際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Desmond Wee 
PSCI229 Chinas Domestic Politics 
University of Pennsylvania 
Symbol of the Supreme Peoples Court (SPC)
The Chinese Judiciary
Donald Clarke, Peter Murrell, and Susan Whiting, The Role of 
Law in Chinas Economic Development, in Chinas Great 
Economic Transformation, (Cambridge University Press, 2008) 
chapter eleven, pp. 375-428
Problems of Chinas Legal 
System Today 
 Significant gaps in legal structure governing economic 
activity 
 Lacks a number of institutional features that could be 
effective in identifying and reducing the inevitable 
gaps and ambiguities 
 Local protectionism: dependence of courts on local 
government and Party leaders 
 Corruption
Rights Hypothesis 
 [E]conomic growth requires a legal order offering 
stable and predictable rights of property and contract 
However, 
 Clarke, Murrell & Whiting (CMW): provides little 
explanatory power for China.
Functional Substitutes for Formal 
Institutions 
 Property Rights 
 Cadre evaluation system (Lecture 7; Whiting) 
 Fiscal system (Lecture 7; Whiting) 
 Local government ownership of township and village 
enterprises (TVEs) 
 Transactions in Goods & Services 
 Dual-track system 
 Footnote: Transitional institutions vs. Best-practice 
institutions (Qian, 2003)
Conclusion 
 The relationship between legal and economic 
development was bidirectional  a coevolutionary 
process 
 Have formal legal institutions contributed in an 
important way to Chinas remarkable economic 
success? 
No, but instead 
 Economic success has fostered the development of law, 
rather than the reverse.
The Chinese Judiciary
Jerome Cohens Testimony to the Congressional-Executive 
Commission on China
Criminal Justice 
 Death penalty 
 Criminal Procedure Law (CPL) 
 No warrants 
 Arrest 
 Search 
 (Mostly) no bail/release under guaranty pending trial 
 Limited right to counsel 
 False confessions gained by torture 
 UN Convention Against Torture 
 Section 306 of the Criminal Law 
 Reeducation through labor (laojiao)
Major Defects 
 National Peoples Congress (NPC) Standing 
Committee (NPCSC) reserves the sole power to modify 
legislation; interpret and apply the Constitution 
 The Chinese Constitution is not enforced 
 No judicial review for courts: invalidating legislation is 
prohibited 
 Conflict: courts must seek a resolution from a higher-level 
legislative body OR rule in accordance with the 
lower-level rule
Constitutional Review: 
The NPC Review Model 
 NPCSC 
 Law on Legislation 
 Sun Zhigang case 
 Limited review: 
 Administrative Litigation Law 
 State Compensation Law 
 Supreme Peoples Court 
 2001 education case Reply to Qi Yuling; 2008 update 
 [Update:] 2011 SinaWeibo case 
 (Independent?) Constitutional Court?
Further reading 
 Judicial reform: Court orders 
http://www.economist.com/news/china/21591210-it-turns-out-torturing- 
people-confessions-isnt-all-right-after-all-court-orders 
 Chinas Constitutional Crisis 
http://www.theatlantic.com/china/archive/2013/09/chinas-constitutional- 
crisis/279285/ 
 Citizens Rights, the Constitution and the Courts 
http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2011/09/26/citizens%E2%80 
%99-rights-the-constitution-and-the-courts/ 
 Chinese Judge Expresses Support for Free Speech on SinaWeibo 
in Ruling 
http://www.businessinsider.com/chinese-judge-expresses-support- 
for-free-speech-on-sina-weibo-in-ruling-2011-9 
 A Comment on the Rise and Fall of the Supreme Peoples Courts 
Reply to Qi Yulings Case 
http://suffolklawreview.org/wp-content/ 
uploads/2013/01/Tong_AdvancePrint.pdf

More Related Content

The Chinese Judiciary

  • 1. Desmond Wee PSCI229 Chinas Domestic Politics University of Pennsylvania Symbol of the Supreme Peoples Court (SPC)
  • 3. Donald Clarke, Peter Murrell, and Susan Whiting, The Role of Law in Chinas Economic Development, in Chinas Great Economic Transformation, (Cambridge University Press, 2008) chapter eleven, pp. 375-428
  • 4. Problems of Chinas Legal System Today Significant gaps in legal structure governing economic activity Lacks a number of institutional features that could be effective in identifying and reducing the inevitable gaps and ambiguities Local protectionism: dependence of courts on local government and Party leaders Corruption
  • 5. Rights Hypothesis [E]conomic growth requires a legal order offering stable and predictable rights of property and contract However, Clarke, Murrell & Whiting (CMW): provides little explanatory power for China.
  • 6. Functional Substitutes for Formal Institutions Property Rights Cadre evaluation system (Lecture 7; Whiting) Fiscal system (Lecture 7; Whiting) Local government ownership of township and village enterprises (TVEs) Transactions in Goods & Services Dual-track system Footnote: Transitional institutions vs. Best-practice institutions (Qian, 2003)
  • 7. Conclusion The relationship between legal and economic development was bidirectional a coevolutionary process Have formal legal institutions contributed in an important way to Chinas remarkable economic success? No, but instead Economic success has fostered the development of law, rather than the reverse.
  • 9. Jerome Cohens Testimony to the Congressional-Executive Commission on China
  • 10. Criminal Justice Death penalty Criminal Procedure Law (CPL) No warrants Arrest Search (Mostly) no bail/release under guaranty pending trial Limited right to counsel False confessions gained by torture UN Convention Against Torture Section 306 of the Criminal Law Reeducation through labor (laojiao)
  • 11. Major Defects National Peoples Congress (NPC) Standing Committee (NPCSC) reserves the sole power to modify legislation; interpret and apply the Constitution The Chinese Constitution is not enforced No judicial review for courts: invalidating legislation is prohibited Conflict: courts must seek a resolution from a higher-level legislative body OR rule in accordance with the lower-level rule
  • 12. Constitutional Review: The NPC Review Model NPCSC Law on Legislation Sun Zhigang case Limited review: Administrative Litigation Law State Compensation Law Supreme Peoples Court 2001 education case Reply to Qi Yuling; 2008 update [Update:] 2011 SinaWeibo case (Independent?) Constitutional Court?
  • 13. Further reading Judicial reform: Court orders http://www.economist.com/news/china/21591210-it-turns-out-torturing- people-confessions-isnt-all-right-after-all-court-orders Chinas Constitutional Crisis http://www.theatlantic.com/china/archive/2013/09/chinas-constitutional- crisis/279285/ Citizens Rights, the Constitution and the Courts http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2011/09/26/citizens%E2%80 %99-rights-the-constitution-and-the-courts/ Chinese Judge Expresses Support for Free Speech on SinaWeibo in Ruling http://www.businessinsider.com/chinese-judge-expresses-support- for-free-speech-on-sina-weibo-in-ruling-2011-9 A Comment on the Rise and Fall of the Supreme Peoples Courts Reply to Qi Yulings Case http://suffolklawreview.org/wp-content/ uploads/2013/01/Tong_AdvancePrint.pdf