際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Thomas Nagel, The
Absurd (1971)
PHIL 102, Spring 2017
UBC
Christina Hendricks
Except images noted otherwise, this presentation is licensed CC-BY 4.0
Nagel: bad arguments for absurdity
(1a)
Nothing we do now will matter
in a million years (716)
1 million yearsAction
s Now
Wont
matter
But then: nothing that will be the
case in a million years matters now
(716)
Doesnt
matter now
Nagel: bad arguments for absurdity
(1b)
Nothing we do now will matter
in a million years (716)
1 million yearsAction
s Now
If their mattering now is not enough ... how would
it help if they mattered a million years from now? (716)
Matter now but not
in 1m years: current
actions absurd
Matter now and/or in
1m years: current
actions not absurd
??
Nagel: bad arguments for absurdity
(2)
Would infinite duration
or larger size make our
lives less absurd?
We are tiny in the universe
in terms of time and space
(717)
Image of galaxy by NASA
What matters is absurdity
now
Are our lives meaningful or absurd now, as we
are?
 If lives have no meaning/ are absurd now,
adding more years or size in universe
wouldnt make our lives less absurd.
Life infinitely absurd ..................
Life
absurd
Nagel & Camus on absurdity
Camus: a divorce, a confrontation between
what humans want & what the world offers (7)
Image of space licensed CC0 from pixabay.com
Nagel & Camus on absurdity
Nagel: absurdity is a discrepancy between ...
aspiration and reality (718)
 More specifically: a collision between two
inescapable viewpoints in us (719)
Image of space licensed CC0 from pixabay.com
a collision within
ourselves (722)
Two viewpoints on our lives
Seriousnes
s
Detachment
From inside: we
are seriously
engaged in our
lives, with effort,
plans, goals;
things have
meaning (719)
From outside:
lives arbitrary
b/c all meaning
& purpose
comes from
internal
perspective
interna
l
external
Internal & external
Goals in life
Reasons justifying those
goals (e.g., beliefs, values)
Detached from
goals, reasons,
beliefs, values
These are only
meaningful to
me if I take them
seriously, from
perspective
inside my life
interna
l external
Collision of viewpoints
We need to take our lives seriously to
live
 Need to hold seriously to our beliefs,
values, goals...make plans and work
towards them
Yet we can take a detached view
 and so not take our lives, beliefs,
values, etc. seriously
Can these two be combined?
How can we live with both?
interna
l
external
Irony & Humility
DetachmentSeriousnes
s
We return to our lives, as we must, but our seriousness is
laced with irony (724).
Live with humility: between complete detachment & blind
self-importance (The View from Nowhere 222).

More Related Content

Thomas Nagel, "The Absurd"

  • 1. Thomas Nagel, The Absurd (1971) PHIL 102, Spring 2017 UBC Christina Hendricks Except images noted otherwise, this presentation is licensed CC-BY 4.0
  • 2. Nagel: bad arguments for absurdity (1a) Nothing we do now will matter in a million years (716) 1 million yearsAction s Now Wont matter But then: nothing that will be the case in a million years matters now (716) Doesnt matter now
  • 3. Nagel: bad arguments for absurdity (1b) Nothing we do now will matter in a million years (716) 1 million yearsAction s Now If their mattering now is not enough ... how would it help if they mattered a million years from now? (716) Matter now but not in 1m years: current actions absurd Matter now and/or in 1m years: current actions not absurd ??
  • 4. Nagel: bad arguments for absurdity (2) Would infinite duration or larger size make our lives less absurd? We are tiny in the universe in terms of time and space (717) Image of galaxy by NASA
  • 5. What matters is absurdity now Are our lives meaningful or absurd now, as we are? If lives have no meaning/ are absurd now, adding more years or size in universe wouldnt make our lives less absurd. Life infinitely absurd .................. Life absurd
  • 6. Nagel & Camus on absurdity Camus: a divorce, a confrontation between what humans want & what the world offers (7) Image of space licensed CC0 from pixabay.com
  • 7. Nagel & Camus on absurdity Nagel: absurdity is a discrepancy between ... aspiration and reality (718) More specifically: a collision between two inescapable viewpoints in us (719) Image of space licensed CC0 from pixabay.com a collision within ourselves (722)
  • 8. Two viewpoints on our lives Seriousnes s Detachment From inside: we are seriously engaged in our lives, with effort, plans, goals; things have meaning (719) From outside: lives arbitrary b/c all meaning & purpose comes from internal perspective interna l external
  • 9. Internal & external Goals in life Reasons justifying those goals (e.g., beliefs, values) Detached from goals, reasons, beliefs, values These are only meaningful to me if I take them seriously, from perspective inside my life interna l external
  • 10. Collision of viewpoints We need to take our lives seriously to live Need to hold seriously to our beliefs, values, goals...make plans and work towards them Yet we can take a detached view and so not take our lives, beliefs, values, etc. seriously Can these two be combined? How can we live with both? interna l external
  • 11. Irony & Humility DetachmentSeriousnes s We return to our lives, as we must, but our seriousness is laced with irony (724). Live with humility: between complete detachment & blind self-importance (The View from Nowhere 222).