�ݺ�ߣ

Axel Rennoch, Sascha Hackel, Dorian Knoblauch
2nd Int. Workshop on Verification and Validation of Adaptive Software Systems,
IEEE Int. Conference on Software Security and Reliability (QRS), 18th July 2018, Lisbon
TEST EXECUTION INFRASTRUCTURE
FOR IOT QUALITY ANALYSIS

2
BERLIN CENTER FOR DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION

3
? IoT Testing
? Challenges and scope
? IoT test language: TTCN-3
? Project IoT-T
? Eclipse IoT-Testware
? Standardization & Certification
? Summary and outlook
AGENDA

4
? Mirai botnet, October 2016:
? botnet using insecure configured IoT-devices (~100.000)
? attack causes blackout and disruption
(e.g. Amazon, Netflix, Twitter, Github)
? Wannacry, May 2017
? ransomeware affecting the whole world (e.g. hospitals in the U.K.)
? KRACK: Key Reinstallation Attack, October 2017
? Replay attack on Wi-Fi ProtectedAccess protocol
? Spectre and Meltdown, January 2018
? Spectre: vulnerability that allows observable side effects from mispredicted
speculative executions
? Meltdown: hardware vulnerability that allows to read all memory
MOTIVATION FOR QUALITY

6
IOT ARCHITECTURE
The Three Software StacksRequired for IoTArchitectures,Eclipse IoTWorking Group,September 2016
telemetry
commands
telemetry
commands

7
? IoT devices,
? Mikrocontroller (MCU),
? Gateways (Bosch XDK, IoT starterkits)
? IoT platforms
? RIOT, relayr, Thread, mbed��
? service layer (oneM2M, FiWare)
? IoT protocols
? Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)
? MQ Telemetry Transport (MQTT)
IoT challenges: complexity, asynchronism, resource constraints, long operation phase
STARTING: TEST OBJECTS
LPWAN
LoRa
oneM2M

8
After the acceptance and system tests there will be
a long operation phase => new test phase ?operation��
LONG OPERATION LIFETIME

9
? Wide portfolio of competences required
? Devices (sensors, HW, embedded SW)
? Platforms (Cloud, platform domain knowledge)
? Applications (SW, dashboard, business logic)
TECHNICAL SCOPE
? IoT platforms
? 360+ worldwide
? IoT protocols
? Rich selection
? IP-based
? non-IP based
Cellular
netw.
Cellular: 4G, NB-IoT, Cat-M1,EC-GSM��[5G];
non-cellular: Wifi, LoRa, Sigfox ,Zigbee, BLE, �� connectivity
MQTT MQTT-SN CoAPAMQP3OPC
UA
XMPPHTTP1 Web
Socket21|2|3
applicationIoT application logic
TCP UDP
SMS
DTLSDTLS
IPv4/IPv6(6loWPAN)
transport
TLS/SSL
IoT services layer services��
? Connectivity
options
? Throughput
? Latency
? Power efficiency
? Packet size

10
INTEGRATION OF SEVERAL TESTING APPROACHES
IoT
Testing
Software
Testing
System
Testing
Security
Testing
Test
Automation
Protocol
Testing

11
? Less resources needed (time and money)
? Avoid human mistakes due to manually testing
? During test development and execution
? Speed-up of regression tests and product time-to-market
TEST AUTOMATION

12
MULTIPLE TEST CONFIGURATION (SAMPLES)

13
? Toolset (selection of available means)
Protocol tester/monitor (Eclipse Titan, Wireshark)
Test devices (RFID kit, Bluetooth test device)
GUI tester (Selenium, SikuliX, Chrome headless)
Web services tester (soapUI)
��
? Public Testsuites (in development)
? Application of a standardized notation
? Abstract and platform-independent
TESTWARE

15
? TTCN-3 is the Testing and Test Control Notation
? Internationallystandardized testing language for formally defining test
scenarios.
? Designed purely for testing
CHALLENGE TEST AUTOMATION
testcase Hello_Bob () {
p.send(��How do you do?��);
alt {
[]p.receive(��Fine!��);
{setverdict( pass )};
[else]
{setverdict( inconc )} //Bob asleep!
}
}

16
? One test technologyfor different tests
? Distributed, platform-independent testing
? Integrated graphical test development, documentation and analysis
? Adaptable, open test environment
? Areas of Testing
? Conformance and functional testing
? Interoperability and integration testing
? Real-time, performance, load and stress testing
? Security testing
? Regression testing
? Used for system and product qualification and certification
DESIGN PRINCIPLES OF TTCN-3

Eclipse IoT-Testware
THE IOT-T PROJECT

18
Take available software and tools ��
�� and adding public testuites as a result of insights from IoT testing:
IOT-TESTWARE
��
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.iottestware

19
? Supplement to running and active Eclipse projects
? Paho, OM2M, Titan
? New project at Eclipse Foundation:
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.iottestware
? TTCN-3 test suites for CoAP, MQTT, OPC-UA, LoRa?
? Assured licenses for users
? Currently in cooperation with
relayr GmbH, Ericsson, LAAS/CNRS, itemis AG, Spirent Communications,
Easy Global Market, Iskratel/Sintesio, ��
THE ECLIPSE PROJECT

20
SAMPLE TESTSUITE STRUCTURE: MQTT
? Broker as SUT
? All mandatory message data fields
? Regular and illegal data
(Fixed/variable header, payload)
? Protocol features
? General
? Connect/disconnect (session)
? Subscribe/unsubscribe
? Immediate publish
? Last will and Testament (LWT)
? Heartbeats keepAlive values
? Topic
? Error handling
? Client as SUT
? ��

21
TEST DEVELOPMENT SAMPLE: MQTT
TESTZIEL-KATALOG
? Test configurations
? Test Suite Structure
? Test purpose (catalogue)
? Test implementation (TTCN-3)

22
MQTT BROKER EVALUATION (CONFORMANCE, APRIL 2018)
Broker PASS FAIL INCONCLUSIVE
# % # % # %
HiveMQ ? 39 86,67% 4 8,89% 2 4,44%
Mosquitto "1.4.15" 38 84,44% 5 11,11% 2 4,44%
VerneMQ "1.3.1" 37 82,22% 5 11,11% 3 6,67%
EMQ "2.2" 35 77,78% 8 17,78% 2 4,44%
lannister ? 31 68,89% 12 26,67% 2 4,44%
ActiveMQ "5.15.3" 29 64,44% 14 31,11% 2 4,44%
aedes
"v0.33.0" 26 57,78% 17 37,78% 2 4,44%
RSMB
? 26 57,78% 17 37,78% 2 4,44%
RabbitMQ "3.7.4" 19 42,22% 26 57,78% 0 0,00%
Mosca "2.8.1" 19 42,22% 24 53,33% 2 4,44%
HBMQTT 0.9 17 37,78% 28 62,22% 0 0,00%
Moquette 0.10 16 35,56% 29 64,44% 0 0,00%

23
? Vulnerability scanner:
? in particular for web applications, zero-day/fuzzing, considerationof data
bases, traffic/network analyser, program code scanner
? Penetration tester, e.g. ��SQL injection��
? Intrusion detection tools
? Load test/Scalability
? Further utilities: Model-based testing (UML testing profile) and risk modelling
TESTWARE: SECURITY

24
FUZZING APPROACH
CoAP
ATS
CoAP
ETS
Fuzzed
Data
SUT
ATS: Abstract Test Suite
ETS: Executable TS

25
Results for CoAP:
- Initially, 4421 fuzzed test data for CoAP were generated
- After sending the data to a (local) CoAP server, it crashed after date ��1107��
https://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/de/sqc/security_testing
https://github.com/fraunhoferfokus/Fuzzino/blob/master/doc/Fuzzino_XML_Description.pdf
FUZZINO RESULTS AND RESOURCES

Standardization & Certification
THE IOT-T PROJECT

27
? New Working Group (TST) will develop
IoT test catalogues and specifications (not covered elsewhere)
? The types of testing include
conformance, interoperability, security and performance testing
? The initial technical focus will be:
? IoT network layer
(communication protocols, node connectivity, edge computing etc.),
? Basic security of IoT devices
ETSI TC MTS

28
ETSI ACTIVE WORKING ITEMS
IEC 62443-4-2
CoAP
MQTT
LoRaWAN
Vul. database

29
BASE SECURITY CERTIFICATION SCOPE
The Three Software Stacks Required for IoTArchitectures,Eclipse IoTWorking Group,September 2016
IoT-Testlab Scope
(basic security level
certification)
telemetry
commands
telemetry
commands

Putting everything together
SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK

31
?Advanced testing technology:
? Open source IoT-Testware (code):
? External (open source) SW
?Standardized IoT test purposes:
SUMMARY

32
(ALMOST) COMPLETE IOT-TESTWARE
��
SUT

33
? Adding more protocols to IoT-Testware
AMQP, LWM2M, 6LoWPAN, LPWAN
? Increased security level for certification
? Cooperation/liaisons (in preparation) with
ETSI TC Cyber/SmartM2M, oneM2M, OPC Foundation ...
OUTLOOK

34
Axel Rennoch, axel.rennoch@fokus.fraunhofer.de, phone +49 30 3463-7344
CONTACTS
Thank you for your attention!
https://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/en/sqc

�ݺ�ߣ

Test Execution Infrastructure for IoT Quality analysis

More Related Content

Test Execution Infrastructure for IoT Quality analysis