Temp
?Download as DOCX, PDF?
0 likes?22 views
The principal wrote a letter to the Deputy Commissioner summarizing issues with a parent, Mr. Natarajan. Key points: - Mr. Natarajan's daughter failed her exams and supplementary exams in math. - He threatened the principal and teachers, demanding his daughter be passed without merit, and said he would write complaints otherwise. - Mr. Natarajan has a history of making unfounded complaints against staff to get his demands met, beyond school rules. - The principal asserts the school followed proper procedures and the parent's allegations are baseless attempts to malign the school for not acceding to his threats.
Temp
- 1. F.1775/KV IIT/A-17/2019-20 Date: 28.05.2019 To, The Deputy Commissioner, KVSRO, Chennai. Sub: Reply/Commentsone-mail receivedfromMr.S.Natarajan,F/o.Kum.MeenaAngel (failedinclassIX-C) – Reg. Sir, Withreference tothe subjectcited above,Iwouldlike toforwardthe factfor yourConsiderationand perusal. ? KV IIT Chennai isone of the best Schools inIndia, consecutivelythree yearsrankedNo.2amongst GovernmentSchools&KendriyaVidyalayas inall overIndia. ? KV IIT Chennai,the managementandstaff are verymuch committed,sincereindisseminating dutiesandresponsibilities. ? Students,Staff,ParentsandManagementsare verymuchhappyandsatisfiedwiththe functionsof KV IIT Chennai. ? Mr.Natarajan,F/o.Meena Angel (ClassIX-C),isnevercome toSchool toattendany of the Parents Meetingswhichwasconductedregularly inthe year2019-20 to ensure andfoundthe strategiesfor the improvementandperformance of the child. ? Kum. MeenaAngel failedinSessionEndingExam (SEE-2019) inMaths & Supplementary also. After thisresult,the parentapproachedthe school topass the childotherwise Iwillwrite the complaint againstthe Principal,teachersandeveryonerelatedtoschool andhisbehaviorishavinghigh atrocity. ? It istrue; he wrote manycomplaintsagainstpreviousPrincipal,teacherswhohave notsatisfiedhis undue demandswhich are notwithinthe limitsof KVSRules&Regulations. Evenhe gotadmissions of hisDaughterthroughHon’ble CourtOrder. ? The same wayhe started writingthe mail againstthe Principal andStaff. Evenhe toldeveryone I have manyevidencesandmade separate file against the principalandstaff asthreatenedtoget herdaughterpromote the nextclass. If the School promote hisdaughterfornextclass he will not write anycomplaintsaboutanybodyashe said duringdiscussionwiththe Principal. ? We can expectsome more complaints infuture whichhasnocredibilityandreliability. ? RegardingSupplementaryexams,onlyone setof QuestionPaperwasprovidedtoall students. ? Supplementaryexamswereconductedasperthe directionsof CompetentAuthority andthe schedule wasinformedontime. ? The Stack holdersincludingthe ParentTeachermeetingshave alwaysbeeninvited andprovideda platforminthe school forsuggestions/grievancesforthe Children improvement. Whereashe never
- 2. evervisitedKV IITParentsMeetingandhe ishavingthe nature of threateningthe teacherthat I will write complaintbecause Iknow highlevel officials,I’mbelongstoweaker sectionandI’m workinginPMO Office,Intelligence Bureau,Home Ministry,etc., ? In fact noidentityorservice of thispersonisdisclosedto school authorityasaparent. ? Hence thistype of attemptto malignthe Vidyalayamanagementbyspreadingthe false/irrelevant information insteadof givingconstructive suggestionsforimprovementandwelfareof the students. ? The all allegationsagainstPrincipal,School are baselessand havingnoevidences.The language usedinthe mail was threateningthe Pincipal,ROandothersat random and an attempttoscare the KV toget to do whathe wants (i.e.Promotionof the childtonexthigherclass) byfalse allegations. ? Whereasthe Principal hasnotindulge anykindof misuse of KV IITChennai emblemandproperties. ? These submissionsare placedbeforeyouforyourperusal andconsiderations. Yours faithfully Dr M Manicakasamy (PRINCIPAL)