1) This e-learning module provides information about the TARGET Pain Trial being conducted across Australian EDs to improve pain management and patient satisfaction.
2) The trial aims to provide "adequate analgesia" defined as decreasing a patient's pain score by 2 or more points and to a level under 4 out of 10.
3) Providing adequate analgesia according to this definition has been shown to significantly increase patient satisfaction with pain management. The goal of this trial is to provide adequate analgesia to all patients presenting with moderate to severe pain.
1 of 25
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Target pain e learning module
1. The TARGET Pain Trial
This trial will be undertaken in EDs across Australia
under the auspices of the Clinical Trials Group of the
Australasian College for Emergency Medicine.
2. This e-learning module
• This e-learning module will advise you of the
background, nature and purpose of this trial
• Please read each information slide carefully
• Select an answer on each question slide
• Review the correct answer and explanation on
the following slide
3. Background
• Pain is often poorly managed in EDs
• Initiatives attempting to improve pain management:
• Staff education
• Time-to-analgesia KPIs
• Pain score recording
• Nurse-initiated analgesia
• These initiatives have had variable success
5. This is supported by:
‘Research will have to change its
measured outcomes to terms like
adequate pain relief and satisfaction
with pain care’
James Ducharme EMA 2013; 25: 110-111
6. Q1.Q1. What is the most important outcome in
pain management?
A. Short times to analgesia
B. High levels of patient satisfaction
C. Accurately recorded pain scores
D. Most patients receiving opioids
7. Q1.Q1. What is the most important outcome in
pain management?
A. Short times to analgesia
B. High levels of patient satisfaction
C. Accurately recorded pain scores
D. Most patients receiving opioids
•Times to analgesia may be short but the analgesia may be inadequate
in dose and/or frequency
•Pain scores are of little use unless they are acted upon and used to
tailor the patient’s analgesia
•Opioid analgesia may be inadequate in dose and/or frequency

10. Q2.Q2. What is the best way to manage a
patient’s pain?
A. Administering opioid drugs
B. Administering analgesics intravenously
C. Providing adequate analgesia
D. Using combinations of analgesics
11. Q2.Q2. What is the best way to manage a
patient’s pain?
A. Administering opioid drugs
B. Administering analgesics intravenously
C. Providing adequate analgesia
D. Using combinations of analgesics
•Opioids alone, drug combinations or the intravenous route may be
inadequate in dose and/or frequency
•Adequate analgesia is provided if the patients pain is decreased by a
significant amount and to a level that is mild

12. Research shows us that:
a significant
decrease in
pain
a decrease in
pain score of ≥ 2
(scale of 0-10)
=
=
Kelly AM. Emerg Med 2001; 13: 57-60
Todd KH et al. J Pain 2007; 8: 460-6
a mild level
of pain
pain score < 4
(i.e. 0-3)
13. moderate-severe pain
↓ pain by ≥ 2
and
↓ pain until < 4
↑ satisfaction with pain management
Study hypothesis:
14. But does it work?
Our own research shows that:
Patients who get adequate analgesia
(as defined) are significantly more
likely to be very satisfied with their
pain management (OR = 7.8)
Jao K et al. Emerg Med Australas 2011; 23, 195–201
Shill J et al. Acad Emerg Med October 2012
15. Q3.Q3. How is adequate analgesia provided?
A. Reducing the pain score by ≥ 2
B. Reducing the pain score to < 4
C. Either A or B
D. Both A and B
16. Q3.Q3. How is adequate analgesia provided?
A. Reducing the pain score by ≥ 2
B. Reducing the pain score to < 4
C. Either A or B
D. Both A and B
•Only decreasing a patient’s pain by only 2 may leave them in
considerable pain e.g. 9 reduced to 7
•Even if pain is reduced to < 4 (mild), it may not have been reduced
by a significant amount e.g. 4 reduced to 3
•Reducing the pain significantly and to a mild level is required

17. Aim of this trial
• Our ‘target’ in this trial is to provide
adequate analgesia (as defined) to all
patients with moderate-severe pain
• We will measure the effect on
patient satisfaction
18. How can you help?
• ED staff can help by endeavouring to provide
adequate analgesia
• This will be achieved by decreasing the pain
score by ≥ 2 and to a level < 4
• This differs little from standard practice only
now we have a target to aim for: ≥ 2 and to <4
19. Q4.Q4. What should be used to provide
adequate analgesia?
A. any method or a combination
B. analgesic drugs
C. hot or cold packs
D. reassurance, support
20. Q4.Q4. What methods can be used to provide
adequate analgesia?
A. any method or a combination
B. analgesic drugs
C. hot or cold packs
D. reassurance, support
•Many methods can be used to decrease a patient’s pain. The way will
depend upon the patient, the pain severity and the cause.
e.g. splinting/elevation/ice may work best for a # wrist
•In this trial, any method(s) can be used so long as you provide
adequate analgesia (i.e. decrease pain score ≥ 2 and to <4)

21. Summary
• Adequate analgesia is defined as a decrease
in pain score by ≥ 2 and to < 4
• There is a strong association between receipt
of adequate analgesia and a high level of
patient satisfaction with pain management
• This trial will strive to provide adequate
analgesia and so increase patient satisfaction
22. Q5.Q5. Which pain score change represents
adequate analgesia?
A. 7 decreased to 4
B. 4 decreased to 3
C. 5 decreased to 3
D. 3 decreased to 1
23. Q5.Q5. Which pain score change represents
adequate analgesia?
A. 7 decreased to 4
B. 4 decreased to 3
C. 5 decreased to 3
D. 3 decreased to 1
•7 to 4: score decreased by ≥ 2 but not to < 4
•4 to 3: score decreased to < 4 but not by ≥ 2
•5 to 3: score decreased by ≥ 2 and to < 4
•3 to 1: score decreased by ≥ 2 but was mild (< 4 ) to begin with

24. TARGET Pain by providing
Adequate Analgesia
Pain Score:
down by ≥ 2
and to < 4