This is a presentation file of "Tracking Trends in Korean Information Science Research, 2000-2011" which was published in COLLNET 2012 proceeding, October 23rd, 2012.
If you need a full paper of it, feel free to contact So Young Yu (soyoung.yu21@gmail.com)
1 of 22
Downloaded 12 times
More Related Content
Tracking Trends in Korean Information Science Research, 2000-2011
1. Tracking Trends in Korean
Information Science Research,
2000-2011
Eun-Gyoung Seo
So-Young Yu
3. Previous Work: Seo(2010b)
The main area in the IS field is 'Information
Retrieval nationally and the studies on IT
application and service or system
evaluation have been expanded and will
be expanded.
3
4. Methodology
Subject
Code
Classifying
Frequency
the articles
(Time
Serial)
Diachronic
Analysis
Data Core
Collection Keyword
Frequency
(Time
Serial)
Indexing
Keywords
Extracting Visualizing
Extracting Comparative
Co-word Co-word
PF Matrix Analysis
Matrix Network with Maps
5. Data Collection
JKOSIM JKSLIS JKBSLIS Total
#of total articles 686 749 391 1826
# of selected 602 223 85 910
articles(proportion) (88%) (30%) (22%) (50%)
# of author names 1,004 346 125 1474
# of single-authored 408 140 56 604
articles(proportion) (68%) (63%) (66%) (66%)
# of author names per articles 1.67 1.55 1.47 1.62
5
6. Pre-Processing
KLT v 2.0(Kang, 2002)
Eliminating Stopwords
Indexing
1,125 unique index terms in Korean
Translation : Keywords in English
Diachronical Analysis
Keywords occurred over 50 times
Comparative analysis
Selecting Core Ke
the terms co-occurred with others in more than 6 d
ywords
ifferent papers over 12 years
the terms co-occurred with others in more than 5 d
ifferent papers over 6 years
6
7. Diachronic Analysis : Document
Classification and Trend line detection
IS taxomony scheme(Seo, 2010a)
Core Keyword frequency growth rate
Two 6-year timewindows: 2000-2005 and 2006-2011
12-year timewindow: 2000-2011
7
8. Comparative Analysis : Visualization
PAJEK 2.8(de Nooy et al., 2005)
Network WorkBench(NWB Team, 2006)
PathFinder network(Schvaneveldt, 1990)
Two 6-year timewindows: 2000-2005 and 2006-2011
12-year timewindow: 2000-2011
8
10. Publication distribution over IS sub-
domains
No. of No. of
SUBJECT SUBJECT
articles articles
7. DESIGN & EVALUATION
1. GENERAL 7.1 System Design, Web site 121(13
1.1 Value, Quality, and Properties 21(2%) Design, IA %)
of Inf. 0 7.2 HCI, Search Interface 27
1.2 Definition, Theories, 10 7.3 System/Web Evaluation, 25
Methodologies 11 Usability 45
1.3 Information Economics 7.4 DB / Web Resource/ Contents 24
Evaluation
8. INFORMATION SYSTEMS
8.1 Digital Libraries, IR System,
2. INFORMETRICS 72(8%)
73(8%) Expert System
2.1Bibliometrics 26
35 8.2 KM/KMS, Integrated Library
2.2 Intellectual Structure, Research 38
38 System
Trends Anal. 8
8.3 Information Centers,
Information Providers
10
11. No. of No. of
SUBJECT SUBJECT
articles articles
9. INORMATION RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT(IRM)
9.1 Digitization, SGML / HTML / XML,
3. INFORMATION USE & USERS 73(8%)
DOI
3.1 Information. Needs & Use, Cognitive 61(7%) 17
9.2 Digital(WEB) Archiving /
Process 8 31
Repository
3.2 Inf. Seeking Behavior, Searching 31 7
9.3 Digital Preservation, Risk
Behaviors 22 12
Management,
3.3 User Studies, User Perception 6
9.4 Record Management, ERM, DRM
9.5 Security, Access control,
Authentication
4. KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION 10. NETWORK & TECHNOLOGY
4.1 Classification Theory, Taxonomies 132(15% 10.1 Telecommunication, LAN/WAN,
44(5%)
4.2 Cataloging Theory Tagging, MARC, ) Protocol
0
FRBR 18 10.2 Library Network, Library Portal,
16
4.3 Metadata, DC, Descriptors 15 Gateway
15
4.4 Thesauri, Ontologies, Semantic 39 10.3 Internet, Browsers, Web, Web2.0
10
Network 48 10.4 Social Networking, Web Linking
3
4.5 Indexing, Automatic Indexing / 12 10.5 IT Adaptation, Open Source
Abstracting Software
11
12. No. of No. of
SUBJECT SUBJECT
articles articles
5. INFORMATION PROCESSING 11. SOCIETAL ISSUES
5.1 Automatic Document Analysis, 11.1 Information Policies,
Automatic Classification 71(8%) Information Ethics, 46(5%)
5.2 Database, DBMS, File 50 11.2 Information Literacy, 6
Organization 5 Information Society 21
5.3 Data mining, Visualization / 10 11.3 Copyright , Intellectual 18
Mapping 6 Property 1
5.4 Multimedia & Multilanguage 11.4 Filtering, Censorship,
Processing Information Flows
6. INFORMATION RETRIEVAL
6.1 IR Model 12. RESOURCES & SERVICES
6.2 Search Strategies, Query 78(9%) 12.1 E-journal, Scholarly 118(13
Formulation 5 Communication, %)
6.3 Performance, 14 12.2 Information Sources, Open 21
Ranking/Relevance 11 access 14
6.4 Neural Networking, Semantic 11 12.3 Information Professionals, 21
Process 17 Education 38
6.5 Content-based Searching 20 12.4 Information Services, DDS 24
6.6 Web Searching, Search Engine, 12.5 Library Services
Agent 12
14. Big Changes in Dominant Subject
Areas over Time
Scholarly communication of IS in Korea has been moving to the
research of analytics and applications from the technology and
system.
14
15. Change of Subject Portion by Two
Periods
P-2: Informetrics, Information Organization,
etc.
P-1 : Designing & Evaluation, Information
System, Services, etc.
15
16. Subject Portion of the Highly Posted
Subcategories
P-2: Bibliometrics, Trends Analysis,
Ontology, Digital Archiving, Document
Processing, etc.
P-1: Usability , Library System, etc.
16
17. Increasing/Decreasing trends in
research topics
IS research in Korea has been studying application of IS on Library
domains with service-oriented approaches instead of technology-
oriented approach
Increasing Domains:
Library, Users, Retrieval,
Web, Services, Digital,
Korea, Metadata, Ontology
Decreasing Domains :
Evaluation, Model, Use,
Knowledge,
Management, Digital,
Technology, Internet
17
18. Digital (Library)
Use & User
Information
Retrieval
Metadata
Intellectual
Structure of
Information
Science in
Korea, 2000- Model
Evaluation
2011
19. Metadata
Search
Evaluation
Use & Users
Intellectual
Structure of
Information
Science in Korea,
2000-2005 Administration
Korea
20. Metadata
Social
Tagging
Search/
User
Evaluation
Administration
Intellectual Structure
of Information
Science in Korea,
2006-2011 Retrieval User
21. Conclusions
Increase in publication of
Informetrics with Evaluati
on and Metadata regardi
ng User study nationally
Follow-up analysis Expanded research i
Analysis with longer publi
nterests to the world
cation windows scholarly community
Statistical analysis from that of Korea
21