�ݺ�ߣ

5300 5260 5235 5235 5211 5150 5150 5125 5100 5086 5053 5046 4949 4802
44.1 33.7 53.4 63.9 75.2 55.4 79.6 93.4 95.2 79.7 98.7 80.0 94.9 78.9
6271 5991 5991 5880 5771 5605 5500 5473 5450 5414 5400 5400 5400
47.2 69.6 29.4 50.9 41.2 37.0 47.0 47.6 50.3 46.3 50.8 67.2 70.1
Monitoring glacier variations in the Urubamba and Vilcabamba Mountain Ranges, Peru, using Landsat 5 images
SUAREZ Wilson1,3, CERNA Marco1, ORDÓÑEZ Julio1, FREY Holger2, GIRÁLDEZ Claudia2, HUGGEL Christian2.
REFERENCES
National Service of Meteorology and Hydrology of Peru (SENAMHI)1 , University of Zurich 2 , La Molina National Agrarian University of Peru (UNALM) 3
Correspondence to: Dirección General de Hidrología – SENAMHI Perú. Jr. Cahuide 785 Lima 11 Perú. dgh@senamhi.gob.pe
The Chains of Urubamba and Vilcanota Mountains are located in in the Cusco region in southern Peru, about 800 km from
the city of Lima. The mountain ranges constitute the boundary of the Andes and the jungle and have an elevation range from
800 to 6200 m a.s.l. Due to the difficult access to the glaciers of the mountain ranges, satellite-based monitoring is required.
Glaciers are grouped by main peaks (“nevado” in Spanish), which can drop different glacier tongues. The main map to the
right (Landsat 5, June 1996), shows the two mountain chains separated by the river Urubamba.
INTRODUCTION
DATAAND METHODOLOGY
The method used to characterize the ice is based on Silverio and Jacquet (2005) from the Cordillera Blanca, which is based
on the normalized difference snow index "NDSI”. Eight satellite scenes (=4 mosaics) of the dry months (southern winter)
were used from the years 1991, 1996, 2004 and 2011. Data from rainfall stations was used to identify precipitation-free
periods to avoid snow cover in the satellite images. A second analysis was performed with rain data (1966 - 2010) to
identify potential trends and breaks in precipitation patterns using nonparametric tests: Mann - Kendall for trends and
CUSUM for the breaks were applied (95% confidence).
Fig. 2: Glacier areas in the Urubamba and Vilcabamba mountain ranges in 1991, 2004, and 2011. The number in parentheses identifies its position in Fig.1. Text in pink background shows the peaks below 5400 m a.sl. Area loss (in %) refers to the period 1991-2011.
A
B
European Geosciences Union (EGU)
General Assembly 2013
Macchu Picchu, Incas City
11.02
7.37
3.27
11.55
8.67
6.74
2.06
1.86
5.18
1.72
2.78
1.29
1.13
0.22
8.13
5.20
1.93
7.11
5.25
3.74
0.83
0.81
1.91
0.60
0.86
0.24
0.20
0.02
6.94
4.11
1.70
5.91
4.42
2.80
0.64
0.52
1.40
0.32
0.46
0.13
0.07
0.01
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
(01)CCOLQUE
CRUZ
(02)CHICON
(03)MARCONI
(04)
HUAJAYHUILLCA
(05)VERONICA
(06)TERIJUAY
(07)SIRIHUANI
(08)
PUMAHUANJA
(09)
HALANCOMA
(10)CAPACSAYA
(11)BONANTA
(12)
PATACANCHA
(13)QUILLOC
(14)C.PADREYOC
Surface(km²)
Urubamba Mountains
1991 2004 2011
10.30
3.99
2.51
5.85
5.92
4.79
2.58
1.18
2.64
1.57
1.12
1.75
0.87
0.46
8.12
2.91
1.28
2.62
2.19
2.43
0.71
0.11
0.28
0.39
0.03
0.83
0.19
0.13
5.76
2.65
1.17
2.11
1.47
2.13
0.53
0.08
0.13
0.32
0.01
0.35
0.04
0.10
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
(28)
CHAUPIMAYO
(29)RUNASAYOC
(30)AMPAY
(31)AMPARAY
(32)
CHAUPILOMA
(33)Occoro
(34)MOYOC
(35)
CHOQUEZAFRA
(36)OCOBAMBA
(37)CHUCUITO
(38)PITUPACCHA
(39)CAYCO
(40)
MANDORCASA
(41)
QUENUAORCO
Surface(km²)
Vilcabamba Mountains
1991 2004 2011
ALTITUDE
(a.s.l.m) 5818 5530 5350 5361 5682 5264 5399 5246 5367 4962 5032 4982 4955 4863
LOST (%) 37.0 44.2 48.0 48.8 49.1 58.5 68.8 72.1 73.1 81.6 83.5 90.2 93.5 96.7
15.22
1.66
56.19
12.82
22.96
8.37
14.59
7.99
8.89
3.00
5.94
9.70
7.49
10.12
0.91
46.72
7.78
16.26
5.74
11.29
4.66
5.94
1.79
4.17
4.41
3.18
8.03
0.50
39.69
6.30
13.49
5.27
7.73
4.19
4.42
1.61
2.92
3.18
2.24
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
(15)SALCANTAY
(16)PUMASILLO
(17)SACSA
(18)TUCARHUAY
(19)PADREYOC
(20)PANTA
(21)
CHOQUETACARPO
(22)SOIROCOCHA
(23)HUAMANTAY
(24)SORAY
(25)
CORIHUAYNACHIN
A
(26)HUAYANAY
(27)PALJAY
Surface(km²)
Vilcabamba Mountains
1991 2004 2011
SACSA
RESULTS, CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION
• Mark, B.G. ( 2002). Hot ice: glaciers in the tropics are making the press. Hydrological Processes 16, 3297–3302.
• Rabatel, A., Francou, B., Soruco, A., Gomez, J., Caceres, B.,Ceballos, J., Basantes, R., Vuille, M., Sicart, J.-E., Huggel, C., Scheel, M., Lejeune, Y.,
Arnaud, Y., Collet, M., Condom, T., Consoli, G., Favier, V., Jomelli, V., Galarraga, R., Ginot, P., Maisincho,, Mendoza, J., Menegoz, M., Ramirez, E.,
Ribstein, P., Suarez, W., Villacis, M., Wagnon, P. (2013). Current state of glaciers in the tropical Andes: a multi-century perspective on glacier
evolution and climate change, The Cryosphere 7, 81-102.
• Silverio, W. and Jaquet J.-M. (2005). Glacial cover mapping (1987–1996) of the Cordillera Blanca (Peru) using satellite imagery, Remote Sensing of
Environment 95, 342–350.
• Vuille, M., B. Francou, P. Wagnon, I. Juen, G. Kaser, B.G. Mark, and R.S. Bradley. (2008). Climate change and tropical Andean glaciers – Past,
present and future. Earth Science Reviews 89, 79-96.
VERONICA
SALKANTAY
LEGEND
GLACIER AREA LOST 1991-2011
White number underlined: 80 - 98.7%
Orange number underlined: 60 - 80%
White number : 40 - 60%
Orange number : 29.4- 40%
Yellow Letters: Precipitation Station
•In the last 20 years all glaciers showed a loss in area between 98.7% (Pitupaccha) and 29.4% (Sacsa). For the years 1991,
1996, 2004, 2011 glacier coverage of Urubamba was of 64.8 km ², 49.4 km ², 36.9 km ² and 29.4 km ², for Vilcabamba
220.3 km ², 183.8 km ², 145.2 km ² and 129.4 km ². It was observed that the area loss is stronger at mountains with
elevations below 5400 m a.s.l. (Fig. 2).
•Precipitation analysis showed no significant changes in the trend or breaks in the series.
•The analysis did not consider debris-covered glaciers, although these exist but are very rare (see example Salkantay) in
Fig. 1.
•According to Vuille et al. (2008) air temperature in the tropics has been increasing since 1930 at a rate of 0.1°C / decade,
and Mark (2002) indicates that in the tropics the temperature increased at a rate from 0.35 to 0.39°C / decade between
1951-1999. Together with the lack of variations in precipitation patterns this indicates, that glacier loss will not stop and
confirms the finding of Rabatel et al. (2013), that tropical glaciers below 5400 m a.s.l. are about to disappear in the coming
years.
Fig. 1: Mountain chains Vilcanota and Vilcabamba view from Landsat 5 June 1996
MacchuPicchu, Inca City

�ݺ�ߣ

Monitoring glacier variations in the Urubamba and Vilcabamba Mountain Ranges

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Monitoring glacier variations in the Urubamba and Vilcabamba Mountain Ranges (20)

More from InfoAndina CONDESAN (20)

Monitoring glacier variations in the Urubamba and Vilcabamba Mountain Ranges