This document discusses using learning analytics to study student success in face-to-face instruction and MOOCs. It first compares the models of traditional instruction and MOOCs, noting both differences and similarities. It then proposes that learning analytics could uncover further variances and commonalities by analyzing data on student characteristics, activities, and performance. Several research questions are posed about predicting outcomes and the effects of course components. Factors influencing student achievement are reviewed for different datasets. The conclusion maintains that learning analytics can further the understanding of the overarching principles of student success that apply across models.
1 of 22
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Student Success
1. Student Success on
Face-to-Face Instruction
and MOOCs
What can Learning Analytics uncover?
@AdrianaGWilde / Ed Zaluska / Dave Millard (@hoosfoos)
29 June 2015 Web Science Education 2015 #wseducation
Web And Internet Science Group
2. Why is it important to study
student success in Higher
Education?
How is the model of face-to-
face instruction
different/similar to that in
MOOCs?
How can learning analytics
uncover further
differences/similarities?
2
@AdrianaGWilde #websci2015
4. Student success in Higher Education
Stakeholders interest:
Personal dimension
Institutional
Society as a whole!
4
@AdrianaGWilde #websci2015
5. 5
F2F instruction vs MOOCs
There are some
obvious differences
but are these
fundamental to the
way students learn?
What are the
commonalities?
Koller, D. (2012) What were learning from online education
@AdrianaGWilde #websci2015
6. 6
Analysis of data to extract characteristics of students and learnin
activity that could be used for understanding of performance,
prediction of achievement, and timely interventions.
Ferguson (2012) Learning Analytics: drivers, developments and challenges
@AdrianaGWilde #websc
8. 8
While all sectors
have barriers to
capture value from
the use of big data
[these] are higher
for education,
because of a lack
of data-driven
mind-set and
available data
The
challenge!
McKinsey Global Institute
report (2011)
@AdrianaGWilde #websci2015
14. 14
The UCh Datasets
221 attributes, including:
Socioeconomic data (e.g. parental level of instruction)
Previous education attainment (e.g PSU results)
Current performance (e.g. marks in intermediate
assessments)
Students data-trail of their interactions with the mobile
version of their VLE, U-Cursos
@AdrianaGWilde #websci2015
17. Who elects to
do this MOOC?
employment
17
Research Questions
(on MOOC data)
What are the predictors of
participants completion?
Does the composition of various
types of MOOC activities have a
measurable effect on participants
completion?
What type of activity students
complete/engage on the best?
Does the perceived difficulty of
activities have a measurable effect
on completion?
audios discussions
articles
exercises
videos
age education
gender
confusion
boredom
happiness
frustration
difficulty
@AdrianaGWilde #websci2015
18. parents education
private/state schooling
employment
18
Research Questions
(on F2F instruction)
What are the predictors of
students retention and
completion?
What type of modules students
complete/engage on the best?
Does the perceived difficulty of
modules have a measurable effect
on completion?
physics engineering
computing
chemistry
mathematics
age
PSU scores
Initial
demographics
enrolment rate
semester
area
failure rate
difficulty
Registration type
place of origin
gender
education
@AdrianaGWilde #websci2015
20. Factor affecting student success In FL data In UCV data In UCh data
Disability ?
Age 賊
Gender 賊
Previous education 賊
Ethnic group 賊 ?
Socio-economic background
Subject studied
Module assessment strategy 賊
Financial issues 賊
Employer support
Personal life events
Workload
Early engagement
Language ability
Advice received on course choice 賊
Study calendar/scheduling
Peer support and belonging 賊
Family support 賊
20
@AdrianaGWilde #websci2015
21. Conclusions
Student success is important not just to the educational
stakeholders but for society as a whole.
F2F instruction is different to MOOCs but we hypothesize
that there is an overarching common principle
manifesting itself in different ways.
Learning analytics methods, such as the application of data-
mining algorithms on pre-processed data about learners,
dealing with the dimensionality of the space to produce
understanding diagnosis and predictions.
@AdrianaGWilde #websci2015
22. References and attributions
Literature:
Pascarella and Terenzini (2005) How college affects students: A third decade of research
Jones (2008) Student retention and success: A synthesis of research
Lee and Choi (2011) A review of online course dropout research: implications for practice and future
research
Leony (2014) Rule-based detection of emotions in the Khan Academy Platform.
Ferguson (2012) Learning Analytics: drivers, developments and challenges
Images:
22
Le Ch辿鱈le Leixlip 5KM Road Race 2014 P. Mooney
Mirando estrellas S. Rivas
Diagrama CONEST S. Rivas & J. Zambrano
Take Away Sign N. Smale.
Habits quote: www.matt-potts.com/habits-the-common-denominator-of-both-success-and-failure/
際際滷s 5,8: www.slideshare.net/sbs/designing-systemic-learning-analytics-at-the-open-university
Institutional logos for FutureLearn, and all HEI mentioned
Thanks! @AdrianaGWilde @hoosfoos #websci2015