibited.

Unfortunately, many older, analog systems
are increasingly unreliable or are broken and
require replacement. The cost of repairing or
replacing these systems can be cost-
prohibitive, especially if the district owns the
system, (often a “hand-me-down” from a
public safety agency). Budgeting for these
capital expenses is difficult and often
impossible.
Assuming two-way radio makes sense, the
options are to: (a) build and own a system,
or (b) use a system by a local provider.
Increasingly, there is a preference for working with a local two-way provider that
has an understanding of your local market and your requirements. These new
two-way radio systems employ the latest digital technology that overcome many
of the performance shortcomings of older, analog systems, especially in terms
of coverage and reliability.
It is important to explore a number of network options that can provide the
performance you need. In doing so, you will find solutions that not only address
your driver communications needs but are compliant with distracted driving
regulations. And, you don't have to own the system.
Bruce M. Lee is product manager at pdvWireless, a provider of Motorola
MOTOTRBO fleet and employee communications solutions.
Last modified on Wednesday, 16 September 2015 08:03
��

�ݺ�ߣ

STN pdvWireless Blog Post 9-15-15

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot (8)

Viewers also liked (16)

Similar to STN pdvWireless Blog Post 9-15-15 (20)

STN pdvWireless Blog Post 9-15-15